Solar panels in space ‘could provide 80% of Europe's renewable energy by 2050'
Using a detailed computer model of the continent's future power grid, the researchers found that a system of space-based panels designed by Nasa could reduce the cost of the whole European power system by as much as 15%. It could also cut battery use by more than two-thirds.
The study, led by researchers at King's College London, is the first to assess the possible impact of space solar energy on Europe. The space-based solar panel (SBSP) that yielded the positive results uses a heliostat design. The design, which the system imitates, uses mirror-like reflectors to collect sunlight in orbit. The sunlight is then transmitted to stations on Earth and converted to electricity before it is delivered to an energy grid.
The computer model of the continent's power grid spans 33 countries, and simulates electricity demand, generation and storage to identify the lowest-cost option to meet Europe's electricity needs.
When the researchers integrated the SBSP concept into the model based on Nasa's predictions of its potential energy capacity, results showed that it could replace as much as 80% of Europe's land-based renewable energy.
Land-based renewable energy is irregular and weather-dependent, complicating reliable supply, and comes at varying costs, the researchers point out. SBSPs could be an alternative centralised energy resource that operates above the atmosphere with continuous gigawatt-scale power.
The authors note that the modelling does not account for potential impacts from space-specific challenges such as orbital congestion, transmission interruptions or beaming variability, which could influence SBSP reliability and operational performance.
Nor could the potential cost-effectiveness of SBSPs be realised until 2050 because building, launching and maintaining them would be too expensive unless technological growth reduces its costs.
Dr Wei He, a senior lecturer at KCL's engineering department and lead author of the study, which is published in Joule, said: 'There are some risks to consider, such as how the satellite in space could have too many solar panels. Could it cause collisions or be damaged by debris in space?'
Despite those risks, Wei believes the research shows that have the potential to help countries in achieving net zero. 'Renewable energy to replace fossil fuels is the most important action we are taking as humans. Space-based solar power is a potential technology and can provide continuous solar power as a renewable energy source,' he said.
Japan is already developing SBSPs and integrating them into its space and net-zero strategy, Wei said.
Sign up to Down to Earth
The planet's most important stories. Get all the week's environment news - the good, the bad and the essential
after newsletter promotion
Europe could follow suit, the paper suggests, mentioning the continent's longstanding tradition of multinational cooperation of cross-border electricity exchange and satellite ventures under the European Space Agency.
The authors believe Europe could leverage its multinational cooperation to develop and operate a centralized SBSP infrastructure. In doing so, it could create a continent-scale solution to provide stable, baseload-scale renewable supply, reducing the continent's reliance on gas-fired power.
'Now is the time,' Wei said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News
an hour ago
- Sky News
Millions of people threatened by wildfires near their homes, research finds
Why you can trust Sky News The number of people whose lives or property are at risk from wildfires has surged by almost 40% in just two decades, according to new research. Analysis by an international team of scientists showed that 440 million people were threatened by fire encroaching on their homes between 2002 and 2021. And while the area affected decreased over the study period, the number of people affected each year rose by 7.7 million. Dr Matthew Jones, from the University of East Anglia, told Sky News that a combination of climate change and population movements is driving the increase. "We're seeing hotter, drier conditions, and that's leading to more fire-prone weather," he said. "We're also seeing people migrating more and more into areas that are historically fire-prone. In the western US, we see this idyllic, romantic image of living closer to nature. "And that's a trend which is putting people closer to fire-prone landscapes than in the past." The researchers analysed 18.6 million records of wildfires over 20 years. High-profile disasters in the US, Europe and Australia grab public attention, but they only account for 2.5% of the global burned area, according to results published in the journal Science. The vast majority of affected land - 85% - is in Africa. But that is falling as more savannah scrub and grassland is taken over by agriculture - a change so significant that it shows up in global totals, with a 26% fall in land burned over the study period. "The apparent increase in damaging and destructive wildfire impacts on society has until now seemed perplexing because the area burned by fires globally has been falling," said Dr Jones. He added: "By closely analysing the shifting geography of both fire and population, this study brings vital clarity - our work shows that wildfires really are becoming more frequent and intense in populated areas. "These changes bring danger to life, damage to property, and threat to livelihood." The researchers say the increasing vulnerability of human populations to wildfire underlines the urgent need for proactive measures to protect communities. That could include deliberately starting small, controlled fires to burn off vegetation, so it doesn't build up.
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Gruesome pit of tortured warriors is uncovered in France after being laid undiscovered for 6,000 years
A gruesome pit of Stone Age human skeletons has been uncovered after being hidden for more than 6,000 years. Dozens of warriors came to their brutal end after being captured in northeastern France, where warfare was widespread across the region. However, rather than kill their enemies, 'victory' celebrations were held where researchers say invaders were tortured and mutilated. Dating back to between 4300 and 4150 B.C, a total of 82 human skeletons were unearthed in the pits, with some having their left arms severed or hands completely dismembered. Writing in the Science Advances journal, experts said: 'The severed upper limbs would represent war trophies removed at the battle site following the violent encounter and then taken back to the settlement for perhaps further transformation and display.' Dr Teresa Fernandez-Crespo, who worked on the findings, told Live Science that the warriors had their lower limbs fractured to stop them from fleeing. She said: 'We believe they were brutalised in the context of rituals of triumph or celebrations of victory that followed one or several battles.' Researchers also found they had suffered 'blunt force traumas' as well as signs of piercing holes through their bones, which could point to the invaders being put up on display as a warning for others. Food evidence found on their teeth suggests the tortured warriors may have come from Paris. However, chemical signatures from their remains indicate the group may have also moved around different regions. While some remains showed no signs of being mutilated, which could be the skeletons of warriors who did not survive when attempting to defend the area. Another theory put forward by scientists is that skeletons could be the result of 'collective punishments or sacrifices of social outcasts'.
BBC News
3 hours ago
- BBC News
Stonehenge cow tooth helps scientists understand mystery of monument
It's one of the world's greatest monuments and greatest mysteries; how and why did the famous stones of Stonehenge end up in south-west England? However, scientists say an unlikely object might help them moo-ve an udder step closer to solving the taken a closer look at a cow's tooth, which was previously found close to Stonehenge's south now believe the cow originated from Wales and could have played an important role in transporting the stones across the UK. What did experts find at Stonehenge? More than one hundred years ago, in 1924, archaeologists discovered an ancient cow's jawbone that had been carefully placed next to Stonehenge's south dated the find to the monument's very beginning, around 3000BC - however the strange discovery has puzzled historians ever since. A team of researchers from the British Geological Survey, Cardiff University and University College London decided to take a closer look at one of the teeth from the ancient wanted to understand why it had been placed there and why was the cow considered special?Scientists carried out tests on the tooth to find out what it was made of, which offered clues about the cow's diet, environment and discovered data which suggests that the cow originated from Wales, before moving to say this is the first time that they have seen evidence linking cattle from Stonehenge to Wales - and it supports the theory that the animals were used in the transportation of the enormous rocks across the country. What is Stonehenge? Stonehenge is one of the world's most famous stands on Salisbury Plain in Wiltshire, in south-west England, and its giant stones can be seen from miles took many hundreds of years to build, and work is believed to have began around 3000 BC, in the late Neolithic the next thousand years, people changed parts of the monument. The last changes were made in the early Bronze Age, around 1500 may never know exactly why Stonehenge was built, but it's widely believed that people gathered there for religious ceremonies.
