Test vendor moves to toss California's lawsuit over botched bar exam, says fraud claims fail
June 23 (Reuters) - The testing company that delivered California's disastrous February bar exam asked a judge on Friday to throw out the bulk of The State Bar of California's lawsuit against it, claiming that the state bar cannot rely on the company's early statements about its online testing capacity to demonstrate fraud.
In a court document, opens new tab filed in Los Angeles County Superior Court, defendant Meazure Learning sought dismissal of five of the state bar's six alleged counts, including fraud and negligent misrepresentation. The company's filing, which is called a demurrer, did not address the state bar's breach of contract claim.
The state bar on Monday declined to comment on the filing, and attorneys for Meazure did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
The state bar sued Meazure in May, accusing, opens new tab the company of failing to live up to its promises that its systems could handle thousands of bar examinees. The state bar signed a $4.1 million contract with the company in September 2024 to administer the February and future exams, to be given both remotely and in person. The new format was meant to reduce the state bar's cost of administering the attorney licensing exam.
However, the February test was marred with widespread technical and logistical problems. Some test takers were unable to log into the bar exam at all while many experienced delays, lax exam security, distracting proctors, and a copy-and-paste function that didn't work.
In the new filing, Meazure argues that any comments made by the company about the number of online test takers it could handle outside of its actual contract with the state bar do not meet the standard to prove fraud of negligent misrepresentation because they are not binding.
'The court should reject plaintiff's attempt to turn Meazure's alleged breaches of contract into an intentional tort,' Meazure's demurrer reads.
Meazure is already facing two proposed federal class actions from people who took the February test. State Bar Executive Director Leah Wilson said she will step down from her post in July, citing the bungled rollout of the new bar exam.
Meazure, based in Birmingham, Alabama, bills itself on its website as the "largest and most experienced remote proctoring operation in the market," with more than 1,500 test centers in 115 countries. Meazure was formed through the 2020 merger of testing companies ProctorU and Yardstick.
Read more:
California Bar sues vendor over exam meltdown
California bar exam test takers sue over 'disaster' rollout this week
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
33 minutes ago
- Reuters
Trump administration expects deal with Harvard by end-June, Washington Post reports
WASHINGTON, June 24 (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump's administration is ramping up negotiations with Harvard University and expects a deal by the end of June to resolve the White House's campaign against the country's oldest and richest university, the Washington Post reported on Tuesday. On Friday, Trump said a deal could be announced "over the next week or so" to end a months-long battle with the Ivy League school, which sued after the administration terminated billions of dollars in grants and moved to bar the school from admitting international students.
The Guardian
34 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Judge blocks Trump from withholding EV charger funds awarded to 14 states
A US district judge has blocked the Trump administration from withholding funds previously awarded to 14 states for electric vehicle charger infrastructure. Seattle-based judge Tana Lin, who was appointed to the bench by Joe Biden in 2021, granted a partial injunction to the states that filed suit against Trump's Department of Transportation. She ruled that the states' lawsuit – led by attorneys general in California, Colorado and Washington – would likely succeed. Her ruling did not apply to the District of Columbia, Minnesota and Vermont, which she found did not provide evidence that they would suffer immediate harm. The injunction will go into effect on 1 July, unless the Trump administration files an appeal blocking it. In February, the Trump administration ordered states not to spend $5bn in funds allocated under the Biden administration as part of the national electric vehicle infrastructure (Nevi) program. The program provided up to 80% of eligible project costs to deploy electric vehicle charges. Currently, 16 states have at least one operational EV station, according to EV States Clearinghouse. 'The new leadership of the Department of Transportation … has decided to review the policies underlying the implementation of the Nevi formula program,' Emily Biondi, associate administrator for planning, environment and realty at the transportation department's Federal Highway Administration, wrote in a memo. 'As result of the rescission of the Nevi formula program guidance, the FHWA is also immediately suspending the approval of all state electric vehicle infrastructure deployment plans for all fiscal years. Therefore, effective immediately, no new obligations may occur under the Nevi formula program until the updated final Nevi formula program guidance is issued and new state plans are submitted and approved,' she added. In May, the Government Accountability Office found that the Trump administration violated the law when it withheld the funding. The administration 'must continue to carry out the statutory requirements of the program', it said. The White House challenged those findings, which it called 'wrong and legally indefensible', and ordered the transportation department to ignore them. The department is expected to release a draft of its updated electric vehicle guidance this month. During a hearing before the Seattle judge earlier this month, Leah Brown, of Washington's attorney general's office said, 'This passing reference to revised guidance and to changed priorities is simply insufficient to override congressional intent.' She added that the states aren't 'challenging the ability to revise guidance, but we are arguing that doing so simply is not a sufficient explanation for the actions that they've taken,' the Washington State Standard reported. 'The agency has no intent to withhold funds from the states,' justice department attorney Heidy Gonzalez said. 'It just wants the opportunity to review past guidance and to promulgate guidance that comports with the current administration's policies and priorities.' During his campaign for the presidency, Donald Trump voiced a hatred for electric vehicles that ran counter to his growing friendship with Tesla CEO Elon Musk. At one point in the campaign, Trump said supporters of the vehicles should 'rot in hell' and that Biden's support of EVs would bring a 'bloodbath' to the US's automotive industry. Although he later appointed Musk to serve as head of the 'department of government efficiency', Musk and Trump have since parted ways.
Finextra
36 minutes ago
- Finextra
BIS report pours cold water on stablecoin hype
They may be the current darling of the financial services world, but stablecoins fall short as a form of sound money and at best may "eventually play a subsidiary role in the hinterland of the financial system," according to the Bank for International Settlement. 0 Stablecoins have seen a surge in interest in recent months, with US regulators paving the way for adoption. big banks exploring rolling out their own tokens, USDC issuer Circle soaring on its market debut, and Citi predicting that the market will hit trillions within five years. Yet, while offering some promise on tokenisation, they are fundamentally flawed, says a report into the next generation monetary and financial system from the BIS, because they "do not stack up well against the three desirable characteristics of sound monetary arrangements and thus cannot be the mainstay of the future monetary system". These characteristics are the ability to deliver singleness of money (acceptance for payment at par), elasticity (timely discharge of obligations, preventing gridlock) and integrity (safeguarding against financial crime). Therefore, "besides acting as a gateway to the crypto ecosystem, their future role is unclear," says the report. In fact, without regulation they could be actively damaging, posing a risk to financial stability and monetary sovereignty. The BIS instead predicts that a tokenised unified ledger incorporating central bank money, commercial bank deposits and government bonds will lay the foundations of a tokenised monetary and financial system based on the time-tested principles of sound money. This trilogy can boost efficiency and open new possibilities in cross-border payments, securities markets and beyond, while maintaining the key principles of sound money that stablecoins fail in: singleness, elasticity and integrity. Hyun Song Shin, head, monetary and economic department, says: "Tokenisation of deposits and central bank money means that both the primary means of payment as well as the settlement function of central bank money can be integrated seamlessly on the same programmable platform. It has the potential to transform securities markets and its application to correspondent banking is especially promising." The BIS is already exploring this through Project Agorá, a collaboration led by the group with seven central banks and 43 private sector institutions to "test and develop tokenisation as the backbone of the future monetary and financial system," says Andréa M Maechler, acting head, BIS Innovation Hub. Read the report.
