
Pay bus drivers minimum wage or face action, ministry tells firms
PETALING JAYA : The human resources ministry says it will not hesitate to act against companies that flout national wage laws, in response to a report on the low basic salaries paid to bus drivers.
Harian Metro had reported that some express and tour bus drivers claimed they receive basic salaries as low as RM700, with some saying they are not paid base salaries at all.
In a statement today, the ministry said it takes such reports seriously, and that the labour department will tighten enforcement against parties violating the laws on wages.
It reiterated that all companies must pay their employees a minimum of RM1,700 regardless of salary structure, according to the Minimum Wages Order 2024.
It said companies that flout the National Wages Consultative Council Act 2011 are punishable under Section 43 of the Act, with first-time offenders liable to a fine not exceeding RM10,000 for each employee, and repeat offenders a maximum of RM20,000 or up to five years' prison sentence.
In the report, those who claimed they are not paid basic salaries said they have to rely on travel allowances and overtime work to make ends meet.
'In my company, there is no base salary. I earn RM50 for a single trip from Manjung (Perak) to Terminal Bersepadu Selatan (Kuala Lumpur). I can make RM100 a day from a round trip.
'If I take four days off in a month, I earn around RM2,600. If I don't take any day off, I can earn RM3,000,' said a 29-year-old express bus driver who only wanted to be known as Mamat.
Another driver, who asked to be identified as Mior, said he had previously taken only three days off in a month, relying on payment depending on the distance of his trips.
Malaysian Bumiputera Bus Operators Association chairman Zainal Abidin Mehat also said some bus companies allow their drivers to work up to 28 days a month because of a shortage of manpower.
The ministry also said it would carry out a review of 28 labour-related laws through a task force headed by deputy secretary-general (policy and international) Shaharin Umar to ensure that there are no exploitable legal loopholes.
This review is scheduled for completion in May next year.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Star
43 minutes ago
- The Star
No travel woes as Brunei cover cost for visiting Super League teams
PETALING JAYA: No need to tighten your travel budgets – Brunei are footing the bill. Super League teams making their trip to the Sultanate for matches for the new season in August can breathe easy, as the foreign football club have agreed to sponsor all travel expenses for visiting teams. Malaysian Football League (MFL) acting chief executive officer Mohd Shazli Shaik Mohd said the arrangement was a major factor in Brunei's participation in the 2025-2026 season. 'The sponsorship was one of the main matters in our agreement with Brunei,' said Shazli after the official ball launch ceremony for the new season. 'Brunei requested to handle this aspect and they will do it.' The agreement with MFL is the same as Brunei did for clubs when they competed in Singapore's S-League last season. Shazli added that even though Brunei would be competing in the league, they would not be eligible to compete in any Asian or Asean level tournaments, such as the Asian Championships League Elite, Asian Championships League 2 and AFF Club Championship. 'If Brunei are in a position to qualify for a slot, they will not be representing the position as our national representatives,' said Shazli. Meanwhile, Shazli also said that 12 out of the 13 teams have locked in their home venues, with the Darul Makmur Stadium in Kuantan being an alternative venue for any last-minute changes. Only Immigration team have until today to confirm their home field.


Malay Mail
an hour ago
- Malay Mail
Is public transport meant to turn a profit? Five countries show it's not that simple
KUALA LUMPUR, July 7 — Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim's administration said at the launch of the Kuala Lumpur Local Plan 2040 that public transport will be the backbone of all future development plans, amid growing calls to curb Malaysia's overreliance on private cars. The assertion again sparked a debate about who will fund these projects. Public transportation systems in Malaysia have long depended on government subsidies. But over the years, the discourse around public transit has included support for privatisation, the thinking being profitability — or at least break even — would make operators innovate and become more financially independent. Experiences of other countries, however, show that the issue around public transport funding is usually more complicated. Some countries have tried privatisation, but not all have enjoyed positive outcomes. 'Public transport is a social service' In Malaysia, policymakers are divided, although many are inclined to view public transport as a social service that should be financially backed by taxpayers. 'In my experience, return on investment is not the issue. The issue of efficiency and funds for expansion of services normally arises,' said Rajiv Risyakaran, the pro-public transport Bukit Gasing state assemblyman who had been involved in Selangor's city and town planning. 'I don't expect public transport to break even or be profitable. It's a social service the government provides for the people, and it's a net cost to the government. So, are there countries where public transport operators make money? Malay Mail looks at five countries with arguably the best public transportation systems, and analyses open-source information to see if operators there are financially self-reliant or subsidy-dependent. People walk past signs for the Tokyo Metro underground system inside Shimbashi Station in central Tokyo in this file photo taken on October 21, 2024. — AFP pic Japan Japan's public transport systems, particularly its rail networks, are known to be among the most efficient in the world. The train operations, including the famous Shinkansen (bullet train), are incredibly punctual with minimal delays. Japan's rail networks, among the world's most complex, were initially operated by public and private companies, but in the 1980s, policy favouring car ownership plunged the government-run entity Japanese Railways (JR) into heavy debt. This pushed JR to privatise by splitting into regional-based companies (JR East, JR West, JR Central and JR Kyushu) that gave it flexibility to tailor the unique needs of the service areas. Today, the Japanese privatisation programme is the exception in terms of profitability. But ticket sales are not the only income source. A key to its success is diversification into real estate and retail businesses around its stations, according to the World Bank. A file photograph shows public busses in Singapore. — TODAY pic Singapore Singapore's public transport system is internationally renowned, and public transport operators like SBS Transit in Singapore have shown to make profits according to media reports citing financial records. But Singapore operates through a unique model where the government often owns the infrastructure, such as tracks and stations, and the operators lease or run services on it. This helps manage the massive capital expenditure. Switzerland The Swiss public transport network, which includes rail systems, taxis, and buses has a total length of 24,500 kilometres and has more than 2,600 stations and stops, some even cutting across the Swiss Alps. The Swiss Federal Railways (SBB), the national railway operator, has seen a return to profit in recent years after pandemic-related losses, according to official statements published on a government website, but like Japan, much of the profit comes from diversification of income sources like rentals from real estate and its energy divisions. Generally, public transport operators there still rely on government subsidies to stay afloat, with half of their operating costs funded by taxpayers. Germany Germany's public transport system is a mix of public and private ownership, with the federal government, state governments, and private companies all playing a role. Local public transport, including buses, trams, and some regional trains, is primarily managed by state governments and municipalities. Deutsche Bahn (DB) is the main railway provider, a state-owned company, but it operates as a private entity and faces competition from other private companies such as SWEG, ODEG, and Flixtrain. Still, many of the operators rely heavily on federal subsidies. In 2021, at least 11.6 billion euros in federal funds were reported to have been invested in public transport, with more promised annually starting in 2025. Over the years, there has been growing criticism over the funding model. Travellers wait at the Eindhoven Airport. — AFP pic Netherlands Dutch public transport is frequently ranked among the best in the world for being well-organised, efficient, reliable, and covers the entire country. Its transport system is known for its integration of trains, buses, trams, and metros, making it easy to travel between cities and within urban areas. Like Germany and Switzerland, Dutch public transport operators rely heavily on government subsidies. But unlike Germany, there is strong public support for financial assistance of public transit systems because they view it as a social service first. Public transport in the Netherlands is funded through a combination of ticket revenue, government subsidies, and sometimes regional or local government contributions.


Free Malaysia Today
12 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
French visit to yield RM4bil in potential investments, says Miti
Investment, trade and industry minister Tengku Zafrul Aziz said the mission's overall success reflects the foreign companies' continued confidence in Malaysia's investor-friendly policies. (Bernama pic) KUALA LUMPUR : Malaysia is expected to reap RM4 billion in potential investments and RM675 million in potential exports following the trade and investment mission to France led by Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim on July 4. In a statement today, the investment, trade and industry ministry said Anwar met 40 representatives from France's industrial sector, with several companies expressing intention to invest in high-tech manufacturing, aerospace, renewable energy, tourism and hospitality, digital economy and sustainable infrastructure. 'As for potential exports, RM675 million was generated for high-impact sectors such as aerospace, automotive, renewable energy, pharmaceuticals, digital economy, lifestyle and halal industries. 'These are sectors targeted under the New Industrial Master Plan 2030 (NIMP 2030) and the Green Investment Strategy,' it said. Miti said several companies also shared their intention to continue investing in Malaysia, driven by key factors such as a conducive, stable and dynamic investment ecosystem; encouraging global demand for Malaysian-made products; efficient domestic supply chains; a highly skilled workforce; and investor-friendly government policies. The delegation included the minister, Tengku Zafrul Aziz, and representatives from the Malaysian Investment Development Authority (Mida) and Malaysia External Trade Development Corporation (Matrade). Tengku Zafrul said the mission's overall success reflected the foreign companies' continued confidence in Malaysia's investor-friendly policies, supply chain ecosystem, competitiveness and economic growth potential. 'The investment and trade potential to be realised will also provide business opportunities for local companies, including small and medium enterprises, and more high-paying jobs for Malaysians. 'All these are key in driving our economic transformation agenda,' he said.