Punjab PA Speaker firmly opposes proposed ‘Gunda Act'
LAHORE: Punjab Assembly Speaker Malik Muhammad Ahmad Khan has firmly opposed the proposed 'Gunda Act' prepared by the provincial Home Department, stating that he cannot support such a law. He declared that if necessary, he would even approach Punjab Chief Minister Maryam Nawaz, emphasizing that he would go to any lengths but would never accept this kind of legislation.
While talking to media outside Punjab Assembly, Speaker offered unsolicited advice to Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI), urging the party to abandon its talk of no-confidence motions. He claimed that several politicians within PTI strongly oppose the party's political approach and warned that 20 to 25 members might defect during any no-confidence motion.
Malik Muhammad Ahmad Khan stressed the need to eliminate terrorism from its roots, stating that no crime is greater than committing offences under the guise of politics.
Referring to the alleged involvement of Indian spy agency RAW in Balochistan, he expressed confidence that the Pakistan Army would eradicate such threats completely.
Commenting on reports of former Prime Minister and PTI founder Imran Khan's potential release or deal, the Speaker questioned why there had been a 'show of speeches' over the past two to three years if such reports were true. He added that playing with public emotions in such situations is inappropriate.
Meanwhile, opposition leader in Punjab Assembly Malik Ahmad Khan Bhachar strongly criticized the government while talking to media outside Punjab Assembly. He said the Chief Minister of Punjab Maryam Nawaz has lied to the people once again. He also said the government is claiming that they are providing free medicines in all public hospitals for the past year, the reality is the opposite. He pointed out that during PTI's tenure, free medicines were available in hospitals, and RHCs (Rural Health Centres) and BHUs (Basic Health Units) were upgraded. He questioned where the medicines worth 100 billion rupees meant for the people of Punjab are being distributed.
Malik Ahmad Khan Bhachar accused Maryam Nawaz of selling 1,132 health units. He also mentioned that nursing staff have been suspended for making TikTok videos. He demanded the government specify which hospitals currently provide free medicines. Highlighting the destruction of the education sector, he stated that 11,000 schools have been sold, leaving government teachers unemployed.
He raised questions about the naming of Nawaz Sharif Cancer Hospital, asking why a hospital built on 5,000 kanals of land was named after Maryam Nawaz father. He challenged Maryam Nawaz, asking whether the hospital was built using funds from Ramzan Sugar Mills or money brought from home. If so, he questioned why it was being named after her father?
He said if Maryam Nawaz stepped out of her offices and gauged public reaction, she would realize how unpopular she is. He claimed that if she took to the streets now, she would understand her true standing. He accused her of making false allegations regarding the events of May 8 and 9.
He stated that the family of PTI's founder, lawyers, and close associates are being denied meetings.
Addressing farmers' issues, he said that farmers have been devastated by wheat prices, leaving 13 crore farmers displaced. He also mentioned those trapped in military cases, saying they are being denied the right to appeal and are subjected to difficult ATC (Anti-Terrorism Court) trials.
Bhachar asked Maryam Nawaz 'what message she wants to convey to Punjab?' He predicted that when she assumes power, she will prove to be ruthless. Criticizing the 'Gunda Act' (anti-vandalism law), he called it a colonial-era law being reintroduced, promoting a colonial mindset where anyone can be arrested for speaking out. He questioned how the Punjab government could deprive people of their ID cards, passports, or basic human rights.
He accused Maryam Nawaz of disrespecting teachers, destroying paramedics and doctors, and now trying to further oppress the people with this law.
He said the events of May 9 were falsely linked to India's actions, for which the public must be apologized to. He urged the people of Punjab to free themselves from the 'Form 47 TikToker government.' Criticizing Faisal Kamran SSP, he said that despite being educated, he is mistreating elders.
Condemning the mistreatment of Shah Mahmood Qureshi, he said violence is being committed against women. He warned that the greater the oppression, the stronger the response would be. He demanded a polygraph test for Maryam Nawaz, who claims to own no property in Pakistan, let alone Britain. He also called for polygraph tests for both brothers (Nawaz Sharif and Shehbaz Sharif), as one claims to have been a labourer while the other says their father was wealthy.
He asserted that Imran Khan could emerge victorious because he stands firm for the nation's future. He made it clear that no deal can bring Imran Khan out—only the people's power can. He accused Maryam Nawaz of acting to please her foreign masters and warned that she would face consequences.
Earlier, the Punjab Assembly session commenced two hours and 13 minutes behind schedule, with Speaker Malik Muhammad Ahmad Khan presiding. As soon as the session began, opposition members entered the house chanting slogans and creating an uproar against the government. They raised slogans such as 'Who will save Pakistan?' and 'Founder of PTI.'
During the session, government MPA Ahmad Iqbal Shah criticized minister Zeeshan Rafiq, sarcastically suggesting that if he had gone to Sialkot, he should also recite Fatiha for the roads. Speaker Malik Muhammad Ahmad Khan responded mockingly, 'Zeeshan Rafiq has gone to Sialkot for Fatiha; when he returns, he will again demand answers about the roads.'
Government MPA Amjad Ali Javed raised concerns over the agenda, stating, 'The agenda should have been received a day earlier. We were preparing the special education agenda until 2:30 PM.' The Punjab Assembly Speaker replied, 'I had the agenda changed.'
Opposition member Mumtaz Chang objected, saying, 'When our questions came after six months, we found out the agenda had been altered.'
The Speaker clarified, 'Some important matters had to be included, which is why the agenda was changed.'
Government MPA Amjad Ali Javed announced his intention to move an adjournment motion against the Gymkhana Club and Chief Minister's Advisor Babar Aliuddin. He questioned, 'My adjournment motion is not on the agenda. Can we not speak against the Brahmins of the system?'
Opposition member Ahmar Bhatti protested against a 26% increase in private school fees during summer vacations. He stated, 'Private schools have raised fees by seven to eight thousand rupees. International schools have increased fees by seven thousand rupees for grades two to three and eight thousand rupees for grades five to six.'
He reminded the assembly that, according to a High Court ruling, only half the fees should be charged during summer vacations.
Punjab Law Minister Sohaib Bharath said, 'We will look into this matter and also obtain the court's decision.'
The Speaker remarked, 26% fee increase is excessive, and directed the matter to the Standing Committee on Schools for further review.
During a session of the Punjab Assembly, Speaker Malik Muhammad Ahmad Khan commended MPA Waqas Maan, calling him a skilled orator. The Speaker remarked, 'You speak so sweetly that one wishes you would keep talking.'
He jokingly added, 'You don't even have to look at me—just keep speaking.' Referring to a previous incident, the Speaker quipped, 'Earlier, I got caught telling Hina Pervez to look at me, but now I won't ask Waqas Maan Sahib to do the same.' His humorous comment drew laughter from both treasury and opposition members.
Parliamentary Secretary for Sports Ans Mahmood responded to questions regarding the collapsed wall of Shaheen Football Stadium in Toba Tek Singh, stating that a detailed reply would be provided in the next session.
Government member Ahmed Iqbal Shah raised concerns in the Assembly about whether Pakistan's football team would participate in FIFA. The Parliamentary Secretary smiled and replied that this had become a fresh point of inquiry. Speaker Malik Muhammad Ahmad Khan humorously intervened, saying, 'Now I'll roll out the question to you—answer whether the team is going to FIFA or not.' He further remarked, 'In a country where Chaudhry Shujaat heads the Kabaddi Association and Arshad Lodhi led the Football Association, what do we even expect from FIFA?'
Hafiz Farhat Javed criticized PCB Chairman Mohsin Naqvi, suggesting that the matter should be handed over to someone else. However, the Punjab Assembly Speaker defended Naqvi, stating, 'Mohsin Naqvi is working to improve cricket.'
Speaker Malik Muhammad Ahmad Khan criticized proposed bills that grant departments the authority to formulate rules, stating he could not allow such a move. He supported the stance of opposition members Aamir Rashid Bhatti and Zulfiqar Shah, asserting that lawmaking powers should not be delegated to bureaucrats. Rana Aftab Ahmad Khan also objected, saying that newly formed authorities were being given legislative powers, which was inappropriate.
The Speaker referenced the 1972 Act, stating that if a provincial assembly member is present in any committee meeting, they should chair it. Opposition member Ahmar Rashid Bhatti argued that under the Privileges Act, assembly members should lead sub-committees, but in government-proposed bills, this authority had been wrongly assigned to the Chief Secretary.
During the Punjab Assembly session, government member Ghazali Saleem Butt pointed out the lack of quorum, prompting Speaker Malik Muhammad Ahmad Khan to order the ringing of bells for five minutes to gather members. Following the quorum call, government members walked out of the assembly hall, leading the Speaker to extend the bell-ringing for another five minutes.
After a nearly half-hour delay, the session resumed, with the Speaker addressing the opposition, stating that the meeting had been convened at their request and it was their responsibility to ensure quorum. Although only 81 members were present, the Speaker declared quorum without a formal count and proceeded with the session.
Meanwhile, the Punjab Assembly introduced a new draft law titled the Centre of Excellence on Countering Violent Extremism Punjab 2025.
Additionally, Panel of Chairperson Samiullah Khan deferred the Consumer Protection Amendment Punjab 2025 bill and a general discussion motion on law and order until Tuesday.
Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
an hour ago
- Express Tribune
India's role in South Asia: time to honour Delhi Agreement
The writer is a public policy analyst based in Lahore. She can be reached at durdananajam1@ Listen to article South Asia, with its intertwined histories and complex relationships, remains one of the most volatile regions in the world. The 1974 Delhi Agreement, signed between Pakistan, India and Bangladesh, was envisioned as a step towards lasting reconciliation, one that would help the nations move beyond historical grievances and forge a path toward cooperation. However, decades later, rather than fostering regional stability, India has positioned itself as the dominant power, often at the expense of Pakistan. From perpetuating the terrorism narrative to influencing Bangladesh's policy against Pakistan, India's approach has largely contributed to the fragmentation of South Asian unity. The latest military standoff between India and Pakistan, which erupted in May 2025, was yet another reminder of the fragile peace between the two nuclear-armed neighbours. The conflict began after India launched missile strikes on Pakistan, citing retaliation for an April 22 terrorist attack in Indian-administered Kashmir that left 26 people dead. Pakistan denied any involvement, but India proceeded with Operation Sindoor, targeting alleged militant infrastructure deep within Pakistani territory. Pakistan responded with Operation Bunyan-um-Marsoos, striking Indian military sites in a show of force. The skirmishes escalated further, with both sides engaging in drone warfare, marking a new chapter in their military confrontations. The conflict ended with a US-brokered ceasefire, but the damage - both physical and diplomatic - was already done. The depiction of Pakistan as a perpetual antagonist gained momentum after the Kargil War, when India aggressively pushed the idea that Pakistan was solely responsible for regional instability. Following the 2008 Mumbai attacks, this narrative reached new heights, with India successfully framing Pakistan as a state sponsor of terrorism in international forums. This rhetoric served multiple purposes. Firstly, it justified India's refusal to engage in third-party mediation over Kashmir, despite Pakistan's repeated calls for international arbitration. Secondly, it enabled India to diminish the legitimacy of the Kashmiri freedom movement, recasting it as a product of Pakistan-based extremism rather than a genuine struggle for self-determination. Thirdly, it created an atmosphere in India that fostered hostility, ensuring that any peace initiatives would be met with suspicion or outright rejection by the Indian public. Beyond its own borders, India actively exported this narrative to Bangladesh, a country with historical grievances against Pakistan dating back to 1971. India played a significant role in ensuring that Bangladesh remained firmly within its sphere of influence, cultivating an anti-Pakistan sentiment that has led to strained relations between Dhaka and Islamabad. Under Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina's Awami League government, Bangladesh increasingly aligned itself with India's position. One of the most visible manifestations of this was the controversial war crimes trials that had targeted pro-Pakistan elements. However, the political landscape in Bangladesh underwent a dramatic transformation in 2024 when mass protests and military intervention led to the ousting of Sheikh Hasina. The uprising, fueled by public dissatisfaction with her government's authoritarian policies and economic mismanagement, culminated in her exile to India. With Hasina gone, Bangladesh has taken significant steps to mend its relations with Pakistan, marking a new chapter in regional diplomacy. The new Bangladeshi leadership has actively sought to rebuild ties with Islamabad, recognising the mutual benefits of economic and strategic cooperation. Trade agreements have been revisited, diplomatic channels reopened, and a renewed sense of partnership has emerged. This shift has not only strengthened Pakistan-Bangladesh relations but has also challenged India's long-standing influence over Dhaka. India's influence over Bangladesh was evident in its support for Hasina's government, particularly in the controversial war crimes trials that targeted pro-Pakistan elements. India actively encouraged Bangladesh to distance itself from Pakistan, reinforcing the idea that Pakistan was the perpetual antagonist in South Asia. Moreover, India's economic and military dominance left Bangladesh with little room to maneuver independently. Trade agreements, defence collaborations and diplomatic pressure ensured that Bangladesh remained within India's sphere of influence, often at the expense of its relations with Pakistan. However, with Hasina's removal, Bangladesh has begun to assert its independence, signaling a shift away from India's shadow. India's strategy of isolating Pakistan and asserting its dominance in South Asia has reached a breaking point. The recent military conflict demonstrated that Pakistan is capable of defending itself, and India's aggressive posturing has only fueled instability. The Delhi Agreement was meant to foster cooperation, not perpetuate hostility. If India truly wishes to be a responsible regional power, it must abandon its antagonistic approach and engage in genuine dialogue. Confidence-building measures, such as reopening diplomatic channels, restoring trade relations and allowing third-party mediation, could pave the way for a more stable South Asia. Instead of using neighbouring countries as a tool to weaken Pakistan, India should encourage regional unity based on mutual respect and shared economic interests. India's role in South Asia has largely been defined by its desire for dominance. By fueling anti-Pakistan sentiment and leveraging neighbouring countries as a tool for regional influence, India has perpetuated instability rather than fostering cooperation. The time has come for India to rethink its strategy and embrace diplomacy over aggression. Honouring the 1974 Delhi Agreement would be a step in the right direction — one that acknowledges the shared history of South Asia while paving the way for a future built on peace and mutual respect. The region's prosperity depends not on rivalry, but on the ability of its leaders to recognise that cooperation, not conflict, is the way forward.
Express Tribune
an hour ago
- Express Tribune
Khawaja Asif declares Simla agreement a 'dead document'
Listen to article Defence Minister Khawaja Asif has declared the 1972 Simla Agreement 'dead' in the current geopolitical context, stating that Pakistan has effectively returned to the 1948 position regarding Kashmir, and the Line of Control (LoC) should now be viewed as a ceasefire line. In an interview with a private television channel on Wednesday, the minister said that while the Simla Agreement had initially committed both India and Pakistan to resolving disputes bilaterally, that framework had collapsed due to unilateral Indian actions in recent years. 'The Simla Agreement is now a dead document. We are back to the 1948 position, when the United Nations declared the LoC a ceasefire line following the ceasefire and resolutions,' he said, referring to the UN-mediated cessation of hostilities in the first India-Pakistan war. 'Going forward, these disputes will be dealt with multilaterally or internationally.' He also cast doubt over the status of other bilateral arrangements, stating that "whether the Indus Waters Treaty is suspended or not, Simla is already over." Commenting on regional tensions, Asif said the threat of war with India remains present. 'Pakistan does not desire war, but if it is imposed on us, the response will be even stronger than before,' he warned. The minister touched upon post-conflict developments, stating that Pakistan had emerged as a strengthened defensive power after its past wars with India. "We have become a defensive force. Orders for our JF-17 Thunder fighter jets are coming in," he said, highlighting Pakistan's growing defence capabilities. Also Read: 'Ready but not desperate' for talks with India: Dar On the issue of Afghan refugees, Asif reiterated that Afghans should now return to their homeland. 'Afghans must settle in their own country. They have no loyalty to our soil,' he remarked, adding that the time had come to address this issue firmly. The defence minister also highlighted the issue of tax evasion in the country, stressing that billions of rupees are lost to tax theft annually. 'We must plug this leakage and divert these funds towards national defence,' he concluded.
Express Tribune
an hour ago
- Express Tribune
Military notes; Indo-Pak conflict: deterrence, pre-battle manoeuvres
The writer is a retired major general and has an interest in International Relations and Political Sociology. He can be reached at tayyarinam@ and tweets @20_Inam Listen to article We continue to discuss various aspects of the recent Indo-Pakistan military standoff. Third, deterrence per se. More than a billion lives escaped Modi's madness in a closer than ever nuclear Armageddon. Besides the conventional side of warfare, the more dangerous 'nuclear parity' still overhangs South Asia perilously. With deterrence in 'conventional terms re-established', one hopes India under Modi would avoid another wasteful adventure of humiliation, and resume talks over the table, rather than in the skies and through brinkmanship. The future India-Pakistan conflict scene will no longer be unilateral. It will be dictated and decided by Sino-Pak military alliance especially in collaboration with China's Western Theater Command. And this would augment deterrence for rational players on the Indian side, if any. Pakistan's Military, in South Asia's modern history, showcased the most integrated defensive strategy and real-time coordination. And just to reiterate, in military literature, a weaker side is supposed to have won an asymmetrical contest, if it denies outright victory or the attainment of war's aims and objectives to the stronger side, which Pakistan did to a larger India. So perceptually speaking, deterrence in the Indo-Pakistan context would, henceforth, be defined by the conventional military capabilities plus nuclear arms, and the fragility of psychological threshold on both sides, as discussed in my piece, 'India, Pakistan — redefining deterrence', printed in this space on May 22, 2025. And in Pakistan's context, deterrence would remain to be fortified by the Sino-Pakistani alliance, and the resolve of Pakistan's civil and military leadership, through Islamabad's 'quid-pro-quo Plus' strategy, to never let India prevail. So, peace, the perusal of which now squarely lies with a mellowed but bellicose India that still pursues its intended water wars, would remain elusive if we do not recognise each other's capabilities, and do not engage each other with dignity, mutual respect and patience, and not with ignorance or arrogance. Fourth. The Exterior Manoeuvre. Without going into the nuts and bolts of the diplomatic war, the Indian efforts to paint Pakistan into endemically bad light and as a state sponsor of terrorism, had very few takers, regionally and internationally. Indian diplomatic overtures focused on painting itself taller by telling the world its military response was calculated and non-escalatory and that this 'new India' would respond muscularly to the so-called terrorist attacks, without wanting a wider war with Pakistan and its people. Essentially contradictory iterations. No country condemned Pakistan for the 'alleged' terrorism; none appreciated India's 'carefully calibrated' military response. The world, contrarily, was preoccupied with the IAF's French Rafael jets being shot down by PAF's Chinese J-10C fighters using PL-15 E air-to-air missiles. Even the US after some initial ambivalence from VP Vance had to forcefully intervene to affect a ceasefire, without giving India the blank cheque of unilateralism and brinkmanship. Russia, India's traditional friend, withheld the 'expected' diplomatic support for India. And Türkiye, Azerbaijan, Iran, Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Qatar and the entire OIC, the UN all called for restraint and then ceasefire. Major capitals responded with studied neutrality despite India sending seven diplomatic delegations to 32 countries. Beijing's signalling and posturing in support of Pakistan were overtly clear. Washington's ceasefire appeal re-hyphenated the two nuclear neighbours, to India's great chagrin. New Delhi even refused to acknowledge any US role, for which Trump had publicly taken credit. The paradox of Indian 'Exterior Manoeuvre' was laid bare, as to why was it accepting a ceasefire, irrespective of whether it was reached bilaterally (as India claimed) or under US interlocution (as Trump tweeted), if it had an upper hand militarily. During the conduct of operations, fiasco after fiasco derided New Delhi's aspirations and outsized ego. From denial to acknowledging downing of planes including Rafaeles, to persistent lies on the state and social media, greatly diminished India's shine, sheen and diplomatic weight. New Delhi's comical effort to influence the World Bank under its Indian-origin president, Mr Ajay Banga, from sanctioning loan to Islamabad failed spectacularly. The extent of India's hostility towards Pakistan permeated not only its body politics, but also its cultural elite (read Bollywood), its state behaviour; and resulted in a compulsive obsession with Pakistan, whom India's intellectual wizards proudly claim to have pushed into irrelevant ignominy. This paradox - Pakistan's irrelevance and Islamabad being an uncomfortable reality - remains unresolved and has been damaging India's 'perceived' important power aspiration and status, without pundits realising it. Fifth, The Inner Front. India whipped up its jingoist anti-Pakistan narrative in order to jell its inner front, silencing opposition, muzzling rationality and suppressing truth in the process. And it failed. The Modi Government had to launch Operation "Tiranga Yatra (tricolour journey)" for intense domestic messaging, to manipulate outcomes during Operation Sindoor. From annihilating Pakistan to dominating South Asia as the new hegemon, its efforts, however, could not convince most of its 200 million Muslims, who constitute 10.9 per cent of its population, is the world's 3rd largest Muslim population, and the largest Muslim-minority globally. Its illegally occupied Kashmir, the expected battle zone, simmers with hate, discontent and a resurgent anti-India sentiment, making operations and rear-area security a nightmare for the Indian Military. Assam, Christian Mizoram, Nagaland, the Naxalite insurgency in the 'Red Corridor', Khalistan Movement in Punjab and abroad, and other insurgencies drive wedges in the India Union. Even the Brahman-dominated decision-making elite had and have reservations on the direction secular India has taken under Hindutva-laced Modi Sarkar. Indian security sector and armed forces saw removals, arrests and demotions during the stand-off; and its population is still experiencing arrests for supporting Pakistan, as per press reports. By comparison, Pakistan's inner front jelled like it always does in a crisis with India. RAW-financed terrorism in KP and Balochistan, and the expected political uprising by some political forces against the armed forces, in hilarious formulation of Indian intelligence, failed and failed miserably. Pakistan's national will, determination, resolve and motivation across the political spectrum and across the nation was tougher and firm. Pakistan's 'relative' demographic homogeneity compared to India's heterogeneity is always an asset and a force-multiplier. Such demographic truism also permeates Pakistan's armed forces, making it a formidable fighting machine. Continues...
