I'm a stay-at-home. Do I take a part-time job to spend more time with my kids — or get a job for six figures?
I've been thinking about the kind of life I want, why I want it, and the finances needed to get there. We live in a high-cost-of-living area and have to stay since my husband's work is here. Our children are in elementary school and finally settling in, but I wouldn't mind moving somewhere else for better schooling and programs for kids with ADHD and speech issues. Growing up, my parents drilled it into me to work hard, which I really appreciate. But it came with a heaping side of shame that if I didn't 'achieve my full potential' and make millions of dollars and be on the cover of Forbes magazine, I would be a disappointment to them.
At the same time, they were not supportive when I went into the workforce. When I got my first promotion, they scoffed at the paltry increase. I've been working since I was 14; sometimes in the family business, sometimes with side gigs. If I had saved even a quarter of what I've earned and put it into a Roth IRA, I'd have a decent nest egg when I reach my 50s. I find it very odd that for parents who want me to be my best, they didn't educate me about personal finance, but just kept pushing me to get more schooling and work more hours at the family business. I guess it was easier to keep me under control that way.
My brother stole $100K from my mom to buy bitcoin. Do I convince her to sue him?
Most American weddings are a lot more extravagant than the nuptials of Amazon's Jeff Bezos
'He doesn't seem to care': My secretive father, 81, added my name to a bank account. What about my mom?
S&P 500 scores record high for first time in 4 months. What could push stocks higher from here?
JPMorgan has a new way of forecasting the stock market — and there's a surprising finding
Now, I've been a stay-at-home mom for the last decade. It's one of the hardest jobs because the work is constant, there are no holidays or sick days, there are no colleagues or intellectual stimulation, and my parents are still scoffing at my life choices when they were the ones to push me to get married and have kids. I did find a man I love and who loves me and I'm so grateful for our two beautiful, healthy kids, but I still hear the criticisms, expectations and disappointments inside my head. Again, I find it odd that my parents would push me to get married and have kids without a plan for getting back to work.
Don't miss: My wife and I have $7,000 in pensions, $140,000 in cash, plus Social Security. Can we afford to retire?
What now? Do I take a low-paying part-time job that allows me the freedom and flexibility to be there for my kids? Or do I put them in after-school programs that are a bit of a madhouse so that I can work a full-time job? Do I take courses and earn certificates and go for a six-figure position in the tech field? Or do I work at my kids' school or in a municipal office? My husband makes a good living, which allows me to stay home and take care of the kids. We make a good team. But I'm aware that if something happens to either of us, our family/kids would be in trouble. So that is a good reason for me to at least try to make six figures.
Is it possible to have a decent life making $40,000 a year in my 50s and 60s? Part of me wants to get a master's degree in library science online and apply to work at local libraries. I'm not crazy about paying for a master's at this time, only to end up with a job that pays at most $35 an hour. So I may only go that route if there are scholarships or such. So much of my head has been filled with thoughts of needing to be the best, the brightest, the wealthiest, and I've just come to the realization that that's not where true happiness lies. But I'm also aware that I've been sheltered and did not have to live on $40,000 a year.
What is the minimum needed to have a decent retirement? A fully paid off house, $1 million dollars spread out across 401(k), taxable brokerage, (Roth) IRAs and perhaps a part-time job with health benefits? I feel awful that we have nothing set aside for our kids' college funds, but I am thinking that I could work at a college that provides tuition benefits to direct family members. Is this a possibility? Just to make this scenario extra fun, my parents have tried offering me monetary gifts with conditions that would make me feel like I would be again under their control. I wonder if I'm being naive and stupid not to accept some of these gifts.
Stay-at-home Mom
Related: My job is offering me a payout. Should I take a $61,000 lump sum or $355 a month for life?
The last thing I want to do is give you homework, but I'm going to give you homework.
The first thing you can do is get a giant piece of paper and write all the things your parents did to disappoint you, annoy you, thwart you, undermine you, frustrate you and generally make you feel less than. Then buy a giant red marker and write in big letters over all of those complaints: 'THEY DID THE BEST THEY COULD AT THE TIME.' And then burn it. They want to help you now. Maybe it's a form of amends, or perhaps they believe they were good parents. They did what they did. They said what they said. They are who they are. They wanted to help you, but they didn't have all the skills. There was no workbook, as you know, and what's done is done.
The second thing you can do is know that everyone has regrets, particularly financial ones, and it's easy to have the decision-making skills of Mary Barra or Warren Buffett when you're looking back with hindsight. When you're done forgiving your parents for raising you, forgive yourself for all the twists and turns you wish you'd done differently. If it helps, get out a separate sheet of paper and write all the good decisions you've made in one column, with your regrets in another column, and do the same thing again. Take out that red pen and write: 'I DID THE BEST I COULD AT THE TIME.' And burn it. Life is pretty good. You've gotten this far.
If you're unsure about whether to go back to work full-time or part-time, ease back into it. If it suits you, good. If you get the urge to go back and join the rat race full-time with an eye on a six-figure salary in a job that gives you a renewed sense of purpose, fantastic. If it also helps you save more for retirement and put money aside for your children's college education in tax-advantaged 529 plans, great. Perhaps it would allow you and your husband to pay off your mortgage earlier than planned. But there's no right/wrong answer. Nobody will write, 'I wish I spent more time at the office' on their gravestone.
Don't miss: 'I'm 68 and my 401(k) has dwindled to $82,000': My husband committed financial infidelity and has $50,000 in credit-card debt. What now?
Here's the headline: It's OK to take the foot off the pedal when your children get a little older and you have more time to yourself. You've been working a 24/7 job raising your kids. Research shows that women take more time off from their careers than men and their lifetime income suffers as a result, as does their ability to rejoin the workforce at a similar level of seniority. Life, society and the workplace, as they're currently structured, are not fair or equal. But you have a husband who works full time and earns a good living, so see a financial therapist or a psychologist and talk through your plans. You don't have to put even more pressure on yourself.
If your gut tells you that a master's in library science does not have the kind of reward that makes it worthwhile, don't do it. But yes, it's possible to have a comfortable life and retirement if you earn $40,000 a year. Millions of Americans do it, despite letters to this column from couples with millions of dollars who worry about retirement. Studies repeatedly warn Americans that they need $1 million or more, but the truth is you need enough to ensure that your expenses don't exceed your income, have at least two years of a cash cushion for unexpected events, including medical complications — and long-term-care insurance doesn't hurt.
What's missing from my answer is women's voices, so here are a few thoughts on your letter about returning to work from the Moneyist Facebook Group. 'You'll be providing a good role model for the kids, too. Since family life is a job in itself, don't let the new job be too demanding, just pleasantly challenging,' one woman writes. 'Start by taking a few classes at a local community college to get some idea of what you might like to pursue,' another adds. A former teacher says: 'Although teaching wasn't at the top of the pay scale, by 63 I was retired and debt-free with enough to live well and do a little traveling.'
The past is another country. The future is a travel agent's window. Give yourself a break today.
Related: We're living in 'end times' when you can't retire on $1 million
Most American weddings are a lot more extravagant than the nuptials of Amazon's Jeff Bezos
My husband will inherit $180K. I think we should invest the money. He wants to pay off his $168K mortgage. Who's right?
I'm 51, earn $129K and have $165K in my 401(k). Can I afford to retire when my husband, 59, draws Social Security at 62?
What drove stock market's record-breaking week? Don't overlook growing rate-cut expectations.
My job is offering me a payout. Should I take a $61,000 lump sum or $355 a month for life?
There's an important market indicator that suggests investors remain wary. It's good news for stocks.
Coinbase's stock is up over 40% this month as Wall Street projects amazing profit growth
20 banks expected to increase their dividends the most following the Fed's stress tests

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Democrats split on presidential primary candidate, poll says
LANSING, Mich. (WLNS) — A new Emerson College Polling of U.S. voters shows that Democrats are split on who they will support in the 2028 presidential primary. According to the poll, 16% support former Secretary of Transportation Pete Buttigieg, 13% former Vice President Kamala Harris, 12% California Gov. Gavin Newsom, 7% Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro, and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, respectively, 5% Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders, and 3% New Jersey Senator Cory Booker. 23% percent of voters are undecided. Emerson College reports that in the last poll, held in , Harris received 37% support, Gov. Newsom 7%, and Sec. Buttigieg 4%, Gov. Shapiro 3%, and Gov. Whitmer 3%. In the November poll, voters were allowed to write in their preferred candidate. On a generic 2028 presidential ballot test, 42% would support the generic Democratic candidate, 42% the Republican, and 16% are undecided. 'Similarly to the generic congressional ballot, independents break for the generic Democrat on the presidential ballot, 37% to 29%, with a significant 34% undecided,' said Spencer Kimball, executive director of Emerson College Polling, in a news release sent to 6 News. According to the poll, the economy remains the top issue for voters at 32%, down from 41% in March. Threats to democracy are the top concern for 22% of voters, a four-point increase. Immigration follows at 14%, healthcare at 9%, housing affordability at 7%, and crime at 5%. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.


Fox News
34 minutes ago
- Fox News
Trump golfs with Republican senators Schmitt, Graham and Paul ahead of 'Big, Beautiful Bill' vote
President Donald Trump played a round of golf with Republican leaders on Saturday. The president was joined by Sen. Eric Schmitt, R-Mo., Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-SC., Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., and CIA Director John Ratcliffe, sources confirmed to Fox News. The outing comes as Republican senators look to pass the "Big Beautiful Bill" by Saturday afternoon. The bill has a self-imposed deadline of July 4. In a memo sent on Saturday to Senate offices, the White House endorsed the latest revisions to the bill and called for its passage, while warning that failure to approve the budget "would be the ultimate betrayal". Graham shared the golf outing in a post on social media, expressing optimism over the bill's vote. Graham revealed the stitched-together text of the colossal bill late Friday night. Republican leaders, the White House and disparate factions within the Senate and House GOP have been meeting to find middle ground on other pain points, such as tweaking the caps on state and local tax (SALT) deductions. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent hammered on the importance of passing Trump's bill on time. He met with Senate Republicans during their closed-door lunch and spread the message that advancing the colossal tax package would go a long way toward giving businesses more certainty in the wake of the president's tariffs. "We need certainty," he said. "With so much uncertainty, and having the bill on the president's desk by July 4 will give us great tax certainty, and I believe, accelerate the economy in the third quarter of the year." Follow Fox News Digital's sports coverage on X, and subscribe to the Fox News Sports Huddle newsletter.
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Markets are gearing up for rate cuts. Morgan Stanley thinks investors will be disappointed.
Markets have been clamoring for rate cuts, and are eyeing the next two Fed meetings as possible windows. But Morgan Stanley analysts predict that the Fed won't be cutting rates in July or September. The market's view of rate cuts has brightened after recent dovish commentary. Economists at Morgan Stanley think investors are about to be disappointed in the outcomes of the next two Federal Reserve meetings. The bank said in a note on Friday that, despite a recent push from President Donald Trump and recent dovish talk from central bankers, the July and September FOMC meetings will result in no change to borrowing costs. The Fed's cautious approach this year has sparked backlash from President Trump, who has said he believes interest rates need to be cut "by at least 2-3 points." But since the last meeting, other top Fed officials have come out in support of rate cuts in July, with markets cheering the dovish talk. But Morgan Stanley says don't count on it. Their thesis centers around two key points. First, they expect that the economic data released in the short term will remain consistent with the "wait and see approach" displayed by Powell. While the Fed chairman has reaffirmed a need to further assess the impact of tariffs, he has also recently raised concerns regarding the reliability of economic data. "We expect firmer inflation prints showing more signs of a tariff push over the summer," the analysts note, adding that they also expect the coming employment report to be "relatively solid," both of which are factors unlikely to push the Fed toward rate cuts. They also highlight that despite the recent push from Fed governors Christopher Waller and Michelle Bowman, the pro-rate-cut camp is relatively small. "The Summary of Economic Projections (SEP) published last week revealed that there are seven policymakers who expect no cuts this year," the report states. "In fact, the overall tone of Fed speakers this week was much more aligned with Chair Powell's." San Francisco Fed president Mary Daly and New York Fed president John Williams are examples of Fed officials who have taken a more hawkish approach to interest rates. Both have expressed sentiments similar to Powell's. Morgan Stanley added that both Waller and Bowman's statements raised the probability of rate cuts to 20% in July and 60%-90% in September. The higher odds were cheered by markets during the week, with more dovish forecasts helping propel the S&P 500 to a new all-time high. While Morgan Stanley's analysts note uncertainty remains high and that their predictions could be wrong, they maintain that firmer inflation prints will be coming later in the summer and will likely peak in July or August. They add that their forecast is aligned with Powell's expectations, which include tariffs pushing prices higher in the coming months. Read the original article on Business Insider