&w=3840&q=100)
Pakistan closes key border crossing with Afghanistan amid security threats
Pakistan has temporarily closed a key border crossing with Afghanistan due to security threats, until further notice, officials said on Sunday.
The Ghulam Khan border has been closed after Saturday's suicide attack in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa's North Waziristan district and skirmishes in the province, bordering Afghanistan, a senior Pakistani security official said.
"Following the attack, a curfew has been imposed in North Waziristan, and the border (Ghulam Khan) has been shut down for an unspecified period, he said.
At least 13 security personnel were killed and three others injured in the suicide attack.
Abidullah Farooqi, spokesperson for the Interim Afghan Government's Border Forces, confirmed the closure on Sunday, stating that Pakistani authorities have not provided a clear explanation for the move.
Pakistani officials have merely instructed vehicles at the crossing to use alternative routes, Farooqi said in a statement.
In a separate press release, the provincial administration of Khost province of Afghanistan said officials at the Ghulam Khan crossing were informed by Pakistani authorities on Saturday evening that the route would be temporarily closed due to ongoing security threats.
The statement further noted that no specific timeline has been provided for the reopening of the border, and the closure will remain in effect until further notice.
The Ghulam Khan crossing, located in Khost province, is a critical trade and transit point between the two countries, particularly for goods travelling to and from Pakistan's North Waziristan region.
Afghan authorities have urged citizens, traders, and travellers to avoid the route and instead use other crossings, such as Torkham or Spin Boldak, until the situation is resolved.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
25 minutes ago
- Mint
Indian Embassy clarifies Navy officer's remark on IAF ‘losses' during Operation Sindoor: ‘Misrepresented'
The Indian Embassy in Indonesia issued a clarification on Sunday, addressing reports concerning comments made by its Defence Attaché, Navy Captain Shiv Kumar, regarding Indian Air Force losses during Operation Sindoor. The embassy stated that the captain's remarks had been taken out of context and misrepresented by the media. In a statement posted on X, the embassy emphasised that the presentation delivered by Captain Kumar at a recent seminar was misunderstood. 'We have seen media reports regarding a presentation made by the Defence Attaché at a seminar. His remarks have been quoted out of context and the media reports are a misrepresentation of the intention and thrust of the presentation made by the speaker,' the embassy said. The statement further clarified that the presentation highlighted the principle that the Indian Armed Forces operate under civilian political leadership, unlike some other countries in the region. It also explained that the objective of Operation Sindoor was to target terrorist infrastructure, and that India's response was deliberately non-escalatory. During a presentation on 10 June, India's Defence Attaché to Indonesia, Captain Shiv Kumar of the Indian Navy, disclosed that the Indian Air Force (IAF) lost 'some aircraft' during Operation Sindoor, the May 7 strikes targeting terror sites in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK). He claimed that these losses occurred because the political leadership had instructed the armed forces not to target Pakistani military infrastructure or air defences in the initial strike. 'Only because of the constraint given by the political leadership to not attack the military establishment or their air defences,' Captain Kumar said, clarifying why the IAF suffered fighter jet losses. He further stated that following these losses, the Indian armed forces adjusted their tactics. 'We went for the military installations... we first achieved suppression of enemy air defences and then... all our attacks could easily go through using BrahMos missiles,' he added. The Defence Attaché's candid remarks sparked criticism from the opposition Congress party, which accused the BJP-led government of misleading the nation. Congress leader Jairam Ramesh questioned, 'Why is the PM refusing to preside over an all-party meeting and take the Opposition into confidence? Why has the demand for a special session of Parliament been rejected?' Senior Congress leader Pawan Khera also took to X, calling the defence attaché's comments a 'direct indictment.' He asserted, 'They know they've compromised national security, and they're terrified of what the Congress Party will expose before the people of India.' Captain Kumar's statements came during a seminar titled 'Analysis of the Pakistan-India Air Battle and Indonesia's Anticipatory Strategies from the Perspective of Air Power'.
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Bajwa, Sahney support Diljit Dosanjh amid controversy
Jun 30, 2025 08:22 AM IST Senior Congress leader and leader of Opposition in state assembly Partap Singh Bajwa has supported singer-actor Diljit Dosanjh amid recent calls by the Federation of Western India Cine Employees to revoke his Indian citizenship over casting of Pakistani actress Hania Amir in Sardaar Ji 3. 'I find FWICE's demand not only unreasonable but also completely unjustified,' said Bajwa. 'Diljit is a celebrated Indian artiste who has made all of us proud on the global stage,' he said, adding that artistic collaborations should not be politicised. Rajya Sabha member Vikramjit Singh Sahney said questioning Diljit's patriotism was unjust. (HT File) Rajya Sabha member Vikramjit Singh Sahney said questioning Diljit's patriotism was unjust. In a statement, Sahney said Dosanjh had clearly clarified that the movie was shot in February, well before the Pahalgam attack, during which even an India-Pakistan cricket match also took place. 'We must not confuse timelines or facts when judging intent,' he said. The MP lauded Dosanjh for his sensitivity to public sentiment, citing his decision not to release the film in India.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
IAF lost some jets due to no-strike orders on Pakistan's defences, says official; govt says remarks taken 'out of context'
Live Events 'Losses prompted change in tactics' Govt says comments were 'quoted out of context' (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel A senior Indian defence official posted in Indonesia has said that the Indian Air Force (IAF) lost some fighter jets during the May 7 strikes on terror camps in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK) because the country's political leadership had restricted attacks on Pakistani military remark, made by Navy Captain Shiv Kumar at a seminar earlier this month, has triggered political controversy and prompted a clarification from the Indian Kumar, who holds the rank of colonel and currently serves as India's defence attaché to Indonesia, made the statement during a seminar titled "Analysis of the Pakistan-India Air Battle and Indonesia's Anticipatory Strategies from the Perspective of Air Power" held on June comment came weeks after Chief of Defence Staff (CDS) General Anil Chauhan acknowledged that the IAF suffered losses during Operation Sindoor , India's large-scale retaliation for the Pahalgam terror attack 'I may not agree that we lost so many aircraft, but I do agree we did lose some aircraft and that happened only because of the constraint given by the political leadership to not attack their military establishments and air defences,' Capt Kumar said during the seminar, as reported by officer added that the Indian strategy changed after the initial losses.'After the loss, we changed our tactics and we went for the military installations (and radar sites). So, we first achieved suppression of enemy air defences and then that's why all our attacks could easily go through using BrahMos missiles (on May 10),' he remarks are broadly consistent with what CDS Chauhan said at a forum in Singapore on May he did not disclose the number of jets lost, he confirmed that there had been setbacks in the early phase of the operation and that subsequent Indian strikes focused on suppressing enemy air defences before executing successful precision attacks.'What I can say is that on May 7, in the initial stages, there were losses. Numbers are not important. What was important is why did these losses occur, and what we will do after that,' Gen Chauhan had Kumar's remarks, once reported, were quickly picked up by the Congress to criticise the Modi government's approach to Operation Sindoor. Pakistan, for its part, has claimed it shot down six Indian aircraft, including three Rafales—a claim that Gen Chauhan has called 'absolutely incorrect.'In response to the political fallout, the Indian embassy in Jakarta issued a statement defending the officer, saying his remarks had been distorted.'The remarks made by the defence attaché have been quoted out of context and the media reports are a mis-representation of the intention and thrust of the presentation made by the speaker,' the embassy posted on clarified that the presentation aimed to highlight India's model of civilian control over the military and to emphasise that Operation Sindoor was intended to be a calibrated, non-escalatory response focused on terrorist infrastructure.'The presentation conveyed that the Indian armed forces serve under civilian political leadership, unlike some other countries in our neighbourhood. It was also explained that the objective of Operation Sindoor was to target terrorist infrastructure and the Indian response was non-escalatory,' the embassy government has not officially stated how many jets were lost in the cross-border air operations.
