Reform-led Durham county council scraps climate emergency declaration
Durham county council, which has had an overwhelming Reform majority since the May local elections, passed a motion to rescind a declaration made in 2019. More than 300 local authorities have declared a climate emergency.
It voted instead to declare a County Durham care emergency, a move described as 'cynical and insulting' by the Liberal Democrat councillor Mark Wilkes.
He said there was a financial case as well as an environmental case for keeping the declaration.
Wilkes said the council's climate action had helped save more than £13m in the last year alone. He added that stopping work on tackling the climate crisis would risk the loss of external funding. It ran the risk of less money to invest in social care, he said. 'This is not an either-or.'
During a sometimes fractious and bad-tempered debate on Wednesday, the Reform council leader, Andrew Husband, said the authority was now driven by data and common sense.
'During the Roman-occupied era not far away from County Durham, around 45AD, there is evidence of Roman vineyards along Hadrian's Wall. This is because the Roman period in Britain is known for having a relatively warm climate which would have been conducive to growing grapes. Mind, how the climate has changed,' he said.
Kenny Hope, a Reform councillor, accused the Lib Dems of being in favour of adult and child slave labour. He said the mining of material for lithium batteries was 'rife with child slavery' as was the production of solar panels in China.
'I do not believe in child or adult slave labour and I believe the guys on this side of the house also do not believe in it. But I believe the guys on the other side must believe in adult or child slave labour because they have not took that into consideration,' he said.
Darren Grimes, a former GB News presenter, prolific tweeter and now deputy leader of the council, proposed the motion and accused his opponents of wanting to make local residents 'colder and poorer … shame. Shame. Shame.'
He said Durham was done 'with expensive virtue-signalling tripe' and said the 2019 declaration was 'a feel-good' one chasing 'net-zero rainbows while the likes of China belch out coal more than Sauron's Mordor'.
Afterwards, Jonathan Elmer, one of the council's two Green members, described some of what he heard in the debate as 'bonkers'.
He said the vote represented 'a very dark day' for the council. 'Eighty per cent of the population do believe in the climate emergency and want to do something about it. Durham has an administration that doesn't. They've got a head-in-the-sand, don't-look-up approach,' Elmer said.
Sign up to First Edition
Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters
after newsletter promotion
Wilkes said he was concerned for his nine-year-old son. 'I want to know he can grow up and live in a country and on a planet that is safe. There is a personal aspect to everything, isn't there?'
On Monday, the energy secretary, Ed Miliband, warned MPs about the climate crisis, saying he would explicitly call out politicians who rejected net zero policies for betraying future generations.
The duration of the Durham council debate was short because of rules limiting it to 30 minutes. A move by Wilkes to have a fuller debate was voted down by Reform.
The rules also meant there was no time for another motion by Grimes to strengthen what he described as free speech protections in the code of conduct for elected members.
Before the debate, about 200 protesters gathered outside county hall with banners and placards highlighting the climate crisis.
'Reform is asking you bury your head in the sand,' read one. 'Our children need a healthy world,' said another.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
a few seconds ago
- The Guardian
It's not just about building houses – communities need infrastructure to grow
There is a very real danger that, in its bid to reform the planning system and build 1.5m homes across England at pace, the government will neglect the basic requirements of livable communities ('No shops, no schools': homes in England built without basic amenities, 27 July). As your article makes clear, already 'thousands of homes across England are being built without urgently needed community infrastructure'. The planning system cannot allow such fundamental aspects of quality, sustainable placemaking to be neglected. It would do well to recognise the solution offered by a landscape-led approach to development. Landscape is everywhere – not just in protected countryside, but in every high street and cul-de-sac. It is the setting in which we all live, study, work and play. By thinking landscape first and engaging landscape architects early, planners and developers can design-in essential community infrastructure from the outset, creating resilient places that deliver what people need. So, let's build quality as well as quantity by prioritising GöhlerPresident, Landscape Institute One of the problems with the way we build homes in England is that local people have no role beyond complaining and objecting. In one case in your article, the community offered to finish off and run a community centre if the developer would just build the shell. But the idea that communities could roll up their sleeves and build, own, run these things just isn't considered by our housing and planning systems. The developer considered and rejected the idea; the community had no say. In a small but growing number of places this opposite is happening. Communities are gaining a seat at the table in the design and build-out of new homes, and taking ownership of shops, playgrounds, open space, community centres and affordable homes. Developers have to work with, and negotiate with, local people over what is built. This little bit of leverage and agency, achieved through a community land trust, builds better places with a stronger sense of community. The Labour government has talked a lot about supporting communities. The prime minister recently spoke of people tired of being excluded from decisions about their own lives. Here's your chance, Sir Keir, to include them in decisions about housing by wiring community agency and ownership into the planning ChanceChief executive, Community Land Trust Network
Telegraph
3 minutes ago
- Telegraph
How Leftists seized control of Britain's doctors' union
The origins of the transformation stretch back to 2020, when a grouping of Corbynite doctors within the union formed the Broad Left coalition. The name stems from a Communist Party strategy to 'capture positions within a union' and take it over. Its logo is a stethoscope arranged to look like a hammer and sickle. By 2022, the coalition seemed to have increasingly joined hands with a larger group of young activist doctors called DoctorsVote – which is mainly dedicated to winning massive pay rises for resident doctors. And in the spring of that year, the two groups combined to seize dozens of seats on the BMA council, the union's foremost decision-making body. In a vote to determine the makeup of the council for the following four years, Broad Left/DoctorsVote candidates secured 26 of the 69 places up for grabs. Since then, their influence has only grown. Indeed, a 2023 Policy Exchange report – 'Professionalism is not relevant' – concluded the union had been 'taken over by young, self-declared 'entryists' in a planned campaign similar to that [orchestrated] in the Labour Party at the time of Jeremy Corbyn's leadership'. 'It is very sad to see what was basically a well-rounded organisation that covered so many issues of importance to a wide range of doctors being hollowed out by the angry activism around residents' pay, Gaza and LGBT issues,' says Mark Pickering of the Christian Medical Fellowship, which counts many BMA members in its ranks. 'It is very similar to the way Momentum took over the Labour Party from the inside. We saw then how people started using democracy to try to dismantle democracy and that's what it seems has happened here. 'You had these two groups come in and they all vote for each other… and that's shifted what happens at the annual meetings, where BMA policy is formed.' As the union has become ever more of a crucible for Left-wing politics, members appalled by the takeover have begun to leave. First out the door have been many Jews, who have been dismayed by the union's response to the war in Gaza. Last month veteran doctor Robert Winston told The Telegraph he had resigned as a member of the BMA after 61 years due to a combination of his disgust with the strikes, the union acting 'highly politically' in recent times and its failure to tackle anti-Semitism among doctors.
The Guardian
3 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Journey times up, deaths down: Welsh 20mph speed limit still divisive two years on
A few weeks ago, two groups of protesters gathered on the steps of the Senedd in Cardiff Bay. One demonstration was against the war in Gaza, the other against the Welsh government's two-year-old default 20mph speed limit in urban areas. The change from 30mph was brought in by the Welsh Labour government across about 35% of the country's roads in September 2023, at a cost of £34m. The reduced speed limit applied to any built-up area, defined as roads where lamp-posts were no more than about 180 metres apart. Last week a small study by GoSafe, which monitors road cameras, found the policy had added an average of two minutes to journey times of differing lengths, aggravating an already bitter culture war over legislation designed to save lives. Collisions along roads that have changed from 30mph to 20mph decreased by 19% in 2024 compared with 2023, and 100 fewer people a year have been killed or badly hurt in road traffic accidents, according to Welsh government figures. Yet according to canvassing Senedd members and local councillors, the issue remains deeply unpopular with voters as the country's embattled Labour administration gears up for Senedd elections next May. The former first minister Mark Drakeford, who spearheaded the policy, has previously said he was surprised at the level of opposition and anger the new limit provoked. The backlash included protests, defacing and knocking down new speed limit signs, and a petition signed by nearly half a million people opposing the policy – the largest in the Senedd's history. Phil Jones, a chartered engineer and transport planning expert who chaired the Welsh government taskforce on establishing 20mph default, said the policy was working 'exactly as intended'. 'There's nothing preventing local authorities from putting the limit back up. We reviewed practices in other places, journey times, economic impact; none of this should be a surprise,' he said. 'Say all the roads go back up and casualties go up again too. What is an acceptable death toll that justifies getting to work two minutes faster? That's what people who want to get rid of it need to answer.' More than 130,000 drivers – or 34% of people with licences in Wales – have been caught breaking the lower limit since it was introduced, while the most recent YouGov polling, from a year ago, found seven in 10 people opposed the 20mph default. The Welsh Conservatives have consistently called for the law to be scrapped over what the party says is the confusion and frustration it causes for drivers. Sam Rowlands, the shadow cabinet secretary for transport, said: 'It's a hard balance to strike but as a country we've been doing this risk assessment for decades, and we landed on 30mph. It's a huge waste of taxpayer money.' Ken Skates, who caught the hospital pass on his appointment as transport cabinet secretary in March 2024, was quickly forced into a partial climbdown, giving councils £5m to reassess local speed limits over what he described as 'consistent' concerns. Last month, Wrexham began changing 52 roads back to 30mph. Newport council has named 14 roads where the speed limit will go up again, while in Blaneau Gwent one road has changed back, and in Ceredigion no changes are planned.
