Homeowners file lawsuit against approval of Fairview Temple construction
The construction of the Fairview temple has been a hot topic of debate in the town for the past year. After and a new design for the temple was proposed, the town council approved the temple for construction on with a 5-2 vote.
However, this lawsuit is alleging that due to Texas law, the council did not have enough votes to approve the permits. Because residents voiced their protests against the construction, the council needed to have a supermajority (75%) of votes to approve the variance, the lawsuit said.
TIMELINE: The year-long debate surrounding the now-approved Fairview Texas Temple
According to the lawsuit filing obtained by ABC4.com, three homeowners are named in the suit against the town. They allege that 'out of an abundance of caution,' they appealed the council's decision with Fairview's Zoning Board of Adjustments.
Though the Zoning Board has not ruled on their appeal, the lawsuit alleges that in a recent town council meeting, representatives for the town questioned whether the Zoning Board had the authority to overturn the town council's decisions.
The lawsuit states that the homeowners believe that the Zoning Board does have the authority, but they have filed the suit in the case that the Zoning Board is found not to have the authority, or if the Zoning board agrees with the council.
According to the suit, when a certain number of property owners who will be affected by the permit file a written protest, the permit can only be approved by a supermajority of the governing body, in this case, the Fairview Town Council.
Per Texas Local Government Code § 211.006(d), the protest must be signed by 20% of the owners of the 'immediately adjoining the area covered by the proposed change and extending 200 feet from that area.'
PREVIOUS COVERAGE: 'Serious inaccuracies': Texas town mayor responds to LDS Church letter in ongoing temple dispute
The lawsuit is alleging that the people who signed the protest against the temple construction permits own 20% of the land extending 200 feet from the area where the temple will be built, or the 'protest zone.'
However, the issue is that the land the temple is set to be built on adjoins the neighboring city of Allen, Texas, and part of the protest zone could include land in Allen.
The lawsuit is arguing that any land in Allen should not be included in the protest zone, because people who own property outside of Fairview cannot file protests with the Town of Fairview, because they are not included on Fairview's tax rolls.
If you exclude any land outside of Fairview, then the protest was signed by 20% of the property owners within the protest zone, according to the homeowners, and then the town council's approval would not be valid because they did not have a supermajority.
Fairview Mayor Dr. John Hubbard issued a statement in response to the lawsuit filed against the town council.
'The Town of Fairview maintains that the area of the 'protest zone' was calculated correctly,' he said. 'The Town Council acted based on the information available at the time and in what was believed to be in the best interest of Fairview. Every resident has the right to pursue any legal remedy if they believe the Council did not follow proper procedures in approving the Conditional Use Permit (CUP).'
He also stated that the issue is not opposing the construction of the temple. The issue, he said, 'has always been about the size of the building and the height of the steeple.'
'While the LDS Church has graciously reduced the steeple height to 120 feet, many residents believe that a structure of that scale is incompatible with a district zoned for a 35-foot height limit,' he continued,
PREVIOUS COVERAGE: Texas town mayor responds to LDS Church letter in ongoing temple dispute
He concluded by sharing that he believes a path to compromise is possible without getting the courts involved.
'I believe litigation could be avoided if both the LDS Church and the appellants are willing to compromise further on the height,' he said. 'A lower steeple would allow the town to avoid costly legal proceedings, the church to build the temple it needs, and the community to preserve the small-town character that makes Fairview unique. This is a path where everyone can win.'
If the court rules in favor of the homeowners, the Fairview Town Council will have to vote on the temple's construction permit again, and a supermajority of council members must vote in favor in order to approve the permit.
The homeowners requested that the court wait to hear their case until the Zoning Board has ruled on their appeal. They are also requesting that the court pay their attorneys' fees.
In April, the to approve the construction of a temple for the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
'This has been an extraordinarily difficult decision, how to deal with this… None of us are pleased with this, but it is what we think we need to do,' a councilmember said. Other council members also voiced their displeasure with the decision, but they still voted to approve the construction of the temple — with provisions.
The Fairview Texas Temple is not allowed to exceed a height of 44 feet and 7 inches from the ground up to the roof, and the spire will not be allowed to exceed 120 feet from the ground. The building itself will be limited to roughly 30,700 square feet, and the town council also placed restrictions on the exterior lighting of the building.
The original plan for the temple was for a 44,000-square-foot building with a reported 174-foot spire. Current plans are for a 30,000-square-foot building with a 120-foot-tall spire on 8.61 acres in Fairview.
Utah Alzheimer's Disease advocates visit Washington, D.C.
Homeowners file lawsuit against approval of Fairview Temple construction
Kouri Richins: New trial date set for Kamas mom accused of killing her husband
Fire burning on Navajo Mountain in San Juan County
Hazy sunshine expected through the weekend
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
6 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Tens of thousands expected at Stop Starving Gaza protest in New York City
Editor's note: The video above aired in a previous newscast. NEW YORK (PIX11) – Tens of thousands of protesters are expected to descend on Manhattan for the Stop Starving Gaza march this Saturday, organizers said. 'The blockade of Gaza has created a devastating hunger crisis that worsens daily as Palestinians continue to die of starvation and malnutrition,' The People's Forum wrote on X. 'Now, reports show the US is working with Israel to tie future aid to Israeli plans for full occupation.' More Local News Israel's finance minister announced on Thursday a new settlement project in the West Bank, which critics and Palestinians argued would cut the territory into two separate parts. Israel has also recently been accused of starving Palestinians seeking aid, with over 100 people dying from malnutrition in Gaza since June, when Gaza's Health Ministry started keeping count of deaths related to starvation. Israel denied the Gaza Health Ministry's claims, saying that packages of food and water have been airdropped into the territory and alleging that Hamas is diverting aid. Here's everything you need to know about the Stop Starving Gaza protest: Where The protest will start at the steps of the New York Public Library near Bryant Park at 2 p.m. Protesters who can't make it to the march are encouraged to wear kuffiyehs or black armbands, picket Israeli embassies and consulates, walk out from work or school, host speak-outs and rally in front of businesses that profit from Israeli business in Gaza. More: Latest News from Around the Tri-State Organizations The organizations behind the upcoming protest include the Palestinian Youth Movement, National Students for Justice in Palestine, ANSWER Coalition, The People's Forum, International Peoples' Assembly, Al-Awda-NY and the Palestinian American Community Center of New Jersey (PACC). PIX11 News reached out to the NYPD for comment on the upcoming protest. For more information, including how to get to the city by bus, click here. This story comprises reporting from The Associated Press. Erin Pflaumer is a digital content producer from Long Island who has covered both local and national news since 2018. She joined PIX11 in 2023. See more of her work here. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Why Investors Were So Fired Up About First Solar Stock on Friday
Key Points Data center operators are unhappy with potential changes to federal incentives for green energy solutions. A group of them are lobbying the Trump administration to leave these incentives alone for now. 10 stocks we like better than First Solar › The solar industry has struggled mightily for years to achieve meaningful growth and post net profits. During the Biden administration, the green energy sector as a whole received something of a break in the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act, with a slew of tax incentives for building out alternative-energy solutions. In its attempt to reverse this, President Donald Trump has tasked his administration to make the current subsidies harder to obtain. Thankfully for green energy companies, a theoretically influential lobbying group stepped in on Friday to push back against this effort. Numerous solar stocks popped on the news, including First Solar (NASDAQ: FSLR), which rose a sturdy 11% by market close. A mighty lob by a lobbying group The business grouping behind Friday's pushback is the Data Center Coalition. News broke that the coalition sent a formal request to Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent to maintain the subsidy policy as it is, rather than changing it. The organization -- which lists as members Amazon, Oracle, and CoreWeave, among other prominent tech companies -- told Bessent that any regulatory roadblock limiting green energy solutions will hamper the development of artificial intelligence (AI). Many data center operators are currently building out their facilities to handle the vastly increased resource demands of AI. To do so, they require more energy, hence their support of renewable sources like solar. Does the silence speak volumes? Bessent hasn't yet publicly responded to the coalition's lobbying effort, nor has anyone else in the Trump administration. But investors seem convinced that they've not only digested the letter, they're taking it seriously, since the organization behind it has many prominent members who drive the U.S. economy. Should you invest $1,000 in First Solar right now? Before you buy stock in First Solar, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and First Solar wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $663,630!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,115,695!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,071% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 185% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of August 13, 2025 Eric Volkman has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Amazon, First Solar, and Oracle. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Why Investors Were So Fired Up About First Solar Stock on Friday was originally published by The Motley Fool
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Melania Trump sends letter to Putin about abducted children
By Steve Holland ANCHORAGE, Alaska (Reuters) -U.S. President Donald Trump's wife, Melania Trump, raised the plight of children in Ukraine and Russia in a personal letter to Russian President Vladimir Putin, two White House officials said on Friday. President Trump hand-delivered the letter to Putin during their summit talks in Alaska, the officials told Reuters. Slovenian-born Melania Trump was not on the trip to Alaska. The officials would not divulge the contents of the letter other than to say it mentioned the abductions of children resulting from the war in Ukraine. The existence of the letter was not previously reported. Russia's seizure of Ukrainian children has been a deeply sensitive one for Ukraine. Ukraine has called the abductions of tens of thousands of its children taken to Russia or Russian-occupied territory without the consent of family or guardians a war crime that meets the U.N. treaty definition of genocide. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy conveyed his gratitude to the first lady on his call with Trump on Saturday, Ukraine's foreign minister said. "This is a true act of humanism," Andrii Sybiha added on X. Previously Moscow has said it has been protecting vulnerable children from a war zone. The United Nations Human Rights Office has said Russia has inflicted suffering on millions of Ukrainian children and violated their rights since its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022. Trump and Putin met for nearly three hours at a U.S. military base in Anchorage without reaching a ceasefire deal in the war in Ukraine. (Reporting By Steve Holland, additional reporting Yuliia Dysa, Editing by Trevor Hunnicutt, Sam Holmes and Sharon Singleton) Solve the daily Crossword