Tennessee couple gets creative recouping their $8.1K from cabinetmaker after he disappeared with their deposit
The Wrights's renovation disaster began when they placed an order at Riverwoods Home Furnishings in Tennessee for $16,200 worth of custom cabinets.
I'm 49 years old and have nothing saved for retirement — what should I do? Don't panic. Here are 6 of the easiest ways you can catch up (and fast)
Thanks to Jeff Bezos, you can now become a landlord for as little as $100 — and no, you don't have to deal with tenants or fix freezers. Here's how
Want an extra $1,300,000 when you retire? Dave Ramsey says this 7-step plan 'works every single time' to kill debt, get rich in America — and that 'anyone' can do it
Since the company was well-known for offering custom-made cabinets and handcrafted furniture, the retired couple had no reason to doubt Ronnie Wheelock, the company's owner. In fact, as WATE reports, the Wrights happily gave Wheelock an $8,100 deposit upfront.
But the delivery date for the cabinets came and went before the couple discovered the store had unexpectedly closed in October 2024. And while some people might have given up in this situation, the Wrights took a different approach — one that required a little creativity and some legal expertise.
When Wheelock closed his store for good, he reportedly left a handwritten note on the door at his warehouse stating that 'all orders will be fulfilled or deposits returned.' But the Wrights's order was never fulfilled, and despite telling WATE over the phone that he'd give the Wrights their money back, Wheelock never returned the $8,100 deposit.
The Wrights then decided to file a civil lawsuit against Wheelock for breach of contract, and despite the fact that they won, they soon realized their issue with Wheelock was far from over.
'We got our civil judgment, but that's all they do,' Steve Wright shared with WATE. 'So we figured out, hey, we need to do work on our own.'
Taking matters into their own hands, the Wrights decided to do their own reconnaissance, looking for opportunities that could help them enforce the court judgment. Turns out both Steve, a retired firefighter, and Tammy, a retired Sheriff's deputy, are quite familiar with the law.
'We had actually taken pictures of the vehicle,' said Steve, referring to Wheelock's company van. 'I never thought anything about it when I did it.' And to their pleasant surprise, those photos ended up giving Tammy all that she needed.
'From the plate number, I was able to gain the VIN number,' Tammy shared with WATE. 'With the VIN number I was able to go to the secretary of state and file a motor vehicle lien. Then took that paperwork to the clerk's office and filed the execution. Then the sheriff's department picked it up and sent it to auction, where it sold for $24,000.'
Read more: No millions? No problem. With as little as $10, here's of diversified assets usually only available to major players
A car lien is typically used when someone finances a vehicle. When a borrower finances a car, the lender will place a lien on that car until the borrower can pay off the loan. If the borrower were to fall behind on their payments, the lien allows the lender to repossess the vehicle, sell it at auction and use the profits to cover the rest of the loan balance owed.
But this is not the only use for a car lien, as there are other types of liens that can come from legal claims and unpaid debts. For example, a judgement lien allows a creditor to put a lien on your car if you fail to pay off a court-ordered debt. And since the court ordered Wheelock to pay the Wrights back, the Wrights went about enforcing the court's ruling by placing a lien on Wheelock's van.
Once Wheelock's van was repossessed and sold at auction, the Wrights got their $8,100 deposit back — plus $600 for legal fees — while the remaining $15,300 went to Wheelock. The latter was then charged with theft and remains in jail as he's been unable to make bond ahead of his next court appearance in July 2025.
'I warned him karma was coming,' said Steve.
While the Wrights got their money back, many others who run into similar home renovation issues aren't as lucky.
According to the Federal Trade Commission, a total of 81,925 home improvement scams were reported in 2024, with the average combined financial losses from such scams coming in at $13.8 million per year, according to Inspection Support Network.
The FTC, however, has some tips on how to spot a shady contractor before giving one your business. Here are a few things to look out for:
People showing up at your door offering their services. These contractors often say they're already doing work in your neighborhood, or that they have materials left over from another job.
Someone that pressures you into making a quick decision about home improvement work.
Contractors that ask you to pay for everything up front or request that you pay in cash.
Contractors asking you to apply for any required building permits.
Contractors advising you to borrow money from someone they know.
If you've hired a shady contractor for home improvements and they're refusing to give your money back, you can take a page from the Wrights's playbook and file a civil lawsuit. You have rights, and as the Wrights demonstrated, there are ways to push back when a contractor tries to walk away with your money.
This tiny hot Costco item has skyrocketed 74% in price in under 2 years — but now the retail giant is restricting purchases. Here's how to buy the coveted asset in bulk
Robert Kiyosaki warns of a 'Greater Depression' coming to the US — with millions of Americans going poor. But he says these 2 'easy-money' assets will bring in 'great wealth'. How to get in now
Rich, young Americans are ditching the stormy stock market — here are the alternative assets they're banking on instead
Here are 5 'must have' items that Americans (almost) always overpay for — and very quickly regret. How many are hurting you?
Money doesn't have to be complicated — sign up for the free Moneywise newsletter for actionable finance tips and news you can use.
This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
6 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Why Amazon Stock Is Plummeting Today
Key Points Amazon's shares slipped after Q2 earnings revealed slower-than-hoped-for AWS growth that lagged growth seen by its rivals. New tariffs imposed by President Trump complicate its operations. 10 stocks we like better than Amazon › Shares of Amazon (NASDAQ: AMZN) are falling on Friday, down 8.3% as of 3:28 p.m. ET. The move comes as the S&P 500 and Nasdaq Composite have lost 1.7% and 2.3%, respectively. Amazon released its Q2 financials, which, while beating many of Wall Street's expectations, fell short of lofty targets in a few key areas. News of additional tariffs is also affecting shares. Amazon's cloud business is growing, but not fast enough for some investors Amazon's Q2 earnings report revealed the company beat consensus estimates for both earnings per share and revenue. The company delivered $1.68 per share on $167.70 billion in sales, while $1.33 per share on $162.09 billion was expected. However, investors were paying close attention to growth in the company's data center business, Amazon Web Services (AWS), and how it compares to its competition. The 18% year-over-year growth was much less than that of Microsoft's Azure or Alphabet's Google Cloud, which recorded 39% and 32% growth, respectively. Still, CEO Andy Jassy drove home the point that AWS is still by far the dominant player, saying, "I think the second player is about 65% of the size of AWS." Trump's new tariffs President Trump signed an executive order updating "reciprocal" tariff rates for many countries, with new rates from 10% to 41%, on the August 1st deadline. Markets appear to have thought another extension would be announced, and stocks are down across the board. Because of Amazon's reliance on international trade, its stock was hit particularly hard. Despite the tariff news and the somewhat underwhelming Q2 report, Amazon remains an incredibly profitable company with major growth potential. Should you buy stock in Amazon right now? Before you buy stock in Amazon, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Amazon wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $625,254!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,090,257!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,036% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 181% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 29, 2025 Johnny Rice has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Alphabet, Amazon, and Microsoft. The Motley Fool recommends the following options: long January 2026 $395 calls on Microsoft and short January 2026 $405 calls on Microsoft. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Why Amazon Stock Is Plummeting Today was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
6 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Micah Parsons' dad once named Chiefs, Steelers, Lions as preferred trade destinations
With Micah Parsons officially requesting a trade from the Dallas Cowboys, an old clip of his father, Terrence Parsons, talking about preferred destinations for his son in a hypothetical trade scenario has resurfaced. During an appearance on the "Life in the Stands" podcast in December 2024, Parsons' dad stated that his preferred trade landing spots for the superstar edge rusher are the Kansas City Chiefs, Pittsburgh Steelers, and Detroit Lions. "I know Pittsburgh fans are like, 'whoa,' but I'm sorry, him [Micah Parsons] and [T.J.] Watt together would be like cheating," Terrence Parsons said. "Him and [Aidan] Hutchinson together in Detroit would be like cheating. I love it. Kansas City, that's who they are right now." Parsons requested a trade out of Dallas due to the franchise's lack of communication with his agent. The 26-year-old's relationship with the Cowboys and owner Jerry Jones seems to be completely destroyed. Dallas has no plans of trading Parsons, but if they can't agree on a long-term extension with him, they may be forced to move him at some point. Parsons' father's landing spots for the four-time Pro Bowl edge rusher are bold. Adding Parsons to Kansas City's defense would be lethal, while pairing the disgruntled Cowboy with Watt or Hutchinson in Detroit would also be pretty much unstoppable. However, none of the teams Parsons' dad listed as preferred spots have the money to sign Parsons to a record-breaking extension. The Chiefs are slated to have negative $61 million in cap space next offseason, and the Steelers already have two expensive edge rushers in Watt and Alex Highsmith. As for the Lions, the team must prioritize getting an extension done with Hutchinson first, which likely takes them out of the running for Parsons. It's possible that Parsons lands with one of three destinations his dad spoke about during a podcast appearance last year, as all three franchises are playoff contenders, and two are legitimate Super Bowl contenders in Kansas City and Detroit. However, it remains to be seen whether any have the money to sign Parsons to a new deal after trading valuable picks for him while also keeping their core together. MORE:Infamous Raiders trade used as measuring stick for potential Micah Parsons deal
Yahoo
6 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Tesla ordered to pay $200 million in punitive damages over fatal crash
Tesla was found partly liable in a wrongful death case involving the electric vehicle company's Autopilot system, with a jury awarding the plaintiffs $200 million in punitive damages plus additional money in compensatory damages. The case, which took place in a Miami courtroom over the last couple of weeks, centered on whether defects in Tesla's self-driving technology ultimately contributed to the death of 22-year-old Naibel Benavides Leon in 2019. Along with the $200 million in punitive damages, Tesla was also ordered to pay around $43 million in compensatory damages directly to the plaintiffs. Leon was killed when a man driving a Model S Tesla equipped with Tesla's Autopilot technology plowed through a T-shaped intersection and struck her and her boyfriend Dillon Angulo. Angulo survived but was gravely injured. The federal jury held that Tesla bore significant responsibility in the incident and that George McGee, the Florida driver who lost sight of the road when he dropped his phone, was not entirely to blame. "Today's verdict represents justice for Naibel's tragic death and Dillon's lifelong injuries, holding Tesla and Musk accountable for propping up the company's trillion-dollar valuation with self-driving hype at the expense of human lives," said the plaintiffs' attorney Brett Schreiber in a statement shared with CBS News. The plaintiffs in the case originally asked for $345 million in damages during closing arguments on Thursday. During the trial, lawyers for the plaintiffs alleged that Tesla either hid or lost key evidence after a forensic data expert was able to recover data from the accident that Tesla said had been deleted. Tesla disputes ruling and will appeal "Today's verdict is wrong, and only works to set back automotive safety and jeopardize Tesla's and the entire industry's efforts to develop and implement life-saving technology," Tesla said in a statement to CBS MoneyWatch. "This was never about Autopilot; it was a fiction concocted by plaintiffs' lawyers blaming the car when the driver — from day one — admitted and accepted responsibility." Tesla also said it plans to appeal the decision. The case was a big test for the electric vehicle maker, which has been under scrutiny over the safety of its cars. Similar cases have been brought against Tesla, although many have been dismissed. "This will open the floodgates," said Miguel Custodio, a car crash lawyer not involved in the Tesla case. "It will embolden a lot of people to come to court." Arkansas officials reveal new details about Devil's Den murders of husband and wife Trump says nuclear subs to be positioned after former Russian president's remark Trump says he's ordered the firing of U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics commissioner