The Rise of Young Investors: How Gen Z is Shaping the Future of Online Trading
In an era defined by digital empowerment and financial self-awareness, a new generation is rapidly reshaping the investment landscape. Across the UAE and broader MENA region, Gen Z and millennial investors are entering the financial markets earlier than ever, armed with information, mobile apps, and a hunger to take control of their financial futures. What was once considered the domain of seasoned professionals or older, affluent individuals is now becoming more accessible—and increasingly, more youthful.
This shift is not just a passing trend—it's a fundamental transformation in how financial participation is viewed. At the heart of this movement is a convergence of technology, education, and platform accessibility. And leading this transformation in the UAE is Orient Finance, a Dubai-based online trading brokerage that has embraced innovation to empower the next wave of investors.
'We're seeing a seismic change in who is entering the markets,' says Mr. Seraj Khan, Managing Director of Orient Finance. 'Young investors are no longer passive spectators. They are active participants, curious learners, and confident decision-makers. At Orient Finance, we view it as both an opportunity and a responsibility to guide this demographic with the right tools, resources, and support systems.'
As trading becomes increasingly mobile-first and information-driven, platforms must evolve to meet new expectations. Orient Finance has taken a proactive stance by investing in education-first initiatives, simplifying its trading interface, and rolling out intuitive features that cater to both beginners and experienced users. From step-by-step trading tutorials to real-time market insights and risk management tools, the platform is designed to demystify the world of stocks, indices, and commodities for the digital generation.
Moreover, the company has recently increased its engagement through social media and interactive webinars, making financial learning both accessible and culturally relevant. With a strong emphasis on financial literacy, Orient Finance has introduced multi-language resources and personalized customer support to ensure young investors—especially in the expat-heavy UAE—feel confident navigating global markets.
The shift is being driven in part by broader economic realities. With inflation concerns, rising living costs, and a desire for financial independence, young people are actively looking for avenues to grow their income outside of traditional 9-to-5 roles. Online trading, when approached responsibly, offers a scalable and empowering opportunity to achieve those goals.
But with opportunity comes risk. 'We always emphasize responsible trading,' Mr. Khan adds. 'Our goal is to not just open doors, but to provide guidance that ensures long-term sustainability. That's why our platform places a strong emphasis on education, risk management, and client support.'
As the UAE continues to lead the region in fintech innovation, the rise of young investors is likely to accelerate further. And with platforms like Orient Finance staying ahead of the curve, the future of investing looks not only digital—but refreshingly youthful, informed, and inclusive.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Arabian Post
an hour ago
- Arabian Post
UAE Pushes for Trade Deal to Counteract U.S. Metal Tariffs
Arabian Post Staff -Dubai The United Arab Emirates and the United States are preparing to initiate negotiations for a potential bilateral trade agreement aimed at reducing or eliminating tariffs imposed during President Donald Trump's administration on UAE steel and aluminium exports. These tariffs include a baseline 10% duty and a specific 25% tariff on steel and aluminium—which the Trump administration plans to double to 50%. The UAE, whose steel and aluminium are significant non-oil exports and accounted for 8% of U.S. steel and aluminium consumption in 2024, is looking to leverage its history of swiftly concluded trade deals with nations such as India, Turkey, and Australia. While the U.S. may pursue a limited agreement rather than a full free trade pact, it is expected to be labeled a Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement , consistent with the UAE's past trade deals. ADVERTISEMENT The UAE, Washington's largest trade partner in the Middle East with $34.4 billion in bilateral trade in 2024, is also a major U.S. investor and security ally, hosting American troops and planning $1.4 trillion in future U.S. investments. Both sides reportedly responded positively to the idea during Trump's recent visit to Abu Dhabi, though a timeline for formal talks remains unclear. The Trump administration's decision to double tariffs on imported steel and aluminium to 50% took effect on June 4, 2025, impacting nearly all trading partners except the United Kingdom, which has a preliminary trade agreement with the U.S. The policy significantly affects major U.S. trading partners like Canada and Mexico, with Canada being the leading exporter of aluminium to the U.S. and both countries ranking high in steel exports. UAE-based steel producers expect to escape major impact from the latest move by the U.S. to double tariffs on steel imports. The new tariffs apply to all trading partners except the UK, which struck a preliminary trade agreement with the U.S. last month. However, steel manufacturers in the UAE don't anticipate a hard hit. The U.S. decision to double steel import tariffs 'may have an indirect effect on market dynamics but is not expected to materially impact Emsteel's business,' said Michael Rion, chief commercial officer at Emirates Steel, part of Abu Dhabi-listed Emsteel Group. The company has a 'modest exposure' to the U.S. market, with exports accounting for less than 2% of total annual sales. The UAE's push for a trade agreement with the U.S. is part of its broader strategy to mitigate the impact of increased tariffs and strengthen economic ties. The potential agreement, discussed during President Trump's visit to Abu Dhabi, seeks to address the challenges posed by the new tariffs and reinforce the economic partnership between the two nations.
Khaleej Times
3 hours ago
- Khaleej Times
UAE: Bank accounts for Eidiya? How some parents teach children value of saving
As the spirit of Eid brings families together across the UAE, many parents embrace a modern approach to an age-old tradition of saving their children's Eidiya in dedicated bank accounts. Eidiya, a cherished cultural practice in which children receive gifts often in the form of money from relatives during Eid Al Fitr and Eid Al Adha, has long been a source of joy for little ones. But today, many parents also see it as an opportunity to teach the value of saving from an early age. Amna Abdulaziz Al Nuaimi, mother of two-year old Aisha, told Khaleej Times she deposited her child's Eidiya into a bank account as soon as possible. 'She gets around Dh4,000 to Dh5,000 annually from family and friends on special occasions such as Eid,' Amna said. 'I save it all for her. I plan to keep saving all the money she receives until she's old enough to spend it wisely.' For Amna, separating her daughter's funds from her own is key. 'It's important to have a clear way of saving your children's money,' she said. 'If you mix it with your own, you forget what's theirs and what you've already spent.' Fatma Al Tenaiji, a mother of three, shares the same philosophy. She has opened individual bank accounts for her children Mohammed (10), Meera (6), and Ghanem (2) and deposits both their monthly savings and Eidiya gifts. 'Each month, I transfer Dh100 into each child's account. During Eid, they usually receive Dh300 to Dh400 each. I let them enjoy 25 per cent of that, and the rest goes straight into their savings,' said Fatma. Um Hasher opened accounts for her children Hasher (7) and Almaith (5) early on because she felt they deserved a place that was truly theirs to collect and manage their money. She explained that Eid and other festive occasions often bring cash gifts from all relatives: uncles, aunts, grandparents, and even neighbours. 'A bank account helps us track exactly how much our kids receive,' she said. 'Everything is organised and transparent. We don't lose track of the amount, and it helps us teach the kids how to divide their money between spending and saving.' Um Hasher makes it a point to document everything right after the Eid celebrations. 'I usually gather all the money, record the total, and then decide with the child how much we'll deposit into the account and how much they can keep to spend on simple treats,' she said. 'I never want to take away the joy of Eid from them, so I always let them keep a small amount to buy something they like while the rest goes into their savings.' By adopting these habits, parents across the UAE are not only protecting their children's financial gifts but also instilling early lessons in money management. Many say starting small, like saving Eidiya, can plant the seeds for future financial responsibility.
Arabian Post
5 hours ago
- Arabian Post
Renewed Race For Gulf-India Aviation Sector Trophy As Stakes Increase Further
By K Raveendran Strong signs of undercurrents are emerging in the aviation space between India and the Gulf. There is renewed tussle over landing rights — the coveted permissions that determine which airlines get to fly where, how often, and with how many seats. For years, this battleground has been tilted in favour of Gulf-based giants, particularly Emirates and later Etihad, both of which have entrenched themselves so deeply in the India-Gulf sector that they dominate passenger volumes, especially among the vast Indian expatriate population in the Gulf. But recent movements suggest that the terrain may be shifting again, albeit not necessarily in India's favour, raising concerns about whether past missteps are being repeated or even institutionalized. The first wave of this dominance came during the United Progressive Alliance (UPA) years, a period that aviation experts and political observers often recall with unease. During this time, India's aviation rights — especially in the high-demand Gulf sector — were offered up with a generosity that baffled many. The most glaring beneficiary was Emirates, which capitalised on India's fragmented aviation policy and the aggressive diplomacy of Dubai government. The role of Praful Patel, then Union Civil Aviation Minister, and N. Chandrababu Naidu, then Chief Minister of Andhra Pradesh, has often come under scrutiny for facilitating deals that disproportionately benefited Gulf carriers. The underlying implication, often whispered but never proven in courts, was that kickbacks were exchanged for each seat Emirates filled on its India routes — a suggestion that continues to fester in the collective memory of Indian aviation policy circles. At that time, Emirates enjoyed a distinct monopoly, owing largely to the fact that it was the sole UAE-based carrier of international standing. With Dubai's rise as a global aviation hub and Emirates' unmatched marketing muscle, the airline quickly scaled up its footprint in India, locking in prime time slots and lucrative routes with little resistance. In effect, Emirates became the default choice for millions of Indians flying to the Gulf and beyond, eclipsing the capacity and visibility of Indian carriers like Air India. This asymmetry didn't just result in a business setback for Indian aviation — it triggered a slow bleeding of India's aviation sovereignty. The profits, the passenger data, the traffic, and the global prestige of being a gateway carrier all accrued to Emirates, while Indian airlines floundered under the weight of policy paralysis and state apathy. Things became even more complicated when Etihad entered the fray. As Abu Dhabi's flagship carrier, Etihad's arrival introduced a new axis of influence in the India-Gulf aviation theatre. Where earlier it was just Emirates leveraging its ties with Indian authorities to expand its rights, now both Emirates and Etihad were competing not just with each other but also for the same slice of the Indian aviation pie. The diplomatic equation thus had to be recalibrated. No longer could Dubai's interests automatically translate into Emirates' gain. Abu Dhabi, backed by the UAE federal structure, began asserting its claim, demanding equitable treatment for Etihad. India, in turn, found itself in a quagmire. Granting more rights to one Gulf emirate risked offending the other. But instead of revisiting its entire bilateral framework or strengthening Indian carriers to hold their ground, Indian policymakers chose the path of least resistance: acquiescing to more requests from both sides. The result was that foreign carriers ended up with the lion's share of rights, while Indian carriers, with limited international ambitions and fleet capacity at the time, were left watching from the sidelines. Fast forward to today, and the script seems eerily familiar. Both Emirates and Etihad are once again lobbying for increased landing rights and additional seat allocations. This comes at a time when the dynamics of the aviation industry have evolved significantly. There is renewed focus on strategic aviation corridors, a post-pandemic surge in travel, and a stronger realisation globally that aviation is not just commerce — it is a soft power instrument. Yet despite all this, India appears to be on the verge of conceding even more ground. That this is happening without a thorough review of how previous concessions impacted national interests is particularly disheartening. A disturbing undertone to this situation is the re-emergence — or rather, the persistence — of the very individuals who were instrumental in the original giveaways. These actors, once thought to have exited the stage after presiding over what some call the 'Great Indian Aviation Surrender,' are now reappearing in various roles, emboldened by their earlier success and perhaps by the lack of accountability. The risk here is not just the erosion of market share but the institutionalization of a defeatist approach to aviation diplomacy, where India negotiates from a position of weakness rather than asserting its growing economic and geopolitical clout. However, the new player that adds an unexpected twist to this ongoing narrative is IndiGo. As India's largest airline by a considerable margin, IndiGo is no longer content with its domestic dominance. It wants in on the Gulf bonanza, and it is using its size, efficiency, and growing international aspirations to demand a bigger seat at the table. This changes the calculus considerably. For the first time in years, there's an Indian private player with both the appetite and the capacity to challenge Gulf airlines on their turf. IndiGo's entry into the fray has the potential to reshape the competitive landscape — provided, of course, the government aligns national policy with corporate ambition. To avoid repeating past mistakes, India must initiate a root-and-branch review of its bilateral air service agreements. The country needs a clear aviation doctrine — one that articulates when, how, and under what conditions foreign airlines may operate in India. This doctrine must prioritize Indian interests, encourage domestic capacity building, and align with broader national objectives. It must also be shielded from short-term political compulsions and the influence of lobbying networks that have historically undermined strategic policymaking. (IPA Service)
