Mediation between two unequals not possible: Shashi Tharoor on Trump's claims
Congress MP
Shashi Tharoor
has said that to suggest one can mediate between two unequals is not possible because there is no equivalence between terrorists and their victims, amid repeated claims by US President
Donald Trump
that he "helped settle" the tensions between India and Pakistan.
Tharoor, currently in the US leading a multi-party delegation on
Operation Sindoor
, made the comments in response to a question during a conversation at the
Council on Foreign Relations
here Thursday.
"...Mediation is not a term that we are particularly willing to entertain. I'll tell you why not. The fact is that this implies, even when you say things like broker or whatever, you're implying an equivalence which simply doesn't exist," Tharoor said.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Free P2,000 GCash eGift
UnionBank Credit Card
Apply Now
Undo
He said there is no equivalence between terrorists and their victims.
"There is no equivalence between a country that provides safe haven to terrorism, and a country that's a flourishing multi-party democracy that's trying to get on with its business," he said.
Live Events
"There is no equivalence between a state that is a status quo power that just wants to be left alone by its neighbours, where the neighbours don't agree with us, and a revisionist power that wants to upset the geopolitical arrangements that have existed for the last three-quarters of a century. There is no equivalence possible in these cases, and in these circumstances, to suggest that you can mediate between two unequals is not possible," Tharoor added.
Since May 10, when Trump announced on social media that India and Pakistan had agreed to a "full and immediate" ceasefire after a "long night" of talks mediated by Washington, he has repeated his claim over a dozen times that he "helped settle" the tensions between India and Pakistan.
He has also claimed that he told the nuclear-armed South Asian neighbours that America would do a "lot of trade" with them if they stopped the conflict.
On being asked how he would characterize the American role in the conflict, Tharoor said he is "guessing to some degree" that the American role would have been first of all to keep themselves informed, conversations on both sides, and "certainly my government received a number of calls at high levels from the US government, and we appreciated their concern and their interest."
He said that at the same time, the US must have been making similar calls at the highest levels to the Pakistan side, and "our assumption is that's where, because that's the side that needed persuading to stop this process, that may well have been where their messages really had the greatest effect. But that's guesswork on my part. I don't know what they said to the Pakistanis."
Trump repeated the claim as recently as Thursday when during a meeting with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz in the Oval Office, the US President said that he is "very proud" that he was able to stop the conflict between nuclear powers India and Pakistan.
"I spoke to some very talented people on both sides, very good people on both sides" and said that Washington will not do any trade deals with either "if you are going to go shooting each other and whipping out nuclear weapons that may be even affect us. Because you know that nuclear dust blows across oceans very quickly, it affects us," Trump said.
"You know what, I got that war stopped...Now, am I going to get credit? I'm not going to get credit for anything. They don't give me credit for anything. But nobody else could have done it. I stopped it. I was very proud of that," Trump added.
About two weeks after the horrific April 22 terror attack in Pahalgam in Jammu and Kashmir in which 26 civilians were killed, India launched Operation Sindoor targeting terror infrastructure in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir on May 7.
India and Pakistan reached an understanding on May 10 to end the conflict after four days of intense cross-border drone and missile strikes.
India has been maintaining that the understanding on cessation of hostilities with Pakistan was reached following direct talks between the Directors General of Military Operations (DGMOs) of the two militaries.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
17 minutes ago
- Mint
Donald Trump has many ways to hurt Elon Musk
THERE WAS a time, not long ago, when an important skill for journalists was translating the code in which powerful people spoke about each other. Carefully prepared speeches and other public remarks would be dissected for hints about the arguments happening in private. Among Donald Trump's many achievements is upending this system. In his administration people seem to say exactly what they think at any given moment. Wild threats are made—to end habeas corpus; to take Greenland by force—without any follow-through. Journalists must now try to guess what is real and what is for show. So it is with the break-up between Mr Trump and Elon Musk, the world's richest man and until last week a 'special government employee". A few months ago Mr Musk posted on X, his social-media platform, that he loved the president 'as much as a straight man can love another man". On May 30th, at a joint press conference in the Oval Office to announce Mr Musk's departure from government, Mr Trump called him 'an incredible patriot" and praised his work with the Department of Government Efficiency (known as DOGE). Yet by June 5th it had all broken down. On his Truth Social media platform the president posted that the billionaire was 'wearing thin" and 'went CRAZY". Mr Trump then threatened to 'terminate" his government contracts. Mr Musk responded on X, claiming that Mr Trump's name appears in the government's files on Jeffrey Epstein, the late financier who was convicted of trafficking and having sex with underage girls. 'That is the real reason they have not been made public," wrote Mr Musk. Later he agreed with a post saying that Mr Trump should be impeached. He also said he would begin decommissioning his Dragon spacecraft, which transports astronauts to the International Space Station. If carried out, the threats could be disastrous for both men. Mr Trump could lose a valuable donor and the supportive sway of X; Mr Musk's business interests could suffer enormously. But in response to a comment advising him to 'cool off", Mr Musk wrote 'good advice" and backtracked on his call to decommission the Dragon. Where things go from here is anyone's guess. The initial cause of the falling out between Mr Trump and his 'first buddy" was the president's so-called 'One Big Beautiful Bill". Mr Musk was incensed that the measure would add enormously to the deficit, and so undermine the work of DOGE. On June 3rd he escalated his criticism, calling the bill a 'disgusting abomination". On June 5th he added another complaint, saying that Mr Trump's tariffs are going to bring about a recession. Mr Trump has his own explanation for Mr Musk's sudden disloyalty. He says the Tesla CEO is unhappy because his bill would cancel a government subsidy for electric cars created by Joe Biden. If Mr Trump does decide to retaliate, the risks to Mr Musk and his businesses are extensive. The threats the president has already made, however, are the least credible. Cancelling the contracts of SpaceX, Mr Musk's space company, would be profoundly disruptive to the government. Without SpaceX rockets, it would struggle to put anything into space, including spy satellites. The Pentagon relies heavily on the firm's Starlink satellites. SpaceX itself could probably weather such moves. Though it has benefited greatly from government contracts, the firm's commercial revenues soared nearly three-fold last year, according to estimates by Quilty Space, a business-intelligence firm. Mr Musk has also wanted to cancel the Dragon spacecraft for some time. Steve Bannon, a former adviser to Mr Trump who is no fan of Mr Musk, has proposed even bigger penalties. He wants the South African-born billionaire to be stripped of his American citizenship—he says Mr Musk is an 'illegal alien"—and his companies nationalised under the Defence Production Act. Such actions also seem unrealistic. Stripping Mr Musk's citizenship would require a judge to rule he committed fraud. The Defence Production Act almost certainly does not permit sudden nationalisation, even if the country is at war. That does not mean Mr Musk can breathe easy, though. His interests are vulnerable to more routine measures. At the time he entered government in January, he and his companies were subject to 65 potential or actual regulatory actions by 11 federal agencies, according to the minority staff of the Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, an arm of the Senate. These include accusations that Tesla, Mr Musk's car company, lied about its self-driving technology; that Neuralink, his brain-implant company, violated the Animal Welfare Act with its experiments on monkeys; and that SpaceX repeatedly failed to follow the law when launching rockets. (As head of DOGE, Mr Musk was able to dismantle some of the agencies within the government investigating him, such as the Consumer Finance Protection Bureau.) One of the reasons why Silicon Valley magnates like Mr Musk rallied around Mr Trump last year was that he promised a more favourable regulatory environment. But 'there was always the risk that what they were buying instead were the conditions of oligarchy", says Donald Moynihan of the Gerald Ford School of Public Policy at the University of Michigan. That is, business leaders who are loyal to the president get to operate as they like, while those who are critical get the full force of the law. Mr Musk may be about to discover what life is like outside the tent. Perhaps on feeling the cold he will find a way back inside. © 2025, The Economist Newspaper Limited. All rights reserved. From The Economist, published under licence. The original content can be found on
News18
18 minutes ago
- News18
Vivek Ramaswamy's Photo Met With Racial Remarks Again. This Time Netizens Shut Trolls
Last Updated: Despite the hate, several users called out the unnecessary attacks directed towards Vivek Ramaswamy and questioned the racial double standards. The ongoing public fallout between Tesla co-founder Elon Musk and US President Donald Trump has taken an unexpected turn. It has now dragged Indian-origin Republican leader Vivek Ramaswamy into the spotlight. While the two heavyweights were engaged in a full-blown feud, Ramaswamy quietly posted a family photo which was met with a fresh wave of vicious trolling. The post in question showed Ramaswamy carrying his two children, Karthik and Arjun, with a caption that read, 'It's why we do it." But instead of being seen as a heartwarming moment, the picture sparked backlash online with users interpreting it as a sign of him distancing himself from the Musk-Trump standoff which is something that didn't sit well with many Americans. One user commented, 'Go fix India, anchor baby." 'Is there a scientific reason as to why I find this photo repulsive?" someone wrote. Some stood by Ramaswamy, expressing support and condemning the racist slurs being posted by users even using Grok for abuse. @grok change the background of this photo to a American White House— ThatuVadaiSettu (@ThatuVadaiSettu) June 6, 2025 @grok change the background of this photo to a garbage-filled street in India— Trevor Sutcliffe (@TrevorSutcliffe) June 6, 2025 An individual simply advised, 'Take care of your family. Protect your family. The rest is noise." Take care of your family. Protect your family. The rest is noise.— MAZE (@mazemoore) June 6, 2025 In the comments, some users even mocked his children for wearing shoes without socks. A person said, 'In America we wear socks," while another added, 'We wear socks under our shoes in America." In America we wear socks.— MongolianBeast (@MongolianBeast1) June 6, 2025 These comments were not random. They were linked to an earlier incident in March when Ramaswamy was trolled for being barefoot in his own home during an old interview. The photos had resurfaced online and many people mocked him for following the common Indian custom of removing shoes indoors. Some even wrote, 'We aren't in India." Another such racial attack on Ramaswamy surfaced just a few days ago. The Indian-origin entrepreneur had shared a post celebrating his 10th wedding anniversary with wife Apoorva. It included before-and-after pictures from 2014 and 2025 taken at the same spot in the Rockies. What should have been a personal and joyful moment also attracted hateful comments. Some users posted discriminatory remarks like – 'The beauty of the whiteness destroyed by brown" and 'Why do you both look 3-4 shades lighter? You didn't bleach your skin, did you?" In the fall of 2011, I met a brilliant medical student named Apoorva & asked her out on a first date – to head west for a weekend & hike Flattop Mountain in the Rockies. She accepted. We got within striking distance of the summit when a blizzard hit. I was foolishly stubborn… — Vivek Ramaswamy (@VivekGRamaswamy) May 26, 2025 The backlash ties into Ramaswamy's past remarks on the H-1B visa programme. Last year, he spoke about the need for more foreign workers but also called for major changes in the system. He said the process should be more merit-based and transparent. But he was slammed for allegedly favouring the replacement of American workers with Indian immigrants. He eventually stepped down from his role as co-chair of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), a position he was set to share with Musk. As of now, Vivek Ramaswamy is running for governor in the state of Ohio. About the Author Buzz Staff A team of writers at bring you stories on what's creating the buzz on the Internet while exploring science, cricket, tech, gender, Bollywood, and culture. First Published: June 07, 2025, 10:07 IST
Mint
20 minutes ago
- Mint
Pakistan reacts as PM Modi says Islamabad involved in Pahalgam attack
Pakistan said on Friday it was "dismayed" over Prime Minister Narendra Modi's remarks that Islamabad was involved in the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack in which 26 civilians were killed. Commenting on PM Modi's remarks, Pakistan's Foreign Office said it "firmly rejects the baseless and misleading remarks" made by PM Modi. 'We are deeply dismayed that the Indian prime minister has once again chosen to accuse Pakistan of involvement in the Pahalgam attack, without presenting a single piece of credible evidence,' it said in a statement, as per news agency PTI. PM Modi accused Pakistan of targeting "insaniyat and Kashmiriyat" through the terror attack in Pahalgam during his speech in Jammu and Kashmir on Friday. PM Modi reiterated that the April 22 Pahalgam attack was a stark example through which Pakistan "intended to incite communal violence in India and cripple the earnings of hardworking Kashmiris". 'What happened in Pahalgam on April 22 is a clear example of this. Pakistan attacked both insaaniyat and Kashmiriyat in Pahalgam. Its intention was to incite riots in India. Its aim was to stop the earnings of the hardworking people of Kashmir. That's why Pakistan targeted the tourists,' PM Modi said while addressing a rally in Katra after inaugurating the first direct train service to the Kashmir Valley. He added, 'The way the people of Jammu and Kashmir have stood up against Pakistan's conspiracy, the strength shown by the people this time has not only sent a strong message to Pakistan, but also to the entire world's terrorist mindset. Jammu and Kashmir's people have given a powerful response.' Earlier on Friday, the prime minister inaugurated the Chenab bridge and India's first cable-stayed Anji bridge, both symbols of India's engineering excellence, before flagging off Vande Bharat trains to mark the completion of the 272-km Udhampur-Srinagar-Baramulla railway link (USBRL) providing direct train connectivity to the Valley. About two weeks after the horrific terror attack in Pahalgam, India launched Operation Sindoor, targeting terror infrastructure in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir on May 7. India and Pakistan reached an understanding on May 10 to end the conflict after four days of intense cross-border drone and missile strikes. (With inputs from agencies)
