The NHS must stop wasting our money on trans surgery
Following the earth-shattering news from the Supreme Court last month that women are female, not male, trans activists may fear that the tide is turning against them. Still, at least they can always count on the support of our beloved NHS.
Because, as the Telegraph revealed on Sunday, the health service has spent £20million in three years on giving trans women (i.e., biological males) 'feminising genital surgery'. Which, for those not entirely up to speed with trans terminology, means removing their penises – and, in the words of our report, creating a 'canal' designed to 'imitate the vagina'.
I have to admit to feeling somewhat puzzled by this news. According to the NHS website, 'Cosmetic surgery is not routinely provided on the NHS.' But isn't an operation to 'feminise' one's genitals a form of cosmetic surgery? After all, it's undertaken to alter the appearance of a person who is physically healthy. We all expect the NHS to operate if we happen to find an alarming growth. But I'm not sure that category should include the penis.
An even bigger mystery, however, is as follows. For the past decade and more, trans activists have relentlessly, and very fiercely, informed us that 'trans women are women'. But if that's the case, then why should trans women require this surgery at all?
The whole point of gender ideology is that you are whatever you say you are, regardless of your physical appearance. So if you say you're a woman, then you are a woman, and that's that – even if you have the genitals of a man. In which case, there is surely no need for the NHS to provide a trans woman with a biological woman's genitals – or at any rate, a rough approximation of them.
In fact, the more I think about it, the more shocked I am that the impeccably progressive and inclusive NHS even offers such a thing. Because if its bosses truly believe that trans women are women, they should righteously refuse to carry out 'feminising genital surgery'. And in explanation, they should say: 'These operations insidiously reinforce the hateful, bigoted and outdated notion that people who have penises are men, and people who have vaginas are women. Which, as everyone except JK Rowling and a few fusty old judges now knows, is not true.'
Or, to put it more simply: trans surgery is transphobic.
Still, taxpayers can hardly be blamed if they're unsure what services their taxes entitle them to receive. Consider this other story, from Scotland. At the Royal Hospital for Children and Young People in Edinburgh, sick children are given tutoring, provided by the Labour-run city council, so they don't fall behind with their education. Sounds great. But it seems that there's a catch.
Your sick child will receive this tutoring free of charge only if he or she is enrolled at a state school. But if he or she is enrolled at an independent school, you have to pay for it yourself.
The parents of one young patient couldn't understand this, so they complained to the city council. And, according to the Mail on Sunday, here's what the council's 'Head of Education (Inclusion)' said in reply.
'Unfortunately, as you have chosen to privately educate your son, he cannot be supported by this team,' she said – because 'you have effectively opted out of state-funded education'.
Well, yes. I suppose they have. None the less, I can't help feeling that there's a tiny problem with this argument.
After all, the parents in question haven't opted out of paying for 'state-funded' education, have they?
The term 'state-funded' may seem to imply otherwise, but state education is actually funded by taxpayers. Such as these parents. So, having paid their taxes, these parents should surely be entitled to rely on state education the one time they happen to need it.
If, however, they're to be denied it, it doesn't seem terribly reasonable to keep making them pay for it. In which case, I think it would be only fair to award them a tax rebate – equal to the exact value of the hospital tutoring sessions.
Of course, if they do get that rebate, then every other private school parent in Edinburgh will want one as well. But the row is unlikely to end there. Because these parents may then start demanding a rebate for the entire cost of the state education that their children haven't received. They've 'opted out' of state schools, so they're 'opting out' of funding them.
Which, in turn, will prompt calls to extend this exciting new approach to other areas of taxation. For example: allow those in paid employment to 'opt out' of funding benefits for the unemployed. Allow those who were born in this country to 'opt out' of funding hotels for asylum seekers. And allow those who use private healthcare to 'opt out' of funding the NHS.
Then this last group, at least, would no longer be forced to foot the bill for all these trans surgeries.
'Way of the World' is a twice-weekly satirical look at the headlines while aiming to mock the absurdities of the modern world. It is published at 6am every Tuesday and Saturday
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Lancs woman welcomes NHS psychological support system for infected blood victims
Thousands of people impacted by the infected blood scandal in England will be able to self refer to a bespoke psychological support NHS service, officials have announced. Now, a Lancashire woman has welcomed the launch of the new support service. Nicola Leahey was infected with hepatitis C following blood transfusions in 1975 and/or 1980 and has described the launch of the NHS's Infected Blood Psychological Service as "much-needed." Ms Leahey, from Chorley, was part of an advisory group that helped to develop the service, which began a phased rollout in September. Talking therapies, peer support, and psychosocial support will be offered as part of the service to people impacted by the infected blood scandal, which saw more than 30,000 people in the UK infected with HIV and hepatitis C after they were given contaminated blood and blood products between the 1970s and early 1990s. More than 3,000 people have died as a result, while survivors are living with lifelong health implications, according to a spokesperson. The new service is open to victims as well as bereaved partners, parents, children, and extended families. People can self-refer by phone or can be referred to the service by their GP. Claire Murdoch, national mental health director at NHS England, said: "The contaminated blood scandal and the subsequent long fight for answers have had life-altering physical and psychological impacts for thousands across the country, and the NHS is determined to ensure that anyone infected or affected can receive evidence-based support and treatment. "It has been so important that the Infected Blood Psychological Service has been co-designed with members of the infected blood community to ensure the best and most personalised care possible, and we are very grateful to all our partners who have helped establish these vital new services." Ms Leahey said: "After my diagnosis, I felt that my body had been violated, that I had been physically and mentally abused, stripped of my dignity, my self-esteem diminished - I mourned lost opportunities, I felt betrayed. "So many of us have long awaited the opportunity to have professional support to try to cope with the trauma and life-long effects that we've been subjected to. "I'm thrilled that this much-needed service is now operational." READ MORE: Birds Fish and Chip Shop in Burnley among our top 10 Hundreds attend funeral of hospital imam who died on Eid day Professor Meghana Pandit, co-national medical director for secondary care at NHS England, added: "Following the recommendations of the inquiry, this new service represents a vital step in ensuring patients and families affected in England can be offered tailored psychological treatment and support, and we are pleased that specialist clinics are now open in all areas of England. "This bespoke psychological treatment is already making a difference to the lives of the first people to access it, and we now want to ensure everyone eligible is aware of the services provided." More information is available at
News24
an hour ago
- News24
Why your kidneys are your body's silent heroes and how to keep them healthy
Kidneys are the silent heroes of your body. Be among those who shape the future with knowledge. Uncover exclusive stories that captivate your mind and heart with our FREE 14-day subscription trial. Dive into a world of inspiration, learning, and empowerment. You can only trial once. Start your FREE trial now
CNN
an hour ago
- CNN
US foreign aid cuts threaten decades of progress on driving down malaria
Cuts to US-funded malaria programs are adding to a host of issues confronting Congolese mother Mwayuma Idi Feza, whose city, Goma, is at the center of the country's intensifying conflict and run by a vicious militia. 'I have a child who is sick. He has had malaria for a week and a few days now,' Feza, 36, told CNN of her 1-year-old son, whose fever she suspects is caused by the mosquito-borne illness. She is also experiencing symptoms of the disease, she said. 'I'm feeling cold. I feel bitterness in my mouth.' The single mother is out of work and said she can barely afford food, much less malaria treatment for her and her baby. Malaria is a preventable and curable disease, but it still claims hundreds of thousands of lives around the world each year. Infants, children under five and pregnant women are most likely to die from a malaria infection. It's a leading cause of death in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), which bears the world's second-highest malaria burden after Nigeria, according to the World Health Organization (WHO). In 2022, some 24,000 people were estimated to have died of the disease in the central African nation. More than half those deaths were of children under 5. Since the Trump administration started slashing foreign aid early this year, an estimated 36% of US Agency for International Development (USAID) funding for malaria programs has been cut, according to the Center for Global Development, a DC-based think tank. But the true level of aid cuts remains uncertain. In the DRC, that money funded the supply of antimalarials to 'many health zones' across the country, 'including intermittent preventive treatment for pregnant women,' according to Michel Itabu, a former spokesperson for the country's National Malaria Control Program (PNLP), referring to a WHO-recommended program in areas where malaria is endemic. 'The PNLP is already feeling the effects' of the funding cuts, Itabu told CNN. Such preventive programs might have protected Idi Feza and her baby son – instead, if infected, they are both at risk of serious illness or even death. The US government has long been the largest donor to global efforts to combat malaria. For decades, USAID spearheaded a program called the President's Malaria Initiative (PMI) to drive down mortality and eliminate malaria in 30 of the hardest-hit nations, most of which are in Africa. Launched by George W. Bush in 2005, the program helped reduce malaria deaths by more than 60% – saving millions of lives. CNN spoke to several people who previously worked on the initiative but were recently laid off amid Trump's dismantling of USAID. Most PMI staff have been let go or had their work halted by stop-work orders, and the Trump administration's proposed budget called for a 47% cut to the program. 'One of the reasons that we don't have malaria in the US is because we fund and track malaria worldwide, for global health security.' Former USAID contractor, speaking anonymously for fear of reprisals Every aid worker who spoke to CNN emphasized that people would die in the short term as a result of the disruption to malaria prevention and treatment efforts. Longer term, they said the funding cuts would destroy years of American progress in driving down the prevalence and severity of the disease. US-backed surveillance systems that were once the backbone of efforts to monitor malaria and other disease outbreaks around the world have also been cut, former US government workers told CNN, underscoring long-term concerns. 'One of the reasons that we don't have malaria in the US is because we fund and track malaria worldwide, for global health security,' one former USAID contractor told CNN in February, speaking anonymously for fear of reprisals. She warned that locally acquired malaria cases, like Florida experienced in 2023, could become more common 'if we're not funding driving down the parasite elsewhere.' Aid workers and nonprofits have repeatedly made the case that malaria programs and US disease monitoring make America 'safer, stronger and more prosperous,' which was Secretary of State Marco Rubio's stated framework for assessing US foreign assistance. For example, USAID and the US military have long invested in malaria vaccine research to both reduce the global disease burden and protect US soldiers serving abroad. Spencer Knoll, US policy and advocacy director at the nonprofit Malaria No More, said in testimony to the US House Appropriations Subcommittee in April that 'the world's most dangerous infectious diseases – including Ebola, Marburg, and pandemic influenza – often present first as fevers, and malaria detection programs can stop outbreaks in their tracks.' The nonprofit also argued that US assistance prevents other countries like China and Iran from making further inroads in Africa in terms of soft power. 'Everything that comes from USAID… was very intentionally branded, with this logo that says 'from the American people.' People know where it was coming from,' said former PMI contractor Annē Linn, who lost her job in January. 'When all of a sudden everything stops, that just tears down trust – not just from our government to other governments, but within countries' own health systems.' Between 2010 and 2023, the US contributed more than one-third of the world's malaria financing, according to WHO. As of last year, the US was also the largest contributor to the Global Fund, which works to fight AIDS, tuberculosis and malaria. It's unclear what the future level of US funding for the independent, public-private program will be, following the Trump administration's proposal to halve US matching contributions. The Trump administration's funding cuts 'could reverse decades of progress earned, in part, through longstanding investments from the United States of America and other global partners,' WHO warned in a statement earlier this year. 'Although funding for some USA-supported malaria programs have been reinstated, the disruptions have left critical gaps.' The US State Department did not respond to questions from CNN about the stop-work orders and where specifically budget cuts to the PMI would be felt. Former aid workers emphasized concerns about lack of investment to tackle several global threats related to malaria, including drug resistance, increasingly insecticide-resistant mosquitoes and new, invasive types of mosquitoes that are moving into urban areas with high populations. 'The timing for all of this couldn't be worse. Malaria is seasonal, and so having interruptions during times of seasonality sets us back significantly,' said Nathaniel Moller, formerly a senior innovation adviser at the PMI, whose job was cut in January. He warned that with less funding for measures like bed nets and preventative medicine, the baseline of cases will rise this year, enabling further spread of the disease down the road. 'You missed that window, and you can't just go back to that initial baseline… it's going to go up,' Moller said, noting that the rainy season is already underway in parts of east, central and southern Africa. 'We risk losing years of investments and seeing the caseload increase significantly.' That bad timing is particularly evident in Malawi, where recent flooding and cyclones have driven up malaria infections, the country's National Malaria Control Manager Lumbani Munthali told CNN. He added that cuts to USAID funding for malaria interventions have put the country in 'a difficult situation' because 'it's not easy to close the gaps that have been created.' More than 2,000 people died of malaria in Malawi last year. Some 9 million were infected. 'Malawi has made significant progress in reducing malaria deaths because of the technical and financial support from the US government,' Munthali said. That funding went towards procuring millions of malaria tests kits annually and providing insecticide-treated bed nets and antimalarial medication for pregnant women and nursing mothers. 'We are trying to close those gaps but may not close them completely,' Munthali said, as Malawi adjusts to the sharp drop-off in US foreign aid. About 64% of Malawi's USAID funding has been cut across all programs, according to the Center for Global Development's analysis. In 2023, the most recent year for which PMI figures are available, Malawi received $24 million for its fight against malaria. It's not yet clear exactly how much it will lose this year, Munthali said. Cuts to other areas of US foreign aid, like malnutrition programs, will have overlapping effects in Africa, aid workers also warned. 'Kids that are acutely malnourished will be more vulnerable to other diseases,' like measles, cholera and malaria, according to Nicolas Mouly, an emergency coordinator for Doctors Without Borders, or Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF), who works in northwest Nigeria. He said funding gaps for malnutrition programs that were already present in 2024 have deepened significantly this year. Malaria infection can also lead to malnutrition, fueling what MSF has called 'a vicious cycle.' Nigeria's health minister, Muhammad Ali Pate, told CNN that the government has mobilized domestic funding for its health sector, including $200 million recently approved by parliament to lessen the effects of losing USAID funding. 'When the change in US government occurred and the policy was made, we considered it as another opportunity for reset and for us to increase our domestic funding so that we can meet the responsibility of the health of our population,' he said. 'At the end of the day, the responsibility of the health of Nigerians is on the Nigerian government. It is never a primary responsibility of the US government.' MSF doesn't rely on US government funding, but the organization said its programs have been burdened with additional patients following US cuts to other humanitarian actors in the region. 'We won't have the capacity to treat all of them,' Mouly said. Aid organizations prepare for the annual peak of malnutrition – when fall harvests have yet to arrive and rainy seasons have increased malaria cases – by stockpiling ready-to-use therapeutic food sachets. But for this year's lean season, Mouly said there is 'uncertainty' about their availability. 'We can expect a very critical situation,' Mouly said, emphasizing that children will die as a result. 'We've not seen anything like this in terms of disruption of global aid. It's very difficult.' Lauren Kent reported and wrote from London. Nimi Princewill reported from Abuja, Nigeria.
