
The new reality dawning in Australia: it can no longer rely on the US
Not for Australia the brutal humiliation meted out on camera to Ukraine in the Oval Office. Nor Canada's escalating war of invective and retaliatory sanctions.
Australia, instead, got a desultory dismissal in the corridors of the White House – from a staffer: Canberra's plea to be exempted from the punitive new regime disregarded.
'[President Trump] considered it, and considered against it.'
That was all.
But it's not really about the tariffs.
It's what the tariff decision says about Australia's relationship with the US, and the weight a historical alliance carries with a muscular new administration that cares little for history, even less for convention.
From the Australian side, the US relationship remains one cast consistently as 'special', almost familial. It is abiding and reciprocal, cloaked in the semi-sacred rhetoric of Anzus, of 'mateship', of 'shared values'.
But from Washington's end the relationship, always asymmetrical, is looking increasingly immaterial.
Perhaps that is the alliance under Trump: unremarkable, transactional, even disposable.
Director of the International & Security Affairs program at the Australia Institute, Dr Emma Shortis, argues that, in the broad sweep of Australia's economic relations with the US, specific tariffs on steel and aluminium will not be hugely impactful.
But she argues 'politically and symbolically, it's incredibly important because it is Trump demonstrating once again that he has absolutely no care for how his actions affect the United States' traditional allies'.
Australia, she contends, tends still to think it can get special treatment from the US because of its longstanding relationship 'and because of how much we've given the United States in the past'.
'But with this refusal to even engage in the idea of a carveout, Trump has thrown all of that out the window.'
Shortis, author of Our Exceptional Friend: Australia's Fatal Alliance with the United States, argues that, for all of the fraternal rhetoric, the alliance between the US and Australia has always been asymmetric. She contends this is no criticism, rather a realistic reflection of the dramatic power imbalance between the two countries.
At its best, the US-Australia relationship aspires to uphold and promote those values shared – and so often espoused – by the two countries: belief in democratic institutions, in the rule of law, and in the international, rules-based order. Too often though, it has focused narrowly on immediate national interest.
'And with the Trump administration, things are changing rapidly because even the pretence, I think, of caring about allies and their welfare is gone.'
Trump sees his own interests and those of the United States as indistinguishable, Shortis says.
Shades of the Sun King, Louis XIV: L'état, c'est moi.
But a changed America is producing a changed Australian opinion of it.
An Australia Institute poll released this month found three in 10 Australians (31%) think Donald Trump is the greatest threat to world peace (more than chose Vladimir Putin (27%) or Xi Jinping (27%)).
It found nearly half of all Australians (48%) were not confident the Trump administration would defend Australia's interests if Australia were threatened, compared with only 16% who were very confident that it would do so.
Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email
'I think that's a pretty significant shift in how people think about the alliance itself and more broadly what actually makes us safer,' Shortis says. 'The question really becomes: does tying ourselves so irrevocably to Donald Trump's version of America through Aukus actually make us safer or does that make things more dangerous for us and more dangerous for our region and the world?'
Long after he had left the Lodge, former prime minister Malcolm Fraser echoed that thought, writing – at age 83 – that America had transmogrified into Australia's most 'dangerous ally'.
The emerging centrepiece of Australia's security alliance with the US is the Aukus agreement, which – if it proceeds as promised – will see US nuclear-powered submarines sold to Australia.
The deal is a 'step-change' in Australian dependence on the US, Shortis argues. While historically Australia's position has been to follow the US into conflicts, it has always had the choice to do so or not.
'Aukus makes Australian participation in US wars the default setting.'
Trump's America is a changed land, Arthur Sinodinos says.
The former ambassador to the US – in the post during Trump's first term in office – Sinodinos has witnessed America's evolution over decades, stretching back to his days as chief of staff to former prime minister John Howard and the administration of George W Bush.
The Trump administration, especially in its sharpened, second iteration, is categorically different from those that came before it. But Sinodinos says: 'There's no point mourning the passing of [the US's] role in underwriting the global rules-based order. This is the new world we're in. Australia has to act accordingly.
'We just have to be very clear-eyed about what is our national interest in dealing with the US and act accordingly.'
From Washington DC, Sinodinos tells the Guardian that Australia remains, and will remain, an ally to the US, but it must accept 'this is the new world Australia is in: we need a new mindset in this world'.
'The defence and security relationship remains very important to us. It would be hard for us to replicate this if we didn't have the US and therefore we need to put effort into maintaining the commitment of the US to the alliance by showing how essential it is to the US's own security.'
Australia, in its dealings with its larger partner, needs to consistently demonstrate why the alliance is of benefit to America – in security terms (such as joint bases on Australian soil), in economic relationships, and in new areas of potential cooperation such as critical minerals.
'Ask not what America can do for you, but what you can do for America,' Sinodinos says. 'It's 'America first', we want to try to make sure it's not 'America only'.'
Sinodinos argues, while the decision not to exempt Australia from steel and aluminium tariffs may have felt targeted, it was anything but individualised. He cautions against reading too much into it.
'It was a generic decision. The Trump administration has determined to have higher tariffs. They want to make money out of tariffs,' Sinodinos says.
Dr Allan Patience believes Trump's second administration, rather than change the nature of America's alliance with Australia, has simply exposed the deep structural flaws that have always existed.
'Australians have been living in a fool's paradise about America since 1951,' argues the associate professor at the University of Melbourne, referring to the year the Anzus treaty was signed.
'The belief, for generations now, has been that America is our most trustworthy, reliable ally, that it loves Australia, and that they'll come over the Pacific Ocean … should we ever be in any sort of trouble. That's not what the Anzus treaty has ever said.'
Besides, alliances have never been eternal and immutable, Patience argues. They are – to quote John Mearsheimer – always 'marriages of convenience' built on the shifting sands of fickle self-interest.
But a steadfast US alliance has been a useful placatory myth in domestic Australian politics, used by leaders of all stripes.
Patience argues that Australia's deep sense of insecurity, fanned by a distrust in its geopolitical location in the Asia-Pacific, has caused it to depend too heavily on the US as its 'great and powerful friend'.
Australia needs to understand and accept the limitations of the US alliance – 'it hasn't worked and doesn't work' – and look to build a new diplomacy in the Asia-Pacific region. In the 1980s, Bob Hawke spoke of Australia becoming 'enmeshed' in Asia. In the decade that followed, Paul Keating urged Australia 'to seek its security in Asia rather than from Asia'.
Patience advocates building new alliances in the region, forging stronger ties with other liberal democracies, in particular South Korea and Japan, and developing a 'sophisticated diplomacy' with China.
'I think Australia is in very serious trouble because of this naive belief in America. We've been such fools living in this imagined American paradise for so long.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


ITV News
9 minutes ago
- ITV News
Trump orders nuclear submarines to be moved near Russia over 'foolish and inflammatory statements'
Donald Trump has ordered two nuclear submarines to be strategically positioned over what he described as " inflammatory" remarks by the deputy chairman of Russia's Security Council, Dmitry Medvedev. It comes amid a war of words between the pair that started after the US president set a '10 or 12 day' deadline for Russia to agree on a ceasefire with Ukraine during his meeting with Sir Keir Starmer in Scotland on Monday. Writing on his Truth Social platform on Friday evening, Trump said: "Based on the highly provocative statements of the Former President of Russia, Dmitry Medvedev, who is now the Deputy Chairman of the Security Council of the Russian Federation, I have ordered two Nuclear Submarines to be positioned in the appropriate regions, just in case these foolish and inflammatory statements are more than just that. "Words are very important, and can often lead to unintended consequences, I hope this will not be one of those instances. Thank you for your attention to this matter!" It comes after former Russian president Medvedev, Vladimir Putin's right-hand-man, warned Trump against 'playing the ultimatum game with Russia' following his shortened deadline. 'Russia isn't Israel or even Iran,' Medvedev, wrote on X. 'Each new ultimatum is a threat and a step towards war. Not between Russia and Ukraine, but with his own country,' Medvedev said. After Trump responded on his Truth Social platform by telling Medvedev, "the failed former president of Russia, who thinks he's still president" to "watch his words", Medvedev reminded Trump of Moscow's Soviet-era automatic, retaliatory nuclear strike capabilities.


Daily Mirror
10 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Donald Trump orders nuclear submarines closer to Russia in power-play with Putin
Donald Trump has threatened higher tariffs and has vowed to use American nuclear submarines in order to protect itself following statements made by Dmitry Medvedev Donald Trump has ordered nuclear submarines to be moved closer to Russia in response to threats made by the country's former president. In a post shared to his Truth Social, Mr Trump called out ex-Russian President Dmitry Medvedev following statements that he made. The US President said in response he would move nuclear submarines "appropriate regions" closer to Russia. "Based on the highly provocative statements of the Former President of Russia, Dmitry Medvedev, who is now the Deputy Chairman of the Security Council of the Russian Federation, I have ordered two Nuclear Submarines to be positioned in the appropriate regions, just in case these foolish and inflammatory statements are more than just that," Mr Trump said. It comes after Donald Trump recently reignited his feud with Sadiq Khan in front of Keir Starmer, with a savage jibe at the London "Words are very important, and can often lead to unintended consequences, I hope this will not be one of those instances. Thank you for your attention to this matter!" Mr Trump and Medvedev, the deputy chairman of Russia's Security Council, traded taunts in recent days after the Republican said on Tuesday that Russia had 10 days from today" to agree to a ceasefire in Ukraine or be hit, along with its oil, with higher tariffs. Medvedev accused Mr Trump of engaging in a "game of ultimatums" and said Russia still possessed Soviet-era nuclear strike capabilities after the Republican told the former president to "watch his words." The battle of words emerged after Mr Trump reportedly undid months of denying or limiting aid to Ukraine as he aimed to broker a peace between Kyiv and Moscow. Mr Trump agreed to send more lethal aid to Ukraine, sparking fury in Moscow where Putin and his allies had relished the US President's previous unwillingness to support Kyiv as much as his predecessor Joe Biden. Medvedev meanwhile has emerged as one of the Kremlin's most outspoken anti-Western hawks since Russia sent tens of thousands of its troops into Ukraine. Kremlin critics slammed him as an irresponsible loose cannon, though some Western diplomats have said his statements underscore the thinking in the Kremlin. Experts have warned Russia is pursuing its ambition to rebuild its influence and recreate a relevance not seen since its Soviet and imperial eras. Multiple foreign policy analysts have raised the alarm that Putin could pursue a war with NATO by targeting the Baltic States of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania. The countries were once member states of both the Russian Empire and, following brief inter-war periods of independence, the Soviet Union.

Rhyl Journal
39 minutes ago
- Rhyl Journal
Last wheat delivered to largest bioethanol plant under threat after trade deal
Vivergo Fuels, near Hull, has said it is facing closure within weeks following the decision to end the 19% tariff on American bioethanol imports as part of the recent UK-US trade deal. The plant buys more than a million tonnes of British wheat each year from more than 4,000 farms and says it has purchased from 12,000 individual farms over the past decade. Managing director Ben Hackett wrote to growers earlier this year explaining that the plant will only be able to honour existing contractual obligations for wheat purchases while uncertainty continues. Mr Hackett said the last scheduled load arrived at the plant on Friday. Last month, Vivergo, which is owned by Associated British Foods (ABF), said it is was beginning consultation with staff to wind down the plant, which employs more than 160 people, due to the uncertain situation – a process which could see production stop before September 13, if support is not provided. It said Britain's two largest bioethanol producers – Vivergo and Ensus in Teesside – are now in urgent negotiations with the Government. The firms say the UK-US trade deal and regulatory constraints on the industry have made it impossible to compete with heavily subsidised American products. Mr Hackett said on Friday: 'We have a choice of going down a path of stagnation, decline, unemployment, economy shrinking, or we have a choice of going towards a path of investment, growth, prosperity, job creation, and that's why it's crucially important that the Government comes to a decision quickly, and comes to a decision in favour of supporting the UK bioethanol industry.' Farmer Matt Pickering, of Pickering and Sons, near Gainsborough, Lincolnshire, sold the last load of wheat to Vivergo. Mr Pickering said: 'We struggle with the quality of our land type, so we tend to go for out-and-out bulk volume shed fillers. Vivergo has been a fantastic home for us to sell feed wheat into.' Mike Green, owner of haulage company AgHaul, who transported the last load to the plant, said: 'We're in the dark. We don't know where we're going. 'It's very uncertain, uncharted waters, and it's worrying as we've already seen a decline in work.' The landmark came as Meld Energy said the uncertainty over the plant is putting its plans for a 'world-class' green jet fuel project on the Humber in jeopardy. Earlier this year, Meld Energy signed a £1.25 billion agreement with Vivergo Fuels to anchor a Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF) facility at Saltend Chemicals Park in Hull. Meld Energy chief executive and founder Chris Smith said: 'We're excited about the potential to bring our sustainable aviation fuel project to the Humber – one of the UK's most important industrial and energy hubs. 'But, for projects like ours to succeed and the flow of vital investment to be forthcoming, we need a strong and integrated low-carbon ecosystem. 'A bioethanol plant on site at Saltend is a critical part of that mix. Without it, we'd have to consider alternative locations overseas where that infrastructure is already in place.' A Government spokesperson said: 'We recognise this is a concerning time for workers and their families which is why we entered into formal discussions with the company on potential financial support last month. 'We will continue to take proactive steps to address the long-standing challenges the company faces and remain committed to working closely with them throughout this period to present a plan for a way forward that protects supply chains, jobs and livelihoods.' The Government said officials and ministers have met with Vivergo and Ensus consistently over the last few months to discuss options to address 'significant challenges' that the bioethanol industry has been facing for some time. It said engagement with the companies 'continues at pace' and external consultants have been brought in to help.