World Is Watching: Int'l Observers To Monitor PH Mid-term Polls Amid Escalating Election Violence
This is the second IOM mounted by ICHRP after deploying more than 60 observers in the heated 2022 presidential elections. The previous mission was able to document election-related human rights violations, including vote buying, failure of the vote-counting system, misinformation, red-tagging and threats, and killings.
'The 2022 election did not meet the standard of 'free, honest and fair' because prevailing conditions robbed the voters of access to reliable information, access to the voting places without intimidation, and access to credible vote counting system,' says former Australian Senator Lee Rhiannon and now serving her second time as IOM commissioner.
This 2025, the IOM is led by a group of Commissioners with long-standing records in monitoring elections, democratic governance, humanitarian work, and peace-building. Aside from Lee, the IOM Commission includes General Secretary Rev. Michael Blair of the United Church of Canada, Sylvain Goldstein, Asia Director for General Confederation of Labor–CGT (France), and Colleen Moore, the director of Peace With Justice at the General Board of Church and Society (USA). Additionally, Xavier Cutillas, who is the President of the Catalan Association for Peace–ACP.
The mission responds to the call for impartial, international scrutiny of the Philippine electoral process, amid persistent reports of state-sponsored harassment, and election-related killings, and fraud. The IOM will be looking closely at the disenfranchised Filipino communities, particularly in rural areas where it's highly militarized with state and private armed groups. 'Now, we are seeing an intensification of violence on the ground as reported by our local partners. We are determined to carry out this mission and document these cases,' says Commissioner Colleen Moore.
"The situation remains that political elites operate their own bailiwicks, private armies, and patronage networks, which fuel the highest levels of violence in the archipelago's rural areas," says Prof. Danilo Arao, convenor of election watchdog Kontra Daya and official partner of IOM 2025.
The country's Elections Commission, Comelec, recorded 46 incidents of political violence between January 12 and April 11. However, according to the monitoring of IOM local partner Vote Report PH, 'red-tagging is still the highest among violation categories, amounting to 78.72% of our 733 reports as of April 11. Since the official start of the campaign period in the local government, election-related violence rose in numbers,' says Vote Report PH data analyst Ian Aragoza.
'Red-tagging in the Philippines poses a grave threat to democracy, and we're seeing its intensification during election season,' warned Prof. Danilo Arao, convenor of election watchdog Kontra Daya. 'Activists, journalists, and ordinary citizens are being harassed, attacked, and in many cases, killed, often by state forces such as the military and police.' Arao said, adding that Kontra Daya will continue working with the IOM 2025 to document election-related violations and political repression on the ground.
A UN human rights expert has recently sounded the alarm on red-tagging, as it frequently leads to threats, unlawful surveillance, and even unlawful killings. This practice not only intimidates individuals but also stifles freedom of expression, undermining legitimate activism, journalism, debate, and criticism, all of which are essential components of a democratic society.
In its methodology, the mission will monitor election-related violations in the Philippines, including political violence, red-tagging, vote-buying, electoral fraud, and disinformation campaigns on both mainstream and digital platforms. It will also closely track violations of International Humanitarian Law (IHL) and human rights, particularly in militarized areas and communities of rural and indigenous peoples.
'These elections are unfolding under the shadow of deepening repression and the entrenchment of political dynasties,' said ICHRP Vice-Chairperson Patricia Lisson. 'We are here in solidarity with the Filipino people, and we are committed to documenting the truth on the ground.'
From February to May, the mission will cover the official campaign period, election day on May 12, and the critical post-election phase. International delegates will be stationed across Luzon, Visayas, and Mindanao, especially in areas known for electoral violence. Teams will document violations through interviews with voters, poll watchers, and local groups, while remote observers will monitor overseas absentee voting and digital election manipulation.
According to the IOM commission, initial findings will be released shortly after election day, while the final, comprehensive report will be shared with the country's commission on election, relevant United Nations bodies, international human rights groups, foreign embassies, and media partners.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NZ Herald
16 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Government responds to tariff shock as Labour accuses it of ‘major fail'
Finance Minister Nicola Willis and Trade Minister Todd McClay will respond to the Trump administration's decision to raise its proposed tariff on New Zealand. In April, US President Donald Trump announced proposed tariffs on America's trading partners including a 10% tariff on New Zealand. That base tariff has been increased to 15%. Other countries, like Australia and the United Kingdom have secured tariffs of 10%. McClay earlier told RNZ the higher rate could be because New Zealand has a trade surplus with the United States, meaning we export more than we import. He said the Government will try to push back on the higher rate. McClay and Willis are scheduled to speak on the matter at 4.15pm. However, Labour pointed the finger at the Government, with trade spokesman Damien O'Connor saying the episode was 'a major fail for the Government and for our relationship with the US'. 'Christopher Luxon has failed to secure a low tariff rate for our exports, while others around the world such as the EU and UK have managed to make a deal,' he said. 'Businesses will have to decide whether to pass the costs on to American customers, or weather those themselves. They may have to explore new markets. None of these options are good for business confidence here at home,' he said. Deputy Prime Minister and Act leader David Seymour said the tariffs were 'a choice' for the American Government. 'Our choice is to continue expanding to new markets with new trade deals,' he said. Seymour said New Zealand believes in free trade and would continue to advocate for low tariffs around the world. 'We can't control other countries' policy at the end of the day. We can seek new markets and new trade deals,' he said. Seymour would not say whether he believed the tariffs would be inflationary. 'There is so much going on in the world economy. One person's reckons are probably not worth the paper they're written on. There are things we can change, there are things we can't change. 'We can't change other countries' political choices, that's their right to make, what we can change is that this is a place that's good to build a business, things that people will beat a path to our door for, rather than us begging them to open theirs,' he said. Trade expert Stephen Jacobi said the tariff was unjustified at 10%. 'And it's now even more unjustified.' 'We impose very few tariffs on the United States. 'They have no major trade issues with us.' He said the impact of the revised tariff regime on New Zealand exports would depend on the individual sector. 'I think it's going to depend, of course, but there may be some water to flow under the bridge on this.' Today's statement from the White House said the Australian tariff would stay at 10%. 'Britain obviously is at 10%, but we don't really compete directly with them,' Jacobi said.
Scoop
a day ago
- Scoop
Mining Positivity Internationally Recognised
Today's passing of the Crown Minerals Amendment Act is the cherry on top of a great week for mining, says New Zealand Minerals Council chief executive Josie Vidal. "To make the most of international interest in mining in New Zealand, untap the potential of critical minerals, and make a greater contribution to jobs, exports and the economy, we need enabling legislation such as the Crown Minerals Amendment Act," Vidal says. "One of the significant aspects of this law for us, is that the emphasis on promoting mining goes back into the purpose statement of the Act. This is important because it shows the world that the New Zealand Government understands the value of our mining industry and that gives export markets and investors confidence. "The positivity around mining has been reflected in the respected international analysis of policy and investment attractiveness in 82 mining jurisdictions globally by the Fraser Institute in its Annual Survey of Mining Companies, 2024, released this week. "After languishing near the bottom of rankings for too many years, due to uncertainty about the environment for mining, New Zealand has made a massive leap and is now ranked higher than any Australian jurisdiction on the Investment Attractiveness Index - at 12th of 82, compared with 43rd of 86 in 2023 - and 15th of 82 on the Policy Perception Index, compared with 50th of 86 in 2023. "This week we also hosted an event to discuss science in the sector, and it was heartening to see the buzz around the critical minerals the world needs and what is available in New Zealand, and how we can add value and be part of the global supply chain. "Professor Chris Bumby, Chief Scientist (Materials) at the Robinson Research Institute within Victoria University of Wellington spoke about the potential for value-add processing of New Zealand's critical mineral resources. He pointed out why metals production matters - 'today's world is built from metals and tomorrow's world will require a whole bunch more', he said. "He highlighted New Zealand opportunities included critical minerals vanadium, titanium, zirconium, tungsten, and antinomy, among others, and the value New Zealand minerals bring to the world's steel production. "New Zealand science and research stands out globally and Science, Innovation and Technology Minister Shane Reti also spoke about the work the Government is doing to further enable science and technology to advance our country in a rapidly changing high-tech world. "There is so much exciting work happening in our minerals industry and it is important to have enabling laws that back our claims that New Zealand is open for business, and that the Fast-track Approvals Act is allowed to work as it is intended and is not derailed by vexatious detractors," Vidal says.
NZ Herald
2 days ago
- NZ Herald
David Seymour resurrects idea of migrants signing NZ ‘values statement'
'These sorts of things are values that we need to stress. If you don't subscribe to that, don't come here,' he said. Asked about immigration concerns on Newstalk ZB this week, Seymour noted that in 2016 he had made the point that 'we should actually have a New Zealand values statement'. 'That's not the Government's policy. But I suspect it should be,' the Act leader said. He said that 'if you want to be part of New Zealand', people should 'sign up to' ideas such as 'men and women are equal', 'someone's sexuality or religion is a private matter', 'we have certain rights before the law' and 'we have free speech'. The Act Party's constitution makes mention of this idea as an example of a policy that reflects its principles. 'Any person seeking New Zealand citizenship or permanent residency should be required to affirm that they subscribe to the democratic and civil rights enunciated in sections 12-18 of the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990.' These sections of the Bill of Rights Act relate to the likes of freedom of peaceful assembly, expression and association. Act's David Seymour has again raised the idea of a New Zealand values statement. Photo / Michael Craig A spokesman for Immigration Minister Erica Stanford said a values statement is not something the minister has raised with officials or been advised on. 'The minister's work programme has been focused on restoring stability and predictability to the immigration system – getting net migration under control, prioritising higher skilled migrants, reducing migrant exploitation, speeding up visa processing, supporting additional foreign investment for New Zealand, and fit for purpose settings across work, study and visitor visas.' Unlike New Zealand, Australia does have a values statement that most temporary, provisional or permanent visa applicants must sign or accept. This includes confirming they understand 'Australian society values', like 'respect for the freedom and dignity of the individual', 'freedom of religion (including the freedom not to follow a particular religion), freedom of speech, and freedom of association', and 'commitment to the rule of law'. The Australian Home Affairs Department says by accepting the statement, migrants are 'undertaking to conduct yourself in accordance with Australian values and to obey Australian laws during your stay in Australia'. In 2016, Peters, who is now in a coalition Government with Seymour, suggested the Act leader was stealing NZ First's policy. 'Being a secretive admirer of New Zealand First is no excuse for plagiarising that party's leader's statements,' the Herald reported Peters as saying at the time. He also described Seymour as a 'toy MP'. Peters said at the time that migrants should be interviewed at the border to ensure they respect New Zealand 'views'. Two years later, then-NZ First MP Clayton Mitchell proposed the Respecting New Zealand Values Bill, which would have required refugees and migrants to sign up to New Zealand values. These were identified as including respect for gender equality, religious freedom and New Zealand law. NZ First leader Winston Peters also believes migrants should subscribe to New Zealand values. Photo / Mark Mitchell While speaking with Newstalk ZB, Seymour also said there were some people who say, 'immigration is terrible, vote for me [and] I will get rid of it'. 'But they don't actually stop immigration when they get into power,' he said. Seymour said he believed the reason for that was because business owners know 'you can't succeed when you only have 5 million people to pick from when your competitors around the world are operating in labour markets of half a billion'. Peters last week told the Herald he was concerned with the number of migrants entering New Zealand and said it remained NZ First's view that immigration shouldn't be 'an excuse for our failure to train, skill and employ our own people'. His comments about the 'alarming development' overseas of 'careless immigration policies transforming cities' received criticism from Opposition parties. Prime Minister Christopher Luxon on Monday said Peters was entitled to have his own views. 'What I am focused on is making sure I advance New Zealand's national interests, economic and security. Immigration will always be on our terms and in the interest of New Zealand,' Luxon said. 'He is entitled as a political party leader to make comments about his observations of other countries. My job as Prime Minister of New Zealand is to say I am focused on making sure we have the right immigration settings for ourselves in order for us to grow our economy.' Jamie Ensor is a political reporter in the NZ Herald press gallery team based at Parliament. He was previously a TV reporter and digital producer in the Newshub press gallery office. In 2025, he was a finalist for Political Journalist of the Year at the Voyager Media Awards.
