Letters to the Editor: flights, climate and croque-o-diles
Today's Letters to the Editor from readers cover topics including the financial barriers of flights to Auckland, the cost of climate bureaucracy, and goodbye to the Croque-O-Dile. Leaving and arriving on a jet plane welcomed
As a student at the University of Otago, I want to express strong support for the recent announcement of increased flights between Dunedin and Auckland. The addition of 2100 more seats annually is not just a convenience, it's a vital step toward better connecting our region with the rest of the country.
Business South Mike Collins' comments in the article are spot-on: this move goes beyond simply adding flights. It's an investment in the economic and social vitality of Dunedin and the wider Otago region. For students, especially those from the North Island, more frequent and affordable travel options mean greater access to family, internships, and job opportunities.
However, that highlights my only potential nerve around these flights; affordability. A flight around peak traffic is currently around $500, which is a fortnight's rent for students who, like all of us, are struggling to make ends meet.
If this affordability challenge is met, this is a win for students, a win for the local economy, and a win for Dunedin.
P.S. Don't forget to offset your carbon by contributing to Air New Zealand's Voluntary Emissions Contribution. Why bother?
I understand that the Dunedin City Council climate bureaucracy costs ratepayers about $10 million a year.
For what? Whatever they do can have no effect whatsoever on global CO₂. Dunedin is 0.002 % of global human emissions, while China, which is making no effort to reduce emissions, is 33% and growing, with India trying to catch up. 57% of global emissions are from countries not actively pursuing reductions. The UK is going to cease net zero at its next elections and many EU countries will follow — because their economies are being destroyed by the ever increasing cost of electricity.
If actions to reduce emission are totally ineffective, then why do them. It is all very well to talk about doing our share, but when most of the world is not, then any action becomes pointless and self-defeating.
Ratepayers would be well rewarded if the DCC got rid of its climate department and stopped its pointless climate action completely. Principals hailed
Thank you for your sensible advice to caregivers choosing a Dunedin high school in this morning's editorial (4.6.25).
However I was rather dismayed that Bayfield High was the only city school not mentioned.
Roll numbers are fickle but relatively recent Bayfield roll surges were consequent to the appointment of Denis Slowly as principal in 2000 and then again with Judith Forbes in 2012. Why do we do it when the world doesn't care?
I note in today's ODT (6.6.25) an article on the dilemma the Dunedin City Council is facing over the Carbon Credit Scheme.
Over the last few years I have observed that amenity planting, shelter belts, and low vegetation such as shrubs, grass, do not qualify, all of which has greatly increased in volume in my lifetime.
We see the damage forestry has caused, when on unstable ground, slips causing land and structural damage as the trees block roads and take out bridges and infrastructure, resulting in massive repercussions.
No-one yet has convinced me of the necessity of turning our country into the world's carbon sink.
In particular it appears the rest of the world could not care less.
I think we should treat the issue of carbon credits and the constant carping on in support of them, with a great deal of scepticism. Cafe will be missed
I would like to say thank you to the staff at the Croque-O-Dile Cafe.
I often go to the cafe on Thursday afternoons with my friends, who like me have challenges. We always felt welcomed and would have fun.
There are three staff who work there who always remember our orders without having to tell them.
Now the cafe is closed, we will miss the food and playing games, but most of all the staff. One way or another
Re Chris Bishop's rant and Don McGlashan's reply.
At what point does a rant morph into a robust and courageous calling out, or vice-versa?
Address Letters to the Editor to: Otago Daily Times, PO Box 517, 52-56 Lower Stuart St, Dunedin. Email: editor@odt.co.nz
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Otago Daily Times
2 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Exam delayed over cheating allegations
The University of Otago was forced to postpone a law exam due to alleged cheating. The Otago Daily Times has been told information was disseminated after a student took the company law exam a day early due to a timetable conflict. A spokeswoman for the university did not comment on the details of the alleged cheating, but confirmed the exam had been postponed and "an investigation is under way into what has occurred". "The law faculty dean made the difficult decision to postpone the exam on Friday. "For the affected students, a new exam will be run on Wednesday for those who can make it, and a second version will be run in the special exam period at the start of semester 2." Company law is a 400-level paper about "what a company incorporated under the Companies Act 1993 is and how it operates", the university's website said. Universities New Zealand chief executive Dr Chris Whelan said all New Zealand universities took cheating or other allegations of academic misconduct very seriously, and all had very vigorous and clear policies on the matter. "At Universities New Zealand, we work with the sector to enable the sharing of information and best practice in the wake of new technologies and other changes and challenges, but how each university implements and responds to incidents is up to them." Otago University's latest academic misconduct report showed there were 55 examples of misconduct last year, of which four related to exams and 51 to internal assessments. This compared with 79 examples in 2023, of which 12 related to exams and 67 to internal assessment.
The Spinoff
2 hours ago
- The Spinoff
Inside the Waitangi Tribunal's Mana Wāhine hearings
The Waitangi Tribunal's latest hearings delved into the historical and systemic marginalisation of Māori women – and the constitutional future their voices demand. As the cold embrace of Hine Takurua set upon Te Upoko-o-te-ika-a-Māui, the wharenui at Te Herenga Waka Marae was warmed by the testimony, challenge and reassertion for the Mana Wāhine claim. Last week, the Waitangi Tribunal held hearings for the Mana Wāhine Kaupapa Inquiry: a landmark claim addressing the Crown's ongoing failure to uphold the status, rights, and constitutional authority of wāhine Māori. Heard before judge Sarah Reeves and panel members Robyn Anderson, Kim Ngarimu, Linda Tuhiwai Smith and Ruakere Hond, the Mana Wāhine inquiry centres on the enduring impacts of colonisation, patriarchy and the Crown's exclusionary systems of power. From the appointment processes of state boards to the structure of commercial fisheries, the claim argues that wāhine Māori have been deliberately sidelined from decision-making, leadership and economic participation. Claimant representative Natalie Coates opened with a challenge to look inward as well as out: 'Acknowledging that the patriarchal ideas infiltrated our tikanga and how we conduct and order ourselves in our whānau, hapū and iwi is a necessary part of our healing journey as a people.' It was a confronting reminder that while colonisation imposed new systems, some damage manifested through the reshaping of tikanga. Legal academic Ani Mikaere was the first witness, opening proceedings with a clear articulation of what has been lost: 'Our creation stories and tikanga once upheld the mana of wāhine Māori, recognising them as leaders, protectors of whakapapa, powerful spiritual figures. Colonisation has rewritten those stories, often with misogyny, fear and racism layered over our own truths.' Across four days of presentations and cross-examination, a diverse group of lawyers, historians, researchers, kuia and claimants took the stand. The hearings wove together a narrative that was both historic and current, doctrinal and lived. The claim traces its lineage to one woman in particular – Mira Szászy. As the sole wahine commissioner on the Māori Fisheries Commission in 1990, her exclusion from subsequent appointments was a catalyst for Wai 381. Several witnesses described her as having 'grandparented' both the fisheries settlement and the Mana Wāhine claim. Ripeka Evans, an original claimant, told the tribunal: 'The opportunities for wāhine Māori weren't lost. They simply weren't presented.' Much of the testimony outlined how the Crown's systems are structurally incapable of recognising mana wāhine on their own terms. Tribunal veteran and claimant representative Annette Sykes framed the inquiry as 'a constitutional moment'. 'This is the first time the tribunal has been called to confront the Crown's breaches through the distinct and intersectional lens of wāhine Māori.' That lens includes land and resource alienation, gendered violence, the denial of political agency and systemic exclusion. According to historian Aroha Harris, the doctrine of discovery and the English common law model erased not just indigenous rights, but indigenous women. Tina Ngata highlighted the stark link between the two: 'The doctrine of discovery replaced our systems of sacredness with a hierarchy. The more white, and the more male you were, the more sacred. The further you were from that, the more disposable.' That disposability has consequences. Deputy dean for the faculty of business and economics at the University of Auckland Carla Houkamau presented research highlighting how contemporary state systems continue to harm Māori women, particularly in education, health and criminal justice. 'Our pain is more likely to be ignored. Our leadership is more likely to be invisible. Our participation, purposefully hidden.' But the hearings showed that wāhine Māori are not just participating – they are leading in the way. The final day was dedicated to testimony from the Māori Women's Welfare League, led by current president Hope Tupara. The league, with its ECOSOC status at the UN and more than 70 years of intergenerational organising, emerged as a central vehicle for mana wāhine. Former president Areta Koopu described the league as a whare: 'We are one family, one house. We stick together.' That unity was tested over decades of Crown interface. Tupara told the tribunal: 'They don't value our mātauranga. The Crown doesn't understand our way of thinking, because it doesn't operate that way.' Several former presidents outlined how Crown processes had repeatedly sidelined the league from major policy decisions. One spoke of the 'opportunity cost' of the Crown's insistence on engagement with newer pan-Māori bodies: 'Despite our leadership in communities, we were increasingly outside the consultation room.' A core focus of the next steps is remedies. Many witnesses called for changes to appointment structures, constitutional recognition of mana wāhine, and support for pathways rooted in whakapapa rather than CVs. Indigenous rights lawyer Dayle Takitimu urged the tribunal to consider the fundamental shift needed: 'Wāhine Māori have inherent mana and authority embedded into us. The Crown must confront the ways it has polluted or denied that truth – not just in history, but in policy today.' Barrister Natalie Coates reinforced that any future framework must move beyond individual fixes: 'We're talking about the wellbeing of wāhine Māori being inseparable from the communities from which we come from… It's not a zero sum struggle, it's a return to collective health and justice.' The claimants were also clear that this was not about slotting women into existing colonial frameworks. Rather, as Mikaere said, it is about restoring a reality that existed long before colonisation – one where mana was understood as shared, relational and grounded in whakapapa. 'It is only when women achieve mana recognition that the Māori people will rise up,' she said. Last week marked the first round of hearings in a long process. However, for many present at Te Herenga Waka, it was also a reclamation. In the words of former Māori Women's Welfare League president Druis Barrett: 'We were always doing the mahi. The question is when the Crown will finally see it.' The Wai 2700 hearings will continue later this year.
Otago Daily Times
a day ago
- Otago Daily Times
Letters to the Editor: flights, climate and croque-o-diles
Today's Letters to the Editor from readers cover topics including the financial barriers of flights to Auckland, the cost of climate bureaucracy, and goodbye to the Croque-O-Dile. Leaving and arriving on a jet plane welcomed As a student at the University of Otago, I want to express strong support for the recent announcement of increased flights between Dunedin and Auckland. The addition of 2100 more seats annually is not just a convenience, it's a vital step toward better connecting our region with the rest of the country. Business South Mike Collins' comments in the article are spot-on: this move goes beyond simply adding flights. It's an investment in the economic and social vitality of Dunedin and the wider Otago region. For students, especially those from the North Island, more frequent and affordable travel options mean greater access to family, internships, and job opportunities. However, that highlights my only potential nerve around these flights; affordability. A flight around peak traffic is currently around $500, which is a fortnight's rent for students who, like all of us, are struggling to make ends meet. If this affordability challenge is met, this is a win for students, a win for the local economy, and a win for Dunedin. P.S. Don't forget to offset your carbon by contributing to Air New Zealand's Voluntary Emissions Contribution. Why bother? I understand that the Dunedin City Council climate bureaucracy costs ratepayers about $10 million a year. For what? Whatever they do can have no effect whatsoever on global CO₂. Dunedin is 0.002 % of global human emissions, while China, which is making no effort to reduce emissions, is 33% and growing, with India trying to catch up. 57% of global emissions are from countries not actively pursuing reductions. The UK is going to cease net zero at its next elections and many EU countries will follow — because their economies are being destroyed by the ever increasing cost of electricity. If actions to reduce emission are totally ineffective, then why do them. It is all very well to talk about doing our share, but when most of the world is not, then any action becomes pointless and self-defeating. Ratepayers would be well rewarded if the DCC got rid of its climate department and stopped its pointless climate action completely. Principals hailed Thank you for your sensible advice to caregivers choosing a Dunedin high school in this morning's editorial (4.6.25). However I was rather dismayed that Bayfield High was the only city school not mentioned. Roll numbers are fickle but relatively recent Bayfield roll surges were consequent to the appointment of Denis Slowly as principal in 2000 and then again with Judith Forbes in 2012. Why do we do it when the world doesn't care? I note in today's ODT (6.6.25) an article on the dilemma the Dunedin City Council is facing over the Carbon Credit Scheme. Over the last few years I have observed that amenity planting, shelter belts, and low vegetation such as shrubs, grass, do not qualify, all of which has greatly increased in volume in my lifetime. We see the damage forestry has caused, when on unstable ground, slips causing land and structural damage as the trees block roads and take out bridges and infrastructure, resulting in massive repercussions. No-one yet has convinced me of the necessity of turning our country into the world's carbon sink. In particular it appears the rest of the world could not care less. I think we should treat the issue of carbon credits and the constant carping on in support of them, with a great deal of scepticism. Cafe will be missed I would like to say thank you to the staff at the Croque-O-Dile Cafe. I often go to the cafe on Thursday afternoons with my friends, who like me have challenges. We always felt welcomed and would have fun. There are three staff who work there who always remember our orders without having to tell them. Now the cafe is closed, we will miss the food and playing games, but most of all the staff. One way or another Re Chris Bishop's rant and Don McGlashan's reply. At what point does a rant morph into a robust and courageous calling out, or vice-versa? Address Letters to the Editor to: Otago Daily Times, PO Box 517, 52-56 Lower Stuart St, Dunedin. Email: editor@
