logo
Maratha bastion in Tamil heartland: Gingee fort's rise to Unesco glory

Maratha bastion in Tamil heartland: Gingee fort's rise to Unesco glory

First Post20-07-2025
Given the manner in which Indian History is interpreted and taught, the period of Maratha domination of the northern region — including of who sat on the Mughal throne — has been systematically played down. Only in recent years has the truth been told about the 18th century period which can be termed 'The Maratha Century', if I may borrow a title of noted Maratha historian Uday Kulkarni.
In this context, it is nothing short of stunning that a set of Maratha forts, so key to Shivaji's military strategy, have achieved Unesco World Heritage status. And while it is predictable that forts such as Shivneri, Raigad, Sindhudurg and others in Maharashtra would have been part of the list, what makes it truly impactful is the inclusion of Gingee among those acknowledged. For Gingee, in Tamil Nadu, is far from the Maratha home territory or its extensions in Gujarat or Madhya Pradesh.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Gingee's Rajagiri or Raja fort stands on a huge rock overlooking other structures
Located just two hours south of the much-visited temple town of Kanchipuram, Gingee is one of India's most unusual forts and not merely because it has the reputation of being impregnable. The fort at Gingee, sometimes called Senji, is simplistically described as a 'hillfort'. The fort straddles three separate hills and encompasses all the land on top and between these hills. Each hill could function as a self-contained fortress and when combined, a formidable triangular defence network was created. Imagine the plight of an invading force that attempted to assault one hill only to be fired upon from another. But that didn't deter adventurous commanders from attempting an assault. The fort's history is the story of such attempts.
Horse stables at Gingee fort, with the Krishnagiri hill, or Rani fort, looming in the background
While some accounts hold that a small fortification here was done by the Chola dynasty as early as the 9th century, the widely accepted claim is that the first fort of significance was raised at Gingee in the 1190s. This was done by Ananda Kon, who came from a humble shepherd caste and had managed to subdue local chieftains. While he built a fort on Rajagiri hill — now called Raja hill — it became the nucleus for layer after layer of construction by dynasties across centuries. And with each came temples, mosques, water bodies, palaces, pavilions and to protect all this, longer and thicker walls.
A mosque in Gingee fort, possibly from the time the Nawabs of Arcot controlled the fort
After the Kons came another dynasty that rose from shepherd stock, the Kurumbars. And then the fort became part of the mighty Vijaynagara kingdom. Its eclipse in 1565 meant that the Nayakas, who until then had been feudatories of Vijaynagara, became independent rulers. It is they who built much of what is seen today at Gingee.
And in the 17th century came the Marathas. They gained the fort after a tug of war with the kingdom of Bijapur. And when the Mughal ruler Aurangzeb unleashed his full force against the Marathas in the north Deccan region, Shivaji's second son Rajaram took refuge at Gingee, arriving here in November 1689. Aurangzeb's forces followed him and laid siege to the fort.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
A painted icon on a rock while going up Raja hill
While Rajaram escaped the invading forces, the Mughal army was in no mood to allow such a powerful fort to remain out of control. The siege was an epic struggle, ranging from use of military force to inducements being offered to Maratha chiefs. And the harrowing struggle for Gingee continued till 1698, when the fort finally fell. Musical chairs continued later at Gingee, with the fort passing through the hands of the Carnatic Nawabs to the French, from them to the British and then to Hyder Ali of Mysore and then back to the British.
Two other interregnums are noteworthy. During the time that the fort was with the Kingdom of Bijapur, Elihu Yale — the man after whom the Yale academic institution in the US is named — came to Gingee. He was then an official of the East India Company in what became Madras (now Chennai) and came to Gingee seeking trading rights for the British in the region. He went back unsuccessful.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
View of the countryside from Rani fort
The second case was when Gingee lay under Mughal control. Gingee was part of a jagir – land grant – given to a Bundela Rajput chief. His son De Singh inherited the jagir but was forced into a conflict with the Nawab of Arcot. De Singh died in battle and his young wife committed Sati. They left behind legends and folk ballads about love and heroism that are still remembered. Astounding to think of a folk ballad about a Bundela Rajput in the heart of the Tamil countryside. The British did not stay in Gingee for long though. The area around was considered malaria-prone and they shifted their base in the region to Arcot. Gingee's days of glory in history were over. But now, the World Heritage Status has put it once more in the spotlight.
Today, when a visitor enters the fort, they see an assortment of buildings in the area between the hills. There is a mosque, a seven-storey high palace called Kalyana Mahal (in the lead picture), an open-air museum with various sculpted remains that could have come from temples long lost, various gateways and pavilions. Powerful walls of the fort, punctuated by bastions, encircle the place. Towering in the background is the hill on which 'Raja fort' stands.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
It takes an effort to climb up, and carrying a stout stick to discourage enthusiastic monkeys is a good idea. On the way up, a small shrine appears on the right. This is dedicated to a Goddess who eliminated a demon with a hundred heads. As one keeps ascending the fort, one crosses various landmarks – a Hanuman icon carved on rock, various buildings, cannons and fortified walls, not to forget panoramic views of the fort spreading out below.
To reach the inner citadel atop the hill, one needs to cross a small drawbridge. Crossing that while looking at the fort spreading itself out below gives a true sense of what the word 'impregnable' means. And for a moment, you feel sorry for those Mughal troops laying siege for seven long years! At the top of the fort are the Ranganathar Temple, a bell tower and a watch tower. Visible below is the Venkatramana Temple, and at a distance on another hill, the Rani Fort. This fort, which was originally called Krishnagiri, is the second of the three hill citadels that make up Gingee's mighty bastion and has some pavilions and shrines on top. The third is the Chandrayandurg, completing the triangle.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Divine icons inside Venkatramana temple, where worship continues
The Venkatramana Temple, when viewed from the Raja fort hill
The Ranganathar temple atop Raja fort hill
In the space between the three hills lies the Venkatramana Temple. When a visitor enters its high gopuram, the structure reminds him of the shrines of Hampi, capital of Vijaynagara. When this author visited the place, the shrine seemed empty and abandoned. And just when I stepped back to leave, a priest carrying a ceremonial lamp emerged from inside, continuing a puja tradition that dates back centuries. It was a moment when time stood still!
The author is a heritage explorer with a penchant for seeking obscure sites. A brand consultant by profession, he tweets @HiddenHeritage. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect Firstpost's views.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Pay to stay? US may ask tourists for $15,000 bond – What it means? Should you be worried?
Pay to stay? US may ask tourists for $15,000 bond – What it means? Should you be worried?

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

Pay to stay? US may ask tourists for $15,000 bond – What it means? Should you be worried?

US President Donald Trump administration has unveiled a new 12-month pilot program that could require foreign visitors applying for B‑1/B‑2 tourist or business visas to post a bond of up to $15,000, in an effort to curb visa overstays and improve vetting standards. "Aliens applying for visas as temporary visitors for business or pleasure (B-1/B-2) and who are nationals of countries identified by the Department as having high visa overstay rates, where screening and vetting information is deemed deficient, or offering Citizenship by Investment, if the alien obtained citizenship with no residency requirement, may be subject to the pilot program," the US department said in a Federal Register notice on Monday. "Consular officers may require covered nonimmigrant visa applicants to post a bond of up to $15,000 as a condition of visa issuance, as determined by the consular officers," the notice added. The Department said it will roll out the new 12-month visa bond pilot program, starting August 20 and it will remain in effect for one year from the date. What Indian travelers should know While the program hasn't yet named target countries, India's existing history of visa violations, particularly in overstay and screening lapses, could raise the risk of being included. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Pierce Brosnan's Wife Lost 120 Pounds - This Is Her Now Undo According to a public notice posted on the Federal Register's website, the program will require certain applicants for B-1/B-2 nonimmigrant visas, typically used for tourism or short-term business trips, to post refundable bonds of $5,000, $10,000, or $15,000. Eligible travelers include nationals from countries with high visa overstay rates, insufficient screening procedures, or offering 'Citizenship by Investment' programs without residency requirements. The pilot program gives consular officers the discretion to determine bond amounts 'sufficient enough to ensure the alien does not overstay,' while also factoring in the applicant's individual circumstances. "The funds will be returned to travelers if they depart in accordance with the terms of their visas," the notice stated, emphasising that the bond is fully refundable upon compliance. While the notice did not name the countries included, it clarified that the list of covered nations will be announced at least 15 days before the program takes effect and could be updated throughout its duration. These will include countries with "high visa overstay rates," and "deficient screening and vetting information," or those offering citizenship-by-investment (CBI) programs where citizenship is granted without any residency requirements. The State Department said the pilot is not just about enforcement, but also intended as a "tool of diplomacy", encouraging foreign governments to tighten their internal security systems. "The pilot program is further designed to serve as a diplomatic tool to encourage foreign governments to take all appropriate actions to ensure robust screening and vetting for all citizens in matters of identity verification and public safety... and to encourage specified countries with visa overstays to ensure their nationals timely depart the United States after making temporary visits," it added. Quoting data from the Department of Homeland Security, the document noted that in fiscal year 2023, the US recorded over 500,000 suspected in-country overstays, individuals who remained beyond their authorized period of stay. This comes as tough immigration policies under Donald Trump continue to impact travel to the United States, with some international visitors opting to skip US trips altogether. Adding to traveler concerns, a new provision passed in July by the Republican-led US Congress introduces a $250 "visa integrity fee" for all approved non-immigrant visa applicants. It will take effect from October 1. US visa bond pilot program: Key FAQs 1. Who it affects Applies to applicants from certain high-risk countries. Applies to B-1/B-2 visas (business/tourist). Designed to reduce visa overstays and ensure travelers return home on time. 2. How the process works A. Visa application Apply as usual through the US embassy/consulate Pay regular visa fees and attend an interview A consular officer will determine if the applicant falls within the scope of the Pilot Program. B. Bond requirement During interview, if you're selected under the pilot, the officer may require a bond: $5,000, $10,000, or $15,000 Visa will be denied temporarily (under INA 221(g)) until bond is posted. C. Paying the bond You'll receive a link by email to submit Form I-352 and pay the bond. Anyone can post the bond (you or a sponsor). Bond rules apply until you leave the US. 3. Getting the visa: Once bond is posted and you're approved: Visa issued is valid for a single entry. Must enter within 3 months of visa issue. Visa will show a special note saying bond has been posted. 4. Entry rules Entry allowed only through specific ports of entry (to be announced). Stay in the US limited to 30 days by CBP officers at the airport. 5. Bond refund (cancellation): You'll get your money back if, You leave the US on time. You don't use the visa at all. You are denied entry at the airport by CBP. No interest is paid on refunded bonds. You can also request manual bond cancellation: 6. What if you overstay Bond is forfeited if you break visa rules (e.g., overstay or work illegally). DHS will decide final bond breach after a review.

$15,000 visa bond: US tightens rules for visitors from overstay countries
$15,000 visa bond: US tightens rules for visitors from overstay countries

Business Standard

timean hour ago

  • Business Standard

$15,000 visa bond: US tightens rules for visitors from overstay countries

Soon, visitors to the US could be asked to pay bonds of up to $15,000. Starting August 20, 2025, the United States could start requiring bonds of up to $15,000 (Rs 13 lakh) for certain tourist and business visa applicants. The move is part of a pilot programme to discourage visitors from overstaying their visas, according to a government notice seen by Business Standard on Monday. Under this programme, US consular officers will be given the authority to impose bonds on visitors from countries with high rates of visa overstays or where screening and vetting information is considered inadequate. Which visas are affected and who decides? The programme applies to B-1 (business) and B-2 (tourist) visas. Consular officers will have discretion to impose bonds of $5,000, $10,000, or $15,000, but the default expectation is $10,000, the notice said. These funds will be refunded if the traveller leaves the US within the permitted time. This initiative is linked to Executive Order 14159, 'Protecting The American People Against Invasion,' which directs the Departments of Treasury, State, and Homeland Security to establish a bond administration system under the Immigration and Nationality Act. A spokesperson for the State Department said countries will be identified based on 'high overstay rates, screening and vetting deficiencies, concerns regarding acquisition of citizenship by investment without a residency requirement, and foreign policy considerations.' The countries likely to be impacted While no formal list has been published yet, the notice mentioned that countries with high visa overstay rates, particularly in Africa and Asia, are under scrutiny. Nations previously targeted by Trump's travel ban—including Chad, Eritrea, Haiti, Myanmar, and Yemen—are also likely candidates. Customs and Border Protection data for fiscal year 2023 showed that countries like Burundi, Djibouti, and Togo recorded high overstay rates. Additionally, 12,882 Indian nationals on leisure or business trips overstayed their visas in 2023, as per the US Entry/Exit Overstay Report. When does the programme start and how long will it run? The pilot programme will go into effect on August 20 and is expected to run for about a year. A similar attempt was made in November 2020 during the final months of Trump's first term but was never fully rolled out due to pandemic-related travel disruptions. Trump's immigration crackdown continues Former US President Donald Trump has consistently focused on tightening immigration controls. He issued a travel ban in June that restricted entry for citizens of 19 countries on national security grounds. These actions have already impacted travel trends—transatlantic airfares in May dropped to pre-pandemic levels, while travel from Canada and Mexico to the US fell 20% year-on-year. $250 visa integrity fee adds another layer Alongside the visa bond pilot, a $250 'visa integrity fee' will be introduced on October 1. This fee, passed as part of a spending package in July, will be charged to all non-immigrant visa applicants once their visa is approved. The U.S. Travel Association has voiced concerns, saying, 'If implemented, the U.S. will have one of, if not the highest, visitor visa fees in the world.' The group estimates that around 2,000 applicants from a handful of countries with low travel volume to the US will be affected by the bond programme. Key points to note • Bond amounts will be $5,000, $10,000 or $15,000 per applicant, with $10,000 as the norm • effective August 20, for a duration of one year • bonds apply to B-1/B-2 visa holders from countries with high overstay rates or insufficient vetting • $250 visa integrity fee will be mandatory from October 1 for all non-immigrant visa applicants • bonds will be refunded if visitors comply with visa departure rules • around 12,882 Indian visitors overstayed in the US in 2023

Tariff-blow cushion: A tourism boom could offset India's export adversity
Tariff-blow cushion: A tourism boom could offset India's export adversity

Mint

time2 hours ago

  • Mint

Tariff-blow cushion: A tourism boom could offset India's export adversity

As India grapples with the adverse fallout on its economy of higher tariffs on exports to the US, steeper barriers elsewhere and global supply-chain dislocations, one cushion that is seldom padded up to absorb a foreign-exchange shock lies in plain sight: tourism. With US tariffs expected to average close to 18%, the highest since 1934, we must brace for their impact on our export income. The US is our largest trade partner. Also read: India's tourism boom: Sector to double to ₹42 trillion by 2035, driven mainly by domestic travel, says WTTC According to commerce ministry data, our merchandise exports to the US stood at $86.5 billion in 2024-25, as against $77.5 billion the previous year. Service exports are unlikely to suffer, but overall forex earnings could soon take a blow, even if we somehow seal a trade deal with the US. Yes, capital inflows are holding up for now, thanks to portfolio investors, but it is not for nothing that it's called 'hot money': easy come, easy go. Meanwhile, net foreign direct investment dropped below $1 billion in 2024-25 as overseas investments by Indian corporates surged and foreign businesses repatriated more. It is thus imperative that we look for other avenues to earn hard currency. India's tourism sector offers the best of both worlds: A steady source of forex earnings and, better still, mass employment in an inescapably labour-intensive sector. As estimated by the government, it created 76 million jobs over the decade since mid-2014. Many of these roles are not at risk of an AI takeover. Domestic travel has been an expansionary force, no doubt, but on international arrivals, India lags many smaller countries on the itineraries of globe-trotters. Even within Asia, a big draw, our industry punches below the country's weight. Ironically, our ancient civilization has so much more to offer than many rival destinations and to almost every class of tourists. From budget visitors to uber-rich holidayers and from religious arrivals to medical guests, India has something to offer almost everyone, with its diverse climatic regions and natural beauty only part of the appeal. Also read: Foreign tourists return to Taj Mahal, but India's international tourism still trails Yet, we have not been able to capitalize on these advantages for reasons that are not only preventable, but of our own making. High hotel taxes, differential tariffs for Indian and foreign guests, harassment of women around tourist sites, poor infrastructure, untrustworthy service agents and weak law-and-order are just a few commonly cited deterrents. As the government's India Tourism Data Compendium for 2024 notes, although international tourist arrivals rebounded to their pre-pandemic level in 2023, the country accounts for just 1.5% of total overseas arrivals and 2.1% of worldwide tourism receipts. The result is that we rank a lowly 39th on the World Economic Forum's Travel and Tourism Development Index of 2024, having fallen 10 places since 2019. If India is to elevate its tourist experience and overturn the image of a country where it is unsafe for women to travel alone, we need to move fast on all fronts. Today, the tourism sector is estimated to contribute only around one-twentieth of GDP. Contrast this with Thailand's one-fifth and China's one-tenth. We already have an example within India of how tourism can transform an economy. Also read: Mint Explainer | Will Trump's tariff war push India closer to Russia and China? Kerala, a state that has not been able to attract much corporate investment, has reaped rich dividends from this sector, which now chalks up 12% of the state's GDP. If we move swiftly to capitalize on the advantage conferred by nature's bounty and our rich heritage, gains from tourism could outweigh any losses from an export slowdown.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store