Senate confirms former Trump attorney Emil Bove as U.S. appeals court judge
The upper chamber voted 50-49 to green-light Bove's nomination to the Philadelphia-based U.S. Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit, which oversees cases from Delaware, New Jersey and Pennsylvania.
"He has a strong legal background and has served his country honorably. I believe he will be diligent, capable and a fair jurist," Sen. Chuck Grassley, an Iowa Republican who chairs the Senate Judiciary Committee, said of Bove on the Senate floor ahead of the vote.
Bove emerged as Mr. Trump's most controversial judicial pick so far, and former judges, prosecutors and other Justice Department employees had urged senators to reject his nomination. A Justice Department whistleblower alleged that Bove had suggested government lawyers should ignore court orders, prompting Democrats to unsuccessfully push for the Senate Judiciary Committee to delay a vote on his nomination. When the panel voted earlier this month to advance his nomination, all of the panel's Democrats walked out of the meeting in protest.
Two more whistleblowers have since turned over information about Bove to either the Justice Department's internal watchdog or lawmakers, according to the organization Whistleblower Aid, which represents one of the people, and the Washington Post, which reported on evidence given to Sen. Cory Booker, a New Jersey Democrat who sits on the Judiciary Committee.
Booker and Sen. Adam Schiff, a California Democrat, asked the Justice Department's acting inspector general on Monday whether he has launched any investigations related to Bove and said the allegations of misconduct are "troubling."
Bove was one of the lawyers who represented the president in his criminal cases and he joined the Justice Department as principal associate deputy attorney general when Mr. Trump returned to the White House for a second term. Bove also served briefly as acting deputy attorney general in the opening weeks of the second Trump administration until the Senate confirmed Todd Blanche, also a former defense lawyer for the president, to the No. 2 spot.
But former Justice Department prosecutors accused Bove of executing mass firings at the department of employees who were "perceived not to show sufficient loyalty" to Mr. Trump, including officials who worked on former special counsel Jack Smith's investigations into the president, which yielded two prosecutions that have since been dropped.
Bove was also at the center of a controversy involving the Justice Department's decision to drop its prosecution of New York City Mayor Eric Adams in exchange for cooperation with immigration enforcement. Several prosecutors who worked on Adams' case resigned after Bove directed them to dismiss the charges against the mayor and said the move appeared to be a quid pro quo.
But Bove brushed away the accusations, telling senators in a questionnaire to the Judiciary Committee that the decision to drop the five-count indictment against Adams was within the scope of prosecutorial discretion. He also said Adams' own submissions to the court refute the allegations of an "improper quid pro quo."
Bove also faced allegations of unethical conduct from a fired Justice Department lawyer, who filed a whistleblower report with lawmakers last month. The attorney, Erez Reuveni, claimed Bove suggested that the administration should ignore court orders regarding the administration's efforts to remove migrants under the wartime Alien Enemies Act.
Reuveni alleged that during a March meeting with senior department officials about removal flights, Bove suggested that the department would need to consider telling the courts to "f**k you" if a judge blocked deportations under the 1798 law.
Emails and text messages that Reuveni provided to senators include exchanges with a Justice Department colleague in which they appear to be referring to Bove's alleged directive regarding judicial orders.
A second Justice Department whistleblower submitted documents to the department's internal watchdog that supports Reuveni's claims, according to the organization Whistleblower Aid, which is representing the lawyer.
Reuveni worked at the Justice Department for nearly 15 years and had been promoted to acting deputy director of its Office of Immigration Litigation in March. But he was fired in April after telling a federal judge that Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a Salvadoran man who was deported to his home country in March, should not have been removed. An immigration official with the Trump administration had acknowledged in a March court filing that Abrego Garcia's removal was an "administrative error" and an "oversight."
Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee attempted to push the panel to delay the vote to advance Bove's nomination and allow Reuveni to testify, but Grassley rejected the move.
The White House and Justice Department have defended Bove and claimed that Reuveni was a "disgruntled former employee." Grassley lambasted Democrats for their handling of Bove's nomination and said they have tried to obstruct nearly all of Mr. Trump's nominees.
"The vicious rhetoric, unfair accusations and abuse directed at Mr. Bove by some on this committee, it has crossed the line," he said.
Blanche wrote in an op-ed for Fox News that Bove is "the most capable and principled lawyer I have ever known," and said his "legal acumen is extraordinary and his moral clarity is above reproach."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Buzz Feed
12 minutes ago
- Buzz Feed
Gavin Newsom Just Shut JD Vance Down With One Simple Map
In case you didn't know, Texas Republicans are redrawing the state's congressional districts in an attempt to gain five more seats to strengthen their narrow House majority in the 2026 midterm elections. A few weeks ago, Trump said he was encouraging them to do this. When asked if he wanted a complete redraw of the Texas map, Trump said, "No, just a simple redraw. We pick up five seats." Well, that potential new map was released today and it looks like this: Needless to say, Dems aren't happy about it, with some people calling on California and Gavin Newsom to do something: "Gavin Newsom if you can hear me save me Gavin Newsom. Save me Gavin Newsom." JD Vance must have been seeing these tweets because he sent out this one accusing California of gerrymandering, "The gerrymander in California is outrageous. Of their 52 congressional districts, 9 of them are Republican. That means 17 percent of their delegation is Republican when Republicans regularly win 40 percent of the vote in that state. How can this possibly be allowed?" That's when Gavin Newsom jumped in and responded with this: "Try again, dumb dumb." The map Newsom used appears to be from a 2024 map made by the World Population Review. Out of those 11 states, World Population Review says 10 favor Republicans. The 10 states that favor Republicans are Arkansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Texas, Utah, West Virginia, and Wisconsin. The one that favors Democrats is Maryland. Soooo, what happens next? The new Texas map will go to the Texas legislature for approval. Gavin Newsom has said he would try to redistrict in California, but that's not allowed under California law. Redistricting in California is carried out by an independent commission. One way new maps could be adopted in California is if the legislature drafts new maps and holds a special election for voters to approve them. I guess we'll see what happens next...
Los Angeles Times
12 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Texas Republicans propose new U.S. House map with more winnable GOP seats
AUSTIN, Texas — Texas Republicans on Wednesday unveiled plans for a new U.S. House map that would deliver on President Trump's goal of creating more winnable GOP seats before the 2026 elections, pushing ahead with a fast and unusual summer redrawing that Democrats have few options to blunt. The new map would create five new Republican-leaning seats that Trump is seeking as his party looks to bolster its chances of maintaining its slim House majority. Republicans hope to pass it during a special 30-day session of the GOP-dominated Legislature called by GOP Gov. Greg Abbott. Most of the changes target Texas' big cities, which are the few strongholds for Democrats in the booming state of more than 30 million residents. Trump had urged Texas to help the GOP, and his team has signaled that efforts could expand to other states, with a similar push underway in Missouri. 'My understanding is that there is a path forward for a Republican to win five more of those seats,' said Republican state Rep. Cody Vasut, chair of the Texas House's redistricting committee, on the new maps. But the effort has spurred a push by Democrats in California and New York to consider redrawing their districts as well to counter the GOP efforts. Democrats in Texas also are considering walking out to prevent the GOP from passing new maps before the special session ends Aug. 19, though Abbott could simply call another one. Republicans hold 25 of the state's 38 seats, and the new map ups the total they could win to 30. Had the same lines been in place in 2024, Trump would have carried each of the 30 districts by at least 10 percentage points, leading to conservative optimism despite what's likely to be a tough midterm environment for the party. Democratic California Gov. Gavin Newsom said on social media that 'The 2026 election is being rigged.' 'California won't sit back and watch that happen,' he posted on X. Legislators in Texas and and other states have walked out of legislative sessions before, hoping to thwart the other party, with mixed results. In 1979, a dozen liberal Democratic state senators in Texas who became known as the 'Killer Bees' bunked down in a staffer's garage and evaded Texas Rangers for four days, killing a plan to change the date of the state's GOP presidential primary to favor former Gov. John Connally. In 2003, when Texas Republicans also sought to redraw district lines in place for only one congressional election, Democrats fled to Oklahoma and New Mexico but failed to overturn the GOP plan. Republicans had taken full control of the Legislature in the 2002 elections for the first time since the 1870s, and their new congressional map allowed the GOP to pick up six seats in 2004, meaning they held 21 to the Democrats' 11. U.S. Rep. Greg Casar, whose seat would be drawn into a liberal district for Austin and San Antonio with fellow Democratic incumbent Lloyd Doggett, called the proposed changes 'illegal voter suppression,' because his district would be merged with another Democratic-held seat. 'Everyone who cares about our democracy must mobilize against this illegal map,' Casar said in a statement. The new seats come from making two Rio Grande Valley seats that have been narrowly won by Democrats recently slightly more Republican, collapsing the seats held by Casar and Doggett and turning two Democratic-held seats in the Dallas-Ft. Worth area into GOP-majority ones. Adam Kincaid, executive director of the National Republican Redistricting Trust overseeing GOP mapmaking, defended the proposal as beneficial for minority communities in Texas' two largest cities. He said the new map would create two new Black-majority seats, one in Dallas and the other in the Houston area, and one new majority Hispanic one. 'If you go through it, you're going to see that a lot of the communities that were broken up in the previous map were put together in this one,' he said. Trump has been pushing for redistricting in Texas with the explicit goal of making it easier for Republicans to defend their U.S. House majority. And Democrats are limited in their options for countering the GOP's efforts. In California, Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom has talked about redistricting, but an independent commission draws political boundaries. In New York, Democrats introduced a proposal this week that would allow a new map ahead of schedule, but it would require amending the state constitution, a change that must pass the Legislature twice and be approved by voters. The soonest new lines could be in place would be 2028. New York also has a nonpartisan commission that is supposed to come up with the state's congressional lines, though Democrats have in the past overridden the commission's map to draw districts that would be more favorable for their party. Democratic state Sen. Michael Gianaris, who is sponsoring the proposal, acknowledged the 2026 shortcomings of his legislation but said 'we can't just sit there and watch' as Texas redraw its maps. 'There may be opportunities elsewhere but this is not a battle that's going to be over in a year,' he said in a phone interview after Texas proposed its new map. 'Unfortunately this is just a new front in the manipulation in our democracy to gain political advantage.' During the first few days of Texas' special session, Republicans faced scathing criticism from Democrats, who questioned the timing of redistricting efforts when lawmakers are supposed to be focused on providing relief following deadly Hill Country floods. In GOP-led hearings, hundreds of residents testified and expressed their concerns about not yet being able to see the maps and what new districts could mean for Democratic voters. Vasut repeatedly denied the maps would harm voters. Cappelletti, Hanna and Lathan write for the Associated Press. Cappelletti reported from Washington and Hanna, from Topeka, Kan. AP writers Anthony Izaguirre in Albany, N.Y., and Nicholas Riccardi in Denver contributed to this report.
The Hill
12 minutes ago
- The Hill
US citizenship test to get a Trump-era update: What to know
(NewsNation) — The Trump administration will soon move forward with changes to the U.S. citizenship test, which the new head of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services has called too easy. President Donald Trump has referred to naturalization as 'one of the most priceless gifts ever granted by human hands' — an honor his administration will soon make harder to obtain. Recently appointed USCIS Director Joseph Edlow told The New York Times the current test doesn't have a high enough difficulty level. 'The test, as it's laid out right now, it's not very difficult,' Edlow told the Times. 'It's very easy to kind of memorize the answers. I don't think we're really comporting with the spirit of the law.' According to USCIS, 90% of applicants pass the test on their first try. What's in the current US citizenship test? Currently, the test includes an English exam and a civics portion. Participants are required to answer orally and need to correctly answer six of 10 questions about US history, randomly selected from a bank of 100 questions. What is Mexico's 'supercartel,' and what does it mean for crime? Edlow said he plans to revert to the 2020 citizenship test, which would increase the pool of questions to 128 and the number of correct answers needed to pass to 12 of 20. USCIS has also proposed that the new test add a speaking section to assess English skills. An officer would show photos of ordinary scenarios — like daily activities, weather or food — and ask the applicant to describe them. Edlow said these changes would help participants better understand American civics — but some questions have proven difficult to answer, even for American-born citizens who may have forgotten their U.S. history lessons. Want to test your knowledge? You can access the current questions and answers here. Citizenship test changes concern immigrant advocates USCIS reported nearly 820,000 immigrants became U.S. citizens last year, and more than a million have done so since 2022. It's a privilege many immigrants say is worth studying hard for. 'I feel very proud, and I think this is a very big achievement and a big milestone in my life,' one new citizen said. Mechelle Perrott, citizenship coordinator at San Diego Community College District's College of Continuing Education in California, told the Associated Press changing the format could make it much more difficult for those with test-taking limitations. 'We have a lot of students that are refugees, and they're coming from war-torn countries where maybe they didn't have a chance to complete school or even go to school,' Perrot said. 'It's more difficult learning to read and write if you don't know how to do that in your first language. That's my main concern about the multiple-choice test; it's a lot of reading.' Edlow told the Times the revisions would happen soon, but a timeline has not yet been set.
