logo
Hawaii Salary Commission approves hefty raises for legislators, state officials

Hawaii Salary Commission approves hefty raises for legislators, state officials

The state Salary Commission is recommending pay raises ranging from 35% to 48% over the next six years for judges, top state executives and lawmakers, with the largest percentage pay increases proposed for members of the Hawaiʻi Legislature.
The pay raises will automatically take effect beginning July 1 unless lawmakers pass a resolution in the weeks ahead specifically rejecting the increases.
'In all, the Commission's consensus view is that to recruit and retain highly qualified public officials who can perform at the level the State and residents expect and deserve, increases of the recommended magnitudes are necessary,' according to a draft report approved by the commission Tuesday.
The proposed pay package includes an initial 32% raise for state lawmakers that would increase their salaries from $74,160 today to $97,896 effective Jan. 1, 2027.
Those raises for lawmakers would be followed by 4% pay increases in each of the following two years and another 8% pay increase on Jan. 1, 2030, for a total 48% pay increase over six years. At the end of the six years, rank-and-file lawmakers would make $114,348.
The House speaker and Senate president would see their salaries increase from $83,052 today to $128,052 over the six years.
House Minority Floor Leader Diamond Garcia, a Republican from Oʻahu, said he will introduce a resolution in the House to reject the raises, and said Republicans in the state Senate will do the same.
'For most people who I grew up with and most people in my district, $74,000 is something that somebody would dream to retire at,' Garcia said of his current salary. 'So, I just can't justify getting a six-figure salary for four months of real work.'
He said he could have supported a more modest pay increase, but 'Legislators have no real job description, there is no clock in-clock out, and they really are a part-time gig, and many of them have outside employment,' he said. 'Within five years up to $114,000 — I just can't do that.'
The seven-member Salary Commission considered awarding even more generous raises to members of the Legislature earlier this year, reasoning that serving at the state Legislature is essentially a full-time job. But the commission finally scaled back those plans.
Commission Chair Colleen Hanabusa had worried lawmakers might reject the entire pay package, which includes raises for state judges, the governor, the lieutenant governor and state department heads. If that happens, the judges and top state executives would not receive pay increases for the next six years.
'They're the ones who are going to have to vote — or not vote — is really what it comes down to,' Hanabusa said. 'We need to convince them that they don't need to vote it down.'
A handful of left-leaning House Democrats wrote to the commission Tuesday to ask them to limit the initial pay increase for lawmakers to $97,500, which is the area median income for Honolulu for a single earner.
They proposed that future pay increases be tied to the consumer price index, and the commission essentially followed that recommendation.
One of those lawmakers, Rep. Ikaika Hussey, said the group wanted smaller raises than were first proposed because hard times are coming to the state.
'The next few years are going to be incredibly painful for Hawaiʻi, because of the federal changes,' Hussey said. 'We think that the representatives of the people of Hawaiʻi need to be 100% in alignment with the people of Hawaiʻi.'
Gov. Josh Green also asked the commission to scale back on a large pay increase it had been considering for him. The Salary Commission in January considered awarding the governor a series of raises totaling 61% over six years, but Green sent word through his staff that he wanted something less extravagant.
On Tuesday the commission settled on a 15% raise for Green and Lt. Gov. Sylvia Luke effective July 1, which will bring Green's salary to $217,908. That would be followed by a series of smaller 4% raises and an 8% raise in 2027, for a total pay increase for the state's top job of 39% over six years.
'Initial proposals for large salary increases over 6 years didn't seem right and didn't sit well with me, so I thank the commission for considering my input and reducing the proposed raises, given the everyday struggles of our working people to make ends meet,' Green said in a written statement Tuesday.
'Still, given any significant increases in salary for the Office of the Governor, Jaime and I plan to increase our charitable giving to children's hunger programs, programs for the homeless and other nonprofits that serve our most vulnerable residents,' Green said in the statement.
The commission is also recommending a series of raises totaling 40% to 43% over the next six years for about 95 state judges. Court officials have warned it is increasingly difficult to recruit and retain judges because the most qualified lawyers can make far more money in private practice.
Circuit Court judges would see their pay increase from $217,104 today to $327,948 in the years ahead, while District Court and Family Court judges would get a pay boost from $205,296 today to $301,776 in 2030.
The commission plan would increase the pay for the chief justice of the state Supreme Court in a series of steps ranging from 4% to 10% per year, upping it from $248,124 today to $364,752 in 2030.
Separately, an independent salary commission overseeing pay for the Office of Hawaiian Affairs, a semi-autonomous state agency charged with improving the lives of Native Hawaiians, voted last month to boost trustees' annual pay to $91,560. The chair of the board would make $100,308. Those raises would also kick in unless the Legislature rejects them.
___
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Senate Democrats launch radio ad attacking GOP over cuts to rural radio funding
Senate Democrats launch radio ad attacking GOP over cuts to rural radio funding

The Hill

time16 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Senate Democrats launch radio ad attacking GOP over cuts to rural radio funding

The Senate Democrats' campaign arm is launching a new radio ad Wednesday attacking Republicans for slashing funding for rural radio stations as a part of more than $1 billion Republicans made in cuts to public broadcasting in their recissions package. 'Thank you for listening to your local radio station. But stations like these might not be around for long,' a narrator says in the 30-second ad, which was first shared with The Hill. 'Last month in D.C., Republican Senators cut radio funding, voting to end weather alerts, community news and our way to stay connected,' the narrator continued. 'Rural America relies on radio. But Republican politicians left us behind.' They added, 'We can't trust them to fight for us.' The ads are being aired in recognition of National Radio Day, and they're expected to run in rural stations in Alaska, Iowa, Maine, North Carolina, Ohio and Texas, all of which Senate Democrats are eyeing as potential pick-up opportunities next year. 'Rural communities rely on local radio to stay connected on everything from local news to lifesaving alerts about severe weather — but Republican Senators left them behind,' Maeve Coyle, a spokeswoman for the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee (DSCC), said in a statement. 'Republican senators will be forced to explain to their constituents why they're robbing the programs that support their communities in order to pay for a giveaway to billionaires,' she added. President Trump signed a recissions package last month, which rescinds around $9 billion Congress had previously approved for funding for the Corporation of Public Broadcasting (CPB), which helps fund NPR and PBS and its affiliates, and global aid programs. CPB is contending with more than $1 billion in cuts alone. Federal funding makes up a smaller percentage of the money NPR and PBS rely on, but rural stations have already warned it will impact them more severely since it makes up a higher proportion of their overall funding. Republicans have attacked NPR and PBS, arguing they're liberally biased and their programs push 'radical left positions,' which its leaders have pushed back on. Contending with the cuts, the CPB announced it would begin to shut down, with its president Patricia Harrison saying in a statement 'we now face the difficult reality of closing our operations.'

As hurricane season collides with immigration agenda, fears increase for those without legal status
As hurricane season collides with immigration agenda, fears increase for those without legal status

San Francisco Chronicle​

time16 minutes ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

As hurricane season collides with immigration agenda, fears increase for those without legal status

If a major hurricane approaches Central Florida this season, Maria knows it's dangerous to stay inside her wooden, trailer-like home. In past storms, she evacuated to her sister's sturdier house. If she couldn't get there, a shelter set up at the local high school served as a refuge if needed. But with aggressively accelerating detentions and deportations of immigrants across her community of Apopka, 20 miles (32 kilometers) northwest of Orlando, Maria, an agricultural worker from Mexico without permanent U.S. legal status, doesn't know if those options are safe. All risk encountering immigration enforcement agents. 'They can go where they want,' said Maria, 50, who insisted The Associated Press not use her last name for fear of detention. 'There is no limit.' Natural disasters have long posed singular risks for people in the United States without permanent legal status. But with the arrival of peak Atlantic hurricane season, immigrants and their advocates say President Donald Trump's militaristic immigration enforcement agenda has increased the danger. Places considered neutral spaces by immigrants such as schools, hospitals and emergency management agencies are now suspect, and agreements by local law enforcement to collaborate with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement make them more vulnerable, choosing between physical safety or avoiding detention. 'Am I going to risk the storm or risk endangering my family at the shelter?' said Dominique O'Connor, an organizer at the Farmworker Association of Florida. 'You're going to meet enforcement either way.' For O'Connor and for many immigrants, it's about storms. But people without permanent legal status could face these decisions anywhere that extreme heat, wildfires or other severe weather could necessitate evacuating, getting supplies or even seeking medical care. Federal and state agencies have said little on whether immigration enforcement would be suspended in a disaster. It wouldn't make much difference to Maria: 'With all we've lived, we've lost trust.' New policies deepen concerns Efforts by Trump's Republican administration to exponentially expand immigration enforcement capacity mean many of the agencies active in disaster response are increasingly entangled in immigration enforcement. Since January, hundreds of law enforcement agencies have signed 287(g) agreements, allowing them to perform certain immigration enforcement actions. Most of the agreements are in hurricane-prone Florida and Texas. Florida's Division of Emergency Management oversees building the state's new detention facilities, like the one called 'Alligator Alcatraz' in the Everglades. Federal Emergency Management Agency funds are being used to build additional detention centers around the country, and the Department of Homeland Security temporarily reassigned some FEMA staff to assist ICE. The National Guard, often seen passing out food and water after disasters, has been activated to support U.S. Customs and Border Protection operations and help at detention centers. These dual roles can make for an intimidating scene during a disaster. After floods in July, more than 2,100 personnel from 20 state agencies aided the far-reaching response effort in Central Texas, along with CBP officers. Police controlled entry into hard-hit areas. Texas Department of Public Safety and private security officers staffed entrances to disaster recovery centers set up by FEMA. That unsettled even families with permanent legal status, said Rae Cardenas, executive director of Doyle Community Center in Kerrville, Texas. Cardenas helped coordinate with the Mexican Consulate in San Antonio to replace documents for people who lived behind police checkpoints. 'Some families are afraid to go get their mail because their legal documents were washed away,' Cardenas said. In Florida, these policies could make people unwilling to drive evacuation roads. Traffic stops are a frequent tool of detention, and Florida passed a law in February criminalizing entry into the state by those without legal status, though a judge temporarily blocked it. There may be fewer places to evacuate now that public shelters, often guarded by police or requiring ID to enter, are no longer considered 'protected areas' by DHS. The agency in January rescinded a policy of President Joe Biden, a Democrat, to avoid enforcement in places like schools, medical facilities and emergency response sites. The fears extend even into disaster recovery. On top of meeting law enforcement at FEMA recovery centers, mixed-status households that qualify for help from the agency might hesitate to apply for fear of their information being accessed by other agencies, said Esmeralda Ledezma, communications associate with the Houston-based nonprofit Woori Juntos. 'Even if you have the right to federal aid, you're afraid to be punished for it,' Ledezma said. In past emergencies, DHS has put out messaging stating it would suspend immigration enforcement. The agency's policy now is unclear. DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin said in an email that CBP had not issued any guidance 'because there have been no natural disasters affecting border enforcement.' She did not address what directions were given during CBP's activation in the Texas floods or whether ICE would be active during a disaster. Florida's Division of Emergency Management did not respond to questions related to its policies toward people without legal status. Texas' Division of Emergency Management referred The Associated Press to Republican Gov. Greg Abbott's office, which did not respond. Building local resilience is a priority In spite of the crackdown, local officials in some hurricane-prone areas are expanding outreach to immigrant populations. 'We are trying to move forward with business as usual,' said Gracia Fernandez, language access coordinator for Alachua County in Central Florida. The county launched a program last year to translate and distribute emergency communications in Spanish, Haitian Creole and other languages. Now staffers want to spread the word that county shelters won't require IDs, but since they're public spaces, Fernandez acknowledged there's not much they can do if ICE comes. 'There is still a risk,' she said. 'But we will try our best to help people feel safe.' As immigrant communities are pushed deeper into the shadows, more responsibility falls on nonprofits, and communities themselves, to keep each other safe. Hope Community Center in Apopka has pushed local officials to commit to not requiring IDs at shelters and sandbag distribution points. During an evacuation, the facility becomes an alternative shelter and a command center, from which staffers translate and send out emergency communications in multiple languages. For those who won't leave their homes, staffers do door-to-door wellness checks, delivering food and water. 'It's a very grassroots, underground operation,' said Felipe Sousa Lazaballet, the center's executive director. Preparing the community is challenging when it's consumed by the daily crises wrought by detentions and deportations, Sousa Lazaballet said. 'All of us are in triage mode,' he said. 'Every day there is an emergency, so the community is not necessarily thinking about hurricane season yet. That's why we have to have a plan.' ___

Newsom is the face of California's redistricting push. That could help him — and hurt the plan
Newsom is the face of California's redistricting push. That could help him — and hurt the plan

San Francisco Chronicle​

time16 minutes ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

Newsom is the face of California's redistricting push. That could help him — and hurt the plan

SACRAMENTO — By launching a campaign to redraw California's congressional districts, Gov. Gavin Newsom has once again placed himself at the center of the national political conversation. That's helpful to Newsom as he positions himself to run for president in 2028 — something he has not explicitly admitted but has long been evident in his efforts to build a national donor base and boost his visibility in other states, including a recent visit to South Carolina. But it could prove detrimental to the redistricting campaign itself if Republicans can convince voters to view the measure as a power grab by Newsom, rather than the Democrats' framing as a fight against President Donald Trump. For loyal Democratic voters, the key constituency Newsom would need to win in a presidential primary, that framing seems to be working. Newsom has surged in popularity on social media with his persistent attacks on Trump and is earning praise from liberals hungry for their leaders to take on the president more aggressively. 'He's staking out a position as the kind of person who fights,' said Hans Noel, a government professor at Georgetown University in Washington, D.C. 'A lot of Democrats want to see that.' To successfully campaign for president, Newsom needs to shore up support from Democratic leaders and boost his popularity outside of California, Noel said. With the redistricting measure, Newsom risks criticism from people who disagree with his tactics and don't want to see Democrats abandon independent redistricting. But the campaign is undeniably helping him introduce himself to voters outside the Golden State who may not be familiar with him. Being at the forefront of the campaign might help him with a future presidential run, but it could hamper the campaign's chances within California, said Rob Stutzman, a Republican strategist who previously worked for Arnold Schwarzenegger. Democrats describe the measure as a fight against Trump and a direct response to efforts in Texas to redraw maps in favor of Republicans. Newsom has said he'd abandon the effort if Texas dropped its plans. But it's also something that would hand California Democrats more power, as Republican opponents are already pointing out. 'Every issue that matters to Californians has been put to the side so that (Newsom) and other politicians can seize back power,' Assembly Member Carl DeMaio, R-San Diego, said during a news conference opposing the redistricting measure on Monday. 'The reason why we're here today is Gov. Gavin Newsom's failing presidential campaign needs a little boost.' Democratic lawmakers plan to vote on Thursday to place the measure on the ballot in a Nov. 4 special election. They'll have a remarkably short span of time to convince voters to support the proposition, which would redraw California's congressional maps to give an advantage to Democrats. That would temporarily roll back a reform passed by voters in 2010, when they removed power to draw congressional districts from the Legislature and gave it to an independent commission with equal numbers of Republicans and Democrats. That reform was good in theory, Democrats say, but in practice dilutes Californians' power in Congress because other states continue to draw their districts in a partisan way. The proposed redistricting measure would replace the independent commission's maps with maps favoring Democrats for the 2026, 2028 and 2030 elections. After the 2030 census, the independent commission would draw new maps free of partisan interference. It's not clear yet whether Newsom will continue to be the face of the campaign. The fight was his idea, and he has led the charge so far — hosting regular press conferences and doing a blitz of interviews to promote the plan. He narrates the campaign's first ad, which features a speech he gave in Sacramento criticizing Texas Republicans' redistricting moves. Voters tend to be skeptical of efforts by politicians to increase their own power. The more Newsom is seen as the face of the measure, the more likely voters are to see it as a self-serving ploy and reject it, Stutzman said. 'Whether this passes is a more difficult question, but the opportunity it provides for Newsom I think is very valuable,' Stutzman said. 'He certainly seems intent on making the most of it.' Julia Azari, a politics professor at Marquette University in Wisconsin, said Newsom's antagonism of Trump somewhat mirrors what Kamala Harris did in 2017. While serving as California's junior senator, Harris staked out a reputation for taking Trump administration officials to task during oversight hearings, an image that helped propel her candidacy for president in 2020. In the end, Harris wasn't able to out-compete the frontrunners in that race — Joe Biden and Bernie Sanders — who both had many more years in the national spotlight. Getting out in front of voters so early has a potential downside, Azari noted, which is that it will give voters more time to learn unflattering things about Newsom's record as governor of California. But Biden faced the same challenge in 2020, which he overcame to win the presidency. The redistricting fight is particularly well-suited for these purposes. It centers Newsom in a major national political story. And it allows him to position himself at the front of the pack of Democrats vying for a nomination in 2028 while uniting, not attacking them, Noel said. Ludovic Blain, who runs the progressive donor group the California Donor Table, said he's not always aligned politically with the governor, but on this issue, they're on the same page. He said progressives are looking for politicians who will stand up to Trump, and Newsom is rising to the occasion. He said he doesn't necessarily see a major downside for Newsom if the ballot measure fails. 'Voters want to see fighters,' he said. 'The question of whether they're successful — that's secondary because you can't be successful if you don't fight.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store