logo
New Medicaid Work Requirements ‘Impossible' for People To Navigate

New Medicaid Work Requirements ‘Impossible' for People To Navigate

Miami Herald22-05-2025

Medicaid work requirements, under consideration as part of the House Republicans' budget to cut federal spending, are "impossible" to navigate for those using the program, experts said.
Part of the budget mandates 80 hours of verified community engagement per month for able-bodied Medicaid recipients ages 19 to 65.
However, experts warn that the work requirements not only will see millions pushed off the program but also could lead to many struggling to understand what the new requirements mean for their working situation and how to report their work.
If you're unsure exactly what the new requirements could mean for you, you're not alone.
"Previous studies of states that have tried work requirements show that people are frequently unaware or confused about what the requirements mean and how to navigate the rules," Dr. Benjamin Sommers, a professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School in Massachusetts, told Newsweek.
Corroborating this, Julie Marie Donohue, a professor and chair in the department of health policy and management in the School of Public Health at the University of Pittsburgh, told Newsweek: "Evidence from states that have imposed work requirements shows people have difficulty navigating reporting systems, especially when there are monthly requirements.
"Medicaid work requirements can be complex for individuals to understand and for states to implement."
Even without work reporting requirements, Medicaid is a complex program to navigate and manage, as Medicaid beneficiaries face "a significant amount of administrative burden," Jamila Michener, a professor of government and public policy at Cornell University in New York, told Newsweek.
"They have to regularly recertify their eligibility, complete substantial paperwork, navigate managed care plans, coordinate their care, and adhere to a wide range of other requirements," she said, adding that was without having to additionally report work requirements.
While noting the degree and extent of burdens imposed by work reporting requirements will depend on how states design the administrative processes necessary to implement them, Michener said that "adding such requirements to the mix only makes things harder.
"Even in the best-case scenario, such requirements will lead to people who are eligible being denied benefits simply because they cannot jump over bureaucratic hurdles."
The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) predicted that millions of Americans would lose their Medicaid health coverage under the new policy to scale back the Affordable Care Act (ACA), but experts are concerned that many could also lose their coverage because of the legislation's complexity and administrative burden.
"Most of the people who will likely lose coverage will still be eligible for the program and lose their Medicaid due to red tape," Sommers said.
Published studies show that more than 90 percent of Medicaid beneficiaries are already working or have a good reason for not working, Sommers said, adding this might be having a disability, caring for a family member or being in school, to name a few.
This means that many who fulfill the requirements already could be confronted with a heavy administrative burden to prove that they are eligible for Medicaid coverage.
Difficulties with reporting work could become an issue for many for different reasons. If reporting will be done online, those who lack "consistent, reliable access to the internet will struggle to report their work," Michener said, while "people who lack adequate transportation to get to reporting agencies will struggle to report their work," if reporting has to be in person.
Those employed in "temporary, seasonal, contract-based or other jobs with less predictable, regular hours may struggle to report their work accurately or to meet the required hours," she added.
Even recipients who are exempt from the requirement, including caregivers of dependent children, people with disabilities, people who are pregnant, and others, may struggle to prove they are exempt or may not realize they are supposed to be exempt, Michener said.
"People in between jobs, doing gig work, working part-time, or who are self-employed may not know how to accurately report their work and may not know whether they remain eligible given these less traditional work arrangements.
"Work requirements are simply Medicaid cuts by another name. They serve little other purpose. There is little to know evidence that work requirements actually boost labor market participation."
Discussing what specific parts of the legislation appear to mean for different Medicaid recipients with Newsweek, Sara Rosenbaum, a professor of Health Law and Policy and founding chair of the department of Health Policy at the Milken Institute School of Public Health at George Washington University in Washington, D.C., said that when it comes to the number of hours recipients are required to work, it is important to know the 80 hours a month is not an average.
This means that a Medicaid recipient cannot complete the working requirements at 85 hours for one month and then hit 75 hours the next month, Rosenbaum said, as "no averaging" is allowed.
While the working requirements could be work, school, training or a number of other things, a recipient must complete the 80 hours each month.
Rosenbaum said that "every hour needs to be separately proved," adding that it was "impossible to ask people to piece together their lives this way."
Having to report every hour worked could be particularly difficult for those who are self-employed, Rosenbaum said.
"It is impossible for people who work on their own, do odd jobs, clean houses, do yard work, etc., unless the implementing rules allow oral estimation," she said, adding that she didn't think this would be likely.
Those who lose their work or can no longer complete the 80-hour requirement would "be obligated to report a changed circumstance since this is a condition of eligibility," Rosenbaum said.
Those in the process of getting work or looking for work are not exempt from the 80-hour requirement, she said, adding that those who are exempt must also prove their exemption every month.
"The measure is designed to do one thing-remove working-age adults from Medicaid," she said.
Related Articles
Medicaid Changes Get New Timeline: Who's ImpactedDonald Trump's Spending Bill Makes Progress as Medicaid Faces CutsTrump's Proposed Bill Could Leave Millions of Medicaid Patients UninsuredIowa Passes Medicaid Work Requirement
2025 NEWSWEEK DIGITAL LLC.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Rockefeller Foundation Releases New Polling Data: Majority of Americans Want Food is Medicine Programs
Rockefeller Foundation Releases New Polling Data: Majority of Americans Want Food is Medicine Programs

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Rockefeller Foundation Releases New Polling Data: Majority of Americans Want Food is Medicine Programs

Nearly 80% of Americans think food and nutrition should be covered by insurance to address chronic disease NEW YORK, June 12, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- New polling data from The Rockefeller Foundation shows that more than four in five adults in the United States – across demographics, income levels, party affiliations, and geographies – support integrating Food is Medicine (FIM) programs into U.S. healthcare. The survey, conducted by Hattaway Communications, highlights high interest but low public awareness of FIM programs, which aim to treat and manage chronic disease by increasing access to nutritious foods. The research underscores the perceived benefits of Food is Medicine programs, with 79% of respondents reporting that FIM programs would personally help them eat better after they received a definition of the intervention. "Americans want nutrition and food solutions to help them eat better, improve their health, and save money," said Dr. Rajiv J. Shah, President of The Rockefeller Foundation. "We know that these programs are effective in helping patients manage diet-related chronic disease and are cost-effective too. Now, it's even clearer that there is a huge opportunity to improve Americans' health outcomes by investing in low-cost, individualized Food is Medicine solutions that are both proven and popular." Chronic diseases, such as diabetes, obesity, and heart disease, impact an estimated 133 million Americans—more than 38% (or one-third) of the total U.S. population—and cost the United States $1.1 trillion per year (equivalent to what the U.S. spends on food itself). The vast majority of chronic conditions are diet-related: In the United States alone, poor diets contribute to 500,000 deaths annually. Modeling on medically tailored meals shows that investing in FIM programs could save an estimated $32.1 billion a year, significantly reducing Americans' healthcare costs. Even still, only 13% of Americans polled said they knew about FIM programs, which include interventions such as medically tailored meals and prescriptions for accessing fruits and vegetables, coupled with nutrition support. When presented with the definition of what they entail, survey respondents (84%) resoundingly supported the efforts. Some of the key findings include: More than 4 in 5 Americans believe U.S. healthcare should offer more food and nutrition programs to treat and manage illnesses. Nearly 9 in 10 patients would prefer to rely more on healthy eating than on medications to manage their conditions. Nearly 4 in 5 Americans think that Food is Medicine programs should be covered by both public and private insurance, including 85% of self-identified Democrats and 78% of Republicans. 84% of respondents believed FIM could help improve the overall quality of health in the United States. 79% of respondents said FIM programs could help them personally. 49% of the American public and 67% of healthcare workers view high costs of nutritious food as the single largest barrier to eating well. "We are seeing a growing awareness of diet-related diseases and their consequences in the U.S.," said Devon Klatell, Vice President for the Food Initiative at The Rockefeller Foundation. "This polling data shows that Americans want more support to eat well and live well. Food is Medicine programs are one tool that health care practitioners and providers must be considering as they work to address chronic disease in America." The Rockefeller Foundation commissioned Hattaway Communications to conduct the survey, which polled respondents across all 50 states between February 28 and March 11, 2025. The survey sampled 2,271 respondents, including 1,135 patients and 399 healthcare workers. The sample was weighted by gender and education to align with the actual proportions within the population and is representative of racial demographics across the U.S. Since 2019, The Rockefeller Foundation has supported Food is Medicine programs and invested in research to improve their effectiveness and understand the benefits and costs. As part of this effort, The Foundation announced its $100 million investment to expand access to Food is Medicine, including supporting vital research like the American Heart Association's Health Care by Food Initiative. The Foundation also initiated partnerships with the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services to speed the integration of Food Is Medicine into health systems. In February 2025, The Rockefeller Foundation announced $3.5 million in grant funding to support small and mid-scale U.S. farmers, improve health outcomes for people with chronic disease, mitigate rising health care costs in California, Hawaii, Maryland, Massachusetts, Mississippi, North Carolina, Oregon, Rhode Island, Virginia, and Washington, D.C., and advance state-based efforts to include FIM interventions as a medically covered benefit under Medicaid programs. About The Rockefeller FoundationThe Rockefeller Foundation is a pioneering philanthropy built on collaborative partnerships at the frontiers of science, technology, and innovation that enable individuals, families, and communities to flourish. We make big bets to promote the wellbeing of humanity. Today, we are focused on advancing human opportunity and reversing the climate crisis by transforming systems in food, health, energy, and finance. For more information, sign up for our newsletter at and follow us on X @RockefellerFdn and LinkedIn @the-rockefeller-foundation. Media Contact:Ashley Chang, The Rockefeller Foundation: media@ View original content: SOURCE The Rockefeller Foundation Sign in to access your portfolio

Fire Watch program; helping veterans, first responders cope with trauma
Fire Watch program; helping veterans, first responders cope with trauma

Yahoo

time5 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Fire Watch program; helping veterans, first responders cope with trauma

The Brief A new virtual program is helping veterans and first responders cope with trauma. The Fire Watch program is available at Rogers Behavioral Health. FOX6 News spoke with a peer specialist who is, himself, recovering from trauma after military service. WAUKESHA, Wis. - Veterans and emergency responders are often first to run into the line of fire. Now, a new virtual program is giving them support to work through the trauma. What we know When veteran Chris Swift came back from serving in Iraq and Afghanistan, he said he had to learn some lessons the hard way. "Some people are like, 'Oh, tell me some cool stories.' Well, they're not always cool stories. They don't understand all the stuff that goes along with it," Swift said. "I drank a lot when I came back. I ended up getting three DUIs. I went to rehab at the VA for about four months, then I went to jail for about seven months." FREE DOWNLOAD: Get breaking news alerts in the FOX LOCAL Mobile app for iOS or Android Swift said he is now six years sober. He is also a peer specialist for the Fire Watch program at Rogers Behavioral Health. The goal of the program is to provide help and mental health support for veterans and first responders. The program first launched in September 2024. What they're saying "We can do a wide variety of things within this program. We focus on moral injury, but moral injury can come in a lot of different forms. And we can see it come across as anxiety or depression," said Jennifer Parra-Nelson, Clinical Director of Trauma Services & Fire Watch program. Moral injury is the guilt and shame that can come from trauma. The VA defines it as "the distressing psychological, behavioral, social, and sometimes spiritual aftermath of exposure to such events. A moral injury can occur in response to acting or witnessing behaviors that go against an individual's values and moral beliefs." Organizers said addressing that is an important part of the eight-week, 100% virtual program. Participants go through therapy, learn practical coping mechanisms, and connect with others going through the same thing. SIGN UP TODAY: Get daily headlines, breaking news emails from FOX6 News "We've seen a lot seen a lot of patients come in just with a lot of stigma. And with a lot of possibly thinking that maybe this won't work for them. And I think we've seen a lot of people be surprised that we are very accessible to this population," Parra-Nelson said. Swift said his goal is to help others who were in his shoes – for their sake and the sake of their loved ones. What you can do Learn much more about the Fire Watch program and how it might be able to help someone you love. Program organizers said insurance covers the Fire Watch program. Medicaid is also accepted. The Source The information in this post was provided, in part, by Rogers Behavioral Health.

RFK Jr.'s newest CDC vaccine panel includes critics of COVID shots, lockdowns
RFK Jr.'s newest CDC vaccine panel includes critics of COVID shots, lockdowns

Yahoo

time5 hours ago

  • Yahoo

RFK Jr.'s newest CDC vaccine panel includes critics of COVID shots, lockdowns

The Brief U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has replaced the government's vaccine advisory panel with eight new appointees. The new members include vocal critics of COVID-19 vaccines and pandemic lockdowns, such as Dr. Robert Malone and Dr. Martin Kulldorff. Public health groups have raised concerns that Kennedy's changes could undermine long-standing vaccination policies. NEW YORK - U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has named eight new vaccine policy advisers to replace the panel that he abruptly dismissed earlier this week. His selections include a scientist who researched mRNA vaccine technology and transformed into a conservative darling for his criticisms of COVID-19 vaccines, and a leading critic of pandemic-era lockdowns. RELATED: RFK Jr. ousts entire CDC vaccine panel Kennedy made the announcement in a social media post on Wednesday. The backstory Kennedy's decision to "retire" the previous 17-member panel was widely decried by doctors' groups and public health organizations, who feared the advisers would be replaced by a group aligned with Kennedy's desire to reassess — and possibly end — longstanding vaccination recommendations. Dig deeper The new appointees to the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices include Dr. Robert Malone, the former mRNA researcher who emerged as a close adviser to Kennedy during the measles outbreak. Malone, who runs a wellness institute and a popular blog, rose to popularity during the COVID-19 pandemic as he relayed conspiracy theories around the outbreak and the vaccines that followed. He has appeared on podcasts and other conservative news outlets where he's promoted unproven and alternative treatments for measles and COVID-19. He has claimed that millions of Americans were hypnotized into taking the COVID-19 shots. He's even suggested that those vaccines cause a form of AIDS. He's downplayed deaths related to one of the largest measles outbreaks in the U.S. in years. Other appointees include Dr. Martin Kulldorff, a biostatistician and epidemiologist who was a co-author of the Great Barrington Declaration, an October 2020 letter maintaining that pandemic shutdowns were causing irreparable harm. Dr. Cody Meissner, a former ACIP member, also was named. Big picture view The committee, created in 1964, makes recommendations to the director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC directors almost always approve those recommendations on how Food and Drug Administration-cleared vaccines should be used. The CDC's final recommendations are widely heeded by doctors and determine the scope of vaccination programs. The Source The Associated Press contributed to this report. The information in this story comes from a social media announcement made by U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. on Wednesday, in which he introduced eight new members to the federal vaccine advisory panel. This story was reported from Los Angeles.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store