logo
Celtic Boys Club abuse case settled: ‘A significant milestone' after 50 years of pain

Celtic Boys Club abuse case settled: ‘A significant milestone' after 50 years of pain

New York Times07-04-2025

'This is a significant milestone and each of our clients will no doubt have differing emotions at this stage,' Laura Connor, a partner at Thompsons Solicitors Scotland, tells The Athletic.
Her firm last week agreed a seven-figure settlement with Scottish champions Celtic on behalf of 22 victims, who were sexually abused at Celtic Boys Club in the 1970s, 1980s and 1990s, in one of the first American-style class action group litigations of its kind in Scotland. There are a total of 28 claimants in the group, and Thompsons hope the remainder will be resolved by the end of the year.
Advertisement
The civil compensation process began in 2017 and Celtic repeatedly claimed that Celtic Boys Club — a prolific feeder team of the men's first team for several decades since its inception in 1966 — was a 'separate entity' and therefore they were not responsible for the abuse that happened.
The settlement came with no admission of liability by the club, though in 2020 Celtic expressed their 'great sympathy' over allegations and said they 'take these extremely seriously because of the historic contacts between the two organisations'.
'It is difficult to quantify but the delays have likely caused the injuries to be worse, in my opinion, than they would have been had a swift settlement and apology been made, an admission and acceptance of what had happened,' says Connor.
'If that had all been done at an early stage, I don't think our clients would have experienced the same worsening of injuries as they have done.'
A further eight cases are still outstanding which mainly relate to abuse by former coach Jim McCafferty. In 2019 he admitted 12 charges related to child sex abuse against 10 teenage boys between 1972 and 1996, before he died in prison in 2022, aged 76.
Celtic issued a statement last week, which read: 'Celtic football club can confirm that a number of legal claims in the group proceedings against the club have been resolved. We are hopeful that settlement can be reached with the remaining group members shortly.
'For some time, we have sought to work with the group members' lawyers to reach a resolution. The club acknowledges the strength of the survivors of abuse who have come forward, and hope that this resolution may help to bring them some closure.
'Celtic football club is appalled by any form of historic abuse and has great sympathy for those who suffered abuse and for their families. The club is very sorry that these events took place at Celtic Boys Club.'
Allegations of abuse at Celtic Boys Club stretch back more than 50 years. They mainly centre around James 'Jim' Torbett, who founded Celtic Boys Club in 1966 — the year before Celtic became the first British team to win the European Cup — and Frank Cairney, who joined in 1971 after being asked to run the youth side by legendary manager Jock Stein.
Torbett was first jailed in 1998 but it was not until November 2016, when former Crewe player Andy Woodward waived his anonymity to reveal he was sexually abused as a child by former coach Barry Bennell, that the subject was brought out into the open.
Advertisement
The National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children (NSPCC) set up a hotline with the English FA to help survivors across the country who had experienced sexual abuse. More than 860 calls were received in the first week. Greg Clarke, the FA chairman at the time, described it as a 'tidal wave' of allegations.
The Scottish FA announced its own investigation into historical child abuse, which was published in 2021, although many of the related claims could not be included at the time due to ongoing legal issues.
Torbett's first conviction came in 1998 when he was jailed for two years after being found guilty of acts of shameless indecency between 1968 and 1974. That related to three former Celtic Boys Club players, James McGrory, David Gordon and former Scotland international turned radio broadcaster, Alan Brazil.
Brazil gave evidence against Torbett in court and recounted the abuse he suffered in an interview with The Times in 2020: 'I've only hated one person in my life and that's Jim Torbett. For as long as he's alive, there will be a shadow hanging over me.'
Fresh allegations were made in a 2017 BBC Scotland documentary, which included testimony from survivors who waived their anonymity and became the first to allege that further abuse took place in Torbett's second spell at Celtic Boys Club.
That sparked a new police inquiry, leading to Torbett being handed a six-year prison term in 2018 for abusing three children during his second spell at Celtic Boys Club during the 1980s. He was also sentenced to three years in prison in May 2023 for abusing Gordon Woods in 1967, who has been vocal about the need for Celtic to apologise publicly.
Torbett was one of nine former coaches convicted for the abuse committed at Celtic Boys Club.
Cairney was acquitted on similar charges in 1998 but two decades later, he was found guilty of abusing eight boys while running St Columba's Boys Guild in Lanarkshire and the under-16 team at Celtic Boys Club. Speaking in court in 2018, Cairney claimed it was ludicrous, denying his victims any form of closure.
Advertisement
Sheriff Daniel Kelly QC (now KC) paid tribute to the bravery shown by the survivors. 'I commend these men who had the courage to come to court and give evidence as to what happened to them when they were young footballers that you coached,' he told Cairney.
'What was striking about their evidence was it seemed as vivid to them as if it occurred yesterday and I recognise how difficult it must have been for them to relive that moment under public scrutiny.'
It was in 2017 that the first survivor contacted Thompsons, the same time the allegations were intimated to Celtic.
In October 2021, when the class action litigation was launched, Patrick McGuire, partner at Thompsons, hoped it would serve as a wake-up call to Celtic. 'I know of no other similar group actions, or involving such a large number of claimants, against any other club in Europe,' he said.
There was a poignant line in the Scottish FA's harrowing 191-page report from February 2021, which heard 33 personal accounts from people aged between six and 16 across Scottish football at the time of the alleged offences. 'Apology should be made not just because the review recommends it but more importantly because it is the right thing to do,' it read. A number of clubs subsequently apologised but Celtic did not add to their earlier statement at the time, apart from in September 2023 when they confirmed they were in discussions with the lawyers representing those abused at Celtic Boys Club.
The report stated it was not concerned with culpability or liability, that this was about accountability and responsibility. 'Who in Scottish football knew about these matters at the time? What did they know? What did they do?'
Celtic have still not admitted liability, which puts their continued avoidance of liability in stark contrast to Manchester City's handling of Bennell's abuse in the 1970s and 1980s. City launched a 'survivors' scheme' which paid out mostly five-figure compensation sums to former players but, crucially, around 20 received personal, face-to-face apologies from the directors of the club.
Advertisement
The agreement is without an admission of liability from Celtic but Thompsons had always believed that there was compelling evidence to show that the boys' club and the football club were inextricably linked.
'That is what I would say the compensation reflects and what our clients can take from the compensation,' Connor says.
'They wanted an apology for what had happened. The apology that was also desired by the point of settlement related to how the cases had been defended and how long it had been defended for.'
It has taken another three and a half years to get to this point before Celtic agreed an out-of-court settlement, which took the overall process to eight years — in addition to the decades of trauma they have lived with.
A new proof/trial date to hear evidence had not been set as negotiations had been ongoing for 18 months. The previous proof was set to take place in October 2023 to deal with a preliminary point in relation to whether the defender could actually receive a fair trial, which is a common defence taken in historical abuse cases, as they claimed there were documents that they believed would show the distinction between Celtic Boys Club and Celtic Football Club were missing.
That would have been an opportunity to lead evidence but the hearing was discharged because Celtic indicated shortly before it that they wished to explore settlement discussions and so the case moved to those considerations.
'It was always in the hands of the defender to settle the case at any time,' says Connor.
'They could have done it at any point since the claims were intimated to them. The part that they would have not had such control over was our valuation of the cases and gathering the evidence in relation to the injuries and the losses. That can take many months to do, or a year or more.
Advertisement
'They wouldn't have had control over that part, but it certainly was within their control to admit at an early stage, engagement in settlement discussions, make that intention clear and put forward an offer. They didn't need to wait for us to value cases, they could have made that first move had they wanted to do so — although that last point would have been unusual.'
It was only when the Childhood Abuse Limitation Act (CALA) 2017 was passed in the Scottish Parliament, removing the three-year time bar on abuse cases, that Thompsons could pursue a class action.
CALA allows groups of two or more people with the same, or similar, claims to raise a single action in the court of session and was brought into law in Scotland in 2020. Two years later, Lord Arthurson ruled that the legal criteria for allowing the action to proceed had been met for 22 former Celtic Boys Club players to seek compensation for the abuse they experienced.
'From a legal perspective, it has been really interesting to be involved with,' says Connor, who also used the class action method when representing more than 700 former tea pickers in Kenya.
'The benefit it gave us is that the common issues of liability could be addressed for the period during which all the cases happened. If a case related to someone at the Boys Club being abused in the 1970s and another in the 1990s we could consider that entire period, whereas if we had raised each case individually, which was the only option prior to the group proceedings, it is very difficult to bring in any evidence into the case outwith the period specific to that case.'
The criminal convictions of Torbett and Cairney in 2018 provided the foundations for the civil case, albeit there were not criminal convictions in all of the cases.
'As there were so many criminal convictions, they didn't have to prove the abuse happened as we claimed,' Connor says. 'It is taken as fact when there is a conviction.
Advertisement
'That is part of the case we would normally have to prove but that had already been done so the main focus of this case was whether or not Celtic were responsible for that abuse.'
The Scottish FA's report into historical child abuse, published in 2021, mentions 11 professional clubs including Celtic.
Is there the possibility that more survivors from Celtic Boys Club could come forward and join the action, or that former youth players at other clubs could come together and pursue justice the same way?
'I'm afraid I don't have a straightforward answer,' Connor says, 'but I always welcome survivors contacting me from any type of background to discuss their individual case. Every case is so individual that I couldn't give a specific answer.
'There is always the possibility depending on evidence. One of the significant distinctions with the Celtic action as opposed to other clubs is that the perpetrators are still alive and have been convicted. Whereas that is absent with other clubs so the availability of wider evidence and the legal landscape has to be considered.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Where Things Stand With the Epstein Files Following Musk's Allegation Against Trump
Where Things Stand With the Epstein Files Following Musk's Allegation Against Trump

Time​ Magazine

time27 minutes ago

  • Time​ Magazine

Where Things Stand With the Epstein Files Following Musk's Allegation Against Trump

The breakdown in relations between President Donald Trump and his one-time ally Elon Musk has played out over social media in spectacular fashion, with the two engaging in a tit-for-tat spat. The row initially started over politics. Musk expressed his vehement disapproval of Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill,' calling it a 'disgusting abomination' and encouraging people to 'kill the bill.' Meanwhile, Trump maintained that the fall-out was prompted by Musk being upset over the removal of electric vehicle subsidies —a provision that made Tesla vehicles more affordable. But the fight has since taken a far more personal turn, bolstered by Musk's allegation that Trump is listed in the files related to the late financier and alleged sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein. 'That is the real reason they have not been made public,' Musk said in a post shared via his social media platform, X. He did not provide evidence pertaining to this. The accusation has spurred Democrats to chase the full unsealing of the Epstein files. California Rep. Robert Garcia and Massachusetts Rep. Stephen F. Lynch—Democratic members of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform—sent a letter on June 5 to U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi and Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Kash Patel. 'We write with profound alarm at allegations that files relating to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein have not been declassified and released to the American public because they personally implicate President Trump,' read the letter titled 'Is Trump Suppressing The Epstein Files?' The White House responded, saying that the move by the Oversight Committee members was 'another baseless stunt that bears no weight in fact or reality.' Here's what to know about the Epstein files and the renewed push to declassify them following Musk's allegation. What do we know about the Epstein files so far? On Feb. 27, Bondi released more than 100 pages of declassified documents related to Epstein—as part of the Trump Administration's vow to be more transparent regarding the high-profile case. During the presidential election, Trump promised to appease the clamoring for the alleged 'client list' of Epstein's since his arrest and subsequent death by suicide in 2019. Though Bondi called this the 'first phase' of declassified files, people were underwhelmed by the published pages, as much of the text had been redacted. Bondi's release included Epstein's 'black book,' which had previously been published. It featured names like Trump and former President Bill Clinton, but as the New York Times reported, there were people in the book with whom Epstein had never even met, and thus listed names are not necessarily connected to Epstein's activities. One of the only never-before-seen documents included in the release was an 'Evidence List' of catalogued evidence obtained by investigators. Bondi blamed the FBI for the fact that the report was incomplete, suggesting in a published letter to Patel that the FBI had more information related to Epstein. Bondi ordered Patel to deliver the rest of the investigation documents and 'conduct an immediate investigation' to understand why she had only received parts of the files. There is much discussion as to whether a fully-fledged 'Epstein client list' even exists. Jacob Shamsian, Business Insider's legal correspondent who has covered the Epstein case for years, said via social media on Feb. 27: 'I should also point out that the 'Jeffrey Epstein client list' does not exist and makes no sense on multiple levels (you think he made a list???). But if Pam Bondi wants to prove me wrong, I welcome it.' Will the Musk allegations prompt the release of further Epstein files? Musks' allegations have brought the Epstein files back into the spotlight, but there were already calls for them to be published in full. In April, Trump was asked by a reporter about when the next phase of the files are due to be released, to which he responded: 'I don't know. I'll speak to the Attorney General about that. I really don't know.' Since then, Democrats have continued to push for more documents to be released. Democratic Rep. Dan Goldman of New York released a statement in May, 'demanding that [Bondi] promptly release the Jeffrey Epstein Files in full.' Spurred by Musk's allegation, Democrats including Garcia, Goldman, and Lynch are now renewing these calls for more transparency. But it remains to be seen whether or not the pressure will be enough for Bondi, Patel, or Trump to provide more answers. What do we know about Trump's relationship with Epstein? Trump's connection to Epstein dates back decades. In a 2002 interview with New York magazine, he famously said that Epstein was 'a lot of fun to be with.' 'It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side,' Trump told the reporter. In July 2019, NBC News' TODAY released unearthed video footage believed to be from 1992, which showed Trump greeting Epstein at his Mar-a-Lago estate. The two men could be seen laughing as they engaged in conversation. After Epstein's 2019 arrest on federal sex trafficking charges, Trump made strides to distance himself. Speaking to reporters in the Oval Office in 2019, Trump said: 'I had a falling out with him [Epstein]. I haven't spoken to him in 15 years. I was not a fan of his, that I can tell you.'

Manchester United Stock Pops as Deep Europa League Run Fuels Revenue Gains
Manchester United Stock Pops as Deep Europa League Run Fuels Revenue Gains

Yahoo

time28 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Manchester United Stock Pops as Deep Europa League Run Fuels Revenue Gains

Manchester United's deep UEFA Europa League run led to better-than-expected revenue gains in the fiscal third quarter. Manchester United, which has a record-tying 20 top-flight English football league titles, finished 15th in the 20-team Premier League this past season, far below its usual standards. However, it made it to the final of the UEFA Europa League, and it attributed the revenue gains to "additional matches played in the quarter as a result of strong performance" in the United (MANU) had a disappointing 2024-25 Premier League campaign. Its deep UEFA Europa League run, however, led to better-than-expected revenue gains in the fiscal third quarter. The soccer giant on Friday reported quarterly revenue that surged 17% year-over-year to 160.5 million British pounds ($217.1 million). Analysts surveyed by Visible Alpha had expected 157.3 million pounds ($212.8 million). Manchester United attributed the revenue gains to "additional matches played in the quarter as a result of strong performance in the UEFA Europa League and high demand for the Club's hospitality offering." Manchester United, which has a record-tying 20 top-flight English football league titles, finished 15th in the 20-team Premier League this past season, far below its usual standards. However, it made it to the final of the Europa League, losing 1-0 to Tottenham Hotspur. The company raised its fiscal 2025 adjusted EBITDA outlook to between GBP180 million and GBP190 million from GBP145 million to GBP160 million. It also lifted the low end of its revenue projection to between GBP660 million and GBP670 million, which it sees "at the higher end" of the range. Manchester United stock soared close to 15% in recent trading Friday, but remains down about 9% for the year so far. Read the original article on Investopedia Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Carlos Alcaraz lauded for his stunning act of sportsmanship at French Open
Carlos Alcaraz lauded for his stunning act of sportsmanship at French Open

Yahoo

time29 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Carlos Alcaraz lauded for his stunning act of sportsmanship at French Open

An image collage containing 2 images, Image 1 shows The crowd applauded Carlos Alcaraz for his display of sportsmanship, Image 2 shows Carlos Alcaraz went on to defeat Ben Shelton (r.) PARIS — Carlos Alcaraz conjured up what initially appeared — to the chair umpire, to everyone watching in the stands or on TV and to his opponent, Ben Shelton — a remarkable lunging volley to win a point at the French Open on Sunday. But Alcaraz knew it shouldn't count. So after briefly thinking about it, the defending champion at Roland-Garros fessed up and called himself for breaking the rules, handing the point to Shelton during what would become a 7-6 (8), 6-3, 4-6, 6-4 victory for Alcaraz in the fourth round. Advertisement 'It's a shame, because it was the 'Hot Shot' of the day,' Alcaraz said later with a smile. Carlos Alcaraz conceded a point to opponent Ben Shelton during their French Open match as he wasn't holding his racket when it touched the ball. X 'Crazy shot,' Shelton said. Here's what happened: Early in the second set, Shelton whipped a passing shot well out of Alcaraz's reach up at the net. So Alcaraz flung his racket — and, as his equipment flipped through the air, its strings somehow not only made contact with the ball but sent it back over the net and onto the other side of the court. Initially, the second-seeded Alcaraz was awarded the point. But he went over to the chair umpire to admit that he wasn't holding his racket when it touched the ball. That's not allowed, so he conceded the point to Shelton, an American seeded 13th. As Carlos Alcaraz's racket flipped in the air, the equipment made contact with the ball. X The crowd applauded Carlos Alcaraz for his display of sportsmanship. Getty Images When the official informed the Court Philippe-Chatrier crowd what had happened, Alcaraz was given a round of applause. Advertisement 'I thought, 'OK, I could not say anything.' But I would have felt guilty if I didn't say anything,' Alcaraz explained. 'It's just about if I know that I didn't (do), or I did, a wrong thing. … I have to say. I have to be honest with myself. I have to be honest with Ben, with everyone. … It's just about the respect we have against each other, and I think that sports, in general, should be like this.' It came at what could have been a critical moment, because instead of leading 40-30 on his serve, Alcaraz was now down 30-40, giving Shelton his first break point of the match. But Alcaraz saved that one — and five others in that 20-point game — along the way to taking a two-set lead in an entertaining matchup between a pair of 22-year-olds who hit the ball hard. Carlos Alcaraz went on to defeat Ben Shelton (r.) REUTERS 'I thought it was clean, you know? I thought he hit the volley, and (then) the racket flew out of his hand,' Shelton said. 'I was kind of surprised that he was, like, 'No, I let go of the racket and threw it.' … Obviously a guy with a lot of sportsmanship.' Advertisement Shelton, twice a semifinalist at majors, delivered serves at up to 143 mph (230 kph) and forehands at up to 116 mph (187 kph). Alcaraz, already a four-time Grand Slam champion, showed off various parts of his repertoire. It was tighter than the score might indicate: Shelton held three opportunities to own the opening set, leading in the tiebreaker at 6-4, 6-5 and 7-6. Take any of the subsequent points, and Shelton would own that set. Carlos Alcaraz will next face Tommy Paul at the French Open. AFP via Getty Images But Alcaraz — who meets No. 12 Tommy Paul of the U.S. in the quarterfinals Tuesday — saved the first with a service winner. Shelton netted a backhand on the next. And the last ended with Shelton smacking a backhand right at the body of Alcaraz, who was up at the net and contorted himself in order to chop a drop volley winner. Advertisement Alcaraz then converted his second set point, closing a 15-stroke exchange with a down-the-line forehand that drew a mistake from Shelton. The third set went to Shelton when Alcaraz put a forehand into the net, and the big-swinging American punched the air, then his chest, and screamed: 'Let's go, baby! Come on!' The fourth swung Alcaraz's way when he used a drop shot winner to set up a break point that he claimed for a 2-1 edge and, after a total of 3 hours, 19 minutes, he was able to finish off an 11th consecutive win at Roland-Garros.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store