Cancel land allotment for Jindal project: HRF to Andhra governemnt
In a fact-finding visit from July 5-7, a three-member HRF team met farmers in Mushidipalle, Kiltampalem, Moola Boddavara, Chinakandepalli, and Cheedipalem. The farmers, many of whom are Dalits and Adivasis, have been protesting at Boddavara, demanding that the government reclaim the land and return it to the landless and marginal cultivators.
The HRF noted that the original Bauxite Supply Agreement with JSWAL was cancelled in 2016, yet the government did not revoke the land allotment.
In 2023, a new GO allowed a change of land use from refinery to MSME park, a move HRF criticised as favouring private interests. They raised concerns over allocation of water from the Thatipudi reservoir, a key source for irrigation and drinking water, to the proposed park.
HRF condemned the assault on Dalit farmer Muthyala Sanyasi Rao for opposing a company, demanding a probe. It called for G.O. 14's cancellation, land reclamation, redistribution to affected farmers, a time-bound inquiry into the allotment process, and accountability for those responsible.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Indian Express
16 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Chennai corporation sanitation workers protesting against privatisation forcefully evicted by police
Hours after the Madras High Court, on Wednesday, directed the State to take action to remove the Greater Chennai Corporation (GCC) sanitation workers, who have been protesting at the Rippon Building since August 1, police moved in to evict them from the place. As of the latest reports, the eviction has begun. Tension prevailed as workers protesting against privatisation were evicted by the police. The workers chanted "Jai Bhim" and decried the "police atrocity" as they courted arrest. "Several police vehicles reached the location where the sanitation workers have been protesting against the resolution of the Corporation Council to outsource sanitation work soon after the court order on Wednesday afternoon," Prashanth of Left Trade Union Centre (LTUC) said. Advocate Kannan of UUI and DAA said that nearby roads were blocked around 10 pm on Wednesday and that buses had been brought. Activist Shalin Maria Lawrence said, "We have 3000 people, of whom 2000 are sanitation workers; 90 per cent of them are women with kids, and elderly women, and they are Dalits. Food trucks have been blocked since Tuesday afternoon, and most of them are hungry. But they are firm that they will not leave the situation is tense and volatile." She added that when all these things were happening, Chief Minister M K Stalin was watching the preview of Rajinikanth's Coolie. "I have never seen such an insensitive CM in Tamil Nadu," she said.
Time of India
4 hours ago
- Time of India
Champion of Dalits, Karnataka CM Siddaramaiah on backfoot after losing two ST ministers in two years
The ruling Congress has gone into a defensive mode not reacting much to the constant barbs hurled at it by the Opposition BJP over the firing of Valmiki community (ST) minister KN Rajanna. Chief Minister Siddaramaiah removed Rajanna from the ministry on directions from the AICC leadership, displeased over his critical comments on 'votes theft.' His removal from the Cabinet comes a year after another Valmiki minister B Nagendra resigned after allegations of diversion of funds meant for the welfare of ST members surfaced. Finance Value and Valuation Masterclass - Batch 4 By CA Himanshu Jain View Program Artificial Intelligence AI For Business Professionals Batch 2 By Ansh Mehra View Program Finance Value and Valuation Masterclass - Batch 3 By CA Himanshu Jain View Program Artificial Intelligence AI For Business Professionals By Vaibhav Sisinity View Program Finance Value and Valuation Masterclass - Batch 2 By CA Himanshu Jain View Program Finance Value and Valuation Masterclass Batch-1 By CA Himanshu Jain View Program Rajanna's ouster has been a shocker for Siddaramaiah as the MLA from Tumakuru district has been a loyal follower, known for his blunt talk. His exit comes at a time the chief minister had been trying hard to bring back Nagendra into the Cabinet. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Cardiologist Reveals: The Simple Morning Habit for a Flatter Belly After 50! Lulutox Undo The Cabinet is down by two ST ministers, a message that is unlikely to go down well with the community. Siddaramaiah, a leader from the backward class Kuruba community, has cemented his position as a tall leader of the Ahinda (acronym of minorities, backward classes and Dalit) voters. He would not allow anything that would dent this image. The community will now doubt his ability to protect its political interests . The way Rajanna was removed will exact its own political price, said an ST leader, pointing out that the Valmiki members have organized themselves well in the past ten years. The BJP too has been trying to foment anger in the numerically strong community by talking in praise of Rajanna's remarks and projecting him as a victim. 'The Congress government is always ready to betray the Valmiki community,' the BJP posted on X, in a clear attempt to alienate the Valmiki community from the Congress. Live Events The ST subgroup makes up about 14% of the state's population, an ST community researcher estimated, not willing to be identified. The BJP consistently promoted B Sriramulu only because the party knows the political importance of the community, he said. Valmiki members are spread across half of Karnataka and can make or spoil the chances of candidates in several constituencies, he said. The removal of an ST minister comes at a time when the community has been trying to assert itself politically, with the hopes of community member emerging as the CM soon.
Hindustan Times
5 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Unfinished business of gender justice in India
No history of gender justice laws in India can be written without drawing a direct, scarred line from the brutal assault on Bhanwari Devi in 1992 to the gut-wrenching tragedy of the 2012 Delhi gang rape and murder. Not as isolated crimes, but as eruptions of women's long-endured trauma into public and legal arenas. In 2012, a 23-year-old woman's brutal gangrape and fatal assault on a bus in Delhi by six men tore through the nation's conscience. And this time, the State's response was swift. (HT Photo) The story of Vishakha v. State of Rajasthan (1997) begins not in the hushed halls of the Supreme Court, but in a village in Rajasthan, where Bhanwari Devi, a grassroots worker with the Women Development Programme, dared to challenge age-old patriarchal traditions by trying to prevent the child marriage of a one-year-old girl in her village. As punishment, she was brutally gang-raped by five Gujjar landlords. What followed was a chilling display of apathy and systemic failure. The police refused to file an FIR, Bhanwari Devi's medical report was incomplete, and the court acquitted the accused, casting doubt on her husband's testimony and asserting that upper caste men wouldn't rape a lower caste woman. The verdict struck a match to years of simmering feminist anger. The 1980s and 90s were the decades of dowry deaths, bride burnings and misogyny. Women across India were fighting back, marching the streets, protesting and picketing. Bhanwari Devi was assaulted while on duty. Yet, her employer — the State — offered neither protection nor support. Sparking a firestorm of fury within women's collectives and Dalit groups, Bhanwari's case became a lightning rod for the historic case that was to follow. It was now up to the highest court to do what the lower court would not: Rule that workplace safety is a constitutional right. And so, in 1997 a historic PIL was filed by a cohort of organisations under the banner of Vishakha against the Rajasthan and the Union governments. The Supreme Court recognised gender equality as integral to rights under Articles 14 (equality before the law), 19(1)(g) (right to practice profession), and 21 (right to life with dignity). It held that sexual harassment at the workplace violates these rights, making it a constitutional issue. In the absence of legislation at the time, the Court framed the landmark Vishakha Guidelines — binding directives making employers responsible for safe, non-discriminatory workplaces. It also acknowledged the psychology of shame, the courage required for women to come forward, and the reality of police and judicial indifference. Yet, despite the celebrated judgment, implementation remained spotty. Few employers complied, fewer women dared complain, and the State dragged its feet on making the guidelines law. Societal attitudes, too, remained stubbornly unchanged. Until December 2012. In 2012, a 23-year-old woman's brutal gangrape and fatal assault on a bus in Delhi by six men tore through the nation's conscience. It exposed once again the State's chronic failure to protect women in public spaces, reigniting the public and legislative urgency begun by Vishakha. Once again, the country erupted in thunderous, unstoppable outrage. And this time, the State's response was swift. All the accused were arrested and charged with sexual assault and murder. One died in police custody. The remaining four adult men were tried, found guilty and sentenced to death. The juvenile received the maximum sentence under the Juvenile Justice Act: Three years in a reform facility. But most importantly, it snapped Parliament out of legislative slumber. The government responded with historic, if long overdue, laws. The Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013 finally gave legislative teeth to the Vishakha Guidelines, making employer inaction a punishable offence. The Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2013, expanded the legal definition of sexual violence, added offences like stalking and voyeurism, increased penalties, and mandated swifter trials. The arc from Bhanwari Devi's assault to Delhi rape-murder is a reminder that justice in India too often arrives only after unimaginable suffering. Vishakha exposed the cost of legal neglect; the Delhi rape and murder laid bare the deadly gap between law and enforcement. Yes, laws now exist. But women still fear walking home alone. Victims still face shame and disbelief. The courts still drag, and perpetrators still walk free. Why must women bleed before the law takes notice? Rights mean little without action. That is the unfinished business of gender justice. Bhanwari's last surviving rapist still walks free. Yet her legacy planted a stake in the ground. The fight is unfinished. But the path is lit. Insiyah Vahanvaty is a socio-political commentator and the author of The Fearless Judge. Ashish Bharadwaj is professor and dean of BITS Pilani's Law School in Mumbai. The views expressed are personal.
