Scottish ministers urged to rethink ‘poor decision' on guga hunt licence
The group is urging the Scottish Government and its nature agency NatureScot to reverse the licence, which currently permits 500 of the infant birds to be culled.
The guga hunt has been an annual tradition in Ness, north Lewis, since the 15th century, with 10 men setting out for the rocky island of Sula Sgeir 40 miles away.
Uninhabited by humans, the island is home to thousands of pairs of breeding gannets, with the men spending two weeks there in August, taking the birds from open cliffs using a pole and noose, before the creatures are gutted, salted and preserved in brine.
Traditionally the preserved birds are said to have formed an essential part of the winter diet for the people of Ness, but guga is now regarded as a delicacy by some, although it is said to be an 'acquired taste'.
A NatureScot spokesperson said it recognises the 'cultural significance of the guga hunt', adding this was 'reflected in the provision to licence this traditional activity through the Wildlife and Countryside Act'.
They added that 2025 is the first year it had received a licence application from the Men of Ness – who carry out the guga hunt – since 2021.
The spokesperson continued: 'We have thoroughly assessed the application taking into account survey data and population analysis and we have granted a licence with a limit of 500 birds.
'This is significantly fewer than in previous years where up to 2,000 have been granted.
'This revised limit for 2025 safeguards the sustainability of the Sula Sgeir gannet population and allows for its continued recovery following avian flu.'
However OneKind chief executive Jason Rose said: 'Snatching wild baby birds from their nests and bashing their heads in, using the excuse of tradition, will appall and embarrass most people in the Western Isles and across Scotland.
'There is simply no need for this cruel activity to take place. We live in a modern society where we have many more choices about where our food comes from.
'The guga hunt is a grisly story from history that should be left in books or a museum.
'The Scottish Government and its nature agency have made a poor decision.
'Do they really think this kind of cruel and unnecessary activity is how anyone wants Scotland to be seen in the year 2025?
'OneKind will be writing to both NatureScot and Scottish ministers asking them to rethink. It's not too late to save these beautiful wild bird chicks.'
The Scottish Government has been contacted for comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scotsman
24 minutes ago
- Scotsman
Calls to stop wind farm in public forest home to Scottish wildcats rejected by Supreme Court
Claims have been made the wildcats in the forest are hybrids - a result of wildcats interbreeding with domestic or feral cats. Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Calls to stop more turbines in a forest with a population of wild cats have been rejected by the courts for a third time. Wildcat Haven, an organisation dedicated to conserving wildcats in the UK, has been fighting against plans for a second wind farm at the Clashindarroch Forest, near Huntly. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The development was granted consent by Scottish ministers in 2023. The campaign group, a community interest company, first lodged a petition calling for a judicial review into the decision to approve the wind farm. This was rejected by the Court of Session, twice. The proposed wind farm has been controversial with the local community and wildcat campaigners Wildcat Haven then lodged a third appeal with the Supreme Court which was rejected this week. The courts said the applicant did not raise an arguable point of law in its appeal. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Wildcat Haven claims there are 13 wildcats living in the forest which is one of, if not the largest forest in Aberdeenshire. It is also known for its cross-country skiing trails and the Huntly Nordic Ski Club. Today only a few wildcats remain in remote parts of Scotland, though it has been claimed none are believed to be 'pure-bred' – numbers are so low that some experts have concluded the species is 'functionally extinct' in the wild Vattenfall, the developer, already has an existing wind farm in the forest. The Swedish company claims the wildcats recorded in its survey work and that of Forestry Land and Scotland and Scottish Wildcat Action have been identified as hybrids - a result of wildcats interbreeding with domestic or feral cats. Wildcat Haven disputed this claim, with director of the organisation Paul O'Donoghue describing the company's findings as 'truly shocking.' He said the new 14-turbine development would be 'a disaster' for the wildcats, arguing research has shown such developments threaten the species. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Mr O'Donoghue added: 'We have been fighting for seven years. The forest is still there, the wildcats are still there and we are prepared to fight for another seven years and longer, to protect those precious wildcat and their beautiful forest home.' Matt Bacon, Vattenfall's UK head of onshore wind market development, said: 'The Supreme Court decision marks the fourth time this matter has been before the courts, and the consent has been upheld at every level of the UK judicial system.'
.jpeg%3Fwidth%3D1000%26auto%3Dwebp%26quality%3D75%26crop%3D3%3A2%2Csmart%26trim%3D&w=3840&q=100)
Scotsman
2 hours ago
- Scotsman
Edinburgh's 11 top secondaries where pupils earned at least 5 Highers
Earning a diverse array of Highers is a great way for secondary school pupils to set themselves up for future success. Today (August 5) is SQA results day, with pupils and students across the whole of Scotland receiving the long-awaited outcomes of their Nationals and Highers exams in the mail throughout the morning. To mark the occasion, we've taken a look at the state-funded secondary schools within the City of Edinburgh council area that had particularly high rates of pupils earning at least five of these important qualifications, according to the most up-to-date data (currently for the 2023/24 school year). We based this on the Scottish Government's recently updated breadth and depth of qualifications data, specifically the proportion of each school's candidates that attained five or more. This is a fantastic achievement not only for pupils and their families, but for the school community as a whole. And while these rates are far from the only way to measure school success - they're still worth celebrating as an outward sign of what kind of learning environment it provides. Here were the 11 schools in and around Edinburgh that topped the list: 1 . Boroughmuir High School At the top of the list is Boroughmuir, a secondary school in the Fountainbridge area. In the 2023/24 school year, an astounding 74% of its pupils attained five or more Highers. | Google Photo Sales 2 . James Gillespie's High School Next up is James Gillespie's, a secondary school in the Marchmont area. In the 2023/24 school year, 68% of its pupils attained five or more Highers. | Google Photo Sales 3 . St Thomas Of Aquin's High School St Thomas Of Aquin's is a Catholic secondary school in the Lauriston area. In the 2023/24 school year, 63% of its pupils attained five or more Highers. | Google Photo Sales 4 . Craigmount High School Craigmount is a secondary school in the East Craigs area. In the 2023/24 school year, 61% of its pupils attained five or more Highers. | Google Photo Sales Related topics: EdinburghSchoolsStudentsParentsBoost
The National
3 hours ago
- The National
Scots should be telling the stories of our culture and traditions
I'm a tradition bearer and I recently watched an event at the Scottish Storytelling Centre focused on traditional Scottish folktales. The performance was polished, comedic and theatrical (and I'm sure many enjoyed it) but something didn't sit right. The lead storytellers were from England, yet the stories being told were deeply Scottish. If I went to a folklore centre in England, I'd expect to hear English voices telling English stories. That's cultural authenticity. READ MORE: 'The perfect stage': Kelpies to host first outdoor evening ceilidh When Scottish storytellers who have dedicated their lives to keeping traditions alive – often learning directly from communities, elders and oral sources – are passed over in favour of those who have only recently discovered the tradition, through books or academia, it starts to feel less like cultural celebration and more like cultural opportunity. We rely on the likes of Tracs (Traditional Arts and Culture Scotland), funded by the Scottish Government, to help protect and promote our living heritage, especially after generations of damage caused by centralised London rule. So much of our culture, language and oral tradition has been eroded. Spaces for renewal and revival are vital. But what does it say when our stories are so often performed by those not rooted in that heritage? I've noticed the same pattern elsewhere, too. A storyteller in residence appointed by the National Museum of Scotland and the host of the National Library's Teatime Tales podcast both appear to be from England. That in itself is not the issue. But when the same handful of individuals are repeatedly given platforms to tell Scottish stories while many incredible Scottish storytellers with deep roots in Highland and Lowland tradition are overlooked, it raises serious questions. Many now market themselves as traditional storytellers, yet often change the way the stories are told. They add flourishes, theatrical gestures, even alter the structure and meaning, often to make them more entertaining for a modern audience. That may be engaging for some but when it comes to inherited cultural material, that approach can cross a line. It stops being preservation and starts to look a lot like performance. In some cases, it edges into appropriation. READ MORE: Record number of young Scots headed to university after exam results I love to see people learn about and embrace Scottish culture, whether from England, Wales, Bahrain, or Peru. But cultural heritage is about lived experience, lineage and community connection. Around the world, we respect that. You wouldn't expect a first-generation Canadian to become the official storyteller of Native American traditions, not because they can't appreciate or love those stories, but because inherited traditions carry weight, responsibility and cultural authority. Why is it so controversial to say the same about Scotland? Why should someone who's just moved up from Little Codling-on-the-Wold and read a few books be given a national platform to tell Scottish folktales over tradition bearers such as the late, great Sheila Stewart or Duncan Williamson, whose families carried the tradition for generations through memory, song and speech? I'm not suggesting this is malicious but I think we need to ask whether decisions about who gets the platform are being made for the right reasons. Is there a kind of closed circle forming where connections, familiarity, and funding have more influence than authenticity or cultural grounding? Across our cultural institutions – museums, heritage bodies, arts organisation or libraries – many of the leadership roles are held by people who aren't from Scotland. When almost all of those in charge of shaping how Scotland's culture is preserved and presented come from outside the culture itself, it's worth asking what's being lost in the process. I've also noticed a tendency for people in the arts to describe themselves as 'Scotland-based'. READ MORE: Royal Edinburgh Military Tattoo issues statement to fans after show cancellation I don't believe anyone should be made to feel unwelcome. If you've lived here long enough to truly live the tradition, to absorb it through community, language, and experience, and you carry that with care and respect, then great. But when it comes to public leadership, funding, and representation of Scottish culture – especially in institutions specifically funded to protect it – that space should be led by people who aren't just 'based here' but carry the story in their bones. We've spent generations fighting to reclaim our voice in language, story, music and art. We mustn't hand it over to those with no deep, lived connection to them, just because they have the right contacts, know how to fill in a funding form, or perform well in front of an audience.
