House Democrats Renew Effort Calling for Palestinian Statehood
'We believe recognizing Palestinian statehood and obligating Palestinian leaders to abide by the international law binding on states and their governments will make that far more achievable and sustainable than decades of statelessness and repression have,' said the letter, which 13 progressive lawmakers have signed so far.
The letter is expected to gather additional signatures before it is sent to President Trump and Secretary of State Marco Rubio next month. No Republicans have joined the effort or signaled their support, making it unlikely that the letter will influence policy decisions from the president or the State Department.
The effort began last week, when Representative Ro Khanna, Democrat of California, circulated a draft, a standard practice to build consensus before a public announcement. Mr. Khanna said the letter, which was reported earlier by Jewish Insider, was leaked in an attempt to derail the effort, a move he criticized but said would not slow him down.
'You cannot sabotage an idea whose time has come,' he said in a statement on Monday.
The push builds on similar efforts in the last Congress, and lawmakers leading the effort said they expected it would draw additional support from colleagues alarmed by the worsening humanitarian crisis in Gaza who have become more willing to publicly criticize the actions of the Israeli government.
The letter also reflects recent actions by some of Israel's closest Western allies. The leaders of Britain, Canada and France have announced in recent weeks that they intend to recognize a Palestinian state.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Minerva Foods flags potential $300m-plus revenue impact from US tariffs
Minerva Foods, one of Brazil's largest meat processors, has quantified the potential impact on revenue from President Donald Trump's tariffs. Trump exercised his pledge made in July on Wednesday (6 August) to raise import tariffs on Brazilian goods to 50% from 10%, prompting President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva to request talks with the World Trade Organization. While some Brazilian products are exempt from the US import levies, meat, poultry and coffee are not. The same day those increased tariffs went into effect, Minerva Foods issued its second-quarter fiscal 2025 results. The meat giant said in an accompanying presentation that the impact would amount to an estimated 5% of its net revenue, which based on the full-year 2024 results would equate to around 1.71bn reais ($314.6m), in historical terms. Minerva Foods booked revenue in 2024 of 34.1bn reais. 'Based on the results of the last 12 months, the company's consolidated exposure to the US market accounted for approximately 16% of revenue, with Brazil representing around 30% of that exposure,' the company said on Wednesday. 'Therefore, Brazilian exports subject to the new tariff policy may have a maximum potential impact estimated 5% of net revenue.' However, Minerva Foods explained it may have a certain element of leverage due to its geographical diversity in meat supply to the US. 'The company hereby announces that it accesses the US market through its operations in Brazil, Argentina, Paraguay, Uruguay and Australia. 'It is worth noting that, in line with our geographic diversification strategy, exposure to the US market also takes place through our operations in Argentina, Paraguay, Uruguay, and Australia, allowing the company to maximise its ability to arbitrate between markets, reduce risks, leverage opportunities, and respond efficiently to scenario changes such as this one.' The Brazilian president said in an interview with Reuters on Wednesday that 'he saw no room for direct talks' with Trump at present, in what would amount to a "humiliation". Lula described US-Brazil relations at a 200-year nadir after Trump tied the new tariff to his demands for an end to the prosecution of right-wing former President Jair Bolsonaro, who is standing trial for plotting to overturn the 2022 election, Reuters reported. Meanwhile, Minerva Foods said it posted revenue in the second quarter of fiscal 2025 of 13.9bn reais, an 81.6% increase from a year earlier. The company confirmed in its results presentation that it concluded the acquisition in October of assets in Brazil, Argentina and Chile from meat rival Marfrig Global Foods. It included 11 plants and a distribution centre in Brazil, a facility in Argentina, and a factory in Chile for a total consideration of 7.5bn reais. When the proposed asset deal with Marfrig was first announced in 2023, three plants in Uruguay were also included. However, that part of the transaction was subsequently blocked by Uruguay's competition regulator, La Comisión de Promoción y Defensa de la Competencia (Coprodec), in May last year. Minerva Foods then submitted a revised proposal with the antitrust authority in February this year, with the provision to sell one of the factories post conclusion of the deal. The company said in the second-quarter results presentation that it is still awaiting a response from Coprodec. Elsewhere in the latest results, Minerva Foods' EBITDA print almost doubled to 1.3bn reais from 744.6m reais a year earlier, although the margin dipped to 9.4% from 9.7%. Based on an almost 40% increase in meat volumes, net income surged to 458.3m reais from 95.4m reais. 'Minerva Foods' strong international footprint remains one of the key pillars of our performance. In 2Q-25, approximately 60% of consolidated gross revenue came from international markets, underscoring our export-oriented strategy and the competitiveness of our South American assets,' it said. "Minerva Foods flags potential $300m-plus revenue impact from US tariffs" was originally created and published by Just Food, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Fast Company
6 minutes ago
- Fast Company
Oil prices are projected to continue sliding. Here's why
Oil prices edged higher on Friday but was poised for the steepest weekly losses since late June on a tariff-hit economic outlook and a potential meeting between U.S. President Donald Trump and Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin. Brent crude futures were up 52 cents, or 0.78%, at $66.95 a barrel by 1104 GMT. U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude futures rose 43 cents, or 0.67%, to $64.31. Brent was on track to be down 3.9% over the week while WTI was set to finish 4.5% lower than last Friday's close. Higher U.S. tariffs against a host of trade partners went into effect on Thursday, raising concern over economic activity and demand for crude oil, ANZ Bank analysts said in a note. The latest tariffs arrive against a backdrop of an already weaker than expected U.S. labour market and Thursday's announcement by the Kremlin that Putin and Trump would meet in the coming days as trade tensions rise between the U.S. and Russia's oil customers. Trump this week threatened to increase tariffs on India if it kept buying Russian oil, which the market viewed as putting further pressure on Russia to reach a deal with the U.S., said independent analyst Tina Teng. Trump also said China, the largest buyer of Russian crude, could be hit with tariffs similar to those levied against Indian imports. The potential meeting raises expectations of a diplomatic end to the war in Ukraine, which could lead to eased sanctions on Russia, with Russian stocks rallying after the news. 'There could be a meeting between Trump and Putin in the near future, which could indicate that Trump is adopting a wait-and-see approach with regard to further sanctions against Russia and its allies,' Commerzbank analysts said in a note. However, some analysts remain cautious. 'The Russian leader is expected to insist on having his territorial demands granted, a hard sell for the invaded country, while his U.S. counterpart will push for a ceasefire,' said PVM analyst Tamas Varga. 'No breakthrough is anticipated, and the U.S. following through on its threat to impose secondary sanctions on those dealing in Russian energy — including China and India — remains a possibility.'
CNN
7 minutes ago
- CNN
The White House is trying to change the conversation about Trump's BLS scandal
President Donald Trump claims, without a shred of evidence, that the government's premiere economic data operation nefariously engineered negative statistics 'for political purposes.' His top economic advisers don't share that view, even as they continue to defend his stunning – and largely impulsive – decision to fire the head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics after a poor jobs report last week. Trump says 'rigged.' His advisers say 'reform.' The rhetorical sleight of hand, difficult as it may be to catch as Trump's economic team takes pains to defend a fixation untethered to reality, captures an important window into the internal West Wing discussions about the next nominee to serve as commissioner of the BLS. Trump's economic advisers are fully aware of the widely acknowledged necessity of insulating – or at least attempting to shield – the next BLS chief from the perception of political interference, according to people familiar with the internal debate. 'The efficacy and the believability of our economic projections are very important,' Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said on MSNBC this week as he argued for a more efficient and accurate data collection process. 'I think the replacement is going to be a highly competent statistician or labor economist and it will be someone, you know, who won't have errors of this magnitude.' One week after the BLS commissioner was ousted, Trump and his economic advisers have tried to clean up the damage by making the narrative about the need to modernize the agency to make the data more reliable and accurate. But that's easier said than done, and the administration is working to find someone reputable who won't freak out markets. 'It is imperative that Trump's nominee be perceived by businesses and investors as nonpartisan and independent of the White House,' Michael R. Strain, the director of Economic Policy Studies at the American Enterprise Institute, wrote this week. 'Because trust in the integrity of government data is a foundation of prosperity, it is in Trump's direct political interest to appoint an independent BLS chief.' Trump, at least publicly, isn't exactly making that process any easier and his political allies have pressed the White House to appoint an unabashed loyalist, people familiar with the matter told CNN. But Trump's economic advisers understand the bureaucratic constraints any nominee would face if confirmed for the role by the US Senate. The commissioner, after all, isn't responsible for collecting the data. That exceedingly arduous and labor-intensive process is conducted by hundreds of federal employees who Republicans and Democrats familiar with the process alike say pursue their mandate with an apolitical and dedicated approach. As the data comes into the agency, only about 40 career officials have access to the raw findings and are tasked with creating the final presentation for public release. The commissioner doesn't even see the data until it's largely locked in and complete – less than 48 hours before it publishes, according to Bill Beach, the conservative Republican Trump appointed to run the agency in his first term. 'Zero is the upper bound of that response,' Beach said when asked by CNN how much influence a commissioner has over the final numbers. 'There was no way for me to change the data. I could have said, oh, you people need to do a better job, the numbers are too low or too high and it would have made zero difference to that staff. In fact, they would have talked to me less.' That doesn't mean there has been a long-standing discussion about significant improvements that could be applied to the current process. The business response rate to the initial survey that comprises the jobs numbers has dropped dramatically in recent years. Technological upgrades have been weighed for years and are widely acknowledged as a necessity for an agency that has faced budget cuts and significant senior staff departures in recent years. 'There's always room for improvement,' Beach said. 'We need to have a better way of collecting these numbers in a more cost-effective way. That's what I hope the president does.' To this point, that hasn't happened. The administration has proposed an 8% cut to the agency's budget for the next fiscal year and has proposed cutting 150 positions. Lawmakers are set to dive into a fractious government funding debate when they return from their August recess and several senior Democratic aides say House and Senate appropriators plan to utilize Trump's decision to elevate the agency's work will turn it into an important part of the debate ahead. 'I wouldn't say try to do better with the same money,' Cathy Utgoff, who served as the agency's commissioner under President George W. Bush, told CNN. 'I would say you really need to have more money here, because you have to collect more data to make it more reliable.' For the moment, however, Trump's advisers are continuing the tenuous balancing act of highlighting the significant revisions without imposing long-term damage on a strained data operation often referred to as the 'gold standard' by economic policymakers around the world. 'What we need is a fresh set of eyes over the BLS,' National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett said August 3 on NBC's Meet the Press. Hassett, in subsequent interview on Fox News Sunday, said that if he ran the BLS and had 'the biggest downward revision in 50 years, I would have a really, really detailed report explaining why it happened.' Reform and transparency have been the throughline of the evolving defense provided by Trump's allies – even if Trump has shown no interest in the more nuanced rationale for his unprecedented move. The awkward dynamic was on full display in the Oval Office on Thursday, as Trump hastily summoned the White House press corps to display a simplistic chart displaying annual employment revisions under his predecessor. The data was delivered to Trump by Stephen Moore, the conservative economist who has served as an outside adviser to Trump at various points during his first and second administration. As Moore detailed the data making up the posterboard displayed for reporters, he was careful not to ascribe political motives – only to be interrupted by Trump after calling it a 'gigantic error.' 'I don't think it's an error,' Trump said as he cut in. 'I think they did it purposefully.' Moore recalibrated on the fly – carefully and with visible discomfort. 'You may well be right, but even if it wasn't purposefully, it's incompetence,' the senior visiting fellow at the Heritage Foundation said in a hedged effort to avoid contradicting Trump's assertion. Trump has said he will announce his pick to lead the agency as soon as Friday. The nominee will face an intense confirmation process, which lawmakers told CNN will not be expeditious in the wake of Trump's actions and rhetoric. It's a dynamic that only serves to underscore the view shared by economic officials outside of the administration – and within. US economists polled by the Kent A Clark Center for Global Markets at the University of Chicago this week said there was no evidence to suggest the Bureau of Labor Statistics' jobs figures were politically engineered. Several economists surveyed raised significant concerns about the long-term damage Trump's attacks would do to the long-standing perception of reliable US economic data. That's a direct threat to Trump's own aspirations of a new 'Golden Age' for the US economy. 'It is in Trump's direct political interest to avoid this,' Strain said. 'But given his history of scoring own goals, I am worried,'
