Trump claims 'done deal' with China … but is it, really?
[Source]
President Donald Trump announced Wednesday that a U.S.-China trade deal is 'done' after two days of high-stakes negotiations in London, but observers say it just put Washington in a circle.
Catch up
The London meetings were prompted by a May agreement in Geneva that temporarily lowered punishing tariffs that had brought trade between the superpowers nearly to a halt. Trump's April duties had climbed to 145% on most Chinese goods, leaving U.S. businesses that rely on them struggling. The Geneva agreement lowered Trump's new tariffs to 30% and China's to 10%, establishing a 90-day window until Aug. 10 for a broader deal.
The arrangement, however, fell apart due to conflicts over rare earth shipments and technology access. Beijing holds dominant market position in rare earth production — materials vital for products from automobiles to military hardware — leading U.S. industries to lobby Washington for action.
Trending on NextShark:
Where things stand
After a pivotal phone conversation between Trump and Xi Jinping last week that Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said 'changed everything,' negotiators reached what officials termed a 'framework' during extended talks at London's Lancaster House. 'Our deal with China is done, subject to final approval with President Xi and me,' Trump posted on Truth Social Wednesday, noting that the U.S. will get 'a total of 55% tariffs' and China, 10%.
The 55% U.S. tariff structure includes several components: 10% universal duties on most trading partners, 20% penalties aimed at China over fentanyl issues and 25% rates carried over from Trump's first presidency. The framework calls for China to deliver 'full magnets, and any necessary rare earths … up front,' while the U.S. will maintain Chinese student access to American universities.
Trending on NextShark:
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told lawmakers that 'there is no quid pro quo in terms of chips for rare earths.' China's Commerce Ministry, on the other hand, took a more reserved stance, calling the result a 'framework' from the 'first meeting' between the parties.
On Thursday, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Lin Jian confirmed that a consensus has been reached and reiterated that Beijing will always honor its commitments. 'It is hoped that the U.S. will work with China to implement the important consensus reached by the two heads of state during their phone call, give full play to the role of the China-U.S. economic and trade consultation mechanism, enhance consensus, reduce misunderstandings and strengthen cooperation through communication and dialogue,' Lin said.
The big picture
Trending on NextShark:
Despite Trump's positive assessment, analysts are questioning the deal's substance. It appears the framework only primarily returns both nations to their pre-April status, with elevated tariffs still in effect.
'What exactly are we getting that we weren't already getting before?' Veronique de Rugy, a senior research fellow with the libertarian think tank Mercatus Center, told The New York Times. 'This deal suggests there was never a real plan.' Fundamental trade disagreements — including China's large trade surplus and intellectual property concerns — remain untouched, while the World Bank this week lowered global growth projections, identifying elevated tariffs as a 'significant headwind' for most economies.
The U.S. and Chinese governments must approve the framework before any implementation begins.
Trending on NextShark:
This story is part of The Rebel Yellow Newsletter — a bold weekly newsletter from the creators of NextShark, reclaiming our stories and celebrating Asian American voices.
Subscribe free to join the movement. If you love what we're building, consider becoming a paid member — your support helps us grow our team, investigate impactful stories, and uplift our community.
Trending on NextShark:
Subscribe here now!
Download the NextShark App:
Want to keep up to date on Asian American News? Download the NextShark App today!
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Tanks a lot: DC mayor fears Trump-Army parade will chew up city streets downtown
Washington, D.C., Mayor Muriel Bowser said she is still "concerned" about damage to the city's streets from the dozens of tanks and armored vehicles set to roll through the capital's downtown during the Army's massive 250th anniversary parade on June 14 − also President Donald Trump's birthday. Bowser said last month that running tanks over Washington's streets "would not be good" and "should be accompanied by many millions of dollars" for repairs. The Army has since told reporters it did not expect damage to the streets, and would cover the cost of any distressed asphalt. Thick metal plates will be placed over turns on the tanks' parade route to protect the roads, according to Army officials. But Bowser said at a May 29 news conference she worried the city would have to shoulder those repairs and wait around for the Pentagon to reimburse. "I remain concerned about it," she said. "These are, for the most part, local streets, and if they're rendered in unusable, we have to make them usable." "Probably we would fix it and then go seek our money from the Fed," she said. "That gives me some concern about fronting costs and waiting for them to get back." More: Trump's getting his military parade. Here's what they look like from France to Russia The parade – which falls on President Donald Trump's 79th birthday – is a pressure point between Bowser and Trump, who clashed over Trump's push for a similarly huge military parade in his first term. Trump announced in 2018 that he had canceled his plans for the earlier parade, blaming Bowser and "local politicians" for jacking up the price tag to $21 million. "The local politicians who run Washington, D.C. (poorly) know a windfall when they see it," he tweeted. Bowser hit back that she "finally got thru to the reality star in the White House with the realities" of the cost. This time around, Bowser has held back from criticizing the upcoming parade, which will likely cost more than twice as much as the 2018 estimate – up to $45 million, according to the Army. The Army said May 21 the parade will feature 28 Abrams tanks and twice as many armored vehicles rolling down a strip of Constitution Avenue north of the National Mall. Historic fighter planes and at least 50 helicopters will fly overhead. Army parachutists, called the Golden Knights, will sail down and one will present a folded flag to Trump, who will speak from a presidential booth, USA TODAY previously reported. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: DC Mayor Bowser 'concerned' tanks will rip up streets in Army parade
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
'Political props': From deployment to a parade, Trump's use of military prompts concerns
President Donald Trump is sending the military into American streets in provocative ways, with a deployment to quell protests and a massive military parade, projecting power and celebrating troops while raising alarms among critics. Trump has long talked about wielding the military more aggressively for domestic purposes. He clashed with military leaders who resisted some of his requests during his first administration. Trump's approach to the military is coming into focus again during a week that began with the Commander-in-Chief deploying Marines and National Guard troops to Los Angeles over the objection of Gov. Gavin Newsom, and will end with the planned military parade celebrating the Army's birthday. 'I think Trump looks at the military as political props used to demonstrate his authority,' said former Trump National Security Adviser John Bolton, now a frequent critic of the president. Trump's recent military actions and parade plans are drawing comparisons to authoritarian regimes. Newsom said Trump is acting like a 'dictator.' Administration officials have said the military is needed in L.A. to maintain order. Questioned by members of Congress about the troop deployment during a June 10 hearing, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth described the situation in L.A. as 'lawless' and said, 'President Trump believes in law and order.' "If we didn't get involved, right now Los Angeles would be burning," Trump said June 10 during an event in the Oval Office. In the past, Trump's views on the military and concerns about how he might wield troops domestically have generated bipartisan pushback. After Trump lost the 2020 election and refused to accept the results, all 10 living secretaries of Defense – Republicans and Democrats – signed a letter urging military leaders not to get involved in the election aftermath, signaling apprehension that Trump would use the military in ways they described as 'dangerous, unlawful and unconstitutional.' Former Trump National Security Adviser Michael Flynn suggested in a television interview after the 2020 election that the president could invoke martial law and seize voting machines to rerun the election, which former Trump Defense Secretary Mark Esper later described in his book as 'scary.' Trump asked Flynn about the martial law idea during a White House meeting in December 2020, according to media reports. With that backdrop, Democrats and other Trump critics are raising concerns about the potential consequences of Trump's decision to send troops to Los Angeles, his planned parade and future military escalations he might consider. During his first term, military leaders sometimes pushed back on his suggestions, people who 'we may euphemistically call, 'the adults in the room,'" said William Banks, a constitutional law professor emeritus at Syracuse University and founding director of the Institute on National Security and Counter Terrorism. 'I think his senior people today are of a far different caliber," Banks said. "Put pejoratively, they're sycophants.' Some legal experts question whether Trump has the authority to circumvent Newsom and deploy the California National Guard under the law he's using. California has sued to stop Trump's deployment. 'It's sort of wading into uncharted legal territory, and it raises a lot of legal questions and concerns, frankly, the way that he is using this law,' said Elizabeth Goitein, senior director of the Liberty and National Security Program at the Brennan Center for Justice. Looming over the discussion is the Insurrection Act, which Trump sought to invoke during his first term. It gives the president wide leeway to use troops domestically. Trump is using federal troops to protect federal property and law enforcement in L.A. The Insurrection Act would give him expanded authority to use troops for policing, experts say. 'The Insurrection Act is dangerously broad… something close to a blank check if he chooses to take the political hit for invoking it,' said Duke Law Professor H. Jefferson Powell. Congress adopted the Posse Comitatus Act in 1878, barring the military from engaging in domestic law enforcement unless authorized, such as through the Insurrection Act. It reflects 'a centuries-old principle in Anglo-American law against military interference in civilian affairs,' Goitein, of the Brennan Center, said. 'If the leader of a country can turn the military inward against the people, that has great implications for individual liberties,' Goitein added. 'It is a step on the path to tyranny, if not an indication of tyranny itself.' Trump mulled invoking the Act during a White House event on June 10. "If there's an insurrection, I would certainly invoke it,' Trump said. 'We'll see. But I can tell you, last night was terrible. The night before that was terrible." Trump said there were parts of Los Angeles on June 9 where "you could have called it an insurrection. It was terrible." The Insurrection Act has been invoked 30 times, most recently in May 1992 by President George H.W. Bush at the request of California Gov. Pete Wilson to police rioting in Los Angeles after four White police officers were acquitted for beating Black motorist Rodney King. Presidents from both parties have considered invoking the act against the wishes of state governors, such as during civil rights conflicts during the 1950s and 1960s. More recently, some Democrats urged former President Joe Biden to deploy the National Guard to remove razor-wire barriers that Texas Gov. Greg Abbott installed along the border with Mexico, but he didn't. Banks said Trump appeared to be edging back from invoking the Act, which could have long-term consequences. 'It could be corrosive,' Banks said. Bolton, Trump's former aide, predicted any effort by Trump to use the Insurrection Act would end up in court, but said, "I also don't think we should get paranoid and just engage in speculation about what he might do." Trump has been careful to steer clear of the Insurrection Act so far, Bolton noted. Esper, the former Defense secretary, resisted Trump's efforts to invoke the Insurrection Act during his first term. Esper's book describes an Oval Office meeting with Trump, former Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Mark Milley and other administration officials on June 1, 2020, as 'probably one of the most significant meetings a secretary of defense ever had with a commander in chief.' During the meeting, which occurred amid protests in Washington, D.C., and around the country following the death of George Floyd – an unarmed Black man killed by Minneapolis police – Trump repeatedly brought up the Insurrection Act and pushed to use active-duty troops to quell protests, Esper wrote. 'Can't you just shoot them Just shoot them in the legs or something,' Trump said, according to Esper. 'I didn't have to look at General Milley to know his reaction,' Esper wrote. 'I was sure it was the same as mine: Utter disgust at the suggestion, and a feeling we were only minutes away from a disastrous outcome.' Esper wrote that Trump eventually 'backed down.' His book details other concerns about Trump's approach to the military, including a proposal for a July 4 celebration in 2020 featuring a fleet of military vehicles that he worried would politicize the military. Milley told Trump's chief of staff that such displays were 'not what the United States does – it was what authoritarian states like North Korea do,' according to Esper. The same concerns have been raised about Trump's military parade planned for June 14, which will celebrate the Army's 250th anniversary with tanks and other vehicles rolling through the streets of the nation's capital. Trump's 79th birthday is the same day. Sen. Adam Schiff, D-California, called it a "dictator-style military parade." 'There's nothing wrong with military parades when there's reason for them, but the fact it's Trump's birthday on Saturday is not a good reason for it,' Bolton said. Trump said on June 10 that the parade would be "fantastic" and warned people protesting would be met with "very heavy force." "It's going to be an amazing day," he said. "We have tanks, we have planes, we have all sorts of things. And I think it's going to be great. We're going to celebrate our country for a change." This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Trump using military in provocative ways with protests, parade
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Where is Trump's military parade taking place? See route, map
President Donald Trump is getting the military parade he's long wanted this year, as the U.S. Army plans to mark its 250th anniversary with a pomp-filled procession through the streets of the nation's capital, a date coinciding with the president's birthday. "The event is designed not only to showcase the Army's modern capabilities but also to inspire a new generation to embrace the spirit of service, resilience, and leadership that defines the United States," according to a May 21 statement on event organizer's website. "The parade will trace the Army's evolution from the Revolutionary War through to the U.S. Army of Tomorrow." Here's what to know about the parade's route and when it takes place. The military parade is slated for Saturday, June 14, in the heart of Washington, D.C., spanning six blocks and bisecting the National Mall. Celebrations and associated events are set to take place throughout the day, starting with a fitness competition at 9:30 a.m. ET, and an assortment of military demonstrations, equipment displays and live music performances throughout the day. Visitors can expect kid zones, more than 50 vendor and experience booths, and meet-and-greats with "Army soldiers, NFL players, influencers and celebrities," according to the U.S. Army event page. Music: Country singers will perform Army, Trump love a $40M parade. But nothing is planned for Navy, Marines. On June 14, 1775, the Second Continental Congress voted to establish the Continental Army, organizers say, marking the creation of America's first national military force more than a year before the Declaration of Independence. Trump, US Army throwing military parade: How to get tickets The parade will take place along Constitution Avenue NW, starting on Constitution Avenue NW and 23rd Street and ending on 15th Street alongside the National Mall, near the National Museum of African American History and Culture. The procession will begin at 6:30 p.m. ET, passing by Constitution Gardens and the Vietnam Veterans Memorial in the direction of the White House. It will cut through the National Mall between the Washington Monument and German-American Friendship Garden on one side, and the long grassy expanse of President's Park in front of the White House on the other. The parade is set to cross in front of Trump's viewing stand on Constitution Avenue south of the White House. The parade is expected to end at 7:30 p.m. ET, organizers say. A concert at the Ellipse is scheduled to start when the parade ends, and Army officials say a firework display will begin at 9:45 p.m. ET. This story was updated to fix an inaccuracy. Contributing: George Petras and Janet Loehrke, USA TODAY. Kathryn Palmer is a national trending news reporter for USA TODAY. You can reach her at kapalmer@ and on X @KathrynPlmr. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Trump military parade route; See map of June 14 festivities
