
NSW budget 2025 winners and losers
Property developers are the big winners in the New South Wales government's 2025 budget, while injured workers' insurance is in the spotlight as Labor fights to bring down spending.
The premier, Chris Minns, and the treasurer, Daniel Mookhey, have found room for a handful of big-spending items but are leaving much of the state's cost-of-living support to expire.
Here are the winners and losers from Tuesday's state budget.
Housing developers could soon have the government as a guarantor, opt to build their own infrastructure or get permanent tax breaks on build-to-rent projects.
Developers are the big winners from Labor's third budget and the beneficiaries of the government's new measures to address the housing crisis.
The government will put up $1bn to buy homes in case developers can't get their sales over the line. Smaller developers had been crying out for such a system to guarantee pre-sales so they could start building projects without waiting to line up all the home buyers.
About 5,000 homes are expected to be built over the next five years with the help of the guarantee. Technically, the scheme is expected to cost the government nothing at all, unless developers can't find real customers to move in – in which case the state buys the homes.
The government is also allowing developers in NSW to choose to build infrastructure such as roads and parks themselves, instead of paying a levy of $12,000 per lot, also meant to speed up the construction of new housing.
Those working on build-to-rent developments will also enjoy a permanent tax break, with Labor making their 50% land tax discount permanent, when it was initially set to expire in 2039.
New schools, preschools and school buses are on the way for outer Sydney and regional NSW, while today's students will benefit from improved Tafe facilities.
Primary schools and new public preschools will be built in Emerald Hills, Grantham Farm and West Dapto, while a new high school will be built in Wilton. The four schools are expected to accommodate 2,500 students, while another nine schools will get major upgrades.
Thirteen comprehensive public schools will get a share of $50m for new libraries, laboratories and art and design workshop, targeted at gifted students. Another $2m will go to school careers fairs and work experience to encourage teenagers into trades.
Sydney's outer suburbs and some coastal regions will also see more regular school bus services, with the government committing an extra $150m to add to timetables including $26m to buy new buses.
People looking to work in construction will have a shot at snagging one of the 23,000 extra fee-free apprenticeships and traineeships the government will fund at a cost of $40.2m over two years.
In a bid to boost housing supply and ease shortages of plumbers, carpenters and electricians, the government will also encourage 4,800 workers into residential construction over next two years by formalising qualifications for migrants and other workers with unrecognised skills and helping workers specialise into trades.
Those workforce measures make up part of $300m of new spending on TAFEs for this year, along with money to repairing campuses, converting teachers from casual to permanent and moving Bankstown TAFE so it can be replaced with a new hospital – the cost of which has blown out by a further $700m.
The 17,000 children living in foster care in NSW are the focus of $1bn in new spending on out-of-home care services.
Foster carers will see their tax-free allowance rise by a fifth, which would see the carer of a typical 14-year-old rise paid $1,056 per fortnight, up from $880. Extra money will be invested in the system including $191.5m to recruited more than 200 new caseworkers.
The measures aim to lift the decline in the number of carer households after it fell to just 12,500, leaving non-government organisations responsible for a rising share of children children in out of home care in NSW.
Visitors to Western Sydney's airport will find it easier to get around the yet-to-be opened aerotropolis with new funding to build roads and install street signs.
The project already has $2.55bn allocated for the next four years but will now cost nearly $150m more, including $30m to put over 1000 new green directional signs across Sydney pointing motorists to the airport precinct.
Sign up to Breaking News Australia
Get the most important news as it breaks
after newsletter promotion
Another $50m will be spent on road upgrades, nearly $40m to plan new road connections and nearly $30m for an incident management to handle accidents and traffic delays.
A new police boat, to be called the Nemesis, will be sent to sea at a cost of $46.3m allowing NSW police to conduct extended offshore operations.
Law enforcement will also get an extra $6m to spend on communications and analysis equipment to as they investigate and disrupt crime. Police last year received one of the biggest pay rises granted in the NSW public sector.
Cost-of-living relief is fading from the state budget as Labor's signature road toll cap expires. No new income support measures were announced and the toll relief measure, which saw the government reimburse motorists for their weekly toll costs above $60, will cease at the end of 2025.
Minns decried Sydney's costly 'tollmania' before he was elected and committed $15.4m in 2025 to a new NSW Motorways body but promised reforms are yet to be announced.
The previous year's budget's flagship cost-of-living measure, encouraging more doctors to bulk bill by offering lower payroll tax, remains in place but with no additions.
Ahead of delivering 2025's budget, the government celebrated that NSW had the second-lowest expenditure and debt as a share of state economic activity in the country.
NSW household budgets have been been stretched further than other states amid soaring living costs. The state has the second-weakest household spending per person of any state, after declining since late 2022, Commonwealth Bank has found, resulting in sluggish growth in jobs and retail sales.
The government remains focused on cutting workers' compensation spending as it pushes to turn the budget to surplus.
Insurance expenses have blown out by nearly $900m since the end of 2024 and is expected to rise further when the schemes are revalued, which the treasurer attributes mostly to workers' compensation.
After Labor's proposed cuts to the compensation scheme were delayed by the state's parliament, the government is identifying the scheme as the leading pressure on government coffers – ahead of natural disasters, even though expenditure on natural disasters has increased more than 1,000% in the six years since the 2019-20 bushfires compared to the six years prior.
The long-promised 'great koala national park' has received no additional funding despite being a centrepiece of the state government's environment policy. Mookhey told Guardian Australia the government was making progress, after putting $80m aside in the last budget for planning the first stage and was developing a forest industry action plan.
Conservation groups calls to have an entire proposed 176,000-hectare site assessed and included as part of the park in northern NSW to protect it from logging have fallen on deaf ears.
Since Labor's 2023 election victory, more than 10,000 football fields of forests have been cut down in the footprint of the promised park, according to a coalition of groups campaigning for urgent action.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
23 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Anthony Albanese criticised for ‘vindictive' move after Coalition MPs see staff numbers slashed
Anthony Albanese has been labelled 'vindictive' by the opposition after cutting its staffing numbers in the wake of Labor's thumping election win. Pauline Hanson also claims One Nation was denied its fair share of advisers after doubling its Senate seats, accusing Albanese of a 'capricious and politically motivated' move against the rightwing party. Almost seven weeks on from the election and with federal parliament set to resume on 22 July, Albanese has finalised staffing allocations for opposition and crossbench MPs for the next term. The prime minister has discretion over the allocation of personal staff, which are typically more senior advisers who assist MPs with policy development, political strategy and media. After weeks of uncertainty, Albanese informed the opposition leader, Sussan Ley, late on Monday night that the opposition would lose roughly 20 personal staff roles, including 16 senior adviser positions. The Coalition had 106 personal staff positions before the election, 39 of which were based in the former opposition leader Peter Dutton's office. Labor sources confirmed Albanese's decision was based on the Coalition's diminished numbers after it lost 15 lower house seats and three Senate spots at the 3 May election. Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email Albanese also decided to cut about 10 of the government's own positions, reducing its overall staffing numbers despite gaining 21 new MPs and senators at the election. The government had 499 positions in the last parliament, including 65 in Albanese's office. The Coalition maintained it was entitled to 21% of the government's allocation under a longstanding parliamentary convention, which would equate to about 102 positions for Ley's team. Instead, the opposition would receive about 85. Those roles would be spread across Ley's 30-member shadow ministry, which was a similar size to Dutton's frontbench. The shadow special minister of state, James McGrath, said Albanese's 'vindictive and nasty' decision was an 'attack on accountability'. 'The Australian people deserve an opposition that is resourced appropriately to be able to hold the government to account, especially during such a precarious and challenging time for our country,' McGrath said. The Greens' staffing numbers had also been cut after the loss of three seats and defection of Dorinda Cox reduced their numbers in federal parliament from 15 to 11. Guardian Australia understands the Greens will receive about 3% of the government's share, which equates to roughly 14 positions – down from 19 in the previous term. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion Albanese infuriated crossbenchers at the start of the last term after slashing their staffing allocation in one of his first acts as prime minister. The government eventually handed all parliamentarians an extra electorate officer – an increase from four to five – to help them manage the workload. Several independent MPs and senators confirmed to Guardian Australia that their staffing numbers were unchanged from the previous term. However, Hanson was furious with One Nation's allocation. The Senate crossbenchers – including Hanson and her colleague Malcolm Roberts – were allocated two senior advisers each in the previous term. But after One Nation won two extra seats at the May election, Albanese has allocated the party four adviser positions – just one for each senator. 'Adequate staffing only applies if the prime minister doesn't deem you a political threat,' Hanson said. 'I will seek an urgent meeting with the prime minister in an effort to renegotiate the staff One Nation are allocated.' The prime minister's office was contacted for comment. In a statement to Guardian Australia, a government spokesperson said it was 'routine practice to revise staff allocations in a new parliamentary term'. 'Staffing allocations are made based on a range of considerations, including demonstrated need and individual circumstances,' the spokesperson said.


Reuters
35 minutes ago
- Reuters
Australia regulator and YouTube spar over under-16s social media ban
SYDNEY, June 24 (Reuters) - Australia's internet watchdog and YouTube exchanged barbs on Tuesday after the regulator urged the government to reverse a planned exemption for the Alphabet-owned (GOOGL.O), opens new tab video-sharing platform from its world-first teen social media ban. The quarrel adds an element of uncertainty to the December rollout of a law being watched by governments and tech leaders around the world as Australia seeks to become the first country to fine social media firms if they fail to block users aged under 16. The centre-left Labor government of Anthony Albanese has previously said it would give YouTube a waiver, citing the platform's use for education and health. Other social media companies such as Meta's (META.O), opens new tab Facebook and Instagram, Snapchat (SNAP.N), opens new tab, and TikTok have argued such an exemption would be unfair. eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant said she wrote to the government last week to say there should be no exemptions when the law takes effect. She added that the regulator's research found 37% of children aged 10 to 15 reported seeing harmful content on YouTube - the most of any social media site. "This is not a fair fight where our kids are concerned, vis-a-vis social media sites," Inman Grant told the National Press Club in Sydney. She said social media companies deployed "persuasive design features" like recommendation-based algorithms and notifications to keep users online and "YouTube has mastered those, opaque algorithms driving users down rabbit holes they're powerless to fight against". YouTube, in a blog post, accused Inman Grant of giving inconsistent and contradictory advice, which discounted the government's own research which found 69% of parents considered the video platform suitable for people under 15. "The eSafety commissioner chose to ignore this data, the decision of the Australian Government and other clear evidence from teachers and parents that YouTube is suitable for younger users," wrote Rachel Lord, YouTube's public policy manager for Australia and New Zealand. Inman Grant, asked about surveys supporting a YouTube exemption, said she was more concerned "about the safety of children and that's always going to surpass any concerns I have about politics or being liked or bringing the public onside". A spokesperson for Communications Minister Anika Wells said the minister was considering the online regulator's advice and her "top priority is making sure the draft rules fulfil the objective of the Act and protect children from the harms of social media".


BBC News
40 minutes ago
- BBC News
A5: Court decision shows reach of the climate change act 2022
The High Court judgement blocking the upgrade of the A5 road shows the reach and impact of Stormont's climate change has implications not just for the A5 but for other road projects and possibly wider areas of Stormont policy, such as means that when ministers are proposing big construction projects they will need to clearly show how they comply with climate does not mean the A5 upgrade is dead. The judgement is clear that shortcomings in the project can be remedied. However, it may mean the scope of the upgrade has to be revised or that trade-offs will have to be made with other schemes being cancelled or roads expert Wesley Johnston has suggested that it is "likely to take years rather than months" to assemble the technical evidence to support the scheme in anything like its current Assembly passed the Climate Change Act in 2022, legally committing Northern Ireland to achieving net-zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050, with other binding targets along the is an ambitious policy which has major implications stretching into all areas of the economy and Act puts legal duties on Stormont departments to publish targets for cutting greenhouse gas emissions in their area of responsibility and plans for how they will get got off to a slow start as devolved government was effectively suspended between 2022 and 2024 when the DUP walked out in protest at NI's Brexit deal. Central to the implementation of the Act is Section 52 which requires Stormont departments to hit their own targets and cooperate to reach the overall net-zero his judgement Mr Justice McAlinden ruled that the Department for Infrastructure was in breach of Section 52 as it had failed to produce the evidence to show that upgrading the A5 would be consistent with overall climate found the department had instead made "aspirational assumptions".He said: "Section 52 does not prevent a major infrastructure project which is a source of significant greenhouse gas emissions being devised, promoted, constructed and put into operation."But what it does clearly rule out is the construction and operation of such a major project in the absence of robust planning, synchronisation and co-ordination between all NI government departments to ensure that the project fits into the plans, strategies and policies which map out a realistic and achievable pathway to achieving net zero by 2050." In those words the judge throws down two challenges to how the Executive conducts its means that implementing the climate change law is going to require greater coordination between also suggests that ministers will have to be more explicit about the trade-offs which will be necessary to reach the net-zero goal.