US Rejects 15 Shipments Of Mangoes From India, Cites Documentation Errors
The authorities in the United States tossed out at least 15 shipments of mangoes from India, citing errors in the documentation process. They instructed the exporters to either send the shipment back to India or destroy it.
Although a United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) inspector in Mumbai was in charge of the procedure, at least 15 shipments of Indian mangoes were refused because of paperwork issues related to mandatory irradiation, The Economic Times reported.
The fruit was rejected after arriving at airports in Los Angeles, San Francisco, and Atlanta. The shipment underwent irradiation in Mumbai on May 8 and 9.
The exporters chose not to re-export the cargo to India because of the perishable nature of the mangoes and the high cost of shipping.
The officials pointed out the inconsistencies in the documentation related to the irradiation process. It is an obligatory step that exposes a fruit to regulated radiation dosages to eradicate pests and increase its shelf life.
They highlighted inconsistencies with the PPQ203 form - a required document for mangoes exported to the US - potentially resulting in losses of $500,000 (approximately Rs 4.3 crore), The Economic Times reported.
According to a USDA notification sent to one of the impacted exporters, the US Customs and Border Protection refused entrance to the consignment "because PPQ203 was issued incorrectly."
Another exporter received notice that their shipment did not match the "entry requirement" - more precisely, the required irradiation treatment.
The notice further stated that the shipment "must be re-exported or destroyed," and that the US government would not be required to take "remedial measures for this shipment."
Exporters strongly refuted allegations that the treatment was not completed. They pointed out that a USDA official oversees the irradiation procedure, which is carried out at a plant in Navi Mumbai.
They claimed the process was completed and that the PPQ203 form was only provided following the procedure.
The issue reportedly concerns the export of mangoes from the Maharashtra State Agricultural Marketing Board (MSAMB), a USDA-approved plant in Vashi, Mumbai.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
27 minutes ago
- Time of India
Vendors told to shift to new Morhabadi market building
Ranchi: The municipal corporation (RMC) on Tuesday formally sent notification to 161 selected vendors asking them to shift to the newly constructed vendor market near the Morabadi electricity office at the earliest. Additional municipal commissioner Sanjay Kumar said, "All allottees are to ensure the timely setup of their shops at the assigned stalls or platforms." He added, "The allotment was conducted with full transparency. Vendors who couldn't be allotted due to document issues can reapply during the second phase." The new market, built at a cost of Rs 1.36 crore with capacity to house 218 vendors, marks a push by the Ranchi Municipal Corporation to decongest footpaths and bring order to the vending ecosystem. Initially, 418 applied in April, out of which 169 were shortlisted based on eligibility, including PM SVANidhi registration and vendor IDs issued before March 5, 2022.
Time of India
27 minutes ago
- Time of India
Bank fraud case: Court rejects plea of accused to take part in trial without bail
Kanpur: Special Judge Companies Act Azad Singh on Tuesday rejected the plea of two accused who sought permission to appear and participate in the trial of Rs 7,820 crore bank fraud case without seeking bail. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The judicial official not only dismissed their application but also ordered that a date be fixed every week in the case. June 17 has been fixed as the next date of hearing. The accused applicants, Sunil Verma and Anoop Kumar Verma, had submitted an application before the court to allow their participation in the trial. Kaushal Kishore Sharma, special prosecutor for the case, strongly opposed the plea, stating that without obtaining bail they can not be allowed to participate in the proceedings. The Companies Act contains special provisions regarding bail, which override those in the Cr PC. Consequently, the judicial official dismissed the application and fixed June 17 as the next date of hearing. Sharma stated that the Serious Fraud Investigation Office had lodged a complaint against 69 accused on behalf of several banks in bank fraud amounting to Rs 7,820 crore. Some name and famed persons of the city were also implicated in the case while as many as 20 accused were residing abroad and their files had been separated from the main case. Sharma mentioned that the court had already issued a non-bailable warrant against the accused, Satish Chandra Gupta, who is living abroad. The two accused Sunil Verma and Anoop Kumar Badhera had approached the apex court, where an order was passed that no coercive action should be taken against them, although their application is still pending. On Monday last, they moved an application before the court, which was dismissed. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now One of the accused, Vikram Kothari, has died, while others such as Rahul Kothari, builder Vishwanath Gupta, industrialist Suyash Desari and others have obtained bail orders in their favour from the apex court. The special prosecutor added that both accused have also applied for permission to travel abroad, and the court has reserved its order on that prayer. Speaking with TOI, the special prosecutor stated that the accused had formed a company for mercantile trading. They acquired a letter of credit from a bank, claiming that the company would purchase rice from one country and sell it in another. However, they used the funds for personal gains and only displayed sales and purchases on paper. The corporate ministry detected the nexus and ordered the Serious Fraud Investigation Office to lodge a complaint in the Companies Act court in 2020. Kanpur has the Companies Act court, which is the only one in Uttar Pradesh.
Time of India
28 minutes ago
- Time of India
Six firms booked for cheating medical device company of 2.23cr
Surat: Vesu police have registered a case of cheating against the proprietors of six firms from various states for allegedly duping a Surat-based medical device manufacturing company of Rs 2.23 crore. The case was filed following a complaint by Chintan Kapadiya, director of Envision Scientific Pvt Ltd. According to the complaint, Envision Scientific and its associate company, Concept Medical Research Pvt Ltd, supplied medical devices to the six accused firms over the past seven years. Despite repeated notices, emails and payment reminders, the firms allegedly failed to clear their dues. The companies named in the FIR include: Sakshi Enterprise (Raipur, Chhattisgarh), Bright Cardio Care (Perambalur, Tamil Nadu), SVR Medical Technologies (Thane), Meditree Health Solutions (Hyderabad), Hindustan Enterprises (Ranchi), Infinite Medical Solutions (Mumbai). The products supplied included a range of medical devices such as Albuminous, Mitigator, Nostrum and MagicTouch, among others. Kapadiya stated that both Envision Scientific and Concept Medical, which also operates a manufacturing unit in the Sachin industrial area, have faced continuous delays and non-payment from these firms, despite fulfilling all delivery obligations. Vesu police have booked all six firms under relevant sections of the IPC for cheating and initiated an investigation into the matter.
