Latest news with #USDA-approved
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Business
- Yahoo
Illinois ‘chicken bill' aims to boost small poultry farms, expand access to their products
Legislation would allow farmers to sell their poultry at farmers markets, roadside stands and through delivery By GRACE FRIEDMANMedill Illinois News Bureaunews@ SPRINGFIELD — A bill that would lift long-standing restrictions on small poultry farmers in Illinois, reducing red tape and transforming the way local farmers process and sell their products, is heading to the governor. Under a measure dubbed the 'chicken bill,' farmers who process fewer than 7,500 birds annually would be exempt from state and federal inspections of their poultry operations or from having to send birds to USDA-approved processing facilities — an increase from the previous 5,000-bird threshold. The change, part of an update to the Illinois Meat and Poultry Inspection Act, also allows these farmers to sell their poultry beyond their own farms — including at farmers markets, roadside stands and through delivery — a major shift from earlier restrictions. 'This is important for our small farmers to be able to get their product to the community, and that's what this is all about,' said Sen. Sally Turner, R-Beason, who co-sponsored the bill. The Illinois House voted 116-0 on Friday, May 30, to approve House Bill 2196, and the Senate passed it unanimously on May 22. Turner represents a largely rural district spanning 10 counties. 'Farmers in my community, especially small farmers, are important to me, personally, but also to our whole district,' she said. State Rep. Charlie Meier, R-Okawville, a farmer himself, said the legislation provides local agriculture with a much-needed boost. 'We always want to get the freshest product to the consumer. We want them to know where it came from,' Meier said. 'So what's better than meeting the farmer who's raised those chickens, knowing where they're coming from? They're fresh, and you're getting a good, healthy product.' Initially, the bill faced pushback from some public health groups, which argued for stricter labeling and packaging rules to ensure the safety of poultry products for consumption. The revised bill includes mandated temperature controls during storage, transportation, shipping and delivery. Processed poultry must be packaged in sealed, leak-proof containers to prevent contamination. Each package must also be clearly labeled with the farm's name and address, the product name, net weight and a statement indicating that the poultry was processed under exemption and not inspected by state or federal authorities. 'Everything you see in that bill was done by some of the public health coalitions,' Michael Desmedt, interim director of public health for DuPage County, said. 'I think our voices were heard, and they understood our concerns.'' Ed Dubrick, a poultry farmer and policy organizer with the Illinois Stewardship Alliance, a nonprofit organization that advocates for sustainable agriculture, said he went around the state and asked livestock farmers what they needed to help with the processing of their animals. Dubrick said the current exemption was too limiting because farmers could only sell 'on or from the farm.' 'Expecting someone to come to the farm every time they want some chicken just really isn't realistic,' he said. 'But if we can bring it to a farmers market where the consumers are, that adds an opportunity.' Illinois is one of the few states without more flexible on-farm poultry processing exemptions, Dubrick said. 'In many states — about 40 — you're allowed to process up to 20,000 birds under similar rules. We're only asking for 7,500,' he said. Farmers will benefit, according to Dubrick. 'It gives them the opportunity to drive both their production and their profits on their farms,' he said For consumers, he said, 'I think you'll see an increase in the availability of local poultry, and I don't think you'll see any difference in food quality or safety. Farmers are proud of their product. They're not going to put their name, their reputation, their business on the line.' Anna Morrell, co-owner of The Little Farm at Weldon Springs in Clinton, said the bill could make it more viable for her and her husband to scale up their small operation, which began in 2020. 'This basically just opens up another avenue for getting poultry processed with lower overhead and gives us an avenue of sales into farmers markets,' Morrell said. 'We're currently not operating under the poultry exemption. We take our meat to USDA-inspected facilities, but there are very few processors in Illinois that process poultry.' Morrell said the current law had made it more challenging for poultry farmers in Illinois to sell their products; this bill would decrease the number of miles farmers have to travel to get their poultry processed. If signed, Legislators and advocates say the bill represents a rare collaboration between producers, public health departments and state lawmakers. 'And let's see if we can't keep a few more farm families on the farm and give kids another chance at a future on the farm,' Meier said. Grace Friedman is a journalism student at Northwestern University's Medill School of Journalism, Media, Integrated Marketing Communications, and a fellow in its Medill Illinois News Bureau working in partnership with Capitol News Illinois. Capitol News Illinois is a nonprofit, nonpartisan news service that distributes state government coverage to hundreds of news outlets statewide. It is funded primarily by the Illinois Press Foundation and the Robert R. McCormick Foundation. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
21-05-2025
- Business
- First Post
Unfruitful partnership: Why US dumped 15 shipments of India's mangoes worth Rs 4.28 crore
The United States, among India's top buyers for mangoes, rejected at least 15 shipments of the fruit, resulting in a loss of $500,000 (Rs 4.28 crore). This occurred because of errors in irradiation documentation, a process that is overseen by an American official. Here's exactly what happened read more The US authorities have rejected multiple consignments of mangoes from India due to documentation deficiencies. Representational image/AFP This isn't any aam news. A row has broken out between American officials and Indian exporters all over a fruit — mangoes. In fact, the row has emerged after Indian exporters incurred losses of $500,000 (Rs 4.28 crore). But what exactly is going on. We examine this not so-aam situation and get you the answers. US rejects Indian mangoes The entire row stems from the fact that Washington rejected 15 shipments of the fruit sent by air upon arrival. The fruit was rejected after arriving at airports in Los Angeles, San Francisco, and Atlanta. The shipment had undergone irradiation in Mumbai on May 8 and 9. But what exactly is irradiation? And why is it important? Irradiation is the process where a fruit is exposed to regulated radiation dosages to eradicate pests and increase its shelf life. Mangoes are exported to the US under the Cooperative Service Agreement between Agricultural and Processing Products Export Development Authority (APEDA) and the United States Department of Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS). STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD As per the plan, mangoes are procured from farms across the country and then graded and sorted at APEDA packhouses. This is followed by a fungicidal treatment of hot water and finally irradiated at USDA-approved irradiation facilities. Vendors arrange mangoes at a fruit market. The fruit was rejected after arriving at airports in Los Angeles, San Francisco, and Atlanta. Representational image/AFP So, what led to the US rejecting the mangoes? According to the exporters, the shipment of fruit was rejected owing to errors in the documentation process. The American officials pointed out inconsistencies in the documentation related to the irradiation process. They noted that there were multiple inconsistences with the PPQ203 form — a document that is a must to export mangoes to the US. What's important to note here is that the PPQ203 form is certified by a United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) inspector. As one exporter told the Economic Times, 'We are being penalised for mistakes made at the irradiation facility.' Another exporter, whose shipment was initially held at Los Angeles airport told the Indian newspaper that the consignment did not meet the 'entry requirement' — specifically, the mandated irradiation treatment. He, however, refuted the claim, stating that the irradiation process was indeed completed and that the PPQ203 form was issued only after the procedure. 'How can we receive the form if the treatment was never done? And without that form, issued by none other than the USDA officer, the mangoes couldn't even have been cleared for loading at Mumbai airport,' he said. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD When asked about the affected mango shipments and the documentation errors, the office of the Chairman of APEDA responded, 'This issue pertains to a USDA-approved centre operated by the Maharashtra State Agricultural Marketing Board (MSAMB) at Vashi, Mumbai. Hence, a clarification must be sought from them.' Following this, the MSAMB, a government organisation operating an irradiation facility in Mumbai, was quoted as telling Times of India, 'Instead of discussing the matter with relevant agencies or notifying the facility beforehand, they (the inspectors) directly reported the alleged issues to their senior offices in the US, resulting in the rejection in the 15 consignments.' Indian mango exporters dumped their consignments in the US itself after authorities rejected them citing documentation errors. Representational image/AFP Indian mango exporters pay a heavy price As the mangoes arrived in Los Angeles, San Francisco, and Atlanta, American officials rejected the consignments citing errors in documentation. The officials ordered that the mangoes either be shipped back to India or be destroyed. However, given the perishable nature of mangoes and high return transport costs, exporters opted to destroy the fruit, incurring an estimated loss of $500,000 (Rs 4.28 crore). Interestingly, the news of this comes as India and US are working toward finalising a trade deal soon. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD India's mango exports India is world's largest producer of mangoes, growing more than 1,000 distinct varieties. It contributes a staggering 43 per cent of global mango production. Additionally, India is also a huge mango exporter. In the year 2023-24, the country exported 32,104.09 metric tonnes of the fruit across the world, earning $60.14 million. Currently, India currently exports mangoes to 48 countries, with the United Arab Emirates (31 per cent) and the USA (23 per cent) emerging as the top importers during April-February 2024-25. India's mangoes are also finding a space in new markets such as Iran, Czech Republic, Nigeria and South Africa. Of the countries that India exports mangoes to, the United States is a huge market. In fact, data reveals that India's mango exports have shown steady growth since 2007 when 157 tonnes were exported to the US. The numbers climbed consistently, with 1,150 tonnes exported by 2017, 2,500 tonnes in 2023. A farmer tends to his mango crop. Of the countries that India exports mangoes to, the United States is a huge market. File image/PTI Moreover figures show that value of Indian mango exports to the United States has grown — from $4.36 million in 2022-2023 to $10 million last year. But India's mango trade with the US hasn't always been a sweet ride. From 1989 until the mid-2000s, Indian mangoes were officially barred from the US due to American officials' concerns that pests like fruit flies could threaten US agriculture. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD However, this impasse was broken by former US President George W Bush. In March 2006, during a visit to New Delhi focused on the landmark civil nuclear cooperation pact, Bush had a simpler personal request: to taste India's famed Alphonso mango. He did, and reportedly pronounced it a 'hell of a fruit.' Soon after, Bush and India's Manmohan Singh reached what commentators dubbed a 'nuclear mango deal,' finally granting American market access to India's mangoes. The rest as they say is history — or in this case, mango history! With inputs from agencies
Time of India
20-05-2025
- Business
- Time of India
Explainer: How a single paperwork error got 15 Indian mango shipments rejected by the US and left exporters furious
At least 15 mango consignments from India have been turned away at US entry points, including airports in Los Angeles, San Francisco, and Atlanta, due to documentation irregularities. Exporters claim that the shipments had met all export treatment requirements, but discrepancies in paperwork led to the rejections. With no viable option to re-import, the shipments were destroyed, resulting in a loss estimated at $500,000 (around ₹4.28 crore). Exporters say mangoes were treated as required The mangoes were subjected to irradiation — a standard treatment meant to remove pests and satisfy US import requirements — at a USDA-approved facility in Navi Mumbai on May 8 and 9. Exporters stated that the treatment was completed under the supervision of a US Department of Agriculture (USDA) officer and that the mandatory PPQ203 form, which certifies this process, was issued. One exporter said the USDA officer issues the PPQ203 only after the treatment is confirmed. 'If the treatment was not conducted, how did we get the form and clearance to ship?' he asked. Incorrect paperwork cited as cause for rejection Despite the completed treatment, US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) denied the mangoes entry, citing errors in the PPQ203 certification. According to a USDA communication sent to one of the exporters, the form was 'incorrectly issued' and the shipment 'must be re-exported or destroyed.' The USDA also clarified that it would not cover the costs of either re-export or disposal. Given the perishable nature of mangoes and high freight costs, exporters chose to destroy the shipments in the US. Responsibility shifted to irradiation facility Exporters insist the problem lies with the facility managed by the Maharashtra State Agricultural Marketing Board (MSAMB), where the irradiation was conducted. 'There were no pests. The paperwork problem occurred at the irradiation centre,' one exporter explained, adding that they were being held accountable for a process they did not control. The Agricultural and Processed Food Products Export Development Authority (APEDA), which falls under India's commerce ministry, acknowledged the issue but referred all questions to MSAMB, stating that the matter falls under its jurisdiction. MSAMB has not yet responded to the requests for clarification. Wider implications amid ongoing trade talks The US continues to be the primary destination for Indian mango exports. Rejections over procedural errors during the peak season have highlighted challenges in trade execution. This comes as the two countries are working to finalise a broader trade agreement. While the US claims that India has proposed a deal with virtually no tariffs, Indian authorities have offered limited comment on that front. According to The Economic Times, the first phase of the trade deal is expected to be concluded in the coming months.
Chicago Tribune
19-05-2025
- Health
- Chicago Tribune
The best L-arginine supplements to support heart health
Over 80 million Americans have some form of cardiovascular disease. Arginine, also known as L-arginine, is a naturally occurring supplement that can help with many aspects of heart health. L-arginine can help people with clogged arteries or congestive heart failure by relaxing blood vessels and improving circulation. L-arginine also has been linked to lowering blood pressure, helping with kidney function, and hastening wound healing. For a high-quality, time-released L-arginine supplement, the top choice is Thorne Research Perfusa-SR. Who shouldn't take L-arginine supplements? L-arginine affects circulation by relaxing blood vessels. Having a deficiency in L-arginine is rare, but a supplemental dose of the amino acid can be helpful for some conditions. However, anyone taking blood pressure medication, anticoagulants, heart medication, treatment for diabetes or erectile dysfunction pills, pregnant women and asthmatics should consult their doctor first before using L-arginine supplements. What are the side effects of L-arginine supplements? While clinical tests show that users can take L-arginine safely for up to three months, you should be aware of some minor side effects. Diarrhea, bloating, abdominal pain and gout have been reported by some users. Asthma patients should be aware that L-arginine could make breathing more difficult. Side effects from using L-arginine long-term have not been studied. What do L-arginine supplements taste like? In general, L-arginine tastes quite bitter due to its alkaline nature. You may want to consider mixing the powdered form of L-arginine with other liquids to mask the taste. Some L-arginine products are flavored. Powder vs. capsule Whether you choose powder or capsules, you will still be getting the same amount of L-arginine. There are some benefits to powder worth noting. It is slightly more cost-effective and requires just one dose daily. You can mix the powder form with other liquids and ingredients. The powder is also more quickly absorbed by the body, so the effects are felt more quickly. Pills are still a viable option for many because of their portability, the lack of bitter taste and they're less messy. Forms of L-arginine There are three different forms of L-arginine. No preservatives Look for L-arginine supplements without artificial preservatives or added sugar. Some L-arginine supplements include additional vitamins and folate for dietary support. Basic unflavored L-arginine pills are available from $6-$10 per monthly supply, but they are not USDA-approved. Higher quality pills and powders are found in the $10-$20 range, while the premium L-arginine supplements that include additional nutritional support and flavor options will run $20 or more. Are there other sources of L-arginine? A. L-arginine occurs naturally in beef, poultry, fish, grain, seeds, nuts and dairy products. Consider increasing your intake of some of these foods if it meets your dietary needs. Can I take L-arginine if I am taking lysine? A. Take lysine and L-arginine several hours apart, as the two substances negate each other's effect if taken together. Top L-arginine supplement Thorne Research Perfusa-SR What you need to know: This L-arginine supplement has a unique time-release that provides a consistent amino acid level throughout the day. What you'll love: The manufacturer supplies supplements to the U.S. National Teams. Significant research studies confirm the product's positive effect on heart health. It has excellent absorption due to the sustained-release formula. What you should consider: You will pay more for this product's unique benefits compared to other products similar to it. Top L-arginine supplement for the money NOW Foods Double Strength L-Arginine What you need to know: Affordable and effective, this L-arginine supplement works as a nitric oxide precursor to dilate blood vessels. What you'll love: The product is made in a facility that is certified to be kosher and free of GMOs. The manufacturer has been family-owned for over 50 years, employing high-tech technology and active in charitable causes. What you should consider: Some reports of minor heartburn have been reported, and a small percentage of users did not notice any difference. Worth checking out Jarrow Formulas Arginine What you need to know: This trusted brand of L-arginine supplement uses the highest grade ingredients in its production. What you'll love: Formulated for exceptional absorption, this L-arginine supplement has no fillers or dyes and has been certified 99% pure. It supports heart and kidney health. What you should consider: Single bottles are not available for purchase on all online retailers, where only two-bottle packs are sold. BestReviews spends thousands of hours researching, analyzing and testing products to recommend the best picks for most consumers. BestReviews and its newspaper partners may earn a commission if you purchase a product through one of our links. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.
NDTV
19-05-2025
- Business
- NDTV
US Rejects 15 Shipments Of Mangoes From India, Cites Documentation Errors
The authorities in the United States tossed out at least 15 shipments of mangoes from India, citing errors in the documentation process. They instructed the exporters to either send the shipment back to India or destroy it. Although a United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) inspector in Mumbai was in charge of the procedure, at least 15 shipments of Indian mangoes were refused because of paperwork issues related to mandatory irradiation, The Economic Times reported. The fruit was rejected after arriving at airports in Los Angeles, San Francisco, and Atlanta. The shipment underwent irradiation in Mumbai on May 8 and 9. The exporters chose not to re-export the cargo to India because of the perishable nature of the mangoes and the high cost of shipping. The officials pointed out the inconsistencies in the documentation related to the irradiation process. It is an obligatory step that exposes a fruit to regulated radiation dosages to eradicate pests and increase its shelf life. They highlighted inconsistencies with the PPQ203 form - a required document for mangoes exported to the US - potentially resulting in losses of $500,000 (approximately Rs 4.3 crore), The Economic Times reported. According to a USDA notification sent to one of the impacted exporters, the US Customs and Border Protection refused entrance to the consignment "because PPQ203 was issued incorrectly." Another exporter received notice that their shipment did not match the "entry requirement" - more precisely, the required irradiation treatment. The notice further stated that the shipment "must be re-exported or destroyed," and that the US government would not be required to take "remedial measures for this shipment." Exporters strongly refuted allegations that the treatment was not completed. They pointed out that a USDA official oversees the irradiation procedure, which is carried out at a plant in Navi Mumbai. They claimed the process was completed and that the PPQ203 form was only provided following the procedure. The issue reportedly concerns the export of mangoes from the Maharashtra State Agricultural Marketing Board (MSAMB), a USDA-approved plant in Vashi, Mumbai.
