
UK shopper spend in EU "soaring" due to tax-free shopping says retail body
AIR data shows that Britons spent £742 million on VAT-free shopping in the EU in 2024. That compares to £147 million in 2021, £527 million in 2022, and £646 million in 2023.
And this fast growth is continuing in 2025 with spending in the first 22 weeks up 16% on the same period in 2024.
Further AIR findings show that France has become the most popular EU destination for British VAT-free shoppers, attracting 35% of all spending, with Paris accounting for 75% of this.
While the last government scrapped tax-free shopping for tourists in the UK at the start of 2021, it noted EU countries extended it to British shoppers for the first time.
The figures suggest that 'as a consequence, Britons are increasingly shunning homegrown stores and travelling abroad to make significant purchases where they can reclaim sales tax', AIR said.
It believes the findings 'will increase pressure on ministers to reintroduce tax rebates for all international visitors – both EU and non-EU – to put British businesses back on a level playing field'.
Reversing the current policy would, according to AIR's analysis, mean the new market for EU consumers alone would supercharge the national economy by over £3.65 billion a year, create 73,000 new jobs across the country, boost regions of the UK by £1.8 billion a year and generate over £500 million in additional VAT alone for the Treasury.
Derrick Hardman, chair of AIR, said: 'The disproportionate increase in British visitor numbers to the EU show that a new market in shopping-led tourism has emerged.
'It's sad to see British shoppers taking their business elsewhere. But they have worked out that the tax rebates they can get on the Continent more than outweigh the costs of hopping on the Eurostar or taking a cheap short-haul flight somewhere.
'It makes no sense for the UK to remain the only destination in Europe not offering tax-free shopping. Thanks to our position outside the EU, we now have a unique chance to reverse the policy of the last government and become the world's shopping capital – offering tax rebates for both EU and non-EU shoppers.
'All the evidence shows that reintroducing a tax-free shopping scheme would more than pay for itself thanks to all the spending stimulated not just in retailers but on hotels, restaurants, transport, tourist attractions and entertainment.
'This Government has promised to pull every lever available to promote growth – here is an obvious one.'
Helen Brocklebank, CEO of luxury body Walpole, added: 'Every pound spent by British and international tourists in Europe instead of the UK threatens growth, denies the Exchequer revenue and undermines the competitiveness of our retailers, manufacturers, hospitality businesses and iconic brands.
'As the sector body representing Britain's high-value manufacturing and services industries, which export British excellence worldwide and support 450,000 jobs and £25.5 billion in tax revenues, we are calling for a simple reversal of the previous government's policy. This would allow the UK to share in future growth, keep our towns, cities and tourism hubs globally competitive, and ensure businesses of all sizes can trade on equal terms with their European counterparts.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Fashion Network
3 hours ago
- Fashion Network
Relief for UK's River Island as High Court approves restructuring, but the hard work starts now
Chris Bowers, a partner and head of insolvency at Forbes Solicitors, told 'The real question now is whether the restructure plans are anything more than just a sticking plaster, prolonging an inevitable collapse in the near future. Restructure plans concentrate on shutting stores and cutting rents. Such moves support liquidity but stop short of addressing declining sales. River Island's most recent accounts show turnover fell more than 19%. Any form of long-term survival needs to reconnect the retailer with consumers to boost revenues, and quickly.' Bowers cited Arcadia, which went into administration just over a year after a CVA-based restructure. Meanwhile, Marty Bauer, retail and e-tail expert at e-commerce marketing platform Omnisend, told us: 'River Island's decision to restructure, including the closure of 33 stores, is a stark reminder of the ongoing challenges faced by retailers operating on the British high street. 'Sadly, this is an all-too-familiar tale, with physical stores often struggling to compete with the convenience and accessibility of online shopping, and sailing against the wind when it comes to shifting buying habits. 'The future of the high street is uncertain, but while online shopping continues to innovate with better customer service and convenience, many shoppers still value the tactile in-store experience and personal interaction. This is where the key to success still lies. 'While the likes of River Island and New Look have faced challenges on the high street, other fashion brands such as Uniqlo are going from strength to strength by creating a seamless shopping experience that offers well-curated selections, an efficient checkout process and unique in-store experiences such as clothing alterations.' As for the reason for the court's approval of the plan, Lucy Trott, managing associate and insolvency expert at law firm Stevens & Bolton, added that with it having been supported by 80% in value of the company's creditors but failing to meet the required 75% support in each creditor class, 'the High Court was asked to 'cram down' the dissenting categories of creditors [ that is, impose it on them ], which reportedly included landlords, local authorities and trade creditors. 'For the court to grant sanction, it would need to be satisfied that none of the dissenting classes of creditors would be worse off than in the 'relevant alternative' scenario which would likely be administration or liquidation, with a sale of the company's business or assets to follow. 'It is possible that the dissenting creditors could yet seek to appeal the court's decision to sanction the plan particularly in light of the damaging precedent this decision sets in relation to cramming down commercial landlords. However, the River Island creditors will no doubt be wary of appealing the court's decision in light of the recent Court of Appeal judgment on the Thames Water appeal. If the restructuring plan were to be upheld on appeal, an adverse costs order would rub further salt in the creditors' wounds.'


France 24
6 hours ago
- France 24
Southern Europe battles heat-fuelled wildfires
01:14 10/08/2025 Ukraine: robot wars are fast becoming a reality On the ground Europe 10/08/2025 EU leaders urge more pressure on Russia ahead of Ukraine talks Europe 09/08/2025 Trump and Putin to hold talks on Ukraine in Alaska Europe 08/08/2025 'Once Hamas releases the hostages the war will be over', regardless of Netanyahu government's agenda Middle East 08/08/2025 Is the mere announcement of a Trump-Putin meeting enough to delay sanctions on Russia? Europe 07/08/2025 'Wildfires in south of France becoming more widespread, challenging to manage over past 10-15 years' Europe 07/08/2025 'Highest tariffs since Great Depression': In 1930's, trade plummeted and global depression deepened Americas 07/08/2025 'Plastic pollution really begins when we're making plastics and extracting oil, gas from the ground' Environment 07/08/2025 EU faces major export decline amid sluggish growth in key member states Americas


Fashion Network
6 hours ago
- Fashion Network
Relief for River Island as High Court approves restructuring, but the hard work starts now
Chris Bowers, a partner and head of insolvency at Forbes Solicitors, told 'The real question now is whether the restructure plans are anything more than just a sticking plaster, prolonging an inevitable collapse in the near future. Restructure plans concentrate on shutting stores and cutting rents. Such moves support liquidity but stop short of addressing declining sales. River Island's most recent accounts show turnover fell more than 19%. Any form of long-term survival needs to reconnect the retailer with consumers to boost revenues, and quickly.' Bowers cited Arcadia, which went into administration just over a year after a CVA-based restructure. Meanwhile, Marty Bauer, retail and e-tail expert at e-commerce marketing platform Omnisend, told us: 'River Island's decision to restructure, including the closure of 33 stores, is a stark reminder of the ongoing challenges faced by retailers operating on the British high street. 'Sadly, this is an all-too-familiar tale, with physical stores often struggling to compete with the convenience and accessibility of online shopping, and sailing against the wind when it comes to shifting buying habits. 'The future of the high street is uncertain, but while online shopping continues to innovate with better customer service and convenience, many shoppers still value the tactile in-store experience and personal interaction. This is where the key to success still lies. 'While the likes of River Island and New Look have faced challenges on the high street, other fashion brands such as Uniqlo are going from strength to strength by creating a seamless shopping experience that offers well-curated selections, an efficient checkout process and unique in-store experiences such as clothing alterations.' As for the reason for the court's approval of the plan, Lucy Trott, managing associate and insolvency expert at law firm Stevens & Bolton, added that with it having been supported by 80% in value of the company's creditors but failing to meet the required 75% support in each creditor class, 'the High Court was asked to 'cram down' the dissenting categories of creditors [ that is, impose it on them ], which reportedly included landlords, local authorities and trade creditors. 'For the court to grant sanction, it would need to be satisfied that none of the dissenting classes of creditors would be worse off than in the 'relevant alternative' scenario which would likely be administration or liquidation, with a sale of the company's business or assets to follow. 'It is possible that the dissenting creditors could yet seek to appeal the court's decision to sanction the plan particularly in light of the damaging precedent this decision sets in relation to cramming down commercial landlords. However, the River Island creditors will no doubt be wary of appealing the court's decision in light of the recent Court of Appeal judgment on the Thames Water appeal. If the restructuring plan were to be upheld on appeal, an adverse costs order would rub further salt in the creditors' wounds.'