logo
Interview: UK trade expert warns of fallout from U.S.-EU tariff dispute

Interview: UK trade expert warns of fallout from U.S.-EU tariff dispute

The Star27-05-2025

LONDON, May 27 (Xinhua) -- A full-scale trade dispute between the United States and the European Union (EU) would pose serious risks to the global economy and is likely to affect the United Kingdom (UK) as well, a senior British trade expert has warned.
In an interview with Xinhua, William Bain, head of trade policy at the British Chambers of Commerce, said Britain's existing trade arrangements would provide only limited protection from the consequences of rising tensions between Washington and Brussels.
"An escalation of the trade dispute between the U.S. and EU would damage the global economy," Bain said. "The effects will be felt in the UK too, notwithstanding our own agreement with the U.S. on tariff reductions in key sectors."
Bain's warning comes amid heightened concern in Europe following U.S. President Donald Trump's threat to impose 50-percent tariffs on EU imports starting June 1 -- a major escalation in already strained transatlantic trade relations. Following a call with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, Trump agreed to postpone the tariff hike until July 9 to allow for further negotiations.
Despite the temporary reprieve, Bain cautioned that the underlying disagreements remain unresolved. Many British firms that distribute EU-manufactured goods to the United States or rely on EU components in their supply chains now face mounting uncertainty.
In Northern Ireland, where businesses operate under post-Brexit rules aligned with certain EU standards, the impact could be more direct, Bain said. He added that the effectiveness of contingency measures such as the Duty Reimbursement Scheme remains unclear.
Bain attributed the deadlock in talks to U.S. efforts to narrow its trade deficit with the EU, and its concerns over digital services taxes and pharmaceutical pricing in several EU member states.
The EU may look to respond by offering tariff concessions on industrial goods and increasing imports of U.S. products such as fuels and automobiles, he noted. However, he said the bloc is unlikely to change its regulatory stance -- leaving sectors like automotive and pharmaceuticals particularly exposed.
European leaders, including Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni and French President Emmanuel Macron, have called for de-escalation. Von der Leyen's engagement helped delay the tariffs, and both sides have pledged to intensify dialogue ahead of the new deadline.
Although not directly involved in the dispute, Britain faces its own trade headwinds. A recent report by the Centre for European Reform found that UK trade grew just 0.3 percent annually between 2019 and 2024, with real exports of goods falling 20 percent over the same period.
While London has signed trade deals with the United States, India, and the EU, analysts have downplayed their impact. One recent analysis described the U.S. deal as merely a tool to "limit the damage" from broader trade frictions.
"Despite the UK's bilateral agreements, the reverberations of a broader U.S.-EU trade conflict will still have negative economic consequences here," Bain said. "Hopefully, a deal can be reached to prevent further tariff walls."
With the July 9 deadline looming, pressure is building on both sides of the Atlantic to reach an agreement and avert a confrontation that could ripple far beyond Europe and North America.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Sikkim locals fume as India-Nepal climbers ‘defile' sacred Kangchenjunga, world's third-highest peak
Sikkim locals fume as India-Nepal climbers ‘defile' sacred Kangchenjunga, world's third-highest peak

The Star

timean hour ago

  • The Star

Sikkim locals fume as India-Nepal climbers ‘defile' sacred Kangchenjunga, world's third-highest peak

KOLKATA: It was in May 1955 that a British mountaineering team successfully climbed Kangchenjunga, the world's third-highest mountain at 8,586m, for the first time. But members of this expedition did not step onto the peak of the mountain on the border of Nepal and India. They instead stopped about 1.5m short of the summit, in deference to the wishes of locals in the region, who venerate this Himalayan mountain and did not want the climbers to sully its sacred peak by stepping onto it. More than 70 years later, locals in the small Indian state of Sikkim, which lies in the heart of the Himalayas between Nepal, Bhutan and Tibet, are fuming over a mountaineering team having done just that. A team comprising representatives from the Indian and Nepalese armies scaled Kangchenjunga's peak in two waves on May 19 and 20, as part of the Indian government's Har Shikhar Tiranga (Hindi for 'A Tricolour Atop Every Peak') initiative aimed at hoisting the Indian national flag on the highest point in all 28 Indian states. The expedition, which flagged off on March 26, was organised by the National Institute of Mountaineering and Adventure Sports (Nimas), which functions under India's Ministry of Defence and is based in the north-eastern state of Arunachal Pradesh. As the Indian side of the mountain remains closed to climbers, the team approached it from Nepal. Nevertheless, the ascent to the top of Kangchenjunga has angered locals in Sikkim, particularly members of the Bhutia and Lepcha communities, most of whom are Buddhists and consider the mountain as a guardian deity who has watched over them and their land for generations. 'They have defiled the sanctity of our Kangchenjunga,' said Tseten Tashi Bhutia, the convenor of Sikkim Bhutia Lepcha Apex Committee (Siblac) – an organisation that represents the rights and interests of these two communities – and a former minister with a previous state government in Sikkim. The controversy has ignited concerns that the centuries-old religious and cultural traditions of indigenous Buddhist communities in Sikkim, India's second-smallest state with a population of around 632,000, were disregarded to generate patriotic fervour. It also highlighted the power dynamics between the central government, which organised the climb, and the state government, which expressly prohibits any climb atop Kangchenjunga. Sikkim has maintained a formal climbing ban atop Kangchenjunga since 2001, one that followed another controversy in 2000 when the state government allowed an Austrian team to attempt the near-vertical trek up the peak in exchange for US$20,000. The team failed to make it to the summit. 'Whatever has happened, has happened. Now damage control has to be done,' Bhutia told The Straits Times, stressing the need for a 'purification ritual' to placate their guardian deity. He also called for an apology from the climbers as well as the central government that organised the climb and the state government that failed to stop it. 'This type of blunder should also not be repeated in the future,' he added. Neither the climbers nor the Indian government has issued any statement following the controversy. ST approached Nimas for a comment but did not receive a response. On June 12, Siblac issued a statement saying that the recent climb had 'deeply hurt the religious and cultural sentiments' of the Bhutias and Lepchas, and formally called for an apology. The Lepchas believe they are descendants of ancestors who were created out of the snow of the holy Kangchenjunga. Locals in the state also celebrate their unique relationship with the mountain during Pang Lhabsol, an annual festival that commemorates the consecration of Kangchenjunga as the guardian deity of Sikkim. Siblac will organise a Buddhist purification ritual on June 15 at the Kabi Lungchok sacred grove in North Sikkim to seek the deity's forgiveness and 'restore the spiritual harmony and sanctity of our land'. It was at this historic forest site that the Blood Brotherhood Treaty was signed between the Lepchas and Bhutias in the 13th century, marking the beginning of Sikkim's unified rule. Kangchenjunga was invoked as a witness to the signing of this key treaty. Locals fear angering their guardian deity could cause natural disasters, something the state has often been afflicted with. On June 1, a landslide hit the site of an army camp in Sikkim following days of heavy rains, killing at least six individuals. Anger following the ascent has been widespread in Sikkim. A video of Sikkimese children pleading with everyone not to climb their revered mountain has been circulating online and even Sikkim's Chief Minister Prem Singh Tamang, who heads the state government, expressed his concern. He wrote to India's Minister of Home Affairs Amit Shah on May 24 describing the recent ascent as 'a violation of both the prevailing legal provisions and the deeply held religious beliefs of the people of Sikkim'. Sikkim has maintained a formal climbing ban atop not just Kangchenjunga but also eight other sacred peaks since 2001. However, ascents are made from time to time from the Nepalese side of Kangchenjunga. But Bhutia said the expedition team, irrespective of their approach path, had violated the sacred peak. 'They have blown the law (preventing any ascent on Kangchenjunga) to smithereens,' he said. In his letter, Tamang also urged the Indian government to convince Nepal to ensure that no further expeditions are permitted on Kangchenjunga. The demand for such a climbing restriction is not unique. China, for instance, prevents any climbing activity on Mount Kailash in Tibet, given its deep religious significance for followers of not just Buddhism, but also Hinduism, Jainism and Bon, an indigenous religion practised in Tibet. Even Nepal, which has otherwise embraced mountain tourism enthusiastically, bans climbing on Machhapuchhare, an iconic 6,993m mountain whose name translates to 'fishtail' and which is revered by local Gurung people. Jiwan Rai, a political commentator based in Sikkim's capital Gangtok, said it is important to view Kangchenjunga similarly through a 'time-honoured Sikkimese lens', one that does not consider the mountain as a 'trophy for adventurers' but a symbol of cultural heritage and 'the pinnacle of religious identity' for a significant section of the state's people. 'This centuries-old indigenous world view now stands desecrated for the sake of some thrill to be felt by army personnel. Isn't that a massive cultural cost?' Rai told ST. Furthermore, the recent ascent of Kangchenjunga is being seen as an affront to not just Sikkimese cultural and religious values, but also their political rights. Rai added that the Sikkim state government had failed to uphold its rights by not preventing the Indian government-led climb despite its official ban on any ascent atop Kangchenjunga. 'This lapse reveals the current government's inability to withstand pressure from the centre. The only way to disprove this perception is by firmly demanding recompense for the violation of law and redress for the cultural sacrilege,' he said. The state is currently governed by the Sikkim Krantikari Morcha (SKM), a regional party that Chief Minister Tamang leads as its president. The SKM is part of the National Democratic Alliance government at the centre, led by the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party. Siblac had opposed the ascent publicly as early as April, with a letter sent to the state's Governor O. P. Mathur, requesting him to call off the expedition. The governor of an Indian state is appointed by the Indian president on the advice of the prime minister and serves as its constitutional head, taking decisions based on the advice of the chief minister and council of ministers. Said Rai: 'A widespread perception is emerging that India is steering towards a uniform national identity, and a state with its distinct personality like Sikkim comes in the way. If Sikkim does not make its voice heard now, it risks losing its unique identity to India's broader and increasingly homogenised national narrative.' - The Straits Times/ANN

Trump vs a united Asean
Trump vs a united Asean

The Star

time2 hours ago

  • The Star

Trump vs a united Asean

US President Donald Trump's tariffs – especially the ultra-high 'reciprocal tariffs' that he says will be reintroduced on July 8 for any country that has not struck a trade deal with his administration – have sent countries around the world scrambling to respond, adapt, and limit the fallout. Asean's 10 members – Brunei, Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, Myanmar, the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, and Vietnam – have been among the most proactive. Their leaders quickly recognised that, after decades of spectacular gross domestic product growth, Asean is an economic force that the Trump administration would have to reckon with in a serious way. In 2000, Japan was the world's second- largest economy, some eight times larger than Asean; today, it is only 1.1 times larger, and by 2030, Asean's economy will overtake it. From 2010 to 2020, Asean contributed more to global economic growth than the European Union did. Asean owes much of this progress to open trade. Between 2003 and 2023, its trade with the rest of the world exploded, from US$618bil to US$2.8 trillion (RM11.9 trillion). But the real secret to Asean's success is strong and competent leadership, exemplified, in the grouping's early years, by Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew, a Cambridge-educated lawyer, and Indonesian President Suharto, a Javanese military leader and mystic. It was their unlikely partnership that kept Asean together. Today, such leadership is exemplified by another group of seeming political opposites: Malaysian Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim, Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto, Vietnamese General-Secretary Tô Lâm, and Singaporean Prime Minister Lawrence Wong. Anwar and Prabowo both experienced prolonged periods in the political wilderness and became friends during this time. Asean's leaders have upheld relative peace and stability in their countries while cultivating a culture of consultation and consensus (musyawarah and mufakat in Indonesian) in guiding regional relations. This stands in stark contrast to the experiences of many other developing countries and regions. Just a few weeks ago, neighbouring India and Pakistan narrowly avoided full-scale war. The Middle East remains gripped by instability and violence, with Israel winning wars and losing the peace. The leaders of Latin America's two largest economies, Brazil and Argentina, are barely on speaking terms. After 48 years of regular Asean meetings – with over 1,000 ministerial and lower-level meetings taking place annually – constructive engagement is a deeply engrained habit in the region. To be sure, Asean is often accused of lowest-common-denominator cooperation. But without such a measured approach, one guided by pragmatism, consensus-building, and compromise, Asean's member countries would not have managed to remain united through multiple shocks, including the Asian financial crisis of 1997-1998 and the global financial crisis a decade later. Asean is now bringing these strengths to bear in its response to Trump's tariffs. To be sure, the individualised nature of the tariffs – which vary widely within Asean, from 49% on Cambodia to 10% on Singapore – limits countries' prospects for true collective bargaining. But Asean's member states are well aware that they are stronger together. That is why, at the just-concluded Asean summit in Kuala Lumpur, hosted by Anwar, the group proposed a summit attended by Trump and Asean's 10 national leaders. This builds on Asean's April declaration that it would develop 'an enhanced, robust, and forward-looking Asean-United States economic cooperation framework', which strengthens 'constructive engagement' and drives 'innovative initiatives' to deliver a 'mutually beneficial economic relationship', with 'particular focus on high-value sectors'. The statement reflects Asean's awareness of its value to the US, which runs a significant trade surplus in services with the region. It is no coincidence that the US invests heavily there – nearly US$500mil (RM2.350bil) in 2023. Asean's value is set only to grow, owing not least to its efforts to deepen its ties with other regional organisations and economic powers. Its just concluded summit with China and the Gulf Cooperation Council – the first of its kind – sent a clear message: Asean is not pinning its future on its relationship with the US, but it is not turning its back on open trade. This aligns with the global mood: while Trump continues to brandish tariffs as a weapon against America's trade partners, other countries have refrained from raising tariffs unilaterally. Asean is also seeking to boost internal resilience by strengthening trade among its member countries. While intra-Asean trade has been declining as a share of total trade, from 25% in 2003 to 21.5% in 2023, this is only because trade with the rest of the world grew so rapidly. In any case, the group is now seeking to dismantle non-tariff barriers – more than 99% of goods already flow through Asean tariff-free – and exploring other measures to boost trade within the bloc. The US economy is formidable, and Trump's tariffs may well undermine Asean's growth in the short term. But by spurring the Asean countries to deepen cooperation with one another and with others, US tariffs could bring about an even more prosperous – and, crucially, resilient – grouping. This is especially likely if Asean makes the most of existing arrangements – for example, the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) and the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP), which could seek to negotiate a new partnership with the EU. Fortunately, Asean has the kinds of leaders who can spearhead such an effort, beginning with the bloc's current leader, Anwar. — ©2025 Project Syndicate Kishore Mahbubani, a distinguished fellow at the Asia Research Institute of the National University of Singapore, is the author of many books, including The ASEAN Miracle: A Catalyst for Peace. This article was first published by Project Syndicate.

Macron to Greenland in show of support after Trump threats
Macron to Greenland in show of support after Trump threats

The Sun

time2 hours ago

  • The Sun

Macron to Greenland in show of support after Trump threats

PARIS: French President Emmanuel Macron will travel to Greenland on Sunday carrying a message of 'European solidarity and support' for the Danish autonomous territory coveted by US President Donald Trump, located at the crossroads of the Atlantic and the Arctic. Macron will be the first foreign head of state to set foot on the vast territory -- roughly nine times larger than the UK, with 80 percent of its area covered in ice -- since Trump's annexation threats. Trump has repeatedly said the US needs the strategically located, resource-rich Arctic island for security reasons, and has refused to rule out the use of force to secure it. The deep sea, Greenland and Antarctica are 'not for sale', Macron said Monday at a UN oceans summit, remarks clearly directed at Trump's expansionist claims. 'I'm going to say: 'We're here, and we're ready to reinvest ourselves so that there is no preying'' on it, Macron said a few days ahead of his trip. Following his arrival in Greenland's capital Nuuk at 11:30 am (1230 GMT), the French leader will visit a glacier, a hydroelectric power plant and a Danish frigate. He will be accompanied throughout his visit by Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen and Greenlandic Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen. Macron's trip will be 'a signal in itself made at the request of Danish and Greenlandic authorities', his office said. 'Not for sale' The Danish invitation to Macron contrasts sharply with the reception granted US Vice President JD Vance, whose one-day trip to Greenland in March was seen as a provocation by both Nuuk and Copenhagen. During his visit to the US Pituffik military base, Vance castigated Denmark for not having 'done a good job by the people of Greenland', alleging they had neglected security. The Pituffik base is an essential part of Washington's missile defence infrastructure, its location putting it on the shortest route for missiles fired from Russia at the United States. Polls indicate that the vast majority of Greenland's 57,000 inhabitants want to become independent from Denmark -- but do not wish to become part of the United States. Denmark has also repeatedly stressed that Greenland 'is not for sale.' The Arctic has gained geostrategic importance as the race for rare earths heats up and as melting ice caused by global warming opens up new shipping routes. As a result, Copenhagen in January announced a $2-billion plan to boost its military presence in the Arctic region. NATO also plans to set up a Combined Air Operations Centre (CAOC) in Norway above the Arctic Circle, as Russia aims to bolster its military presence in the region. During his visit, Macron plans to discuss Arctic security and how to include the territory in 'European action' to contribute to its development, while 'respecting its sovereignty', his office said. Mount Nunatarsuaq Macron will also see firsthand the effects of climate change when he visits a glacier on Mount Nunatarsuaq, about 30 kilometres (19 miles) from Nuuk. Greenland's ice sheet melted 17 times faster than the historical average during a May 15-21 heatwave in Greenland, a recent report showed. France intends to 'massively reinvest in the knowledge of these ecosystems,' following the footsteps of famed French explorer Paul-Emile Victor who carried out multiple expeditions to Greenland, Macron's office said. Greenlandic authorities recently designated Victor's hut, built in 1950 in Quervain Bay in the north, as an historic structure. At a hydroelectric power station in Buksefjorden, located 600 metres inside a mountain and funded by the European Union, the three leaders will discuss Greenland's decarbonisation and energy supply. Unlike Denmark, Greenland is not part of the European Union but is on the list of Overseas Territories associated with the bloc.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store