Scientists make new plastic that dissolves in water in a few hours
Developed by scientists from the RIKEN Centre for Emergent Matter Science and the University of Tokyo, the new plastic material has the strength of a petroleum-based plastic. But unlike normal plastics, which take anywhere between 20 to 500 years to decompose, the new plastic material breaks down into its original components when exposed to salt.
These components are then processed by bacteria present in the water and leave no microplastic or nanoplastic particles behind. According to Reuters, the researchers showcased the new degradable plastic material in a lab in Wako City near Tokyo. During the demonstration, they focused on how the material dissolved in salty water in about an hour. In case you are wondering, salt is also found in soil, but it would take 200 hours underground for the new material to completely break down.
Moreover, it looks like the new plastic material is non-toxic for humans, has fire-resistant capabilities and does not release Carbon Dioxide. The researchers also said that the material is not ready for commercial purposes, but they are actively working on developing a coating method. Project lead Takuzo Aida said that their research has already attracted significant interest from players in the packaging sector.
According to the UN Environment Programme, plastic pollution is estimated to triple by the year 2040, adding somewhere between 23 to 37 million metric tons of waste every year only in the ocean.
Last year, a study published in the journal Nature claimed that India accounts for a fifth of global plastic pollution. The country burns approximately 5.8 million tonnes of plastic every year in addition to releasing another 2.5 million tonnes into land, air and water as debris, making India the highest plastic polluter in the world.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
2 days ago
- Economic Times
Fossilized teeth in Ethiopia reveal two human ancestors coexisted 2.6 million years ago, including a potentially unknown species
Reuters Fossilized teeth unearthed in Ethiopia's Afar Region show early Homo and Australopithecus lived side by side 2.6 million years ago, hinting at a previously unknown species A groundbreaking discovery in Ethiopia's Afar Region has unveiled evidence that multiple human ancestor species coexisted approximately 2.6 to 2.8 million years ago, challenging traditional views of human evolution. The findings, published in the journal Nature, suggest a more complex and branching evolutionary history than previously understood. The excavation, part of the Ledi-Geraru Research Project, unearthed 13 fossilized teeth, 10 attributed to a previously unidentified species of Australopithecus and 3 to early members of the Homo genus. These discoveries indicate that at least five hominin species may have coexisted in eastern Africa during this period, including Homo, Australopithecus, and Paranthropus. The Australopithecus teeth found at the LD 750 and LD 760 sites exhibit distinct morphological features not seen in known species such as A. afarensis or A. garhi, suggesting the presence of a previously unknown lineage. This challenges the long-held belief that Australopithecus species had disappeared before the emergence of Homo. The three Homo teeth, dated between 2.78 and 2.59 million years ago, are consistent with early members of the Homo genus, such as Homo habilis. This supports the notion that Homo species were present in the region during the same timeframe as Australopithecus. The Afar Region's geological activity, including tectonic rifting and volcanic ash deposits, has preserved these fossils exceptionally well, allowing for precise dating and detailed morphological discovery underscores the complexity of human evolution, highlighting that multiple hominin species may have coexisted and interacted in overlapping environments. The findings contribute to a more nuanced understanding of our evolutionary history, moving beyond the simplistic linear models previously research and additional fossil discoveries are needed to fully comprehend the relationships and interactions among these ancient human ancestors.
News18
2 days ago
- News18
A Star, 10 Times Bigger Than Sun, Tried To Tango With Black Hole: Here's How The Unique Dance Ended
Last Updated: This is the first time astronomers have seen a supernova triggered directly by a black hole companion. An AI system was crucial in spotting this event early Astronomers have documented what appears to be a new type of supernova, as stellar explosions are known, that occurred when a massive star tried to swallow a black hole with which it had engaged in a lengthy pas de deux, Reuters reported. The star, which was at least 10 times as massive as our sun, and the black hole, which had a similar mass, were gravitationally bound to one another in what is called a binary system. But as the distance separating them gradually narrowed, the black hole's immense gravitational pull appears to have distorted the star – stretching it out from its spherical shape – and siphoned off material before causing it to explode. 'We caught a massive star locked in a fatal tango with a black hole," said astrophysicist Alexander Gagliano of the U.S. National Science Foundation's Institute for AI and Fundamental Interactions located at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, lead author of the study published this week in the Astrophysical Journal, who was quoted by Reuters. 'After shedding mass for years in a death spiral with the black hole, the massive star met its finale by exploding. It released more energy in a second than the sun has across its entire lifetime," Gagliano added. The explosion occurred about 700 million light-years from Earth. A light-year is the distance light travels in a year, 5.9 trillion miles (9.5 trillion km). How AI spotted the supernova What began like a typical supernova soon deviated. The light from the explosion re brightened after the initial burst, producing a double-peaked light curve—a highly unusual behaviour in supernova observations. An AI system was crucial in spotting this event early. It flagged unusual light patterns months before the star's final explosion, allowing astronomers to follow it through every phase, according to reports and science journals. How much energy did it release? The explosion released more energy in just one second than the Sun will produce over its entire lifetime. The aftermath continued to emit light as the ejected material crashed into surrounding stellar debris. What really must have happened? Stellar Instability Triggered by Distortion: The gravitational stress caused by the black hole may have destabilized the star, causing it to explode, with the black hole then consuming the remnant. Complete Tearing-Apart (Spaghettification): Alternatively, the black hole may have ripped the star apart before any traditional supernova explosion occurred. Either way, the black hole ends up larger. What makes the supernova unique Unseen Mechanism of Stellar Death: This is the first time astronomers have seen a supernova triggered directly by a black hole companion—opening a new chapter in our understanding of how massive stars end their lives. AI in Real-Time Astrophysics: The role of AI in early detection and extensive follow-up reshapes how we explore transient cosmic events. Binary Complexity: Up to now, most models have focused on single-star supernova mechanisms. This finding places binary interactions, especially with black holes, at the forefront of stellar evolution research. With Inputs from Reuters Click here to add News18 as your preferred news source on Google. Get Latest Updates on Movies, Breaking News On India, World, Live Cricket Scores, And Stock Market Updates. Also Download the News18 App to stay updated! First Published: Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Time of India
4 days ago
- Time of India
Neuroscientist explains why people perceive colours differently
Neuroscientist Emily McDonald reveals that individual color perception is unique due to genetic variations, eye color, and personal experiences. A study by the University of Tokyo and Monash University supports this, finding that color-neurotypical individuals perceive red similarly, while colorblind individuals experience it differently. This highlights the subjective nature of color perception. When your mum tells you, 'You are one of a kind,' trust her. She is right (as always)! You are so unique that even the colours you see may not appear the same way to anyone else in the world. Yes, that's right. Your red is not someone else's red. Emily McDonald is an Arizona-based neuroscientist and mindset coach, has explained the science behind this. Do we all see colours the same way? The neuroscientist explains that no two people see colour the same way. 'If you've ever wondered whether other people see colour the same way as you, according to current scientific understanding, the percent chance that anyone else sees colour the same way as you is essentially zero,' she says. The scientist shared that she was researching the topic and found some interesting aspects of why this happens. 'We all see colours differently, and I used to do research on this. So I'll tell you why. I used to work in a research lab doing something called a quantum catch, where we would take the genotype of the colour-detecting cells in different monkeys' eyes, and then we could map on a colour plot how they would perceive fruits in the rainforest, and you could see how different monkeys would perceive the same colour fruit differently, and humans are the same way. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Could This NEW Collagen Blend Finally Reduce Your Cellulite? Vitauthority Learn More Undo ' She added , 'And genetic code is only one reason that colour of your eye, like brown versus blue, can also change how you see colour. And our personal experiences can also shape how we perceive colours. Neural circuits in the brain that are involved in colour processing can adapt based upon our experiences.' Science behind the colour A recent study led by researchers from the University of Tokyo and Monash University in Australia explored whether two people's subjective experiences might differ when it comes to colour. They introduced a novel experimental and computational paradigm called the qualia structure paradigm, which looks at relational structures of our experiences, called qualia structures, and then compares qualia structures across individuals on a structural basis, as opposed to comparing colors one-on-one. 'Kahin Bada, Kahin Chhota': Ravi Kishan Uses Samosa Analogy To Demand Regulation Of Food Prices 'Using massive online experimental data from both color-neurotypical and colorblind participants, we empirically found that color similarity judgment data derived from color-neurotypical participants can be correctly aligned at the group level, such that red correctly mapped to the same red or similar reddish colors. In contrast, those of colorblind participants could not be aligned with those of color-neurotypical participants, implying that color-neurotypical red is relationally equivalent to other color-neurotypical's red, but not to colorblind people's red,' the researchers said.
