Genetic test to reveal whether Brazil's bird flu case is linked to zoo deaths
Montenegro: Brazilian authorities hope to determine by Tuesday whether a confirmed outbreak of highly pathogenic
avian influenza
among wild birds in a zoo in the southern state of
Rio Grande do Sul
is connected with the country's first bird flu case on a commercial poultry farm in the same state, an official said on Monday.
Rosane Collares, a director at the state's agriculture department, told Reuters that the genetic sequencing of the virus that killed around 100 waterfowl at the zoo in the town of Sapucaia do Sul would reveal if it is related to the outbreak in a commercial poultry farm in the town of Montenegro, where the H5N1 bird flu virus is already responsible for the death of 17,000 chickens, either directly from the disease or due to cautionary culling.
The farm is located about 50 kilometers (30 miles) from the zoo.
"We need to know if there is any relation or if it was an unfortunate coincidence," she said.
No zoo animals were culled following confirmation that a Black-necked swan, one of the birds that died, had caught bird flu. The protocol for wild birds is different from the one guiding commercial flocks, and does not include the culling of animals that are not sick, Collares said.
Collares said the animals that died all lived around one of the zoo's lakes. a
On Saturday, teams from
Vibra Foods
, a Brazilian food processor backed by Tyson Foods that runs the farm where bird flu was detected, buried waste that had first been incinerated to prevent the spread of the virus.
Tyson and Vibra have not responded to several comment requests.
According to Collares, health measures were taken to prevent further contamination within the zoo's perimeter, including isolation of the area and limited access for zoo workers.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
25 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Scientists make new plastic that dissolves in water in a few hours
Plastic is undoubtedly one of the main causes of ocean pollution worldwide. Not only is microplastic present in our food, but the material has also found its way into the placentas of unborn babies and goes as deep as the Mariana Trench itself. However, a new plastic material developed by scientists in Japan might help us lessen ocean pollution. Developed by scientists from the RIKEN Centre for Emergent Matter Science and the University of Tokyo, the new plastic material has the strength of a petroleum-based plastic. But unlike normal plastics, which take anywhere between 20 to 500 years to decompose, the new plastic material breaks down into its original components when exposed to salt. These components are then processed by bacteria present in the water and leave no microplastic or nanoplastic particles behind. According to Reuters, the researchers showcased the new degradable plastic material in a lab in Wako City near Tokyo. During the demonstration, they focused on how the material dissolved in salty water in about an hour. In case you are wondering, salt is also found in soil, but it would take 200 hours underground for the new material to completely break down. Moreover, it looks like the new plastic material is non-toxic for humans, has fire-resistant capabilities and does not release Carbon Dioxide. The researchers also said that the material is not ready for commercial purposes, but they are actively working on developing a coating method. Project lead Takuzo Aida said that their research has already attracted significant interest from players in the packaging sector. According to the UN Environment Programme, plastic pollution is estimated to triple by the year 2040, adding somewhere between 23 to 37 million metric tons of waste every year only in the ocean. Last year, a study published in the journal Nature claimed that India accounts for a fifth of global plastic pollution. The country burns approximately 5.8 million tonnes of plastic every year in addition to releasing another 2.5 million tonnes into land, air and water as debris, making India the highest plastic polluter in the world.
Time of India
5 hours ago
- Time of India
US COVID vaccine recommendations sow confusion among doctors, insurers
Chicago: Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. 's intervention in COVID-19 vaccine recommendations without input from a key U.S. CDC advisory panel has sown confusion among physicians and insurers over who should get the shots and whether they will be covered, experts told Reuters. Kennedy, a long-time vaccine skeptic, in a video posted on social media last week said the government was dropping its recommendation that healthy children and pregnant women should receive COVID shots. Days later, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention updated its recommended childhood vaccine schedule online to show the shots could be given to healthy children when parents and doctors agree they are needed. It removed its recommendation that pregnant women should receive the shot. The moves sidestepped the normal process in which a panel of outside experts to the CDC - the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices - reviews data in a public meeting and votes on vaccine recommendations. The ACIP recommendations are sent to the CDC director for approval and incorporated in the agency's vaccine schedule, which helps determine insurance coverage under the Affordable Care Act . "The surprise announcement has created uncertainty for payers and providers about whether the video posting constitutes an official policy change," said Sarah Moselle, a principal at health consultancy Avalere. Insurers will wait to make coverage decisions until after ACIP makes a recommendation at its upcoming meeting scheduled for June 25-27, according to Robert Popovian, founder of healthcare consultancy Conquest Advisors. The Department of Health and Human Services overseen by Kennedy said the move was within its legal and regulatory authority and reflects the agency's move toward clinical-guided decision making, a department spokesperson said. HHS will continue to rely on the work of expert panels, including ACIP, he said, noting that the committee will be meeting this month. The meeting agenda will be released in accordance with prior practice. Determinations on coverage are up to insurance providers, the spokesperson said. The CDC has previously recommended the COVID shot for everyone aged 6 months and older. 'AWAITING CLARITY' "This whole thing is so murky," said an ACIP member who spoke on condition of anonymity. "It's very unclear whose decision is final." Infectious Diseases Society of America President Dr. Tina Tan said the conflicting COVID vaccine guidance could cause "significant confusion among medical professionals and the public." Dr. Matthew Zahn, an Orange County, California, public health official at OC Health Care Agency who serves as a liaison to the CDC's advisory panel, said: "We're all awaiting clarity." "It's going to be important to understand how these vaccines are insured," Zahn said. "Specifically, if ultimately there is a recommendation for high-risk populations to be vaccinated, how that is interpreted by insurance companies and thus, how providers can recommend it." Zahn expects CDC to clarify its guidance in the weeks ahead, though he could not comment on whether that will be at the ACIP meeting. On Tuesday, Reuters reported that pediatric infectious disease expert Dr. Lakshmi Panagiotakopoulos, a CDC official who helped oversee the expert panel on COVID vaccines, told colleagues she was leaving her post as she was "no longer able to help the most vulnerable members" of the U.S. population. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists raised concerns on May 27 that the HHS decision not to recommend COVID vaccines during pregnancy would make it harder for pregnant women to get the shot "despite the clear and definitive evidence demonstrating its benefit." The Affordable Care Act generally requires insurers to cover vaccines that are listed on ACIP's vaccine schedule, according to the CDC's website. Narrowing coverage without knowing what ACIP recommends could put insurers at risk, Popovian said. "It's a liability," he said, adding that insurers need clarity on what they will be required to cover. A source familiar with plans for the meeting said the panel is expected to consider and vote on COVID-19 vaccines for the upcoming autumn and winter season, adding that the panel had been leaning toward narrowing its recommendations. The advisory panel has yet to receive an agenda for the upcoming meeting, the source said, and it is unclear whether Kennedy would override any deviation from his announced policy.
Hindustan Times
2 days ago
- Hindustan Times
US-backed GHF halts aid distribution in Gaza after multiple firing incidents
The US-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation has halted aid distribution after the recent firing incidents, which have killed over 80 Palestinians. As per a statement from the controversial aid agency, the GHF said that aid distribution will be halted due to "ongoing updates" such as "renovation, reorganization and efficiency improvement." However, a spokesperson for the US-backed agency told Reuters that the closure was to review security measures. "Our top priority remains ensuring the safety and dignity of civilians receiving aid," a GHF spokesperson was quoted as saying by the news agency. In the past week, over 80 people have been killed, allegedly by Israeli forces, while seeking aid at GHF distribution centres. As per Gaza's Hamas-run health ministry, the GHF centres are a "death trap" for Palestinians as Israeli soldiers target civilians gathered for food. The Israeli military has denied all allegations against it and has stated it has only fired "warning shots" to disperse "rowdy crowds." Hospital officials told AP that of the 80 people shot dead near aid distribution centres since Sunday, a majority of the deaths were of women and children. The UN Security Council is set to take a vote on Wednesday regarding a ceasefire in the Gaza Strip. "It is unacceptable. Civilians are risking – and in several instances losing – their lives just trying to get food," said U.N. spokesperson Stephane Dujarric on Tuesday, adding that the aid distribution model backed by Washington and Israel was "all a recipe for disaster, which is exactly what is going on."
