
Two court cases against Elon Musk are putting Tesla's self-driving tech in the spotlight, again
In Miami, a Tesla driver who has admitted he was wrong to reach for a dropped cell phone moments before a deadly accident, spoke of the danger of putting too much faith in Musk's technology — in this case his Autopilot program.
'I trusted the technology too much,' said George McGee, who ran off the road and killed a woman out stargazing with her boyfriend. 'I believed that if the car saw something in front of it, it would provide a warning and apply the brakes.'
In unusual coincidence, regulators arguing an Oakland, California, case tried to pin exaggerated talk about the same Tesla technology at the center of a request to suspend the carmaker from being able to sell vehicles in the state.
Musk's tendency to talk big — whether it's his cars, his rockets or his government costing-cutting efforts — have landed him in trouble with investors, regulators and courts before, but rarely at such a delicate moment.
After his social media spat with President Donald Trump, Musk can no longer count on a light regulatory touch from Washington. Meanwhile, sales of his electric cars have plunged and so a hit to his safety reputation could threaten his next big project: rolling out driverless robotaxis — hundreds of thousands of them — in several U.S. cities by the end of next year.
The Miami case holds other dangers, too. Lawyers for the family of the dead woman, Naibel Benavides Leon, recently convinced the judge overseeing the jury trial to allow them to argue for punitive damages. A car crash lawyer not involved in the case, but closely following it, said that could cost Tesla tens of millions of dollars, or possibly more.
'I've seen punitive damages go to the hundreds of millions, so that is the floor,' said Miguel Custodio of Los Angeles-based Custodio & Dubey. 'It is also a signal to other plaintiffs that they can also ask for punitive damages, and then the payments could start compounding.'
That Tesla has allowed the Miami case to proceed to trial is surprising. It has settled at least four deadly accidents involving Autopilot, including payments just last week to a Florida family of a Tesla driver. That said, Tesla was victorious in two other jury cases, both in California, that also sought to lay blame on its technology for crashes.
Lawyers for the plaintiffs in the Miami case argue that Tesla's driver-assistance feature, called Autopilot, should have warned the driver and braked when his Model S sedan blew through flashing lights, a stop sign and a T-intersection at 62 miles-an-hour in an April 2019 crash. Tesla said that drivers are warned not to rely on Autopilot, or its more advanced Full Self-Driving system. It says the fault entirely lies with the 'distracted driver' just like so many other 'accidents since cellphones were invented.'
Driver McGee settled a separate suit brought by the family of Benavides and her severely injured boyfriend, Dillon Angulo.
McGee was clearly shaken when shown a dashcam video Monday of his car jumping a Key West, Florida, road and hitting a parked Chevrolet Tahoe which then slammed into Benavides and sent her 75 feet through the air to her death. Asked if he had seen those images before, McGee pinched his lips, shook his head, then squeaked out a response, 'No.'
Tesla's attorney sought to show that McGee was fully to blame, asking if he had ever contacted Tesla for additional instructions about how Autopilot or any other safety features worked. McGee said he had not, though he was heavy user of the features. He said he had driven the same road home from work 30 or 40 times. Under questioning, he also acknowledged he alone was responsible for watching the road and hitting the brakes.
Summarizing the testimony, Tesla said in a statement after the court adjourned that McGee had 'stated the simple truth that we all know: If he had just paid attention to the road instead of searching for his dropped cell phone and pressing the accelerator —which he was doing for over a minute before the crash — this tragic accident would never have happened.'
But lawyers for the Benavides family had a chance in the courtroom at parrying that line of argument, asking McGee if he would have taken his eyes off the road and reached for his phone had he been driving any car other than a Tesla on Autopilot.
McGee responded, 'I don't believe so.'
The case is expected to continue for two more weeks.
In the California case, the state's Department of Motor Vehicles is arguing before an administrative judge that Tesla has misled drivers by exaggerating the capabilities of its Autopilot and Full Self-Driving features. A court filing claims even those feature names are misleading because they offer just partial self-driving.
Musk has been warned by federal regulators to stop making public comments suggesting Full Self-Driving allows his cars to drive themselves because it could lead to overreliance on the system, resulting in possible crashes and deaths. He also has run into trouble with regulators for Autopilot. In 2023, the company had to recall 2.3 million vehicles for problems with the technology and is now under investigation for saying it fixed the issue though it's unclear it has, according to regulatory documents.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Chargers reportedly signing LT Rashawn Slater to $114M contract, the richest for an offensive lineman in NFL history
The Los Angeles Chargers and left tackle Rashawn Slater have reportedly agreed to a four-year, $114 million contract extension that makes him the highest-paid offensive lineman in NFL history, ESPN's Adam Schefter reports.


Miami Herald
20 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Cathie Wood buys $45 million of battered megacap tech stock
Cathie Wood doesn't give up on companies she believes in. The Ark Invest chief is known for sticking with tech stocks she sees as "disruptive", often buying even when they face setbacks. This is what she just did, adding to a high-profile tech stock amid a post-earnings dip. Wood's funds have experienced a volatile ride this year, swinging from sharp losses to strong gains. In January and February, the Ark funds rallied as investors bet on the Trump administration's potential deregulation that could benefit Wood's tech bets. But that momentum hit hard in March and April, with the funds trailing the market as top holdings slid amid growing concerns over the macroeconomy and trade policies. Now, the fund is regaining momentum. As of July 25, the flagship Ark Innovation ETF (ARKK) is up 33.3% year-to-date, far outpacing the S&P 500's 8.6% gain. Wood's remarkable return of 153% in 2020 helped build her reputation and attract loyal investors. Her strategy can lead to sharp gains during bull markets but also painful losses, like in 2022, when ARKK tumbled more than 60%. As of July 25, Ark Innovation ETF, with $6.8 billion under management, has delivered a five-year annualized return of negative 0.03%. The S&P 500 has an annualized return of 16.46% over the same period. Wood's investment strategy is straightforward: Her Ark ETFs typically buy shares in emerging high-tech companies in fields such as artificial intelligence, blockchain, biomedical technology and robotics. According to Wood, these companies have the potential to reshape industries, but their volatility leads to major fluctuations in Ark funds' values. Related: Cathie Wood's net worth: The Ark Invest CEO's wealth & income The Ark Innovation ETF wiped out $7 billion in investor wealth over the 10 years ending in 2024, according to an analysis by Morningstar's analyst Amy Arnott. That made it the third-biggest wealth destroyer among mutual funds and ETFs in Arnott's ranking. Wood recently said the U.S. is coming out of a three-year "rolling recession" and heading into a productivity-led recovery that could trigger a broader bull market. In a letter to investors published in late April, she dismissed predictions of a recession dragging into 2026 and struck an optimistic tone for tech stocks. "During the current turbulent transition in the US, we think consumers and businesses are likely to accelerate the shift to technologically enabled innovation platforms including artificial intelligence, robotics, energy storage, blockchain technology, and multiomics sequencing," she said. But not all investors share this optimism. Through July 10, the Ark Innovation ETF saw nearly $2 billion in net outflows over the past 12 months, according to ETF research firm VettaFi. On July 24, the day when Tesla (TSLA) dropped 8.2% following its second-quarter earnings, Wood's Ark funds snapped up 143,190 shares worth around $45.3 million. This was one of Wood's largest recent purchases. Tesla's Q2 earnings were quite dismal. The electric vehicle maker reported a 16% drop in automotive revenue as vehicle sales declined for the second straight quarter. Related: Analysts turn heads with new Alphabet stock price target after earnings The company posted adjusted earnings of 40 cents per share, missing the 43 cents expected. Revenue came in at $22.50 billion, slightly below the $22.74 billion forecast. "We probably could have a few rough quarters. I am not saying that we will, but we could," CEO Elon Musk said. Tesla is grappling with growing challenges, from the rise of lower-cost electric vehicle competitors, especially in China, to a political backlash against Musk that has damaged the brand in the U.S. and Europe. But that hasn't stopped Wood, a longtime supporter of Tesla, from doubling down. "We've been dealing with controversy around Elon Musk in one form or another since we first bought the stock," Wood said in a recent interview with Bloomberg. "We do trust the board and the board's instincts here and we stay out of politics." She also noted that Musk seems more focused on the business again, especially after he decided to take charge of sales in the US and Europe. "One of the announcements Elon made recently is that he is going to oversee sales in the US and in Europe," Wood said. "When he puts his mind on something, he usually gets the job done. So I think he's much less distracted now than he was, let's say, in the White House 24/7." Back in March, Wood predicted Tesla's stock would reach $2,600 in five years, which is nearly nine times higher than where it trades now. Much of the optimism is driven by the company's highly anticipated robotaxi, which Wood believes will account for 90% of the company's value. Musk said during the earnings call that Tesla's robotaxi service, which the company has recently started testing in Austin, Texas, will expand to other states, with a goal of covering half the U.S. population by year-end pending regulatory approvals. "That's at least our goal, subject to regulatory approvals. I think we will technically be able to do it," he said. Tesla stock is down more than 21% year-to-date. The stock has long been Wood's biggest holding, accounting for 9.6% of the Ark Innovation ETF. Related: Analysts unveil bold Amazon stock price target before earnings The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.


Business Insider
33 minutes ago
- Business Insider
Tesla (TSLA) Delays Optimus Robot Amid Production and Leadership Setbacks
Tesla (TSLA) is facing production delays in its Optimus humanoid robot project. The company had planned to build 5,000 units in 2025, but has only produced a few hundred. According to reports, the main issue is the robot's hand and arm components, which remain underdeveloped, leaving many units incomplete on factory floors. Tesla stock is down 21% year-to-date. Elevate Your Investing Strategy: Take advantage of TipRanks Premium at 50% off! Unlock powerful investing tools, advanced data, and expert analyst insights to help you invest with confidence. Optimus Faces Delays Amid Technical and Leadership Setbacks During the company's second-quarter earnings call, CEO Elon Musk acknowledged the challenges and scaled back expectations. He now expects production of the updated Optimus 3 model to begin in early 2026. Musk still sees long-term potential, calling the goal of one million units per year within five years 'a reasonable aspiration.' He added that he would be 'shocked' if Tesla is not producing 100,000 units per month by 2030. Production was paused in mid-June to address hardware issues. Joint motors have been overheating, and current batteries often fall short in terms of durability. The robot's hands, a critical piece for dexterity, lack the strength and reliability needed for repetitive tasks. Tesla is testing new materials and working with multiple suppliers to find a solution. Leadership turnover has also slowed momentum. Milan Kovac, who ran the program, left in June. Ashok Elluswamy, previously head of Tesla's Full Self-Driving division, is now leading the effort. In related news, earlier in June, Tesla filed a lawsuit against one of its former engineers and his robotics startup, accusing them of stealing trade secrets related to the design of the Optimus hand. Tesla is counting on new business lines as its core automotive segment faces pressure. The company reported a 12% decline in revenue and a 16% drop in vehicle sales for Q2 2025. U.S. EV tax incentives are fading, and competition from General Motors (GM), Hyundai (HYMLF), and others is growing. Tesla is betting on robotics and AI to drive future growth, but for now, Optimus remains a long-term play. Is Tesla a Buy, Sell, or Hold? On the Street, Tesla currently boasts a Hold consensus rating from Wall Street analysts based on 35 reviews. The average price target stands at $314.14, suggesting a potential downside of 0.61%.