WWE Money In The Bank 2025 predictions roundtable: Who wins each MITB match?

Yahoo

17 hours ago

Money in the Bank 2025, one of the most exciting and potentially landscape-altering events on the WWE calendar, takes place this Saturday at the Intuit Dome in Inglewood, Calif. The titular ladder matches — one for the men and one for the women — guarantees the winners a championship opportunity for one year following their victory. While there have been a handful of unsuccessful cash-ins, the match serves as one of the major star-making moments in WWE.
Rather than climbing ladders to snag a briefcase, the Uncrowned Horsemen have gathered to make predictions and debate some of the hot topics surrounding WWE Money in the Bank 2025 and the four matches on the card, including a high-profile tag match pitting the team of Undisputed WWE Champion John Cena and Logan Paul against World Heavyweight Champion Jey Uso and Cody Rhodes.
1. Let's keep it simple: Who wins each MITB match?
Riggs: With the final addition of Stephanie Vaquer to the women's match, I can't help but go with her simply because of the treatment she's received since joining WWE. However, I did like the tease this past Monday between her and Rhea Ripley, which was an ultra-specific feud I'd hoped to see when we closed out 2024. That gives me some pause, especially with all the other variables in this great lineup. Saturday's women's winner could — and should — be anyone but Ripley, and given the company's current love for prolonged stories, I could see Roxanne Perez or Naomi as the other most likely options. I just think WWE is all-in on Vaquer, as I am — and as they should be. We're strapping the rockets to "La Primera."
Advertisement
The men's side is a bit more perplexing now that the dust is settled. Count out both Seth Rollins and Solo Sikoa immediately, thanks to their ongoing situations with CM Punk and Jacob Fatu, respectively. This match could very well become an overbooked mess. Penta and Andrade feel like long shots — Penta's hot start has cooled, while Andrade has barely been used. LA Knight is the talk of the town, trying to make his third time the charm after back-to-back MITB failures. It should've been either of the past two years for Knight, and it'd still be the right move now, but I've lost a lot of faith. So yes, El Grande Americano is winning this thing — and probably winning at Worlds Collide too. I don't know how long the whole gimmick gets dragged out, but his involvement in the match alone has made me believe this is going to really be "a thing."
Thankfully, there's still a way a loss can be done right for Knight, which is why I hesitate with confidence. It could fuel him to be the most aggressive version of himself yet, set on a warpath to get a world title by any means necessary. That could mean a heel turn, but it doesn't have to. There's an intriguing route to travel down if he loses, but it has to be something like that if he comes up short a third time in a row.
Sulla-Heffinger: For the men, we have three realistic potential winners and three unrealistic. As great as Penta, Andrade and El Grande Americano are, there's a better chance of me becoming the next Knicks coach than them winning — and trust me, Helwani does not want that to happen. And while I hear what Drake is saying with the trio of Rollins, Knight and Sikoa, I am going to deviate slightly. Rather than paying off the Knight hype train, Rollins winning the MITB match instantly elevates him — and his stable — into a brand new level of threatening on "Raw." Also, in the interest of the 'fight forever' feud with CM Punk, wouldn't it be that much sweeter if Punk cost Rollins after he cashed in, leaving him with nothing?
On the women's side, I am torn between Perez and Vaquer. That said, I am always going to argue that the MITB briefcase works better on a heel than a face, and Perez holding it creates even more tension within the Judgment Day, so that's my pick. Honestly, unlike the men, you could make an argument for any woman in this match to win and it works. I can very easily seeing this being the match of the night.
Advertisement
Dansby: The Men's MITB match has a lot of moving parts, but the most obvious choice for the briefcase is Seth Rollins. Giving him the case instantly boosts his new faction's credibility and makes them a constant threat to the champ.
The Women's MITB field feels more wide open. I wouldn't be surprised if WWE uses it to catapult one of the newer call-ups. Perez and Vaquer had strong runs in NXT and could easily carry that momentum. Guilia, on the other hand, never quite found her groove — her NXT title run felt flat. Giving her the briefcase could be the reset she needs. Feels like it's time to heat her up.
Advertisement
Jackman: LA Knight should win the men's match, and not just because he's entering his third MITB match in as many years. In fact, I suspect some of the Knight fans aren't going to like my reasoning on this. So here it goes: The biggest thing in WWE right now is the Cena heel run (duh) and we all know it's been losing a lot of steam lately. So why not utilize LA Knight as a sacrificial babyface by having him win the briefcase and then embark on a failed cash-in against the champion? It's not the most complex or sophisticated angle admittedly, but it would blow the roof off the stadium when it happens and might actually get the fans booing John Cena for once...
As for the ladies, I think Naomi is the pick here, and I certainly wouldn't complain about that outcome. After that slightly deflating loss to Jade Cargill at WrestleMania 41, she could do with a big win in order to pay justice to her heel turn, which has been more convincing than New Day and Cena's put together. My other pick (if that's allowed) would be Stephanie Vaquer. When was the last time we saw someone arrive on the main roster with so much momentum? Did you hear how the live crowd reacted on "Raw" when she had that brief staredown with Rhea Ripley? When you get these blue moon opportunities, you really don't want to be sleeping on them.
Tiffany Stratton's cash-in proved to be a wise one. (WWE/Getty Images)
(WWE via Getty Images)
2. What's your ideal cash-in scenario? (Timing, face/heel, surprise or telegraphed — anything goes.)
Dansby: I'm expecting one quick cash-in and one slow burn this year. Guilia, Roxanne, or Vaquer winning on the women's side sets up a nice long-term story arc. As for Rollins, imagine him cashing in during Saturday's tag match — he'd have the option of either champ, which would definitely shake things up.
Advertisement
Sulla-Heffinger: I love when the MITB briefcase creates a bit of prolonged uncertainty for the reigning champions, so I am mostly against any night-of cash-ins. For me, I point to Tiffany Stratton's cash-in on Nia Jax as an incredibly well-done iteration. As much as MITB can serve as an instant, star-making tool, it's also one of the best storytelling devices WWE has in its arsenal, so I appreciate when it's leveraged for a few months after the PLE. WWE tends to hit a bit of a lull in the fall/winter after SummerSlam and before Royal Rumble so a cash-in there is ideal, in my opinion, to generate buzz.
Jackman: Like Anthony, I like it when they use the briefcase as a storytelling device before pulling the trigger a la Chekhov's gun. Last year's run-in with Tiffany Stratton was the perfect example of that, with that continual teasing of the 'will she, won't she?' tension getting us more invested in all those Tiffy segments. Having the coercive Nia Jax threaten her against cashing in was particularly good. It felt smarter and more nuanced than your typical wrestling angle.
As for the actual cash-in, there's a tension here between trying to be original and unpredictable without making the briefcase holder look silly. If we're taking kayfabe at all seriously, we have to assume that most wrestlers would look for the path of least resistance here — which means cashing in on an already beaten and bruised opponent, like we saw with Damian Priest back at WrestleMania 41 or Liv Morgan at MITB 2022.
That said, it's nice to have some tension and suspense as to whether they are going to succeed or not. If the title change is too obvious, it dents my interest. Or, even worse, when it's obvious they're not going to cash in successfully (as was the case with Drew McIntyre last year, who was so evidently going to be screwed again by CM Punk).
Advertisement
Riggs: Let me tell you what I can't stand: The honorable "heads-up" cash-in when someone says they're going to have their match at a particular place and a specific date. The only instance where that was perfect was ECW One Night Stand for Rob Van Dam in 2006. Otherwise, I can do without it, because I have such a soft spot for the early incarnation of the concept.
Moments like Edge and CM Punk's cash-ins are just the best. Even farther down the line with Carmella's and, as alluded to, Damian Priest's — they were unforgettable. Rollins' also goes without saying. Those advantageous types of cash-ins are the whole point of the concept. Sure, it's a pretty cheap cop-out in a lot of ways, but that's also the point — unless done right with someone and somewhere like "RVD" and ECW.
John Cena and Logan Paul speak in the ring during "WWE SmackDown" on May 30, 2025 in Knoxville, Tennessee. (Michael Owens/WWE via Getty Images)
(WWE via Getty Images)
3. What's the most intriguing part of the Jey Uso/Cody Rhodes vs. John Cena/Logan Paul tag match?
Dansby: Honestly? Not much. The match feels forced and disconnected from the current storylines. Where does Logan Paul go from here — a world title shot? Are Cena and Rhodes supposed to continue feuding over a title? If so, why? Cena has plenty of fresh matchups for his retirement run that would make more sense.
Advertisement
Riggs: This is a way more difficult question to answer than it should be because I don't give a damn about this match at all. It probably has to be how Logan Paul gets pinned, because I'll be absolutely stunned if the outcome of this match isn't with him taking the loss — or a DQ, of course. Always believe in Triple H booking a DQ.
To provide a sliver of fantasy booking, I imagine Paul gets hit with a handful of Uso and Rhodes' finishers after Cena bails on him and walks out. It's either something similar to that, or Gunther might even interfere to ruin the match because he's facing Uso on the next "WWE Raw." All options suck.
Jackman: My main interest is what the match tells us about the Cena-Rhodes storyline. We're all working from the assumption that we're heading for a rematch between the two (perhaps sooner rather than later), so it would be good to see something that gives their in-ring rivalry a bit more zing. The resounding message at WrestleMania 41 was that Rhodes only lost due to Cena's shenanigans, and we've also seen him take out the champ with a single Cross Rhodes more than once, so it would be good to see something which evens the score a little bit.
To get a little nerdier, I find it interesting how these main roster tag matches have become elevated to PLE main events during the Triple H era. I'm thinking about the excellent Usos vs. Roman Reigns and Solo Sikoa from MITB 2023 of course, but also the other big-ticket tag matches at Bad Blood (Reigns/Rhodes vs. Sikoa/Fatu) and also Night 1 of WrestleMania 40 (Rock/Reigns vs. Rhodes/Rollins). In all three of those cases, the multi-man match was used to tell a bigger storyline, and I hope that will be the case again here.
Advertisement
Sulla-Heffinger: Does Jey Uso need this rub? That's the intriguing question for me, because it really feels like his title reign has been a bit bland/overshadowed on 'Raw,' particularly with the Gunther rematch coming on June 9th.
We know where we are going with Rhodes and Cena — an inevitable rematch of the WrestleMania 41 Night 2 main event— and Paul has become a kind of plug-and-play headliner. Uso's place in all of this is what feels wonky to me, so if you have the babyfaces win on Saturday and then Uso beats Gunther again on Monday (I'll address this later), it might solidify this World Heavyweight Championship run.
Could Seth Rollins throw an immediate wrench in the title picture on Saturday? (Craig Melvin/WWE via Getty Images)
(WWE via Getty Images)
4. So, do we get a cash-in Saturday night?
Jackman: I think there's enough going on already. Obviously you have the two men's champions in the main event, which in theory makes them ripe for the picking, but I can't see how a cash-in would work. And I mean that quite literally: How can you have someone cash-in during a tag match? It isn't like a singles match, which can just become a triple threat.
Advertisement
Going for a cash-in after the match would work, of course, but it might feel like overkill. Add to the fact they've been portentously mentioning the Uso vs. Gunther match on Monday's 'Raw' for weeks now (making that match the first candidate for a speedy cash-in) and I think it's really unlikely anyone cashes in on Saturday.
Dansby: It could happen. The women's titles aren't on the card, so any immediate cash-in would have to come from the men's side. I could totally see Rollins and his crew storming the tag match, wrecking everyone, and then Rollins cashing in. Picture a few Bronson Reed Tsunamis followed by Rollins pinning whichever champ is left standing.
Sulla-Heffinger: No, but I could see one happening on Monday night and setting up two major SummerSlam matches in the process.
If Rollins wins, it opens the door for him to cash-in toward the end of the Uso-Gunther match on Monday night — a la his WrestleMania 31 coup. Rollins cashes in, Punk spoils it and Uso pins Gunther to escape. This protects everyone and sets up (another) Punk-Rollins clash and Gunther-Uso for MetLife in August. This goes against my ideal 'hold the briefcase' scenario, but I think it's what works best for WWE right now.
Advertisement
Riggs: This depends entirely on who wins the men's match, because neither Tiffany Stratton nor Iyo Sky is booked for this card at the time of writing. It would be a cool twist to have the winner call for the match that same night, despite the champion not even being set to compete. Unfortunately, expecting that level of creativity is a stretch.
As for the men's side, and considering who I expect to win, I'm going to say yes — Americano will cash-in. This is the real vision, folks. Gather 'round:
Grande Gable runs out to attack Cena with the briefcase as he's bailing on Paul in the closing moments of the main-event tag-team match, therefore giving Cena and Paul the win by DQ and starting Americano's own match with Cena. Meanwhile, Rollins, Breakker and Reed come out to pick through the scraps of Uso and Rhodes, which involuntarily saves Paul from further damage. Punk and Zayn probably show up too, just to even the numbers with Paul on the side of the heel trio. Despite having the upper hand with his attack on Cena, Americano falls short when Cena hits him with a low blow while the referee is distracted by the chaos outside the ring. Attitude Adjustment, 1-2-3.
Mind you, that would mean WWE immediately clowns the new AAA World Champion. (But not technically because Gable wrestles El Hijo del Vikingo under his name.) I'm not going to make this my official prediction below because it's clearly a bit more extreme, but you cannot convince me it doesn't sound like a possible booking idea — especially for Cena's heel run — in the 2025 WWE.
Lyra Valkyria and Becky Lynch settle their differences on Saturday. (Georgiana Dallas/WWE via Getty Images)
(WWE via Getty Images)
5. Who's more likely to elevate the Women's Intercontinental Championship coming out of MITB: Lyra Valkyria or Becky Lynch?
Sulla-Heffinger: Lynch is an all-time great, but seeing Valkyria spread her wings — see what I did there — post-WrestleMania has been remarkable. She's always been an incredible in-ring talent, but what we've seen during this program with Lynch has shown she has the promo chops as well. I'm all about things feeling fresh, especially when you're talking about championships, and that's what we're getting with Valkyria being showcased as Women's Intercontinental Champion. She was the right pick to win the inaugural belt and remains the right pick to carry it through the summer.
Advertisement
Jackman: This feud has been the sleeper hit of the year hasn't it? While all of us Horsemen were smart enough to be singing Lyra's praises ages ago, I did spot some less savvy pundits questioning why Lynch vs. Valkyria was even on last month's WWE Backlash card in the first place.
Well, the Irish lasses sure showed them, didn't they?
As for what happens on Saturday, my reading is that this is a standard trilogy. Lynch will take home the title after a dusty finish, and Valkyria will have to grimace and acknowledge her superiority by raising her arm as per the stipulation. That gives two months to build up to the final part at SummerSlam, with Lyra Valkyria winning back her title (and maybe getting her arm raised in honor, like with Brock Lesnar and Cody Rhodes a couple of years ago).
Riggs: My feelings haven't changed too much on this feud and what it's done for Valkyria's title. She's been tremendous and had me invested every step of the way, but that's thanks to Lynch. So, by default, Lynch has been the one elevating the title with her status, although she, in storyline, seemingly cares more about beating Valkyria than the belt. The same can't be said about the champion, who keeps acknowledging that Lynch hasn't beaten her.
Advertisement
The long-term answer is Valkyria, at least for now. She can really become something after this feud, and she deserves it. Lynch doesn't need the belt, and surely it can — and will — come later on, potentially with a revisit if Valkyria is still champ by then. WrestleMania 42, anyone? Too far away? OK, OK.
Dansby: The feud with Lynch has already raised Valkyria's profile, but it's time for some real star power to carry that title. Heel Becky taking on the younger call-ups — like her NXT run a few years back — would be the perfect way to build up the Women's Intercontinental belt this summer.
Predictions:
Men's Money in the Bank ladder match: Seth Rollins (Dansby, Sulla-Heffinger) vs. Andrade vs. Penta vs. El Grande Americano (Riggs) vs. LA Knight (Jackman) vs. Solo Sikoa
Women's Money in the Bank ladder match: Stephanie Vaquer (Riggs) vs. Giulia (Dansby) vs. Naomi (Jackman) vs. Alexa Bliss vs. Rhea Ripley vs. Roxanne Perez (Sulla-Heffinger)
Women's Intercontinental Championship match: Lyra Valkyria (Riggs, Sulla-Heffinger) vs. Becky Lynch (Dansby, Jackman)
Undisputed WWE Champion John Cena and Logan Paul (Jackman) vs. World Heavyweight Champion Jey Uso and Cody Rhodes (Riggs, Sulla-Heffinger), No winner (Dansby — DQ due to Rollins interference)
2025 standings