What you need to know about the possible Air Canada strike
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBC
26 minutes ago
- CBC
Tourism not hurt yet by wildfires, but prospect of climate-related losses on some minds
Social Sharing Despite the closure of Crown land and restrictions on outdoor activities, a local tourism association and a trail organization say wildfires haven't really hurt New Brunswick's tourism industry yet. But a long dry spell and the fires that led to the restrictions have prompted these groups to think more about preparing for extreme climate events and how to avoid financial losses. Phyllis Sutherland, the president of Fundy Tourism, formerly known as Albert County Tourism Association, said that because the restrictions have only been in place for a week, she and other members haven't experienced a significant drop in customers. "Most people still have the same numbers, especially those who depend on tourists," said Sutherland, the owner of Ponderosa Pines Campground, a private campground near the Hopewell Rocks. Wildfires have been popping up in New Brunswick for almost two weeks. On Aug. 8, the province closed all Crown land and limited outdoor activities in a bid to prevent fires. Sutherland said most tourists book their vacations early, and at the moment, no wildfires are threatening her campground. Most guests have been respectful of the restrictions, she added, despite not being able to take part in usual activities such as lighting campfires and walking along trails. Restrictions on Crown land include hiking, camping, fishing, and the use of vehicles in the woods. Camping is only permitted in campgrounds such as hers. "We haven't had anybody not accept [the restrictions]. Sometimes they don't like it, but we haven't had any issues about people not accepting it," Sutherland said. She said association members started reporting some cancellations by customers, but because the impact is minimal, they're not modifying their services or operations. Instead, members are focusing on being prepared in case a wildfire does break out nearby. "I think generally we all [are] just taking it a day at a time," Sutherland said. "And key point here is to see what happens with the rain." Sutherland said she plans to advocate more education resources on wildfires for Fundy Tourism members and also wants to talk to government about more funding in case extreme weather events create potential losses for their businesses. The Tourism Department refused an interview, but in an emailed statement, spokesperson Jennifer Vienneau wrote the department is working alongside the Department of Natural Resources and Department of Public Safety "to monitor the situation and prioritize the safety of our staff, residents and visitors." The Tourism Department did not provide information on how tourism has been affected by the closure of parks. Like Sutherland, Mathieu Roy, the CEO of Trans Canada Trail, said it is too early to see the effects of restrictions on New Brunswick tourism. Roy said the organization has been encouraging people to respect the restrictions and shift their mindset and try other trails and outdoor activities still available while Crown land restrictions remain. He said people are still able to interact with nature without endangering their communities. "Not accessing Crown land doesn't prevent you to access the beaches and the waterway," he said. The Wolastoq (St. John River) "is a great way to explore nature, connect with nature without putting yourself at risk or putting a community at risk." Roy also said that Trans Canada wants to make education about wildfires more accessible for trail users. The organization already has programs in place to support local trail organizations to help them in moments of crisis and prepare them for an extreme weather events. "Our vision is really people going outdoors and connecting with nature," he said.
CBC
2 hours ago
- CBC
Third Place Studio aims to revitalize Ottawa's downtown community
A new creative studio space in Centretown aims to revitalize the area and provide a 'third place' to foster community and connection.
CBC
2 hours ago
- CBC
Can the ZEV mandate survive political pressure and industry objections?
Social Sharing With the federal carbon tax dead and gone, Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre has found a new target among the Liberal government's climate policies — the electric vehicle availability standard, otherwise known as the zero-emission vehicle (ZEV) mandate. "We will legalize, into the future, your right to drive a gas or diesel-powered truck or car by repealing the Liberal EV mandate," Poilievre said last week, while restating his desire to see a number of Liberal policies repealed. In a Conservative fundraising email in June, Poilievre's deputy leader, Melissa Lantsman, put the issue in even more bracing terms, writing that the "radical Liberals" were planning to make gas-powered vehicles "illegal" and "force" people to buy "expensive" EVs. Appealing to supporters in rural areas — where EVs might be less practical at the moment — Lantsman added that "Liberals in Ottawa and in busy downtown cores think they know better than you." On Thursday, Poilievre announced that Conservatives would be launching a " nationwide campaign" to stop the mandate. The Conservative leader is smart enough to know he is pushing against a policy that is already under pressure. But that may set up the ZEV mandate as a test of the ability of Mark Carney's government to defend and meaningfully advance climate policy — a test Justin Trudeau's government arguably failed on the carbon tax. Whether or not the Charter can be read to give Canadians the "right" to own an internal-combustion engine, it's not quite the case that gas-powered vehicles will be made illegal. More specifically, the ZEV mandate establishes a series of escalating light-duty vehicle sales targets for auto manufacturers and importers, starting at 20 per cent in 2026 and reaching 100 per cent in 2035. Companies have some flexibility if they are unable or unwilling to meet the annual target — they can buy credits from other sellers or invest in charging infrastructure. The debate over EV policy Advocates of action to fight climate change have supported mandates as a way to guarantee a predictable supply of EVs and accelerate adoption — British Columbia and Quebec have each had ZEV mandates for several years. But North American automakers have bristled at the prospect of additional regulation and would prefer to stick with less-prescriptive regulations aimed at emissions from passenger vehicles. Though those "tailpipe" standards have typically been harmonized with the United States and the Trump administration is currently intent on repealing its regulations. Automakers have called on Carney's government to change or scrap the mandate. Against the backdrop of a trade war, the government seems willing to hear them out — Industry Minister Mélanie Joly told the Globe and Mail in July that the government was working with industry to "find what would be that right level." WATCH | Automakers want EV mandate removed: Automakers push Ottawa to drop EV mandates 1 month ago In arguing against the mandate, the auto industry also now points to a recent slump in EV sales in Canada. But auto executives themselves have said the recent slump is a " direct response" to changes in the rebates offered by federal and provincial governments. The federal government's EV incentive ended in January, Quebec's incentive was temporarily paused in February and British Columbia halted its rebate program in May. The Carney government has said it's working on a new rebate, but that promise might be pushing prospective buyers to wait. Joanna Kyriazis, director of public affairs at Clean Energy Canada, says the Liberal government should broadly stay the course with its mandate, but there are compromises it could make. The Liberals could, for instance, build in additional flexabilities or adjust some of the near-term targets. It could even adjust the ultimate target of 2035. "If this idea of a 100 per cent sales target is really polarizing and really scary to Canadians, then bring it down to 95 per cent — show that there's room for the niche applications or niche situations where in 10 years EVs still might not work," Kyriazis says, though adding that she thinks the technology will have advanced enough by then that such an allowance won't be necessary. Such changes might have the effect of watering down the initial policy without deviating from the larger goal — significantly increasing the use of non-gas-powered vehicles for the sake of reducing the greenhouse gas emissions that cause climate change. "[The current sales targets are] in line with where the rest of the world is going," Kyriazis argues. "North America is on a little detour right now, but in the rest of the world, EV sales keep on rising." Worldwide, electric vehicles and plug-in hybrids accounted for 22 per cent of all new car sales in 2024, according to data from the International Energy Agency. In Canada, according to the IEA, EVs accounted for 17 per cent of all sales (Statistics Canada says it was 14 per cent). In the U.K. — where a Conservative government introduced a ZEV mandate in 2024, which was then amended by a Labour government — EVs accounted for 28 per cent of all new cars sold last year. In France, they accounted for 24 per cent. "If you look at jurisdictions that have high levels of EV adoption, it's because they have put in place the conditions to create strong consumer demand. So you have incentives … and you have a much more effective charging infrastructure rollout," says Brian Kingston, president of the Canadian Vehicle Manufacturers' Association, which represents Ford, General Motors and Stellantis. Beyond the question of which type of regulations make more sense, that argument might make the case for governments putting even more money toward building charging infrastructure, alongside reintroducing rebates for consumers. The politics of EVs In the meantime, there will be a political fight — and it will apparently be waged in terms of a culture war. In a video posted in June, Poilievre said the mandate was not about reducing emissions, but about "imposing elite ideology on the common people." The last time a federal climate policy came under this much concentrated pressure, the carbon tax suffered from both the surging inflation that followed the pandemic and the falling popularity of the prime minister who introduced it. The Trudeau government then undercut its own policy with a carve-out aimed at voters in one region of the country. Appearing before a Senate committee not long after the Trudeau government made that move, Mark Carney said that "if something is going to be changed, then something at least as good is put in its place. Ideally, if you're going to change something, you put in place something better that still has that credibility and predictability that has the power that drives investment." That stated principle might hang over whatever the Carney government is considering now. Ultimately — for Carney and Poilievre, for Canadians in urban and rural communities — there is the unforgiving math of climate change and greenhouse gas emissions. Canada is currently aiming to reduce its total national emissions by at least 40 per cent below 2005 levels by 2030. The federal government is further aiming to reach net-zero emissions by 2050. The transportation sector accounted for 156.6 megatonnes of emissions in 2023 — 22.6 per cent of Canada's total emissions. Specifically, passenger cars and light trucks for 91.5 megatonnes — 13.2 per cent of the national total.
