logo
Is It Too Late to Buy MercadoLibre Stock?

Is It Too Late to Buy MercadoLibre Stock?

Globe and Mail6 hours ago

MercadoLibre (NASDAQ: MELI) stock took several years to reach new highs after dropping over 50% once the air let out of the 2020-2021 stock market bubble, inflated by zero-percent interest rates as part of the COVID-19 pandemic response.
But since hitting new highs late last year, it's been off to the races. Shares of the Latin American e-commerce giant have surged 50% since January.
Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Learn More »
You might be wondering whether this is a new chapter for a stock that has returned nearly 9,000% since 2007, or if MercadoLibre is currently in another bubble getting ready to burst.
I dove into the numbers to determine whether it's too late to buy MercadoLibre. Here is what you need to know.
Is this the Amazon of Latin America? There is a resemblance.
One of the most common comparisons you'll see for MercadoLibre is that it's the Amazon of Latin America. MercadoLibre is a leading e-commerce company in Latin America, much like Amazon is in the United States.
However, I think the resemblance goes deeper than you'd guess. Like Amazon, MercadoLibre has expanded beyond its e-commerce business model. MercadoLibre now operates several businesses, including commerce, advertising, logistics, and a fintech unit (Mercado Pago) that offers financial products and services to merchants and consumers.
E-commerce, financial services, and advertising are massive markets. MercadoLibre's push into all three has helped it sustain rapid growth. The company's annual revenue has grown over sevenfold since 2020, and continues to grow at a nearly 37% pace:
MELI Revenue (TTM) data by YCharts
The risk and reward of emerging markets
MercadoLibre has grown so fast, in part, because it operates in Latin America, an emerging market. It's not as economically developed as, say, the United States, where most Americans might take a smartphone, credit card, or basic banking services for granted.
Many people in Latin America still lack access to these modern luxuries; however, the region has made significant strides over the past decade. Internet access and financial inclusion both skyrocketed from the early 2010s to the early 2020s, and the COVID-19 pandemic helped propel Latin American consumers and businesses onto digital banking and e-commerce platforms.
These trends have driven remarkable user growth for MercadoLibre. In Q1 2025, the company's commerce business had 66.6 million unique active buyers, representing a 25% year-over-year increase. Meanwhile, the fintech business had 64.3 million active users, a 31% jump from the previous year.
Emerging markets do have risks, though. Latin American countries don't have nearly the economic firepower of the United States. Brazil and Mexico's GDP per capita are $10,294 and $13,790, respectively. Therefore, MercadoLibre may not be able to monetize its users to the extent that Amazon can with American consumers, for example.
Additionally, the company reports its financials in U.S. dollars, creating a significant drag due to currency exchange fluctuations. In Q1 2025, MercadoLibre grew its total net revenue by 64% year over year on a currency-neutral basis, but reported just 37% growth due to the stronger U.S. dollar.
These headwinds could place more pressure on user acquisition, and MercadoLibre's growth could slow if its robust user growth stalls.
Is it too late to buy MercadoLibre?
Fortunately, MercadoLibre still appears to have plenty of room to expand. There are over 660 million people in Latin America, meaning MercadoLibre only serves about 10% of its addressable market. As the company's stellar Q1 2025 user growth illustrated, that momentum remains plenty strong yet.
Right now, MercadoLibre's valuation should be the primary focus for prospective investors.
Wall Street analysts estimate MercadoLibre will grow earnings by an average of 30% annually over the long term. That's an ambitious growth estimate, but MercadoLibre is firing on all cylinders, so it's a reasonable expectation.
The stock's torrid run since January has elevated its price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio from 45 to 63. It values MercadoLibre at a premium to the broader stock market, but at a PEG ratio of 2.1, I think it's still a reasonable price tag for such a fast-growing business.
MercadoLibre's rapidly expanding top and bottom lines, multiple business segments, and lengthy track record of success are tell-tale signs of a quality business. The stock isn't a bargain following its recent run, but it's certainly not too late to buy and hold this winner.
Don't miss this second chance at a potentially lucrative opportunity
Ever feel like you missed the boat in buying the most successful stocks? Then you'll want to hear this.
On rare occasions, our expert team of analysts issues a 'Double Down' stock recommendation for companies that they think are about to pop. If you're worried you've already missed your chance to invest, now is the best time to buy before it's too late. And the numbers speak for themselves:
Nvidia: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2009, you'd have $367,516!*
Apple: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2008, you'd have $38,712!*
Netflix: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2004, you'd have $669,517!*
Right now, we're issuing 'Double Down' alerts for three incredible companies, available when you join Stock Advisor, and there may not be another chance like this anytime soon.
See the 3 stocks »
*Stock Advisor returns as of June 2, 2025
John Mackey, former CEO of Whole Foods Market, an Amazon subsidiary, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Justin Pope has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Amazon and MercadoLibre. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Global streamers fight CRTC's rule requiring them to fund Canadian content
Global streamers fight CRTC's rule requiring them to fund Canadian content

Global News

time2 hours ago

  • Global News

Global streamers fight CRTC's rule requiring them to fund Canadian content

Some of the world's biggest streaming companies will argue in court on Monday that they shouldn't have to make CRTC-ordered financial contributions to Canadian content and news. The companies are fighting an order from the federal broadcast regulator that says they must pay five per cent of their annual Canadian revenues to funds devoted to producing Canadian content, including local TV news. The case, which consolidates several appeals by streamers, will be heard by the Federal Court of Appeal in Toronto. Apple, Amazon and Spotify are fighting the CRTC's 2024 order. Motion Picture Association-Canada, which represents such companies as Netflix and Paramount, is challenging a section of the CRTC's order requiring them to contribute to local news. In December, the court put a pause on the payments — estimated to be at least $1.25 million annually per company. Amazon, Apple and Spotify had argued that if they made the payments and then won the appeal and overturned the CRTC order, they wouldn't be able to recover the money. Story continues below advertisement In court documents, the streamers put forward a long list of arguments on why they shouldn't have to pay, including technical points regarding the CRTC's powers under the Broadcasting Act. Spotify argued that the contribution requirement amounts to a tax, which the CRTC doesn't have the authority to impose. The music streamer also took issue with the CRTC requiring the payments without first deciding how it will define Canadian content. Amazon argued the federal cabinet specified the CRTC's requirements have to be 'equitable.' It said the contribution requirement is 'inequitable because it applies only to foreign online undertakings and only to such undertakings with more than $25 million in annual Canadian broadcasting revenues.' Get daily National news Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy Apple also said the regulator 'acted prematurely' and argued the CRTC didn't consider whether the order was 'equitable.' It pointed out Apple is required to contribute five per cent, while radio stations must only pay 0.5 per cent — and streamers don't have the same access to the funds into which they pay. The CRTC imposes different rules on Canadian content contributions from traditional media players. It requires large English-language broadcasters to contribute 30 per cent of revenues to Canadian programming. Motion Picture Association—Canada is only challenging one aspect of the CRTC's order — the part requiring companies to contribute 1.5 per cent of revenues to a fund for local news on independent TV stations. Story continues below advertisement It said in court documents that none of the streamers 'has any connection to news production' and argued the CRTC doesn't have the authority to require them to fund news. 'What the CRTC did, erroneously, is purport to justify the … contribution simply on the basis that local news is important and local news operations provided by independent television stations are short of money,' it said. 'That is a reason why news should be funded by someone, but is devoid of any analysis, legal or factual, as to why it is equitable for foreign online undertakings to fund Canadian news production.' In its response, the Canadian Association of Broadcasters said the CRTC has wide authority under the Broadcasting Act. It argued streamers have contributed to the funding crisis facing local news. 'While the industry was once dominated by traditional television and radio services, those services are now in decline, as Canadians increasingly turn to online streaming services,' the broadcasters said. 'For decades, traditional broadcasting undertakings have supported the production of Canadian content through a complex array of CRTC-directed measures … By contrast, online undertakings have not been required to provide any financial support to the Canadian broadcasting system, despite operating here for well over a decade.' A submission from the federal government in defence of the CRTC argued the regulator was within its rights to order the payments. Story continues below advertisement 'The orders challenged in these proceedings … are a valid exercise of the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission's regulatory powers. These orders seek to remedy the inequity that has resulted from the ascendance of online streaming giants like the Appellants,' the office of the attorney general said. 'Online undertakings have greatly profited from their access to Canadian audiences, without any corresponding obligation to make meaningful contributions supporting Canadian programming and creators — an obligation that has long been imposed on traditional domestic broadcasters.' The government said that if the streamers get their way, that would preserve 'an inequitable circumstance in which domestic broadcasters — operating in an industry under economic strain — shoulder a disproportionate regulatory burden.' 'This result would be plainly out of step with the policy aims of Parliament' and cabinet, it added. The court hearing comes as trade tensions between the U.S. and Canada have cast a shadow over the CRTC's attempts to regulate online streamers. The regulator launched a suite of proceedings and hearings as part of its implementation of the Online Streaming Act, legislation that in 2023 updated the Broadcasting Act to set up the CRTC to regulate streaming companies. In January, as U.S. President Donald Trump was inaugurated for his second term, groups representing U.S. businesses and big tech companies warned the CRTC that its efforts to modernize Canadian content rules could worsen trade relations and lead to retaliation. Story continues below advertisement Then, as the CRTC launched its hearing on modernizing the definition of Canadian content in May, Netflix, Paramount and Apple cancelled their individual appearances. While the companies didn't provide a reason, the move came shortly after Trump threatened to impose a tariff of up to 100 per cent on movies made outside the United States. Foreign streamers have long pointed to their existing spending in Canada in response to calls to bring them into the regulated system.

The Smartest Fintech Stocks to Buy With $500 Right Now
The Smartest Fintech Stocks to Buy With $500 Right Now

Globe and Mail

time2 hours ago

  • Globe and Mail

The Smartest Fintech Stocks to Buy With $500 Right Now

Financial services is arguably the most important industry in our economy, as the movement of money, as well as saving and lending activities, is vital for individuals, businesses, and governments. But alongside the massive banks we're all familiar with, there are smaller businesses to pay attention to. In the past decade, the integration of technology within this sector in an effort to better serve customers has become hard to ignore. And this ongoing trend has investment implications for those looking to put money to work in this area. Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Continue » Here are the smartest fintech stocks investors can buy with $500 right now. PayPal The first fintech enterprise that should be on your radar is PayPal (NASDAQ: PYPL). The business has been at the forefront of digital payments for more than two decades, and it continues to be a leader in the space. PayPal has 436 million active accounts. During the first quarter, it handled a whopping $1.7 trillion in annualized total payment volume, showcasing its impressive scale. There are multiple segments under the hood, like the PayPal-branded checkout solution, Braintree for merchants, and Venmo. It's the latter that is exhibiting the fastest growth lately, driven by the notable adoption of the Venmo debit card product. While there is intense competition in the payments landscape, PayPal has carved out a successful niche. That's because it has a strong brand name in the industry that individuals and merchants have come to trust. As a two-sided platform, the business benefits from a powerful network effect. PayPal's financial situation is robust. The balance sheet is in solid shape, with $15.8 billion in cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities compared to $12.6 billion in debt. Profitability is worth mentioning, as the operating margin was a stellar 19.6% in Q1. For this full year, the company is expecting to produce $6 billion to $7 billion in free cash flow. The plan is to spend $6 billion just on share repurchases. The market has soured on this company, as the stock currently trades 77% off its peak from July 2021 (as of June 3). This gives investors a cheap forward P/E ratio of 14 to take advantage of. That's a good deal for a growing and profitable payments leader. SoFi Technologies Another fintech stock to buy right now is SoFi Technologies (NASDAQ: SOFI), the budding digital bank that's continuing to register fantastic growth. During the first quarter, the business posted a year-over-year revenue gain of 20% while adding 800,000 net new customers to the mix. As of March 31, SoFi had amassed 10.9 million customers, up tenfold in the past five years. Clearly, the company's products and services are a hit. That's because SoFi is finding success with a goal that seems to emphasize utilizing technology to provide an exceptional user experience when it comes to handling one's finances. The average customer uses 1.5 different products, so there remains a significant opportunity to cross-sell. A new development is that SoFi is now firmly profitable. Diluted earnings per share (EPS) totaled $0.06 during Q1, marking the sixth straight quarter of positive generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) net income. The leadership team believes this is just the beginning. After forecasting $0.68 (at the midpoint) of EPS in 2026, the expectation is for this bottom-line figure to increase at a compound annual rate of between 20% and 25% in the years after. It won't always be smooth sailing. Something all banks deal with is cyclicality. Should there be an economic downturn in the U.S., it's likely that SoFi's robust growth and improving profitability will take a hit. This should be temporary, though. As of this writing, investors must be comfortable paying a forward P/E ratio of 49 to add the stock to their portfolios. At first glance, this doesn't look like a bargain deal. However, when you consider the earnings trajectory, the valuation becomes more compelling. Should you invest $1,000 in PayPal right now? Before you buy stock in PayPal, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and PayPal wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $669,517!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $868,615!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor 's total average return is792% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to171%for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 2, 2025

Is Palantir Still a Buy After Its Run-Up? 3 Analysts From The Motley Fool Weigh In.
Is Palantir Still a Buy After Its Run-Up? 3 Analysts From The Motley Fool Weigh In.

Globe and Mail

time3 hours ago

  • Globe and Mail

Is Palantir Still a Buy After Its Run-Up? 3 Analysts From The Motley Fool Weigh In.

One of the fastest-growing stocks in artificial intelligence (AI) over the last year is Palantir Technologies (NASDAQ: PLTR). Its Artificial Intelligence Platform (AIP) brought eye-popping productivity gains to its customers. Investors took notice, as the stock is up by 420% over the last year. Unfortunately for investors who have recently taken an interest, its forward P/E ratio is 205, and it sells for 96 times sales. Knowing that, three analysts from The Motley Fool have weighed in to determine whether its stock is still worth buying at these levels. Is Palantir a repeat lesson from the dot-com era? Justin Pope: Separating noise from signal is arguably the most challenging aspect of investing. For Palantir, the noise is a red-hot stock price. Shares of Palantir have risen a mind-melting 1,770% since 2023. In other words, buying the stock up to this point has looked like a genius move. Anyone seeing this, especially on social media, where people aren't always humble, might feel tempted to jump into the stock. But here is the signal. The stock is rising faster than Palantir's underlying business has grown. Don't get me wrong, I think Palantir is an excellent AI stock, and the company is executing at a high level, particularly since launching AIP two years ago. It can make a stock appear invincible when prices only go up. However, investors have seen this movie before. Cisco Systems ran to wildly excessive valuations during the infamous dot-com bubble in the late 1990s. It lost most of its value when the bubble burst, and still hasn't revisited its all-time high, a whopping 25 years later. That doesn't mean that Palantir will suffer the same fate, but check this out. Cisco's P/E ratio peaked at approximately 234, and its price-to-sales (P/S) ratio peaked at around 39. Palantir is even more expensive today than Cisco at its peak. CSCO data by YCharts At the very least, it's hard to imagine much more rational upside in Palantir from these levels. Even worse, any market downturn or misfire in Palantir's business could pop that valuation bubble. Investors should tread very carefully around Palantir stock these days. Amazon's stock history holds a valuable lesson for those worried about Palantir's lofty valuation Jake Lerch: Here's a sentiment that I often hear: "I love the stock, but it's too late to buy it now." And while there's nothing wrong with this viewpoint in theory, I've seen it disproven too many times in practice to grant it much weight. Take Amazon, for example. For years, countless analysts pointed out -- for good reason -- that Amazon's valuation was sky-high. From 1997 through 2000, Amazon's average P/S ratio was around 16. Moreover, the company had no profits -- and therefore no P/E ratio -- until 2003. Once it was making money, Amazon's average P/E ratio over its first five years of profitability was an eye-popping 88. Yet, investors who bought Amazon -- and held until today -- would be very happy with the results. In fact, $10,000 invested in the stock in 2008 would be worth about $800,000 today. This is all to point out that valuation isn't everything. Yes, Palantir is an expensive stock by just about any measure. Its current P/S and P/E ratios are significantly higher than the historical averages I cited for Amazon. However, that's because Palantir is poised to deliver enormous growth over the next decade or more. The company offers a unique value proposition that appeals to almost every organization. It can deliver efficiency gains for government agencies;it can cut costs for commercial clients. It can even help military and intelligence agencies win wars and prevent terrorist attacks. Simply put, there's very little this company can't do. Lastly, the nature of AI and data analysis means that Palantir is positioned to benefit from significant network effects and economies of scale as its AI systems improve and the company's overall client list grows. On top of that, its revenue is already growing at a year-over-year rate of 39%, andprofits are increasing, as is free cash flow. That's what gives me confidence to believe it's not too late to buy Palantir stock. Palantir is a winner for customers, but not investors Will Healy: When it comes to AI living up to its potential, perhaps no stock outshines Palantir. The company began in 2003 and utilizes AI and machine learning as a national security-focused tool. However, it was only when Palantir began to benefit from AIP's massive productivity gains that its popularity took off. Anduril Industries had a 200-fold efficiency gain in its ability to respond to supply shortages. A global insurer reduced an underwriting workflow from two weeks to three hours. With results like that, it is little wonder its commercial customer count is up fivefold over the past three years. Such gains undoubtedly played a role in the aforementioned stock price growth, but regrettably for Palantir bulls, the increases likely do not justify the software-as-a-service (SaaS) stock 's valuation, and here's why. In Q1, revenue of $884 million rose 39% compared to year-ago levels. With that growth, its net income of $214 million surged 103% higher over the same period. Unfortunately, triple-digit growth is not sustainable for even the best of companies, and the current valuation likely prices it for perfection. That "perfection" is likely not in the cards for Palantir. Analysts forecast revenue growth will slow to 36% for 2025 before falling to 29% in 2026. That is likely to do little to make the 96 P/S ratio more attractive, particularly when the larger and faster-growing Nvidia sells for 24 times sales. Indeed, Palantir is likely to play a key role in the AI field for years to come. Nonetheless, valuation matters at some point, and investors could find themselves stuck in a losing stock for years to come if the sentiment around the stock starts to turn negative. Should you invest $1,000 in Palantir Technologies right now? Before you buy stock in Palantir Technologies, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Palantir Technologies wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $669,517!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $868,615!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor 's total average return is792% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to171%for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 2, 2025 John Mackey, former CEO of Whole Foods Market, an Amazon subsidiary, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Jake Lerch has positions in Amazon and Nvidia. Justin Pope has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. Will Healy has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Amazon, Cisco Systems, Nvidia, and Palantir Technologies. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store