EXCLUSIVE: Biden ATF promoted agents involved in 'illegal' scheme to inflate salaries, GOP senators say
What's more, instead of being disciplined, the supervisory agents who allegedly turned a blind eye to the misconduct – and in some cases allegedly retaliated against whistleblowers trying to expose it – were promoted under the Biden administration, the senators say.
"As a result of ATF's illegal conduct, ATF staff assigned to these positions performed administrative work but unlawfully received enhanced law enforcement pay and benefits to which they were not entitled, wasting millions of taxpayer dollars," Iowa's Republican senators, Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley and Joni Ernst, wrote in a letter transmitted Friday to U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi and ATF acting Director Daniel Driscoll.
Army Secretary Dan Driscoll To Lead Atf, Replacing Fbi Director Kash Patel
In their letter, the senators cited two internal investigations from the Office of Personnel Management (OPM), which concluded in 2020 and ultimately suspended the ATF's classification authority, and the ATF Internal Affairs Division (IAD), which was completed in early 2024. Despite the suspension from OPM in 2020, which was lifted in 2023, ATF officials disregarded OPM directives and continued to re-classify agency employees improperly, according to the senators.
In their letter, Grassley and Ernst singled out two supervisory agents, Lisa Boykin and Ralph Bittelari, who they say the IAD audit shows not only allowed the continuance of this misclassification scheme – despite knowing it violated OPM directives and standards – but also retaliated against whistleblowers trying to expose it.
Read On The Fox News App
Furthermore, the senators claim, Boykin and Bittelari were promoted before President Joe Biden left office and continue to work at the ATF under President Donald Trump.
In one instance, according to the senators, Bittelari and Boykin decided to move forward with the relocation of an ATF law enforcement officer in Phoenix to an administrative position at ATF headquarters in Washington, D.C., despite OPM identifying the position as misclassified. The IAD report allegedly shows Bittelari initially agreed to rescind the job offer, but following a subsequent conversation with Boykin decided to move forward with the unauthorized relocation anyway.
Senator Warns Of 'Unconstitutional' Judicial Overreach Ahead Of Scotus Showdown
Furthermore, the senators alleged in their letter that the IAD report shows Bittelari attempted to hide the "unlawful assignment" by submitting the promotion directly to payroll for processing.
During another instance when Bittelari sought to improperly classify a position description for the chief of ATF's Workforce Wellness and Services Division (WWSD) as law enforcement, the senators said a human resources classification specialist was threatened with insubordination after recusing herself from the matter and sending an email notifying staff it was a violation of OPM directives and standards.
The senator's letter also highlighted Boykin's "troubling lack of candor" regarding the installation of the chief of WWSD. According to the senators, Boykin told IAD investigators she was unsure if the chief of WWSD had been installed prior to the position description ever being adequately approved. However, the senators said, Boykin's emails showed the individual attended meetings and functions with Boykin as WWSD chief prior to receiving approval, and a draft position description was created jointly by the pair weeks before the official WWSD chief position description was approved.
"The findings in the IAD report present clear evidence that corrective action must be taken for, at minimum, Ms. Boykin's and Mr. Bittelari's gross misconduct," the senators wrote. "Yet, the Biden ATF and DOJ leadership not only failed to hold Boykin or Bittelari accountable for their gross misconduct, but legally protected whistleblower disclosures provided to our offices show these career DOJ bureaucrats were promoted after the conclusion of the IAD investigation that harshly criticized their actions."
The senators point out in their letter that Boykin was promoted to chief diversity officer under Biden, but in January 2025 her title was switched to "Senior Executive." Meanwhile, the senators also pointed out Bittelari was promoted to senior advisor at the Justice Department's Justice Management Division (JMD), and later acting deputy director of human resources within JMD.
Atf Accused Of 'Circumventing' Trump Order To Place Dei Staff On Paid Leave
"In closing, the findings in the IAD and OPM audit reports further substantiate the claims whistleblowers made to our offices that senior ATF bureaucrats, Ms. Boykin and Mr. Bittelari, engaged in gross and substantial waste, fraud, abuse, and misconduct at the expense of taxpayers in furtherance of ATF's illegal misclassification scheme, retaliated against whistleblowers for exposing it, and then were promoted for it," stated Grassley and Ernst's letter to Bondi and Driscoll.
"Their complete disregard for the law despite being 'fully aware of the potential consequences' show Boykin and Bittelari should not have leadership positions at the Justice Department or its components."
In addition to calling for corrective action, Grassley and Ernst requested that no later than May 23 the Justice Department submit a response on how it plans to address the issues laid out in the IAD report and their letter.
The Justice Department declined to comment for this article, while the ATF did not respond to Fox News Digital's inquiries.Original article source: EXCLUSIVE: Biden ATF promoted agents involved in 'illegal' scheme to inflate salaries, GOP senators say
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNN
24 minutes ago
- CNN
GOP lawmaker faces raucous crowd in Wisconsin, critical questions over tariffs and immigration policy
Republican Rep. Bryan Steil faced a rowdy crowd at a town hall-style event in Wisconsin on Thursday, with attendees angrily confronting him over a wide range of topics, including tariffs, President Donald Trump's 'big, beautiful Bill,' the war in Gaza and immigration policy. Audience members frequently interrupted Steil as he spoke, often drowning him out with boos and yelling, though there were also moments where the congressman's remarks were met with applause. The event – which the congressman's office described as a 'listening session,' comes as House members have returned to their districts for a weekslong district work period for the month of August. It featured a number of critical questions from the audience over the treatment of immigrants under the Trump administration. At one point, an audience member started chanting, 'We are all immigrants,' as the congressman discussed border security. 'It's not politics, it's morality,' one audience member told Steil, saying, 'I care about people, and what I see happening to our immigrant population embarrasses me, and you have not raised a voice to complain about it. Where do I see your leadership? I see no leadership, I see following Trump 100% of the time.' A different attendee told the congressman, 'I am so disappointed. I am so disappointed in how you represent us as the citizens of Walworth County. Southeast Wisconsin has not been represented by you. President Trump seems to run Southeast Wisconsin through you.' Another audience member said that his 'main concern' is tariffs. 'I was under the impression that Congress was responsible for issuing tariffs,' he said. 'I really feel that this is a terrible tax that's going to be placed on the citizens of the United States.' The congressman began to respond, by saying, 'This really at its core needs to be an opportunity to make sure that other countries are treating the United States fairly,' a remark that was met with booing. 'What we need to do is work with our allies, put trade agreements in place,' he said as he was repeatedly interrupted by yelling from the crowd. 'I think part of this is what gives Trump the authority to put in place the tariffs. The authority that he's operating under is, as it relates to the imbalance of trade,' Steil said. 'There's a court case that's going on right now where there'll be more clarity provided on this, but that's the authority that he's operating under.' The event's moderator had to interject on multiple occasions in an effort to get the crowd to quiet down. At one point, the moderator interrupted a yelling outburst by jokingly asking if the crowd would'rather the congressman go to lunch and you get to shout for the next 45 minutes?' and called out a specific audience member as 'very obnoxious and very disrespectful.' At one point, the congressman said, 'The civil discourse that is a cornerstone of our democracy is challenged right now.' Not long after, he said, 'I don't support anybody denigrating anyone else. People have a right of free speech. But a lot of our discourse, writ large, is really challenged. It's challenged on all sides. So I think we have a real opportunity to improve our discourse a little bit. I'd say the overwhelming majority of people here want to learn and understand my perspective, want to hear the questions, and then there's a small group of people that are challenging and are booing and yelling at each other. The same occurs in Washington. I share the frustration.' On Trump's sweeping tax and spending law known as the 'big, beautiful bill,' one person asked what is being done to protect individuals who are not wealthy, raising concerns that tax breaks under the legislation will only accrue to higher-earners. The congressman responded, 'In part, I would disagree with the way you framed it. As I look at the provisions of the bill, and what was in large part done, was keeping the 2017 tax reforms in place, that's the bulk of the bill,' but was soon interrupted by shouting from the crowd. He added, 'It builds onto that additional tax reforms for hard-working families.' Towards the end of the event, a man jumped up from his seat to question Steil on the war in Gaza. 'Two million people in Gaza are starving – what do you have to say about that?' the man shouted, then stood up and waved his arms in the air. A police officer approached the man, who then sat back down. The officer appeared to say something to the man and then walked away. Shortly after the outburst, a different audience member pressed the congressman to answer the earlier question. 'To me, the easy answer to address this crisis is for Hamas to surrender and release the hostages. That ends the war tomorrow,' Steil said. 'Israel was unfairly, unjustly attacked, their civilians were killed and kidnapped by Hamas terrorists.' Steil said, 'Israel has a right to defend itself,' but paused amid shouting from the crowd. Soon after, amid continued disruptions from the audience, the moderator moved to conclude the event, saying 'We're gonna close it off here because there's no point in continuing.' Separately, Rep. Mark Pocan, a Democrat, told a crowd at a different event Thursday night he knew it was 'a little douchey' to hold a town hall in the Wisconsin congressional district – and hometown – of neighboring Republican Rep. Derrick Van Orden. But Van Orden is 'missing in action,' refusing to hold town halls of his own, and Democrats need to push back harder against the GOP's massive tax and domestic policy bill, Pocan said. 'I think doing, bluntly, town halls in Republican districts where they refuse to do them is one of the best things we can do,' Pocan said. He called himself an 'early adopter' of the tactic and said other progressive lawmakers are following suit. 'I think this is what we need to do. I mean, is this in your face. Is this a little douchey? Yes,' he said. 'But you know what? Taking away your health care and taking away your education funding and adding $4 trillion to the national debt so that the richest people are getting a tax cut is enough that we need to push back.' Pocan told CNN after the town hall that he'd come to Prairie du Chien to goad Van Orden into publicly defending the GOP bill that President Donald Trump signed into law on July 4. 'Come on down the road, Derrick,' he said. 'If you really think this bill's as good as you've been saying it is, not in front of people, let's have an actual debate. Let's talk about the various parts of it. The fact he won't doesn't pass the Wisconsin smell test.' Pocan's hour-long town hall, in front of an audience of about 50 people in the town of about 5,000 was a friendly one with none of the fiery exchanges that other town halls across the nation have featured. Pocan was asked questions largely from the left, about ways Democrats can be more aggressive in taking on Trump. He was also asked about immigration policies, the sustainability of Social Security and Medicare, and about whether he fears Trump will declare martial law and cancel upcoming elections. He focused most of his comments on railing against Trump's so-called 'big, beautiful bill' — but peppered the entire hour with jabs at Van Orden for failing to host town halls. Van Orden's office did not respond to CNN's request for comment on Pocan's town hall.
Politico
an hour ago
- Politico
Van Hollen blocks FBI funding bill from floor debate over Trump headquarters dispute
The simmering dispute over the FBI's future headquarters derailed Senate efforts Thursday night to launch floor debate on the legislation that funds the agency, as well as the departments of Commerce and Justice, NASA and science programs. Sen. Chris Van Hollen objected Thursday night to including the bill in a larger package of funding measures. The Maryland Democrat demanded that the Senate agree to adopt language that would require the FBI to meet a specific security threshold for its headquarters, as the Trump administration keeps the agency in downtown Washington instead of relocating it to the suburban Maryland campus previously selected after a yearslong competition. But Sen. Jerry Moran (R-Kansas), who chairs the funding panel that handles the bill, shot down that request on the Senate floor Thursday night, after the dispute over the FBI headquarters already snagged committee action on the bill. Tearing up as he spoke on the floor, Moran said he knows 'no path forward' that would allow Van Hollen's amendment. 'Our appropriations process is fragile,' he said. If Van Hollen, who serves as the ranking member on the Commerce-Justice-Science Subcommittee, hadn't objected, his amendment would have been teed up for a vote. But Van Hollen didn't want to take the risk that the language would not have been adopted. 'That is a simple request that I would have thought all of us could stand behind,' Van Hollen said, 'making sure that the new headquarters of the men and women of the FBI meets the security requirements that we and they have set out.' Senate appropriators already killed another amendment Van Hollen proposed in committee, which would have barred the Trump administration from dipping into a $1.4 billion construction account for anything besides relocating the FBI to the previously selected site. After the proposal was initially adopted, the committee later voted to strike the language because so many Republicans were threatening to tank the underlying bill if it rebuked Trump on the headquarters decision. 'We did it because the president of the United States was going to throw a fit if that provision stayed on, that's why people reversed the position,' Van Hollen said on the Senate floor Thursday night. 'And we shouldn't make our decisions out of fear about what somebody in the White House is going to do, because that distorts the entire process here in the United States Senate.' Moran's Thursday evening request was to tie together four bills to fund the government for the fiscal year that begins Oct. 1. Those bills would collectively fund the departments of Veterans Affairs and Agriculture, as well as military construction projects, the operations of Congress and the FDA. The Kansas Republican touted that those four measures had made it through the full Senate Appropriations Committee with bipartisan support and 'in some instances, unanimously.'
CNN
an hour ago
- CNN
GOP lawmaker faces raucous crowd in Wisconsin, critical questions over tariffs and immigration policy
Republican Rep. Bryan Steil faced a rowdy crowd at a town hall-style event in Wisconsin on Thursday, with attendees angrily confronting him over a wide range of topics, including tariffs, President Donald Trump's 'big, beautiful Bill,' the war in Gaza and immigration policy. Audience members frequently interrupted Steil as he spoke, often drowning him out with boos and yelling, though there were also moments where the congressman's remarks were met with applause. The event – which the congressman's office described as a 'listening session,' comes as House members have returned to their districts for a weekslong district work period for the month of August. It featured a number of critical questions from the audience over the treatment of immigrants under the Trump administration. At one point, an audience member started chanting, 'We are all immigrants,' as the congressman discussed border security. 'It's not politics, it's morality,' one audience member told Steil, saying, 'I care about people, and what I see happening to our immigrant population embarrasses me, and you have not raised a voice to complain about it. Where do I see your leadership? I see no leadership, I see following Trump 100% of the time.' A different attendee told the congressman, 'I am so disappointed. I am so disappointed in how you represent us as the citizens of Walworth County. Southeast Wisconsin has not been represented by you. President Trump seems to run Southeast Wisconsin through you.' Another audience member said that his 'main concern' is tariffs. 'I was under the impression that Congress was responsible for issuing tariffs,' he said. 'I really feel that this is a terrible tax that's going to be placed on the citizens of the United States.' The congressman began to respond, by saying, 'This really at its core needs to be an opportunity to make sure that other countries are treating the United States fairly,' a remark that was met with booing. 'What we need to do is work with our allies, put trade agreements in place,' he said as he was repeatedly interrupted by yelling from the crowd. 'I think part of this is what gives Trump the authority to put in place the tariffs. The authority that he's operating under is, as it relates to the imbalance of trade,' Steil said. 'There's a court case that's going on right now where there'll be more clarity provided on this, but that's the authority that he's operating under.' The event's moderator had to interject on multiple occasions in an effort to get the crowd to quiet down. At one point, the moderator interrupted a yelling outburst by jokingly asking if the crowd would'rather the congressman go to lunch and you get to shout for the next 45 minutes?' and called out a specific audience member as 'very obnoxious and very disrespectful.' At one point, the congressman said, 'The civil discourse that is a cornerstone of our democracy is challenged right now.' Not long after, he said, 'I don't support anybody denigrating anyone else. People have a right of free speech. But a lot of our discourse, writ large, is really challenged. It's challenged on all sides. So I think we have a real opportunity to improve our discourse a little bit. I'd say the overwhelming majority of people here want to learn and understand my perspective, want to hear the questions, and then there's a small group of people that are challenging and are booing and yelling at each other. The same occurs in Washington. I share the frustration.' On Trump's sweeping tax and spending law known as the 'big, beautiful bill,' one person asked what is being done to protect individuals who are not wealthy, raising concerns that tax breaks under the legislation will only accrue to higher-earners. The congressman responded, 'In part, I would disagree with the way you framed it. As I look at the provisions of the bill, and what was in large part done, was keeping the 2017 tax reforms in place, that's the bulk of the bill,' but was soon interrupted by shouting from the crowd. He added, 'It builds onto that additional tax reforms for hard-working families.' Towards the end of the event, a man jumped up from his seat to question Steil on the war in Gaza. 'Two million people in Gaza are starving – what do you have to say about that?' the man shouted, then stood up and waved his arms in the air. A police officer approached the man, who then sat back down. The officer appeared to say something to the man and then walked away. Shortly after the outburst, a different audience member pressed the congressman to answer the earlier question. 'To me, the easy answer to address this crisis is for Hamas to surrender and release the hostages. That ends the war tomorrow,' Steil said. 'Israel was unfairly, unjustly attacked, their civilians were killed and kidnapped by Hamas terrorists.' Steil said, 'Israel has a right to defend itself,' but paused amid shouting from the crowd. Soon after, amid continued disruptions from the audience, the moderator moved to conclude the event, saying 'We're gonna close it off here because there's no point in continuing.' Separately, Rep. Mark Pocan, a Democrat, told a crowd at a different event Thursday night he knew it was 'a little douchey' to hold a town hall in the Wisconsin congressional district – and hometown – of neighboring Republican Rep. Derrick Van Orden. But Van Orden is 'missing in action,' refusing to hold town halls of his own, and Democrats need to push back harder against the GOP's massive tax and domestic policy bill, Pocan said. 'I think doing, bluntly, town halls in Republican districts where they refuse to do them is one of the best things we can do,' Pocan said. He called himself an 'early adopter' of the tactic and said other progressive lawmakers are following suit. 'I think this is what we need to do. I mean, is this in your face. Is this a little douchey? Yes,' he said. 'But you know what? Taking away your health care and taking away your education funding and adding $4 trillion to the national debt so that the richest people are getting a tax cut is enough that we need to push back.' Pocan told CNN after the town hall that he'd come to Prairie du Chien to goad Van Orden into publicly defending the GOP bill that President Donald Trump signed into law on July 4. 'Come on down the road, Derrick,' he said. 'If you really think this bill's as good as you've been saying it is, not in front of people, let's have an actual debate. Let's talk about the various parts of it. The fact he won't doesn't pass the Wisconsin smell test.' Pocan's hour-long town hall, in front of an audience of about 50 people in the town of about 5,000 was a friendly one with none of the fiery exchanges that other town halls across the nation have featured. Pocan was asked questions largely from the left, about ways Democrats can be more aggressive in taking on Trump. He was also asked about immigration policies, the sustainability of Social Security and Medicare, and about whether he fears Trump will declare martial law and cancel upcoming elections. He focused most of his comments on railing against Trump's so-called 'big, beautiful bill' — but peppered the entire hour with jabs at Van Orden for failing to host town halls. Van Orden's office did not respond to CNN's request for comment on Pocan's town hall. CNN's Eric Bradner contributed to this report.
