California homeowners allege home insurance companies colluded deny coverage
LOS ANGELES — A group of California homeowners is taking on insurance companies that they say illegally coordinated to deny coverage to fire-prone areas, leaving thousands of displaced residents drastically underinsured as they fight for funding to rebuild.
The homeowners, many of whom were affected by the recent wildfires that torched large swaths of Los Angeles, have filed a lawsuit alleging that California insurance companies colluded in a 'nefarious conspiracy' to shut out high-risk homeowners from the insurance market.
The complaint, filed Friday in Los Angeles County, accuses dozens of major insurance companies and their subsidiaries of collaborating in a 'group boycott' of certain areas to eliminate competition and force homeowners toward the state's insurer of last resort, a program known as the California FAIR Plan.
The lawsuits name California's largest home insurers, including State Farm, Farmers, Berkshire Hathaway, Allstate and Liberty Mutual. None of them have provided a comment on the allegations.
The FAIR Plan has its own reserves and is intended to provide basic insurance to residents who cannot find a policy through the private marketplace. While it was created by the governor and the Legislature, and the state's insurance commissioner has oversight, it is not a public program. The insurance companies named in the lawsuit jointly own and operate the FAIR plan, offering terms that limit their risk and place a higher burden on policyholders.
'They knew that they could force people, by dropping insurance, into that plan which had higher premiums and far lower coverages,' Robert Ruyak, an attorney with Larson LLP, the law firm that brought the complaint, said. 'They realized that they could take this device, which is to protect consumers, and turn it into something that protected them.'
Ruyak argues the insurance companies knew they could limit their liability by directing policyholders onto the FAIR Plan, which allows companies to recoup up to half of their losses through premium increases, by agreeing that no company would insure high-risk areas.
'All of these insurance companies participate in the California FAIR Plan. They own it and manage it. It is not a California entity, it is not even a separate entity … the only way this scheme would work is if no one would pick up a dropped policy at any price, on any terms. And that's what happened.'
Millions of U.S. homeowners have in recent years struggled to buy property insurance as companies have increasingly declined to offer coverage to people who live in high-risk areas, particularly as climate change has supercharged some natural disasters. An NBC News analysis in 2023 found that a quarter of all U.S. homes may be at risk of a climate-induced insurance shock.
California has been among the hardest hit by what some have called an 'insurance crisis.' The state's FAIR Plan, meanwhile, has been the subject of growing scrutiny and frustration from insurance regulators and customers.
The plaintiffs are asking for a jury trial and seeking payment for three times their damages.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
3 days ago
- BBC News
India GDP: Growth at 7.4% faster than expected in fourth quarter
India's economy grew by 7.4% in the period between January and March - up from 6.2% the previous quarter and significantly beating analyst expectations. However, growth for full 2024-25 year, which runs between April and March, is pegged at 6.5% - the slowest in four years. The country's central bank - the Reserve Bank of India - meets later in June and is expected to cut rates for the third time in a row to boost remains the world's fastest growing major economy, although growth has sharply dropped from the 9.2% high recorded in financial year 2023-24. Asia's third-largest economy benefitted from strong growth in farm activity, steady public spending and improved rural demand in the last financial year, even as manufacturing and new investments by private companies remained weak. While rural growth has improved on account of a strong winter harvest it is not nearly enough to offset continuing weakness in urban consumption, which has flagged due to high unemployment and lower growth engine remains heavily dependent on the government's infrastructure spending on roads, ports and highways, in the absence of significant growth in private investment. Going forward, lower food inflation and oil prices as well as the pre-arrival of the monsoon and above average rainfall could boost crop prospects and help India's farm sector, according to growth should also benefit from government's income tax cuts announced in the federal budget, as well as "monetary easing, expectations of an above normal monsoon and lower food inflation", Aditi Nayar, an economist with the ratings agency Icra, said. But ongoing global uncertainties, including US President Donald Trump's trade war, are expected to weigh on export is currently negotiating a trade-agreement with the United States which is officially expected to conclude by fall. Trump slapped tariffs of up to 27% on Indian goods in April – and a 90-day pause on these ends on 9 expect GDP growth in the ongoing financial year 2025-26 to further slow to 6% on the back of these global slowdown worries which could delay new private capital spending on projects. The International Monetary Fund (IMF) expects global growth to drop to 2.8% in 2025 and 3% in from Icra earlier showed private sector expenditure, as part of overall investments in India's economy, fell to a 10-year low of 33% in the last financial foreign direct investment (FDI) into India – at $0.35bn in 2024-25 – also fell to the lowest level in two decades, as rising outward foreign investment and repatriations by Indian companies, neutralised inward Minister Narendra Modi's government has been attempting to position India as a manufacturing hub for global companies like Apple indicated recently that it was shifting most of its production of iPhones headed to the US from China to India, trade analysts have cautioned that such manufacturing investment could yet stall, with the US and China agreeing to roll-back tariffs earlier this month.
Telegraph
4 days ago
- Telegraph
SNP forced to axe national park plan after farmers' backlash
SNP ministers have axed plans to create a new national park in Scotland following a backlash from farmers and residents. Mairi Gougeon, the Rural Affairs Secretary, told MSPs an official report had concluded that there was not 'sufficient local support to proceed' with the park in Galloway. In a statement to the Scottish Parliament, she said responses to a consultation showed 54 per cent of people were opposed to the plan compared to 42 per cent in favour. Taking account only of the views of residents, 57 per cent opposed the scheme and only 40 per cent backed it. More than eight out of 10 farmers and foresters were also hostile to the park. Ms Gougeon accepted her announcement 'will be very disappointing for those who have been campaigning for a new national park in Galloway over many years'. The Tories welcomed the decision but warned it could take 'years to heal' deep divisions in the area created by the scheme. SNP ministers announced last July that the region in south-west Scotland had been chosen from a five-strong shortlist as the possible site of the country's third national park. The status meant the area would be set aside for conservation, with most of the landscapes and accompanying plants and animals protected in their natural state. A consultation proposed that it be called the Kingdom of Galloway National Park and covers up to 3,400 sq km, or 1,300 sq miles, making it around twice as large as the one covering Loch Lomond and the Trossachs. But farmers warned that it will lead to extra red tape for their businesses and prioritise tourism and visitor access over their needs, thereby damaging food production. NFU Scotland said 93 per cent of its members in the area opposed the plan. A third national park is the latest in a series of commitments made in the power-sharing deal between Nicola Sturgeon's government and the Scottish Greens to be axed or delayed. The coalition between the two parties, titled the Bute House Agreement, fell apart last year when Humza Yousaf, the then first minister, kicked the Greens out of government. The Telegraph disclosed on Saturday that Holyrood insiders expected the plan to be shelved but Ms Gougeon went further by scrapping it altogether. She said: 'While there is substantial support for a national park and what it could deliver for the south-west of Scotland, there is also significant opposition.' Ms Gougeon said that NatureScot had concluded that 'the proposal does not have sufficient clarity, nor has it garnered sufficient local support to proceed to the next stage of designation'. Finlay Carson, the Scottish Tory MSP for Galloway and West Dumfries, said: 'This a victory for common sense and a victory for local people in Galloway and Ayrshire. 'Ever since Green minister Lorna Slater got her hands on these proposals as part of the disastrous Bute House Agreement, the whole process became deeply flawed. It felt like a Green nationalist park was going to be imposed on these communities rather than one that they were initially keen to see.' Liz Hitschmann, co-founder of the No Galloway National Park campaign, said: 'We are very relieved the Scottish Government has recognised the strength of opposition to the imposition of a national park on our region, but the overwhelming response from local people directly affected was impossible to ignore.' Stephen Young, director of policy at landowners' body Scottish Land & Estates, said: 'The decision not to proceed with the Galloway National Park proposal is the right one by the Scottish Government and aligns with the clear views expressed by communities and businesses across the region.' But Mark Ruskell, a Scottish Greens MSP, said the decision was a 'betrayal' and 'the culmination of lack of confident political leadership and the dangerous influence of powerful vested interests'.
The Independent
4 days ago
- The Independent
California avocado growers say Mexican imports have helped their sales
Andreas Tompros lost his home and at least a third of his avocado orchard to a wildfire last year, but the 47-year-old grower is not worried about his farm making a comeback. While California farmers often rattle off a list of challenges they face including high labor costs, water restrictions and overseas competition, many avocado growers say they have a good thing going. A key reason may come as a surprise to some — Mexican imports. When the United States lifted its ban on Mexican avocados in 1997, California growers worried at first that the imported fruit would displace their production. But the steady flow of avocados has wound up helping, not hurting, their sales by allowing for a year-round supply to markets and restaurants that has fomented demand, farmers say. Before the influx, most American consumers considered avocados to be specialty items — and when they came into season in California, industry officials had to work to rev up widespread interest in order to sell them. But not anymore. Avocado consumption has been booming in the United States over the past two decades. The amount of fruit available per person tripled to more than 8 pounds (3.6 kilograms) between 2000 and 2021, federal statistics show. Avocado toast and guacamole are regular offerings not just in culinary hubs like NYC but at cafes around the Midwest and the South. Avocados are in demand On a steep, sun-soaked hillside northwest of Los Angeles, Tompros is replanting nearly 300 avocado trees with the belief that Americans' hunger for the fruit — and his orchard — will continue to grow. 'It will come back, and I believe it will become better than it was,' Tompros, who previously ran a software company in Hollywood, said of the orchard he took over five years ago in the tiny community of Somis. Avocado demand has also been buoyed by consumers' growing interest in healthy fats, said Emiliano Escobedo, executive director of the Hass Avocado Board. A 2000 U.S. law created the board that collected 2.5 cents for every pound (0.5 kilograms) of avocados imported or produced in the United States. The board used the money to market avocados and conduct nutritional research, an effort that has been widely credited with making the fruit ubiquitous in supermarkets and on restaurant menus. 'It's been really wildly successful. It generates way more money than most of these other industry boards do,' said Richard Sexton, distinguished professor of agricultural and resource economics at the University of California, Davis. 'When you look at the growth rate in avocado consumption relative to all fruits, the difference in growth rate is dramatic.' A successful crop Escobedo said about 60% of U.S. households currently buy avocados, and about half of these are responsible for the overwhelming majority of consumption, which means there's still room for the market to grow — especially in the Northeast, where the fruit is less common. 'There is a lot of opportunity for certain groups of people to increase their purchasing of avocados,' Escobedo said. While the Trump administration has threatened tariffs on a spate of Mexican goods, avocados have so far been spared. California growers said they want Mexican avocados to keep flowing into the country, though they also want robust U.S. inspections of the imports to keep out pests to protect their crop. 'If you are going to farm in California, avocados are about the best deal right now,' said Ken Melban, president of the California Avocado Commission. California farmers grow about 10% of the avocados eaten in the United States, Melban said, and account for nearly all of the country's domestic avocado production. The fruit is largely grown in California from April through September, and Mexican imports arrive year-round to meet nationwide demand, which exceeds what the state's farmers grow, he said. In Southern California 's Ventura County, many growers have shifted to avocados since lemon prices were walloped by cheaper imports from Argentina. As recently planted trees start bearing fruit in a few years, the region's avocado production is likely to rise, said Korinne Bell, agricultural commissioner for the county northwest of Los Angeles. A booming market, despite wildfires Avocado trees do not come without risks in a region prone to wildfires. Still, demand for the trees has jumped due to interest from lemon growers — and since the November 2024 fire charred Ventura County avocado orchards, said Rob Brokaw, whose family-owned nursery has supplied avocado trees to California growers for 70 years. 'Right now we are sold out essentially for this year,' Brokaw said. 'And we're mostly sold out for 2026.' Tompros debated whether to plant the more fire-resistant lemon trees or another crop after the fire ripped through Somis, but he decided to replant due to the soaring demand for Super Bowl guacamole and avocado toast. 'It's the super food, and it's still growing in popularity,' Tompros said. He's taking precautions to not plant the trees too close to what will eventually be his rebuilt home, because the dried-out leaves that help nourish the orchard's soil can also fuel blazes. It may take a few years, but Tompros hopes it won't be too long before his newly planted trees bear fruit that he can sell to a local packinghouse or in seasonal gift boxes with citrus and passionfruit that he ships directly to customers.
