Inside ex-Brazilian president Jair Bolsonaro's fight to stay out of prison
Former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro is in a moment of reckoning.
In January 2023, after his election loss, thousands of his supporters attacked the presidential palace, the Supreme Court and the Congress as they protested an electoral defeat that Bolsonaro had baselessly attributed to electoral fraud. Now Bolsonaro is awaiting a criminal trial before the country's Supreme Court for allegedly plotting to kill his rivals and stay in power. Bolsonaro is barred from running for office until 2030, and he could very well go to prison for decades.
Last week, U.S. President Donald Trump weighed in on Bolsonaro's situation. He called the trial a 'WITCH HUNT' on social media and in a letter to Brazilian leaders when announcing a 50 percent tariff on Brazilian goods.
Reporters Terrence McCoy and Marina Dias, who are based in Brazil, got a rare window into Bolsonaro's thinking and his desire for a Trump intervention during a visit to his office this past spring. Today on the podcast, host Elahe Izadi sits down with McCoy and Dias, to learn what their visit revealed about Bolsonaro, about Latin America's largest democracy and about the United States.
Today's episode was produced by Elana Gordon with help from Sabby Robinson. It was edited by Peter Bresnan and Reena Flores. It was mixed by Sean Carter. Thanks to Jesse Mesner-Hage.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
US House poised to send stablecoin bill to Trump after 'crypto week' drama
(Reuters) -The U.S. House of Representatives appeared poised to pass key crypto legislation on Thursday, including the creation of a regulatory framework for U.S.-dollar-pegged cryptocurrency tokens known as stablecoins, after two days of fraught negotiations. House lawmakers in Washington were due to convene on Thursday afternoon to consider passing the stablecoin bill and another that would develop a regulatory framework for cryptocurrencies more broadly. The stablecoin measure, which has already been agreed to in the Senate, is expected to pass and move on to be signed by President Donald Trump as soon as Friday. That would be a major victory for the digital assets industry, marking the first major crypto law enacted in the United States and paving the way for greater integration of crypto into traditional financial markets. Stablecoins, a type of cryptocurrency designed to maintain a constant value, usually a 1:1 dollar peg, are commonly used by crypto traders to move funds. They have gained much momentum in recent years, offering faster and cheaper transaction costs than moving money through a bank. Their use has grown rapidly in recent years, and proponents say they could be used to send payments instantly. The week's negotiations to consider the legislation - dubbed "crypto week" by Republican lawmakers - ran into unexpected hurdles after some conservative hold-outs voted against considering the measures. Trump huddled with skeptics at the White House on Tuesday to try to save the initiative. Even after Trump announced an agreement, it still took about nine hours for the bills to clear key procedural hurdles late on Wednesday as private talks continued. In negotiations that went late into Wednesday evening, lawmakers decided to include language to prohibit the United States from issuing a central bank digital currency in an unrelated defense spending bill as a compromise to conservatives who strongly supported the ban. The anti-central bank currency bill had become a sticking point for conservative Republicans. While central banks in some nations have explored issuing their own digital currencies, the topic has been met with quick resistance in the United States from conservative Republicans, who argue it could allow the government to monitor Americans' spending. The Fed has studied the issue, but Chairman Jerome Powell has said that the central bank would never pursue one absent explicit approval from Congress. House lawmakers have said they are aiming to vote on all three crypto measures later in the day. When asked if he expects the crypto bills to pass on Thursday, House Speaker Mike Johnson told reporters: "I do." Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
David Rubenstein gives his take on Trump's threats to fire Powell
President Trump has made no secret of his anger toward the Federal Reserve and its decision not to cut rates. Trump says he is not planning on firing Fed Chair Jerome Powell, but he has left the door open to ousting him. The Carlyle Group co-founder and co-chairman David Rubenstein weighs in on the turmoil, explaining why he thinks Powell has "done a very good job." To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Opening Bid here. All right, for today's Power Player, I got a chance to speak with David Rubenstein, co-founder and co-chairman of global investment firm Carlyle about the ongoing saga around President Trump's dissatisfaction with Fed chair J. Powell. Trump telling reporters in the Oval Office Wednesday that he doesn't plan to fire Powell after Bloomberg and CBS reports said the chairman was on the chopping block. Here's what David Rubenstein told me about the situation. Well, President, uh, Trump just as you said, walked back that statement. So, what I just said before we went on the air, so before he went on the air is that he said he's not planning to fire Powell. As you probably know, J. Powell worked at Carlyle, and in effect for me for eight years. I hired him out of the George Herbert Walker Bush Administration, a very smart man. And you know, I recognized not everybody, uh, says he's done a perfect job, but I think he's done a very good job because he tells you what he's going to do or the Fed's likely to do before they do it, which is unusual for a lot of Fed chairs. And after it's done within 30 minutes, he will explain it exhausting detail what they did and why they did it. And I think that's helpful. You may remember in the days of, uh, William McChesney Martin or or Paul Volcker, they would do what they wanted to do and you had to guess what they did and why they did it. Now it's much more transparent. I think Jay's done a good job in that. Secondly, we haven't had a recession since J. Powell's been chairman of the Fed. Now, you know, recessions occur in the United States roughly every seven years or so, and obviously the Fed chairman is not the only person responsible for their being or not being a a recession. But I think we haven't had one because I think he managed the inflation reasonably well. Remember inflation went to 8%. And it went to 8% because um, the Bush administration or the, I'm sorry, the Trump administration and the Biden administration both both uh put a lot of money into the economy to keep us during the Covid period of time from going into recession. So we injected about five trillion dollars into the economy without corresponding tax increases. The result was some inflation. Now, some people made a mistake initially by saying it was transitory, and I think J. Powell would recognize that it wasn't transitory. But once they recognized it wasn't transitory, they began rate increases that I think dealt with the inflation problems brought it down now. Not quite where they want it to be, but lower than it had been. I think the most recent number showed about a 2.7% increase the last month, but uh, the Fed's target is 2%, so they got a way to go. David, how important is it that um, Jerome Powell finishes out this term? In terms of importance to the Federal Reserve as an institution and as the major player in markets. Well remember, the Federal Reserve has two jobs. It was set up originally to take care of inflation, make sure the currency was strong, and in the 1970s was given additional job of worry about unemployment. And the Fed is seen as being independent of the president and power because when you're independent, the theory is you can preserve the currency. You're not a subject to political pressure. And I think that's worked well for our country, and I think most people commented on that have said this worked well, and the Federal Reserve is really the crown jewel of the federal um governmental system in many ways because it's seen as very independent, uh, very merit-oriented, and I think many of the people who are most respected in our country over the years have been chairs of the Federal Reserve like Paul Volcker but and Ben Bernanke. But I I recognize that there are some people who are not happy with uh the fact that interest rates are have not gone down as much as let's say they've gone down in in Europe. But the United States is more complicated economy in some ways than Europe, and Europe had lowered interest rates because their economy was softening so much. They had to uh help the economy move forward. We haven't had that kind of softening. So, um, I J. Powell, uh to his credit, in my view, has not commented on anything that President Trump has said about him. In other words, if it were, if we I was getting beat up every day, or every occasionally from time to time by the president, any president, I probably wouldn't be as quiet as Jay has been. But Jay has basically not responded, not taken the bait. And I think uh he'd like to finish out the term if he could, which finishes in May of '26. And David, as someone that uh hired Jerome Powell, worked with him for what, eight years at at Carlyle, um how do you think he's taking these criticisms? And are you surprised that he hasn't just the hell with this? I'm I'm stepping down and I'm going to go, you know, enjoy myself for the next couple of years. I haven't talked to him specifically about it, so I'm just surmising, but my guess is that nobody likes to be criticized by the President of the United States. Who likes to be criticized by the President of the United States? No one really does, but he hasn't responded to any of the criticism, which I give him great credit for doing. I don't think I could have done that, because he's just decided to just take care of the the job he has and worry about getting inflation down, and interest rates will come down when they they are designed to come down. But remember, there is a uh a FOMC of 12 people, seven members from the Federal Reserve board and five rotating members from the various Federal Reserve boards around the country. 12 people, that's the FOMC, the Federal Open Market Committee. And they make the decision. J. Powell is the chairman, presumably he has a lot of influence, but it's not the only person making a decision. How important is it that the whoever succeeds uh Jerome Powell's Fed chair that they could be someone that is independent from the executive branch, someone that could stand up to the president, you know, because I think some of the thinking, just based on people I've talked to David, is that we get uh someone who has that direct line to President Trump, gets put in there because he promises the president they're going to cut rates, and now this person's doing everything the president asked them to do. Well, I think the markets would respond better uh if somebody is seen as independent. The candidates that have been mentioned, some of them are excellent. And I think they would be somewhat independent, but obviously, many of them have close relationship with the president. The president made it clear what he wants. Some of the people or candidates have already said they would lower interest rates, so maybe they're their existing view is that interest rates should come down and not because of presidential pressure. But I think overall, it would be a good thing for the country to have a strong Fed chair um to succeed J. Powell rather than a weak Fed chair. Out of all the names that we've heard uh and have you heard too, David, Kevin Warsh, um Kevin Hassett, Secretary Benson still in the mix, Christopher Waller at the Fed, is there one person out of that that group of four folks that are reportedly leading the uh the nomination uh or or top of mind with the president that you think would would be best suited to do this job at this moment? I know um I a number of them. I think I know three of them. Uh and I would say they are uh the three that I know um are are all talented, and all could do a good job. But until you get the job, you don't know, you know, how strong somebody's going to be and you don't know how independent they will be. Um so I I just can't say now who'd be better, but I think of the candidates that I know, all of them would be would be able to do a likely a good likely would be able to do a good job. Related Videos Powell isn't the only Fed hawk: Williams keen to hold rates Trump vs. Powell, earnings, retail sales data: 3 Things Trump-Powell to Be Continuing Headwind for Dollar, FX: Saravelos 'Sell America' Returns as Trump Raises Pressure on Powell 登入存取你的投資組合
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Police Scotland requests extra officers from across UK to support upcoming Donald Trump visit
Police Scotland has told Sky News it has requested extra officers from across the UK to support the upcoming visit by US President Donald Trump. has confirmed the trip to his golf resorts in Scotland and will meet Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer and Scottish First Minister John Swinney for informal talks. The visit is expected to last several days and will likely include stays at both his Turnberry and Aberdeenshire courses. A source previously told Sky News up to 5,000 officers could be required to police the visit with officers being asked to work 12-hour shifts. The security operation is being likened to that seen following the death of the late Queen Elizabeth in 2022. The White House is yet to publicly confirm any details of the planned timing of the trip comes as the Trump family prepare to open a new course for golfers in Aberdeenshire. Trump officials declined to comment. Read more: The president's private visit to will come ahead of his . Assistant Chief Constable Emma Bond said: "A policing plan will be in place to maintain public safety, balance rights to peaceful protest and minimise disruption. "The visit will require a significant police operation using local, national and specialist resources from across Police Scotland, supported by colleagues from other UK police forces as part of mutual aid arrangements."
