Sale of loose cigarettes to be BANNED under new law
Remember when you could just score loose cigarettes at the little shop on the corner? Well, updates to the Tobacco Bill aim to ban the sale of loose cigarettes by informal traders and spaza shops. And anyone caught doing so faces hefty fines and even imprisonment.
However, the Portfolio Committee on Health has been hearing arguments against the law over the last week. Specifically, the Tobacco Products Control Bill in South Africa regulates all aspects of tobacco control, public smoking, advertising and packaging. Millions of illegal cigarettes smuggled into South Africa have been destroyed. Image: Pixabay
According to the Cancer Association of South African (CANSA), tobacco-related diseases kill nearly 50 000 South Africans annually. More than 7-million South Africans smoke and there are over 1-billion smokers worldwide.
Nevertheless, spaza shop owners and informal traders believe the banning of loose cigarettes could bankrupt their businesses, reports The Citizen . A spokesperson from the Enterprises and Hawkers Association told parliament that the ban on single cigarettes would cripple operations. He said customers only buy loose cigarettes because they cannot afford a full box. And they're a reliable means to bring customers to the shop/trader. The vast majority of e-cigarettes are sold online and therefore suffer from lax safety control, which the new laws hope to amend. Image: File
Furthermore, the new Tobacco Bill aims improve public health by introducing stricter regulations. It will hold traders liable if customers are found smoking publicly near where they've purchased products. These laws include not just loose cigarettes but banning tobacco product displays at point of sale and regulating electronic nicotine devices (e-cigarettes).
Currently, smoking in indoor public places is banned. Unless the smoking area makes up 25% of the premises. However, the new Tobacco Bill will completely ban smoking in all indoor public places and certain outdoor areas, too. Sale of tobacco products online will also be banned. This is in a bid to control underage smoking. As such, anyone who buys cigarettes and/or e-cigarettes will need to do so in person and produce a physical identification document at the point of sale.
Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1.
Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
an hour ago
- The Citizen
Lesotho gets Musks Starlink as service continues to evade SA
Lesotho is the 23rd African country to be licensed for South African born Elon Musk's Starlink service. Lesotho, a landlocked country surrounded entirely by South Africa, has officially welcomed Starlink. The Lesotho Communications Authority (LCA) granted SpaceX's satellite internet service a 10-year operating license on April 14, 2025, following a year-long regulatory review process. Starlink in Lesotho 'Starlink now available in Lesotho!' SA-born Starlink boss Elon Musk said in a post on his platform X. Lesotho is the 23rd African country to be licensed for the service. Others on the continent include Nigeria, Malawi, Zambia, Eswatini, Botswana, and Ghana. Starlink now available in Lesotho! — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) June 22, 2025 ALSO READ: Bad news for illegal Starlink users in SA South Africa Starlink is not available in South Africa. Talks on launching Starlink in the country stalled earlier after Musk and US President Donald Trump ramped up public rhetoric against policies such as BEE laws, which mandate that foreign-owned telecoms companies allocate at least 30% of local equity to historically disadvantaged groups, primarily black South Africans. Musk claimed Starlink was barred from operating in South Africa because he is not black, an allegation South African officials refuted. Policy direction In May, Communications and Digital Technologies Minister Solly Malatsi published a policy direction to provide alternatives to pave the way for the Starlink satellite internet service in the country. Malatsi issued the directive two days after President Cyril Ramaphosa met Trump in Washington to 'reset' strained relations following false claims of 'white genocide' and attacks against Afrikaner farmers in South Africa, a statement also made by Musk, who attended last week's meeting in the White House's Oval Office. ALSO READ: Malatsi gazettes policy direction to possibly allow Musk to operate Starlink in SA [VIDEO] Parliament However, Communications portfolio committee chairperson Khusela Diko summoned Malatsi to a briefing on the recently published policy directive. Malatsi and the Department of Communications and Digital Technologies officials presented on how the proposed regulation was formulated, stating that one of the main objectives was to create an environment where competition could thrive. 'It is the lack of competition in the market that appears to be the greatest impediment to lower prices for consumers'. Work around South Africans have found ways around the current Starlink restrictions by registering the kit and services in other nearby nations that allow the service and then using the roaming option to access it in their home country. The Independent Communications Authority of South Africa (ICASA)'s chairperson, Mothibi Ramusi, said they have instituted an investigation into the matter. With its wide coverage and increasing affordability, Starlink presents a chance to close the connectivity gap in rural areas while also appealing to urban users. Starlink operates thousands of low-earth orbit (LEO) satellites to provide high-speed internet globally. ALSO READ: WATCH: Starlink not debated with Trump, Ramaphosa says
The Citizen
an hour ago
- The Citizen
‘Hijacked' by the ANC? Maimane issues National Dialogue warning
The government has yet to confirm the details of the financial costs associated with the national dialogue. The government says it is still finalising details of a controversial National Dialogue that some fear may be hijacked by the ANC. The dialogue will give South Africans an opportunity to comment on the kind of country they want to live in and their concerns about the direction the country has taken. Speaking to The Citizen about preparations for the dialogue, presidential spokesperson Vince Magwenya said the government will give full details once they have been finalised. 'Preparatory meetings are underway to finalise various details. The Eminent Persons Group will be meeting the president soon,' Magwenya said. There has been a public outcry over the alleged proposed R700 million budget for the National Dialogue event. Fix SA, not the ANC Build One South Africa (Bosa) leader, Mmusi Maimane, told The Citizen that the dialogue should be treated as an occasion to respond to the country's problems and not those of the ANC. Talks about a national dialogue first surfaced during the election season last year, when some polls suggested that the ANC would lose the elections for the first time since 1994. 'National dialogues occur post a significant crisis, be it a war or pandemic, so ideally we should have had one post the Covid-19 pandemic. Now, what is needed is efficacy in governance. 'So, our call is that the dialogue must depart from the National Development Plan (NDP) and build on from there. The crisis is not the ANC's electoral losses, it is our economy and lack of jobs.' Maimane said. He said a plan should come out of this dialogue on how South Africa should be governed over the next 30 years. 'My suggestion is that a number of parties have a prior dialogue, explore realigning politics and offer a different model of how SA can be governed in the next 30 years. 'If we don't have the alternative, then a dialogue will be ANC hijacked and the outcomes will be the same,' he said. ALSO READ: Clarity sought on alleged R700m cost of National Dialogue South Africans must be part of the process Meanwhile, the president of the South African Council of Churches (SACC), Bishop Sithembele Sipuka, urged all South Africans to actively participate in the National Dialogue. 'The National Dialogue that has been committed to will require all of us to bring our complaints without allowing them to be curses, to speak our truths without weaponising them. 'To listen to the pain beneath the accusations; today's prayers prepare us for that dialogue,' he said. He described South Africa as a 'wrangling' nation in need of transformation and 'true reconciliation'. 'The fact of the matter is that we are a wrangling family. The recent events that have dominated our public conversation, the exodus of some citizens claiming persecution, the debates about the land and genocide, the accusations flying back and forth, those are not just political disagreements, they are the symptoms of a family that has never learnt how to be a family,' he said. Sipuka said black South Africans are unhappy about the slow pace of economic transformation and redress, while white citizens expressed anger about corruption and the collapse of ethical governance. 'We hear, 'Where is the acknowledgement of corruption that has become endemic and is destroying this country? 'Where is the accountability for the collapse of structures and systems that once worked for municipalities that no longer function, and infrastructure that crumbles, and for services that fail the very same people they were meant to serve?'' he said. NOW READ: 'Bring all to dialogue': Experts insist National Dialogue must be people-driven
IOL News
an hour ago
- IOL News
National Dialogue can become act of self-healing
. Lorenzo Davids is the Executive Director of Urban Issues Consulting. Image: Supplied South Africa should have a national dialogue. It shouldn't cost R700 million. Its outcomes should influence the next three elections if we are serious about it. If we get it right, we should have one every ten years. The problem is that South African politicians and bureaucrats continually devise ways to spend money yet consistently fail to devise methods for determining whether the outcomes of those expenditures have been achieved. In his opposition to the proposed cost of the national dialogue, DA leader John Steenhuisen said the recent elections were South African conversations. The problem with that statement is that South Africa, with 63 million people and 28 million registered voters, only had 16 million people turn up to vote. That's just under 27% of our total population. If we include the demographic capacity for participation, then our elections are essentially a case of the middle and upper classes doing all the talking. The National Dialogue is a call to all South Africans to share their views on the kind of country they wish to live in. During elections, its politicians and party loyalists doing all the talking. Any opposing voices are usually shouted down. Our elections prove that many poor people are too discouraged to vote. But they do have a voice. But the DA leader is right: it still doesn't have to cost R700 million. South Africa has just over 49 million people aged 6 and older. This puts the unit cost at just over R14 per person if we include every citizen aged 6 and up. As someone who has done several conversations with communities across the country, the unit cost can be arrested at R2 per person. How? By allowing these conversations to be organically facilitated by local people over many days in their own geographic spaces. Eliminate catering other than water. Eliminate flying people in to host conversations. Eliminate the need to accommodate people in expensive locations. No one gets paid to serve as a local community facilitator for the national dialogue. Don't print any T-shirts. Allow conversations to take on diverse forms. Allow teachers to host conversations in their classrooms and feed this into the national dialogue feedback depository. Allow companies to hold national dialogue conversations. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading Allow sports clubs, places of worship, pubs, and shebeens to host conversations. Appoint skilled, locally based, non-aligned community people to facilitate these local conversations. What skills are required? Not to interrogate inputs but to allow for the mature, free flow of conversations and to record it all in a non-judgmental way, and to protect the process. The Eminent Persons Group should prepare is a list of twenty core questions which can be used as conversation starters. Then allow people to talk. Don't judge their input. Just record it. Then thank them for coming. Within five days of every conversation, the community receives a verbatim transcript of all the inputs they have made to the national dialogue for their records. This ensures the integrity of the process. The worst thing that has already happened is that the Eminent Persons Group has been formed without thoroughly exploring the diverse concepts of a national dialogue. Because the default – a room filled with food and important people with t-shirts and security in over-priced facilities – will now dominate their minds. We have the opportunity to establish a dynamic process in which a country engages in conversation with itself as a regular and organic part of its democratic identity. In a country as filled as it is with generational trauma and constant violence, this process could become an act of immense self-healing. This is not an election. It's not a grandstand for public office. Nor is it the opportunity to launch personal attacks on others or to settle community or political scores. The most empowering and non-judgmental conversation starter for the national dialogue is, "If I had it my way, I would …." Cape Argus
