
Kim Jong Un's Sister Reacts to South Korea's Olive Branch
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
North Korean leader Kim Jong Un's powerful sister has publicly rejected recent overtures from South Korea's new president, calling them a "serious miscalculation."
Kim Yo Jong, a senior official in the ruling Workers' Party of Korea, dismissed peace initiatives from South Korea's new President Lee Jae-myung as inadequate.
Kim dismissed Seoul's peace initiatives—including halting propaganda loudspeaker broadcasts along the border, restricting anti-North Korea leaflet activities, and offering opportunities for individual South Koreans to visit the North—and reaffirmed Pyongyang's refusal to engage in talks.
"We clarify once again the official stand that no matter what policy is adopted and whatever proposal is made in Seoul, we have no interest in it and there is neither a reason to meet nor an issue to be discussed," Kim said in a statement carried by North Korean state media on July 28.
South Korean officials responded by proposing adjustments to joint military exercises with the U.S.—a key point of contention for Pyongyang—in hopes of creating space for renewed dialogue.
Newsweek contacted South Korea's foreign ministry via email for comment on Monday.
Kim Jong Un's sister Kim Yo Jong arrives for the opening ceremony of the Pyeongchang 2018 Winter Olympic Games at the Pyeongchang Stadium in South Korea on February 9, 2018.
Kim Jong Un's sister Kim Yo Jong arrives for the opening ceremony of the Pyeongchang 2018 Winter Olympic Games at the Pyeongchang Stadium in South Korea on February 9, 2018.
PATRICK SEMANSKY/AFP via Getty Images
Why It Matters
Kim Yo Jong's statement marks the North's first official response to President Lee's diplomatic efforts since taking office in June.
The rejection arrives at a critical juncture as Seoul's new government seeks to deescalate regional tensions and revive stalled inter-Korean relations.
The dismissal from the North squashes hopes for near-term thawing of relations but also indicates Pyongyang's continuing pivot toward partnership with Russia, complicating efforts by the U.S. and its allies to counter North Korea's weapons development and contain growing security threats in Northeast Asia.
What To Know
In her official statement, Kim said: "If [Seoul], which had stoked the atmosphere of extreme confrontation in the past after unilaterally declaring the DPRK as its principal enemy, expected that it could reverse all the results it had made with a few sentimental words, nothing is more serious miscalculation than it."
She added: "No matter how desperately the Lee Jae-myung government may try to imitate the fellow countrymen and pretend they do all sorts of righteous things to attract our attention and receive international attention, there can be no change in our state's understanding of the enemy and they can not turn back the hands of the clock of the history which has radically changed the character of the DPRK-ROK relations."
Lee's administration has sought to signal goodwill by scaling back frontline anti-Pyongyang activities. It also repatriated six North Koreans earlier this month who had drifted into South Korean waters in March and May and had expressed their desire to return, Seoul's Ministry of Unification said.
South Korean President Lee Jae-myung and his wife Kim Hea-kyung are pictures at his inauguration at the National Assembly in Seoul, South Korea, on June 4, 2025.
South Korean President Lee Jae-myung and his wife Kim Hea-kyung are pictures at his inauguration at the National Assembly in Seoul, South Korea, on June 4, 2025.
Jeon Heon-Kyun/Pool/Getty Images
Lee's government has reiterated a commitment to dialogue and peace. Unification Minister Chung Dong-young revealed plans to propose scaling down or altering the format of joint South Korea-U.S. military drills, a measure intended to address the North's grievances and support ongoing diplomatic outreach.
Since the collapse of high-profile nuclear diplomacy between Kim Jong Un and President Donald Trump in 2019, North Korea has intensified development of nuclear weapons. Pyongyang officially declared a two-state system on the peninsula and cut off major communication links with the South.
North Korea has also strengthened ties with Russia, supporting Moscow's military actions and reportedly receiving economic cooperation in return. Despite President Trump's claims of positive personal diplomacy with Kim Jong Un, North Korea has not responded to calls for renewed talks.
For American policymakers, Pyongyang's intransigence complicates efforts to curb its nuclear program and maintain stability in Northeast Asia. U.S. security strategies are further challenged by North Korea's growing alignment with Russia and ongoing missile developments around the peninsula.
What People Are Saying
Kim Yo Jong, vice department director of the Central Committee of the Workers' Party of Korea, said in a statement on July 28: "We clarify once again the official stand that no matter what policy is adopted and whatever proposal is made in Seoul, we have no interest in it and there is neither a reason to meet nor an issue to be discussed."
South Korean Unification Minister Chung Dong-young said during a press conference on July 28, reported by The Korea Times, that he will propose adjusting the scale of South Korea-U.S. joint military drills. "The issue will be a key topic of discussion at the working-level National Security Council meeting scheduled for tomorrow [Tuesday]."
Leif-Eric Easley, professor of international studies at Ewha Womans University, told Associated Press on July 28: "Kim Yo Jong's comments are an effort to advance national pride by portraying North Korea in a superior position, despite its economic struggles and international pariah status. She also seeks to justify Pyongyang's weapons programs and divide Seoul and Washington by criticizing upcoming military exercises."
What Happens Next
South Korean officials are expected to meet with U.S. defense counterparts to discuss the proposed adjustments to upcoming joint military exercises.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Newsweek
23 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Project 2025 Architect Challenges Lindsey Graham for Senate
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Paul Dans, a chief architect and co-author of the controversial Project 2025 policy blueprint, is launching a Republican primary challenge against GOP Senator Lindsey Graham in South Carolina, according to an Associated Press interview announcing the run. Dans is set to formally announce his campaign this week at an event in Charleston, joining what is already becoming a crowded field for the November 2026 midterm election. Newsweek reached out to Dans' office via email and an online form for Graham on Monday for comment. Why It Matters This primary challenge represents a significant test of loyalties within President Donald Trump's Make America Great Again (MAGA) movement and the Republican Party. Despite Trump's early endorsement of Graham, Dans believes his Project 2025 vision offers a path to further transform the federal government. Project 2025 is a 900-page document of policy proposals published by The Heritage Foundation think tank. It advocates limited government, border security and tough immigration laws among other conservative measures. The policy proposals have proved divisive, and Trump's critics and supporters alike have debated their influence on him. Before last year's presidential election, Democrats accused Trump of planning to implement Project 2025 if he won. While Trump initially called parts of the plan "ridiculous and abysmal," he told Time after his win that he disagreed with parts of it, but not all of it. He has since appointed a number of people linked to Project 2025 to White House positions. Who Is Paul Dans? According to his Senate campaign site, Dans grew up in a family dedicated to public service and academia. His father, Peter Dans, was a respected professor of medicine at Johns Hopkins University, while his mother, Colette Lizotte, was a French teacher and former chemist at the National Institutes of Health (NIH). After excelling at Dulaney High School in debate and athletics, Dans earned degrees from MIT in economics and city planning before obtaining his law degree from the University of Virginia where he served as president of the campus Federalist Society chapter. Dans spent two decades practicing commercial litigation in New York City at prestigious firms including Debevoise & Plimpton LLP before establishing his own practice in 2009. He gained recognition as the intellectual architect of the "Chevron outtakes" case, helping the oil company combat a $27 billion fraud allegation related to pollution in Ecuador through innovative legal tactics that earned him acclaim in legal circles. His transition to government service began with Trump's 2016 campaign where he worked in Pennsylvania to help secure the state's electoral votes. Dans joined the Trump administration in 2019 at the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) before advancing to the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) as White House liaison and later chief of staff. Trump appointed him to a six-year term as chairman of the National Capital Planning Commission in January 2021. In his most prominent role, Dans served as director of the 2025 Presidential Transition Project at The Heritage Foundation until July 2024. Under his leadership, the project developed a comprehensive "battle plan" for federal agencies, built a database of over 10,000 vetted conservative candidates, and conducted training seminars like "Deep State 101" to empower appointees. Dans expressed delight at the implementation of Project 2025's agenda under the second Trump administration, describing it as "beyond my wildest dreams." Dans is married to Mary Helen Bowers, a former New York City Ballet dancer and founder of Ballet Beautiful fitness brand. They have four children and live in Charleston. Who Are the Other Candidates? Other candidates have formally announced their campaigns for the Senate seat in an early start to the election season. The full field of candidates challenging Graham in South Carolina includes: Democrats: Annie Andrews, Brandon Brown, Catherine Fleming Bruce, Kyle Freeman, Christopher Giracello, and Lee Johnson Republicans: André Bauer and Mark Lynch Libertarian: Kasie Whitener Independents: Jack Ellison and Reece Wright-McDonald Graham, in an appearance Sunday on NBC's Meet the Press, did not discuss his reelection campaign or potential candidates challenging his seat. Paul Dans, then-director of The Heritage Foundation's Project 2025, speaks at the National Conservative Conference in Washington, D.C., on July 10, 2024. Paul Dans, then-director of The Heritage Foundation's Project 2025, speaks at the National Conservative Conference in Washington, D.C., on July 10, 2024. DOMINIC GWINN/Middle East Images/AFP via Getty Images What People Are Saying Paul Dans told the AP: "What we've done with Project 2025 is really change the game in terms of closing the door on the progressive era. If you look at where the chokepoint is, it's the United States Senate. That's the headwaters of the swamp." He later added: "To be clear, I believe that there is a 'deep state' out there, and I'm the single one who stepped forward at the end of the first term of Trump and really started to drain the swamp." Chris LaCivita, a senior adviser to Graham's campaign who co-managed Trump's 2024 bid, told the AP: "After being unceremoniously dumped in 2024 while trying to torpedo Donald Trump's historic campaign, Paul Dans has parachuted himself into the state of South Carolina in direct opposition to President Trump's longtime friend and ally in the Senate, Lindsey Graham." What Happens Next? Dans will launch his campaign with a prayer breakfast followed by his formal announcement in Charleston on Wednesday.


Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Georgia Senate GOP Candidate Misspells Georgia In Campaign Announcement
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Georgia Representative Mike Collins on Monday joined the field challenging Democratic U.S. Senator Jon Ossoff in next year's senate race. But there was a slight error in Collins' official campaign kickoff video: it misspelled the name of his home state, calling it "Georiga" in a brief graphic that can be seen below. Mike Collins is ready to put the hammer down and get it done. — Mike Collins War Room (@TeamOverhaulGA) July 27, 2025 Why It Matters Collins' campaign announcement comes as Republicans have named Georgia a top priority to gain a Senate seat in the 2026 midterms. The second-term member of Congress is entering a packed field: U.S. Representative Buddy Carter is running, while the state's insurance commissioner, John King, recently dropped out. Derek Dooley, the former football coach at the University of Tennessee, is also expected to run, according to the Associated Press. What To Know Collins took aim at Georgia's incumbent senator, Jon Ossoff, in his video announcement released Monday. "I don't know who Jon Ossoff really works for, but it sure as heck isn't Georgia," Collins said in the video, against images of him shooting guns and standing in front of a semitruck. "It's time to send a trucker to the U.S. Senate, steamroll the radical left, deliver on President Trump's 'America First' agenda and put the people of Georgia back in the driver's seat." Collins had been considering a Senate run since Georgia Governor Brian Kemp announced in May that he would not run against Ossoff, AP reported. Ossoff and Raphael Warnock delivered a massive win to Democrats when they picked up Georgia's two Senate seats in 2020, the first time in 15 years that Georgia was represented by two Democratic senators. This is a breaking news story. Updates to follow. The Associated Press contributed reporting to this story.


Miami Herald
2 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Why Scotland's protests about Trump should concern every American
'Convicted US Felon to arrive in Scotland,' read the headline on the front page of Friday's Scotland's newspaper, The National. The headline, referring to President Donald Trump, seemed like a joke, but it was real — and a sad commentary on how the people of Scotland view the president. I wasn't disheartened because I felt the paper was inaccurate — it wasn't. I was disheartened by the lack of respect in those words. The negativity didn't end with a headline. On Saturday, Trump played golf at his course in Turnberry, Scotland. Meanwhile, hundreds of protesters flooded the streets of Britain to protest his visit. The Stop Trump Coalition —'a group of campaigners across the UK determined to resist Trump and Trumpism' — organized the protests Saturday, which included signs protesters waved: 'No to Trump,' 'Trump not welcome' and 'Scotland Hates Trump.' Some protesters objected to Trump's policies on immigration, climate change and the war on Gaza — but the overwhelming focus was personal. They didn't reject the policy alone. They rejected America's president. Regardless of your personal feelings for Trump, this chilly reception should give you pause. I get it — Trump is a convicted felon. Yes, there are still questions about his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. And no, Trump is not the statesman Americans are used to seeing in the Oval Office. But this disrespect for him extends to the office he holds. And that's bad for the United States now and in the future. In fairness, Trump isn't without culpability. He has spent years making politics personal, insulting opponents and threatening world leaders, often prioritizing personal feuds rather than focusing on policy. The vitriol on display in Scotland didn't come out of nowhere. Additionally, his own disregard for presidential decorum has created a permissive structure that allows others to abandon restraint and follow his lead. But as my mother used to say, two wrongs don't make a right. While our allies have previously disagreed with America's foreign policy, our critics generally respected the office, if not the occupant. During a visit to London in 2003, for example, protesters opposed former President George W. Bush's policy on Iraq and his relationship with Blair. The protests were over the Iraq War, not Bush's character flaws. A similar protest happened in 1984, when thousands of demonstrators in London rallied against then-President Ronald Reagan's nuclear policy during an economic summit. The protest was organized by the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament, and when asked about its goal, Roger Spiller, a deputy president of the group, said, ''This is not an anti-American protest, but one opposing Mr. Reagan's policies.'' The protests in Scotland were different. They called Trump a dictator and a felon, focusing on his character and his presence in Scotland, rather than calling for policy changes. That distinction matters. When I first started in politics, there was an unspoken rule: Never call your opponent a liar. Now that's the starting point. And the lack of civility hasn't just taken hold here in America. It's been exported. It's sad but not surprising that this is where we find ourselves. Public vilification of the leader of the free world has serious implications. Some may argue that Trump deserves this type of backlash given his checkered history and questionable behavior. But that argument is short-sighted. When protesters attack the person rather than the policies, they're diminishing the institution itself. And if we normalize these personal attacks, it sets a precedent that won't end with Trump's presidency. We can — and should — debate policies. That's a hallmark of a healthy democracy. But when an American president is greeted with public disrespect by from citizens of an allied nation, it threatens something larger: the respect for democratic institutions. Preserving that institutional respect isn't about protecting Trump. It's about protecting the office of the presidency for whoever comes next. Mary Anna Mancuso is a member of the Miami Herald Editorial Board. Her email: mmancuso@