logo
Local Anesthesia Pain: A Predictor of Post-Cesarean Pain?

Local Anesthesia Pain: A Predictor of Post-Cesarean Pain?

Medscape7 hours ago

TOPLINE:
A higher intensity of pain during infiltration of local anesthesia during cesarean delivery was associated with increased pain at 24 hours postpartum and lower global health ratings, although the quality of recovery scores remained unaffected.
METHODOLOGY:
Researchers conducted a prospective observational study at a university-affiliated tertiary care center between August 2019 and September 2023 to evaluate local anesthesia pain as a predictor of severity of post-cesarean pain and recovery quality.
A total of 114 women (median age, 32 years; 52.6% White) undergoing cesarean delivery with neuraxial anesthesia were included in the final analysis.
Pain during infiltration of local anesthesia was assessed prior to the neuraxial procedure using a numerical rating scale of 0-100 after lidocaine injection, and participants were categorized into mild (n = 83), moderate (n = 24), and severe (n = 7) pain groups on the basis of their scores.
The primary outcome was postoperative pain assessed at 24 hours postpartum, using six pain scores (average and peak pain at rest, with movement, and with uterine cramping).
Secondary outcomes were recovery, assessed using the 11-item Obstetric Quality of Recovery questionnaire (ObsQoR-11), and a global health rating, evaluated with numerical rating scale scores of 0-100, with the numbers indicating worst and best imaginable health states, respectively.
TAKEAWAY:
Significant differences were found among the three pain groups for all primary outcomes. Average and peak pain at rest (P = .0002 and P = .003, respectively), as well as peak pain during movement (P = .002), were significantly associated with pain during infiltration of local anesthesia.
Global health ratings were significantly different among the pain groups, but ObsQoR-11 scores were not.
Only the global health rating showed a significant association with local anesthesia pain (P = .008).
The study found low sensitivity but high specificity in using pain scores during infiltration of local anesthesia for predicting severe post-cesarean pain and poor recovery at 24 hours post-cesarean delivery.
IN PRACTICE:
'Our findings underscore the potential of ILA [infiltration of local anesthesia] as only one component of a multifactorial approach to predicting postoperative pain,' the researchers reported.
SOURCE:
The study was led by Christine McKenzie, MD, of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. It was published online on June 20, 2025, in the International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia.
LIMITATIONS:
The single-center design and focus on scheduled cesarean deliveries may limit the generalizability of the findings. The low number of patients reporting severe pain during local anesthesia infiltration may have affected the study's power. The study did not account for anxiety or other mental health conditions, which may affect the internal validity of the findings.
DISCLOSURES:
The authors reported having no conflicts of interest or funding sources for this study.
This article was created using several editorial tools, including AI, as part of the process. Human editors reviewed this content before publication.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Women usher in strength training's new era
Women usher in strength training's new era

Yahoo

time14 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Women usher in strength training's new era

Gyms are making space. The future of strength training is female. New flex. Once dominated by men, Crunch Fitness CEO Jim Rowley told Bloomberg that women now account for 50%+ of lifting platform usage. Meanwhile, Planet Fitness is removing more than 40% of cardio machines across 1,700 locations to meet growing demand for weights and functional training, Fitt Insider reports. Validated. Between 2011 and 2021, women's use of free weights increased by 150%, while resistance machine use jumped 558%, per Harrison Co. On Strava, strength training uploads climbed 25% in 2024, making it the fastest-growing sport among women. Longevity lift. More than aesthetics, resistance training is essential for aging well, boosting bone density, preserving muscle, and improving metabolic health. A call to arms, experts like Dr. Stacy Sims and Dr. Gabrielle Lyon are pushing strength as a cornerstone of women's healthspan. Stronger together. Still, 73% of US women—and 83% of women 65+—don't meet CDC strength guidelines, creating a major opportunity for services, coaching, and products tailored to female lifters. Punchline: Strength is the new cardio, and women are leading the charge — transforming gyms, supplements, and the future of healthy aging. This story was produced by Fitt Insider and reviewed and distributed by Stacker.

Confessions of a Former Nurx Addict
Confessions of a Former Nurx Addict

Yahoo

time19 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Confessions of a Former Nurx Addict

It was the beginning of 2019—I had been working at a new company for almost exactly a year, and I was super stressed about my healthcare situation. No, I didn't have any diseases or serious conditions. I wasn't sick or even worried about the possibility of getting sick (although that joke was on me; I caught COVID-19 four separate times in 2020). But for the first time in my life, I found myself in health insurance hell. To be fair, dealing with any healthcare bureaucracy in America is sure to be frustrating and annoying, and will most likely turn into a Kafkaesque nightmare. But when you're 28 and still in the honeymoon phase of a new-ish relationship, an abrupt cut-off of your birth control—with no warning and no clear path to restart it—starts to feel less like a logistical hiccup and more like an existential crisis. More from Flow Space UPDATE: Your State-by-State Guide to Understanding Menopause Insurance Options See, the OB-GYN I saw once a year was on vacation, then booked for the next seven months straight (not that she was in-network anyway), and WITH INSURANCE, the pharmacy was charging me over $130 for one pack, only one month's worth, of pills. The health insurance at my last two jobs had charged me $0 for birth control. In fact, at that point, I had been taking Lo Loestrin FE regularly for 12 years and had never once paid for it. I was, as the kids say, shook. Thankfully, in the midst trying to figure out what to do, I was in the kitchen with a couple of coworkers, when I overheard them mention Nurx. They were both raving about it, but I couldn't tell if it was a fancy boutique or a new dish at their favorite brunch spot—all I could tell was that they both thought Nurx was great. I was having fun making wild guesses in my head, but I also. didn't want to miss out on something seemingly so delightful, so I finally asked them, 'What's Nurx?' In retrospect, it's a little weird that both ladies were surprised I hadn't heard of it. Because, remember this took place pre-COVID and the ensuing telehealth boom. In fact, in 2019, only 10% of Americans ever participated in a telehealth visit, according to a 2024 survey conducted by hims & hers; the most recent data shows a 440% rise in telehealth adoption with 54% having had a telehealth appointment as of early 2025. While I might have been early to to the telemedicine game compared to the general public, I was late to Nurx, which launched in 2015, as far as my work friends were concerned. And they were right. For the next four years, everything about my birth control was seamless. I paid $15 dollars for an initial consult (I believe that fee has gone up to $28 now for birth control patients), and by some incredible stroke of luck, the same afternoon I learned about Nurx, I received a company-wide email explaining that our health insurance plans were changing slightly. The notice didn't go into much detail other than that our copays would be going up—birth control costs definitely weren't mentioned—but I found out via chat with the Nurx team through their app that my medication cost would be $0. They would send me three packs at a time, refills were automatic and shipping was free. Other than the initial $15, I would only have to pay a $3 service fee each month—meaning one full year of Lo Loestrin FE would come out to approximately $51. Just days prior, the same health insurance company wanted me to pay around $87 more for a single pack of medicine from a pharmacy where I'd have to remember to call in all my own refills, go pick them up every single month, wait in a never-ending line and then have some pharmacy tech tell me 'it's gonna be another 30 minutes,' despite the text on my phone announcing 'my prescription is ready for pick-up.' In all honestly, I had become dependent on the impeccable consistency and convenience of Nurx. It felt like the company had truly taken a necessary task (managing your birth control) off your plate and put it on the the most dependable auto-pilot. At the end of 2019, Nurx sent out an email recapping exciting things that had happened that year, and it mentioned how they had not only launched HPV home testing and STI home testing and treatment, but also how August 2019 marked one year of providing PrEP home test kits for HIV prevention. I remember at some point later down the line, the introduced some prescription skin products, but as long as my birth control was being taken care of, I really wasn't paying attention to Nurx. It was great! Then, on March 20, 2023, I received a message from Nurx stating, 'Lo Loestrin Fe will no longer be stocked at our pharmacy. This means we cannot refill your birth control prescription.' But it went on to offer me options, Nurx could send my prescription to a local pharmacy or I could work with their medical team to find something similar to switch to. Considering that I had noticeably (and quickly) gained weight on three different birth controls my OB-GYN had me try before we landed on Lo Loestrin Fe, the decision was a no-brainer. So I asked them to to send to my local pharmacy, and it was OK for the most part. I missed the convenience of getting my prescription shipped directly to my apartment and I could only get one pack at a time instead of three, but I couldn't really complain. At least not until March 21, 2024. The only reason I know some of these exact dates is because I did complain; I complained via a 1,400-word email with certain sections highlighted yellow and other section written with pink or blue or orange. I utilized the 'bold' function more than was necessary. I must imagine that my email was the most colorful 'angry email' Nurx has ever received. What happened? Well, the only thing that Nurx had figured out how to automate yet was the yearly renewal process. Once a year, you had to go onto their platform to manually renew your prescription. I had done exactly that on February 21, 2024 and immediately received a confirmation that my renewal went through; the next day, I got another message confirming that my prescription had been sent to my pharmacy. I was able to pick up my first pack of birth control (of the 12-mont prescription) on March 21, 2024—but when I tried to put in the next month's refill, the pharmacy said they had no record of me or my Lo Loestrin FE in its system. When I reached out to Nurx, I was told they had already sent all remaining refills to my local pharmacy and suggested I speak to them, clearly forgetting that the pharmacy had insisted I get in touch with Nurx. It was a never-ending circle of not getting my birth control, yet continuing to pay a $3 service fee every month. I tried everything I could think of, but Nurx stopped responding to my messages, including my colorful monster-of an email. Despite the unfortunate ending of my time with Nurx, it was, without-a-doubt, it was still the best and easiest approach to birth control prescriptions that I've ever seen. After my March refill ran out and I was just beginning to step into my drama-filled exit with the telehealth platform, the pharmacist who was telling me I didn't exist in their system ended up giving me a free pack of Lo Loestrin FE. My former OB-GYN had moved away, and so I found a new doctor on ZocDoc and went back to relying on my yearly well-woman exam as a means to procure my birth control. I wasn't overly fond of this physician so when I realized she had only prescribed me six months worth of Lo Loestrin Fe, I decided I wasn't even going to bother calling her office to ask for a refill. It was October 2024 at this point, living in a post-COVID world, I expected to find more than one freshly launched telehealth platform that would surely outrival Nurx. After some research I chose to create an account with Pandia Health, a telehealth platform focused solely on women's hormonal care from birth control to hormone replacement therapy (HRT). I knew that Nurx had been adding treatments here and there, but it wasn't until I started looking into new telehealth options that I realized it had evolved into far more than just a birth control platform. They now offer everything from Ozempic and Wegovy for weight management and prescription anti-aging skin care to minoxidil for women's hair loss and essential everyday care for core gynecological issues. But it's their mental health services that seem to have gained the most traction—now standing alongside birth control as one of Nurx's primary offerings. I was surprised to find a number of online reviews comparing Nurx to Brightside Health, a subscription-based online psychiatry and therapy platform that I also happen to use; I started on Brightside in 2020 and remain a member to this day. I only have great things about my experience with Brightside but, for me, comparing the two is an apples-oranges situation. And through writing this piece, it seems somewhat obvious to me that Nurx was going through some massive changes at the time of my issue with them. And considering how disastrous Pandia Health turned out to be—every single month you're expected to fill out and submit a form consenting to your prescription, and since it can take up to 10 days to arrive (if it ever actually does), you're constantly inundated with 'refill reminder' and 'refill consent confirmation reminder' emails—Nurx is still easily the best way I've ever received birth control. When it was working, it was the gold standard. I can only hope that any of the kinks I experienced were from its growth spurt into a fully fledged online clinic for women's health and that the shortcomings I encountered have all been worked out by now. As for me, after Pandia failed to deliver my birth control twice, I stopped using them. I then embarked upon an exhaustive, all-night search for a platform that met, what I thought was, some simple criteria—it needed to either be cheap or take my insurance, carry Lo Loestrin FE, able to send three packs at the same time and actually send them to directly to me through the mail. I finally decided two out of four wasn't that bad. I signed up with an online medical consultation service called Dr.B, which was very simple and very cheap (a consultation is $15, then medication costs are handled by your insurance). But I had to have them send the prescription to a local New York pharmacy and I only get one pack at a time. I thought after such a struggle, I was finally in OK place with my birth control. Do I have to physically drag myself to a pharmacy? Yes, but at least Dr.B doesn't clog up my inbox by sending emails every other day. I actually picked up my first packet of Lo Loestrin Fe placed through Dr.B last Friday. The pharmacist called to let me know it was ready and then said, 'Can you come pick it up ASAP? I told her I'd come in after work. She responded with, 'OK, like you really need to come get it though because we're closing down. Closing down for good.' 'When exactly?' I asked. Her answer? Monday. So that's a new birth control thing to worry about. I'm honestly considering restarting my subscription with Nurx.

NASA Plows Forward, Testing A Moon Rocket That The White House Is Trying To Cancel
NASA Plows Forward, Testing A Moon Rocket That The White House Is Trying To Cancel

Yahoo

time33 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

NASA Plows Forward, Testing A Moon Rocket That The White House Is Trying To Cancel

Going to the Moon was always viewed as a near-impossible feat, to the point that a large contingent of skeptics continues to believe that one of humanity's greatest feats simply didn't happen despite the mountain of evidence to the contrary. NASA's return to the lunar surface is being made even more difficult by the Trump administration. Despite the White House's desire to cancel the Space Launch System, the Artemis program's primary launch vehicle, NASA continues to test the rocket as recently as Thursday. NASA tested new SLS hardware twice over the last week for Moon missions that might never happen, Ars Technica reports. Last Friday, test-fired a hydrogen-fueled RS-25 rocket in Mississippi that would be used in the SLS core stage for Artemis V in 2030, the program's third lunar landing. Thursday's test in Utah featured a new solid rocket booster that would debut as a part of the SLS Block 2 rocket for Artemis IX in 2034. The additional 8,900 pounds of payload capacity provided by Block 2 would be used to supply the fledgling moonbase and support a permanent human presence on the Moon. Read more: These Movies And TV Shows Have The Best Car Casting The booster test at Northrop Grumman's site at Promontory, Utah went awry during the uncontrolled burn. Live-stream footage appears to show the exhaust burning away part of the rocket until it disintegrated just above the nozzle. The rocket's failure wasn't contained to just the test stand, as the flames spread to the surrounding hills. The most significant selling point of the SLS will likely be its downfall. The cost-effective appeal of recycling components from the Space Shuttle to reach the Moon was a dream that created more headaches than the dollars saved. This became even more problematic after Elon Musk bankrolled Trump's campaign for a second term while claiming that a SpaceX lunar program could be faster and cheaper with zero evidence to back up that posturing. While Musk believes the idea of returning to the Moon is dumb, the cancellation of SLS would be Artemis' demise, as contracts would likely be doled out for a commercial launch provider. This is occurring while NASA is facing a massive $6 billion budget cut, which will force the agency to reduce its staff by 32%. Employees are already being encouraged to take early buyouts or retire early, like their colleagues at other government agencies. Want more like this? Join the Jalopnik newsletter to get the latest auto news sent straight to your inbox... Read the original article on Jalopnik.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store