Starlink and South Africa: No exceptions in telecom regulation reform
Image: Jonathan Raa/NurPhoto/AFP
The Association of Comms and Technology (ACT) has welcomed the recent directives from the Minister of Communication, Solly Malatsi regarding the alignment of ICASA's empowerment regulations with the B-BBEE ICT Sector Code.
On Tuesday, Malatsi appeared before the Portfolio Committee on Communications and Digital Technologies to justify his directive, which seeks to 'align' the Electronic Communications Act and the ICT Sector Code.
"This policy development, coupled with a proposed inquiry into the necessity of I-ECNS licence applications, marks a pivotal moment for South Africa's telecommunications sector, potentially reshaping the landscape of competition and transformation," ACT said in a statement.
As the industry stands on the brink of significant regulatory reforms, ACT said it urges that these changes be implemented with transparency, consistency, and equitable enforcement of the law.
"If executed properly, this approach could herald a new era for the sector, fostering an environment conducive to both innovation and investment. At the heart of ACT's response is a strong endorsement for the Minister's initiative to have ICASA formally acknowledge Equity Equivalent Investment Programmes (EEIPs)," the Association further said.
The organisation is poised to make comprehensive submissions reflecting its commitment to bridging regulatory ambiguities between ICASA's ownership rules and the B-BBEE ICT Sector Code.
'We support efforts that contribute to the resolution of regulatory complexities while promoting South Africa's transformation agenda,' Nomvuyiso Batyi, CEO of ACT said.
ACT added that it advocates for innovative, scalable solutions that not only deliver impactful results but also restore policy transparency and bolster investor confidence.
"The Association firmly believes that increased competition, particularly in terms of connectivity solutions to underserved communities, is a vital component of this growth. We are particularly supportive of frameworks that ensure all operators, whether terrestrial or satellite, navigate the same regulatory landscape,' Batyi said.
"This is essential for fostering a sustainable and competitive digital economy that can adapt to the rapidly evolving technological landscape. We have consistently been on the pulse of this issue. We've supported the rollout of satellite technology in South Africa, within the same rules that everyone else follows,' Batyi added.
Meanwhile, the Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) condemned Malatsi's recent actions aimed at enabling Elon Musk's satellite company to operate in South Africa without adhering to local ownership laws.
The party expressed deep concern over what it described as an unlawful attempt to bypass legislation designed to protect local economic interests and transformation.
This 'alignment' would allow foreign entities to operate without complying with the 30% local ownership requirement mandated by law for previously disadvantaged groups.
Instead, the EFF said Malatsi wants Starlink to use 'Equity Equivalents' under the Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment (B-BBEE) Act, an approach the EFF describes as an 'anti-transformation participation' strategy.
EFF spokesperson Sinawo Tambo said: "In what can only be described as an unlawful attempt at subverting the powers of the Parliament of South Africa by using a Ministerial Policy Directive, Minister Malatsi characterises the amendments he wants to make to two Acts of Parliament as regulatory alignment."
Trade union, Congress of South African Trade Unions (Cosatu) said it will be engaging with the relevant Departments for Communications and Digital Technologies as well as Trade, Industry and Competition to seek assurance that any such proposals remain in line with existing legislation, in particular the Broad Based Black Economic Empowerment (BBBEE) Act, as well as the constitutional imperative to advance transformation across all sectors of the economy.
The union said it noted the excitement on social media about Starlink.
"As a Federation we remain guided by the law and will at all times jealousy guard its supremacy, and our transformation journey as mandated by the electorate and guided by the Constitution. The Federation's primary concerns remain defending and creating badly needed jobs, spurring economic growth, tackling anti-competitive monopolistic practices, advancing socio-economic transformation and affirming the rule of law."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

IOL News
12 hours ago
- IOL News
Constitutional Court rules on pension fund death benefits distribution
The Constitutional Court took a closer look at who is a dependent of a pension fund when the holder of the fund dies. Image: File In a groundbreaking judgment regarding the distribution of death benefits, the Constitutional Court on Friday held that dependency must be assessed based on facts at the date of a member to a pension fund's death, not at the time distribution decisions are made. Every year, South African retirement funds distribute billions of rands upon the death of their in-service members to persons who were 'dependents' of a deceased member. These benefits are distributed in terms of section 37C of the Pension Funds Act. This application related to the equitable allocation and distribution of death benefits held within a pension fund. The Constitutional Court noted that it is particularly important in the context of South Africa's high incidence of employment precariousness and dependency on a single breadwinner. Pension fund benefits provide much-needed assistance to those left vulnerable in the event of the death of their primary supporter. In this case, Tshifhiwa Mutsila's husband died in 2012 of work-related injuries. She was left to care for herself and their five children. She filed a claim with her pension fund, the Municipal Gratuity Fund, claiming the death benefit of R1.6 million. However, she discovered there was a competing claim from another woman, Dipuo Masete, who said she was the customary wife of the deceased and that they had two children. The fund recognised both the applicant and Masete and their respective children as dependents of the deceased. The fund allocated 47.5% of the benefits to Mutsila and 52.5% to Masete and her children. A complaint was lodged with the Pension Funds Adjudicator who found that the fund had not conducted a proper investigation as required by the Act to identify the beneficiaries of the deceased and set aside its decision regarding the allocation of the death benefit. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ The fund meanwhile launched an application in the high court, which found that the fund had failed to conduct a diligent investigation and dismissed the application. The fund's subsequent appeal to the full court was dismissed on similar grounds. The fund appealed that decision to the Supreme Court of Appeal, which set aside the adjudicator's decision and upheld the decision taken by the fund. It held that both the high court and the full court failed to recognise whether Masete and her two children were factually dependent on the deceased. In a unanimous judgment penned by Judge Leonora Theron, the ConCourt held that a proper investigation to determine the dependency of Masete and her children was not carried out by the fund. The extent of factual dependency is crucial when a fund makes an equitable allocation and distribution, it said. The apex court held that the date of death is to be used to determine dependency. It, however, said that this did not mean that changed circumstances cannot be taken into account when the equitable allocation is made. If, at the distribution stage, there are changed circumstances that alter the needs of the dependent, the fund may have regard to these circumstances when determining an equitable distribution. The court held that it was necessary to remit the matter to the fund and directed it to conduct its investigation afresh and to consider who the dependents of the deceased were at the time of his death. This investigation must be concluded within three months.

The Star
2 days ago
- The Star
Political parties and teacher unions react to new BELA Act regulations
Mayibongwe Maqhina | Published 7 hours ago Political parties and a teacher trade union have welcomed the two sets of regulations for the Basic Education Amendment Bill (BELA) Act being finally published for comment by Basic Education Minister Siviwe Gwarube earlier this week. Gwarube has been under pressure to publish the regulations after the BELA Act came into operation on December 24, 2024, and previously released guidelines while the regulations were being drafted. Gwarube said the two regulations, which deal with language and school capacity, were designed to ensure that the amendments in the BELA Act were implemented in a manner that upheld learners' rights, enhanced school functionality, and maintained a careful balance of powers and functions between school governing bodies and the government in the management and governance of schools. She indicated that further regulations would be released for public comment as soon as they were finalised, vetted, and approved. 'The Department of Basic Education will be embarking on a national public awareness campaign to ensure that the content of the draft regulations is well understood and that all interested parties are empowered to make informed submissions,' Gwarube said. Sadtu on Friday noted the publishing of the two sets of draft regulations in the government gazette. The union said it will exercise extreme vigilance to ensure that the regulations align strictly with the letter and spirit of the BELA Act. 'The union is committed to safeguarding the constitutional right of every learner to access quality education and will oppose any provisions that could undermine this right. 'The union is currently studying the draft regulations and will submit formal comments on or before the deadline of 05 September 2025 as per the Basic Education Minister's invitation.' DA MP Delmaine Christians said the gazetting of the two draft regulations marked a critical milestone in the journey from policy adoption to practical implementation. Christian said Gwarube has provided much-needed clarity for schools, school governing bodies, provinces, and the broader public, unlike previous approaches under the ANC, which were often marred by poor communication and vague directives. 'Minister Gwarube has ensured that the regulations are not only legally sound but also practically accessible. Equally important is the minister's assurance that admission policies will not be unilaterally altered by the department. Instead, any such changes must follow a fair, regulated process,' she said. Freedom Front Plus MP Wynand Boshoff said the published regulations were possibly the best that could be formulated within the framework of the objectionable law. Boshoff said the regulations require the provincial heads of department to act in consultation with the school governing bodies. He also said the definition of the school community remained problematic. 'The regulations should have made provision for schools whose communities are not necessarily in the immediate vicinity of the school, but failed to do so,' he said. Boshoff urged public and independent Afrikaans schools to collaborate more closely. 'They serve the same cultural community, after all. While public schools currently have access to more resources, the government can easily take them away. Independent education (including home-schooling) may still be busy navigating a steep learning curve, but can already determine its fate,' he said. GOOD Party secretary-general Brett Herron said Gwarube used the regulations to undermine the intention of the BELA Act and the now amended South African Schools Act. 'What should have been a welcome milestone, the gazetting of the first two sets of BELA regulations, nearly eight months after the Act came into effect in December 2024, has instead revealed serious concerns,' Heron said. He also said the BELA Act was meant to reform outdated admissions and language policy frameworks and dismantle the spatial, linguistic, and racial barriers that persist in South Africa's public education system. 'However, the wording of the regulations does not reflect that intention. Instead, the minister has selectively chosen language that risks entrenching exclusion,' Herron added. [email protected]


The Citizen
2 days ago
- The Citizen
Bitget surges forward in South Africa with crypto, stocks, derivatives, and cards – powering the future of digital finance
With more than 40 000 users and an average monthly trading volume of 70 million USDT on the platform, Bitget is now emerging as a key player in the country's digital finance space. As cryptocurrency adoption accelerates across Africa, South Africa is quickly becoming one of the continent's most active hubs for digital asset trading. Bitget, one of the world's leading cryptocurrency exchanges and Web3 companies, officially operates in South Africa through its locally regulated entity, Parsa Financial Services (Pty) Ltd (FSP No: 52563), authorised under the Financial Advisory and Intermediary Services (FAIS) Act. This ensures users in South Africa have access to a secure and regulated platform for digital asset services. A comprehensive financial gateway: Crypto, stocks, derivatives & cards Bitget's launch in South Africa isn't just about crypto trading. The platform introduces a full suite of financial offerings designed to give users the power to invest, trade, and spend with ease: Crypto and futures trading South African users can access a robust crypto trading experience across spot and derivatives markets, with a wide range of ZAR trading pairs and advanced trading tools. Bitget is widely recognised for its copy trading feature, allowing newcomers to replicate the strategies of top traders with one click. Xstocks – Tokenised Global Stocks Onchain In a bold step towards traditional finance integration, Bitget has launched Xstocks, allowing users to trade tokenised stocks like Apple, Tesla, and Amazon directly on-chain. This provides a seamless bridge between Web2 equities and the decentralised world of crypto – all with 24/7 access and no traditional brokerage middlemen. Learn more about Xstocks ZAR Fiat Channel: Easy Deposits with Callpay To make onboarding easier, Bitget has integrated ZAR deposit services through Callpay. This allows users to fund their accounts in local currency with fast, reliable payment options. More on ZAR deposits Crypto cards for everyday spending With the Bitget Card, South African users can spend crypto like cash, both online and in-store. The card offers seamless conversion from digital assets to fiat at the point of sale, making everyday spending easier than ever. Bitget's position as a top 3 global exchange in derivatives volume is further backed by its strong focus on transparency and compliance. According to a 2025 report co-published with Bitget consistently ranks among the most liquid and trusted platforms for altcoin derivatives. Read the full report. Moreover, Bitget is one of the few exchanges globally that maintains 100% Proof-of-Reserves. This means that every user's assets are fully backed and verifiable on-chain, giving customers peace of mind and ensuring Bitget never lends out or rehypothecates user funds. In addition, Bitget's Protection Fund, now valued at 742 million (as of 4 August 2025), is designed to cover users against unexpected losses due to hacks or extreme market volatility. This fund is self-insured, independently managed, and regularly audited, demonstrating Bitget's long-term commitment to user safety and financial transparency. Bitget's commitment to South Africa goes beyond product offerings. With localised support, regulatory alignment, and tailored partnerships, Bitget is positioning itself to be the go-to crypto exchange for South African investors, traders, and innovators. With initiatives such as Blockchain4Youth and Blockchain4Her, Bitget is investing in South Africa's youth through specialised education on blockchain and school sports sponsorships. As adoption grows and the lines between traditional finance and Web3 continue to blur, Bitget is here to help users across South Africa trade smarter, invest globally, and spend locally.