Pete Rose reinstated by MLB, eligible for the Hall of Fame: How we got here and what it means
Integrity, MLB announced Tuesday, is as fluid as the passing of time.
In a landmark judgment, commissioner Rob Manfred removed MLB's all-time hits leader, Pete Rose, deadball icon 'Shoeless' Joe Jackson and 15 other deceased transgressors from the league's permanently ineligible list. The verdict means Rose, banned for life in 1989 for betting on major-league games, is now eligible for enshrinement in the Baseball Hall of Fame for the first time.
Advertisement
'In my view, once an individual has passed away, the purposes of Rule 21 have been served,' Manfred said in a statement announcing the decision. 'Obviously, a person no longer with us cannot represent a threat to the integrity of the game. Moreover, it is hard to conceive of a penalty that has more deterrent effect than one that lasts a lifetime with no reprieve.'
Technically, the verdict from Manfred that 'permanent ineligibility ends upon the passing of the disciplined individual' covers all 16 of the deceased players (and one former owner) on MLB's permanently ineligible list. But for all intents and purposes, Manfred's decision, and the timing of said decision, is entirely about opening a door to Cooperstown for Rose.
When Rose hung up his cleats in November 1986, induction into the Hall felt inevitable. That's because his statistical accomplishments were staggering, overwhelming. His 4,256 hits still top the MLB record book. So do his 3,562 games played and his 15,890 plate appearances. Across 24 seasons, Rose made 17 All-Star teams, captured three batting titles, won the 1973 NL MVP and lifted three World Series trophies. Along the way, Rose's edgy, unapologetic, all-out style of play earned him the nickname 'Charlie Hustle' and made him a sporting hero to a generation of baseball fans.
Graded purely on sporting merit, there's no debate that Rose's résumé warrants inclusion in MLB's hallowed halls. But even on-field greatness has its limits.
In March 1989, Rose was alleged to have bet on baseball while serving as player/manager of the Cincinnati Reds from 1985 to 1987. That saga, which unfurled amidst a changeover in commissioner from Peter Ueberroth to A. Bartlett Giamatti, dominated the 1989 MLB season. In August of that year, commissioner Giamatti, following an MLB investigation into the gambling allegations and the resulting Dowd Report, announced that baseball's hit king would be placed on MLB's ineligible list and banned for life.
Advertisement
'The banishment for life of Pete Rose from baseball is the sad end of a sorry episode,' Giamatti announced to a throng of reporters and cameras at the Hilton Hotel in New York City. 'One of the game's greatest players has engaged in a variety of acts which have stained the game, and he must now live with the consequences of those acts.'
Rose, as it turned out, also died with those consequences.
On Sept. 30, 2024, the final day of the MLB season, Rose passed away at the age of 83. In the 35 years between his banishment and death, the firebrand did not exactly embark on an apology tour. Quite the opposite. Although he proclaimed on banishment day that he would 'never bet on any kind of sports again,' Rose continued to live a life dominated by gambling and defined by denial of culpability — in addition to a prison sentence for tax evasion in 1990 and statutory rape allegations that emerged in 2017.
Rose's bad behavior continued in spite of a declaration from Giamatti that "The burden to show a redirected, reconfigured, rehabilitated life is entirely Pete Rose's." The league, essentially, left a window to reinstatement open. But the ever-stubborn Rose, by failing to show sufficient contrition or meaningfully alter his behavior, continually slammed it shut.
Advertisement
Manfred confirmed as much in 2015, pointing right at Rose's obstinacy when he denied another reinstatement request from the then-still-living ballplayer.
'In short, Mr. Rose has not presented credible evidence of a reconfigured life either by an honest acceptance by him of his wrongdoing, so clearly established by the Dowd Report, or by a rigorous, self-aware and sustained program of avoidance by him of all the circumstances that led to his permanent ineligibility in 1989.'
In other words, despite Rose's repeated requests and assertions that he deserved reconsideration, Manfred did not deem the scorned ex-player worthy of reinstatement.
So what changed?
Advertisement
Rose's passing obviously played a significant role. For years, Manfred thwarted Rose's many thinly veiled attempts to reingratiate himself. That Rose was never able to experience the joy and fulfillment of Hall of Fame enshrinement during his lifetime appears to have been sufficient punishment in Manfred's eyes. But the exact timing of Rose's removal from the ineligible list is about more than the aftereffects of his death.
On Feb. 28, President Donald Trump posted a lengthy screed praising Rose and promising to 'sign a complete PARDON' of the disgraced ballplayer. Trump's public affection toward Rose stretches back to his first presidential campaign in 2016, when, at a Cincinnati-area rally, the president called for the beloved Red to be elected to baseball's Hall of Fame. Trump rehashed the topic during the 2020 election, perhaps trying to sponge up votes in Ohio, a crucial swing state.
Then, six weeks after Trump initially reopened Pandora's Rose, he hosted Manfred at the White House.
'One of the topics was Pete Rose, but I'm not going beyond that,' Manfred told reporters afterward. 'He's said what he said publicly. I'm not going beyond that in terms of what the back-and-forth was.'
Advertisement
But Manfred's silence on the specifics couldn't hide the real story. And now, just a month later, Trump's insistence has borne fruit.
Let's be clear: MLB's willingness to accommodate Trump on Rose is about more than typical political pandering. The commissioner's office is surely worried about the administration's sway over (1) the league's antitrust exemption and (2) the hundreds of work visas granted to Venezuelan and Cuban ballplayers each year. There are no indications that a direct quid pro quo has taken place, but Trump's tendency toward aggressive and, at times, punitive immigration policy has likely contributed to MLB's hyper-careful approach to the current president.
Whether Rose is eventually elected or not is likely of little importance to Manfred. This mess isn't his problem anymore. He got the ball out of his court and the president on his good side. And besides, Rose's removal from the permanently ineligible list does not guarantee his enshrinement. The soonest he could be elected is in December 2027, when the Hall's Classic Baseball Era Committee, a group of 16 baseball acolytes — Hall of Famers, retired execs, tenured media members — will next vote on Rose's era. If 12 of 16 put Rose on their ballot, he will earn a spot in Cooperstown as part of the Class of 2028.
Viewed through a romantic lens, that means the game itself will now decide Rose's fate. Not Manfred. Not Trump. Not the court of public opinion. In a way, it's something of a fitting conclusion to what has been an exhausting, decades-long saga. And if the words of Bart Giamatti still carry any weight, those voting might not look brightly upon Rose.
'I believe baseball is a beautiful and exciting game, loved by millions — I among them — and I believe baseball is an important, enduring American institution,' Giamatti waxed on the day he banned Rose. 'It must assert and aspire to the highest principles — of integrity, of professionalism, of performance, of fair play within its rules.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Times
an hour ago
- New York Times
Braves trade deadline primer: 3 early storylines to watch
ATLANTA — If the Atlanta Braves had been swept for a third consecutive series this week at Milwaukee, we might be leaning toward their being sellers at the trade deadline for the first time since 2017. That was when they traded away pitcher Jaime García and catcher Anthony Recker. The Braves pursued controllable starting pitchers at that deadline, including Sonny Gray and José Quintana, but weren't willing to part with their No. 1 prospect, a kid named Acuña. Advertisement Yes, it's been a while. And it'll probably be a while longer before the Braves are trade-deadline sellers. Because as disappointing and frustrating as this season has been for the Braves and their fans, one of the worst stretches of baseball this team has had in decades wasn't bad enough to make them move to likely seller mode. At least not yet. There are nearly seven weeks until the July 31 trade deadline, and only five teams have double-digit deficits in the wild-card standings: the Pirates, Marlins and Rockies in the NL, and the Athletics and White Sox in the AL. The Braves were nine games behind the third-place team in the NL wild-card standings before Thursday. That's an undeniably large deficit, and what makes it even more difficult is that five other teams were closer than Atlanta to the third and final wild-card spot — the Cardinals, Brewers, Reds and Diamondbacks all were five or fewer games behind the Phillies and Padres, the second- and third-place teams in the NL wild-card standings. Still, the Braves are in a unique position in that they have a lineup featuring several former All-Stars who are in their primes led by the aforementioned Ronald Acuña Jr., who has only been back from a yearlong knee surgery rehab for three weeks and has looked terrific, giving the Braves another reason to believe their offense is going to improve. They are a team with position players signed to long-term extensions (including club options) through at least 2027 at every spot except shortstop. It's not a team in any position to consider rebuilding. The Braves want to win another ring or two while they have the likes of Acuña, who's under contract through 2028, including two club options, Austin Riley, Matt Olson and Michael Harris II, all under control through at least 2030. What they do at this year's July 31 trade deadline could depend on how things transpire between now and then, but here are a few scenarios. Advertisement Though it's unlikely the Braves will become sellers barring a continued slide further behind the wild-card leaders, trading veteran catcher Murphy could be a possibility. As good as the strong-armed 2023 All-Star is behind the plate with blocking, framing and game calling, and as much of a power threat as Murphy can be — he's rebounded from a career-worst .636 OPS and 76 OPS+ in 2024 to post a .784 OPS and 118 OPS+ — the Braves have a potential star emerging at catcher in rookie Drake Baldwin and might be a better offensive team with Baldwin catching four of five games. LOVE the Drake#BravesCountry — Atlanta Braves (@Braves) June 5, 2025 There'd be risk in going with a rookie as the main catcher, and if Baldwin were to get hurt, it'd be an obvious problem after trading Murphy. But the Braves have veteran James McCann at Triple A who could be a solid second catcher, and they could trade for another in an emergency. Baldwin is one of the better hitting catchers in the NL already, and the Braves could occasionally DH him if Marcell Ozuna needs a day off for his balky hip, or after this season when Ozuna exits as a free agent. Trading Murphy would also clear up cash and $15 million annually over each of the next three seasons. The Tampa Bay Rays and San Francisco Giants are contenders getting woeful offense from catchers who could use Murphy, who has the intellect and personality that teams know he could step in at midseason and immediately gain the confidence of pitchers. The Braves were two games under .500 and five games out of first place at the 2021 trade deadline, when president of baseball operations Alex Anthopoulos finished remaking the outfield with trades for Jorge Soler, Adam Duvall and Eddie Rosario, after trading for Joc Pederson on July 15. Advertisement Beginning Aug. 3, they won 16 of 18 to go from third place and five games back in the NL East to first place and 4 1/2 games ahead. Those outfielders played major parts in getting the Braves' turnaround and World Series title that year. Granted, this year's deficits and record are a lot worse than in 2021. But again, the Braves have Acuña now and believe the likes of Olson, Riley and Ozuna can get hot and carry an offense that's underperformed. There's an additional unknown element: Jurickson Profar, the left fielder who was their only significant free-agent addition last season and then got slapped with an 80-game performance-enhancing drug suspension in the first week of the season. He's eligible to return June 29 but can't play in the postseason. The Braves don't know what he'll provide after missing three months and coming off a steroid suspension that cast doubt over his career-best 2024 statistics with San Diego, but Profar should be able to give them better production than the platoon of Alex Verdugo and Eli White. And if they could add a decent middle-infield bat, to provide more offense than they're getting from all-glove shortstop Nick Allen and protect in case of another injury to second baseman Ozzie Albies, the Braves' offense could reasonably be expected to perform at a higher level the rest of the way. The Braves lost 14 of 17 before taking two of three from the Brewers. The way they see it, eight of those 14 losses were by one run, and four others were by two, meaning they might've won many of those games with just a big hit here or a shutdown inning there. They outscored the Brewers 14-7 in the series that ended Wednesday, when the Braves flexed considerable power, the kind that carried them to a historic-level offense in 2023 but has been erratic ever since. It's still there, if sometimes dormant. Advertisement Now, they need to add a back-of-the-bullpen arm. Braves relievers have a league-high 15 losses and a league-low 10 saves, making them the only NL team with more blown saves (12) than saves. They can't wait for closer Raisel Iglesias, at age 35, to start pitching as he did the past two seasons (2.30 ERA, 89 hits, 11 homers in 125 total innings) rather than in 2025 (6.48 ERA, 31 hits, seven homers in 25 innings). They also don't know whether setup man Daysbel Hernández, out with forearm inflammation, will miss much longer or whether that'll be a lingering issue. They need to add a closer, or at least someone who fits the profile and could step into the role. Potential target: Félix Bautista of the Baltimore Orioles. What could make him particularly attractive to the Braves is the fact he's under team control through 2027 and could take over at closer for the rest of this season and the next two after Iglesias exits as a free agent. Bautista had converted 12 of 13 saves and has a 3.32 ERA in 22 appearances in his first season back from Tommy John surgery, with 28 strikeouts and 16 walks in 21 2/3 innings. The walk rate is high but not unusual for a post-TJ season, and lately he's been dominant, with a 1.29 ERA in his past seven appearances. Problem is, a bunch of other teams are also looking for bullpen help, including contenders with better prospects to dangle, including Philadelphia, Arizona, Seattle and Milwaukee. (Photo of Sean Murphy: Todd Kirkland / Getty Images)
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Shaikin: Why many cost-conscious MLB owners are rooting for Angels' success
Angels second baseman Christian Moore throws during a spring training game against the San Francisco Giants in February. Moore could make his Angels debut Friday. (Matt York / Associated Press) The winter wails of 'Are the Dodgers ruining baseball?' pretty much established the Dodgers as the team other major league owners love to hate. If there is one thing most owners love more than winning, it is cost control. That is why they covet a salary cap. The team other owners love? It might just be the Angels. Advertisement For owners, costs go beyond the salaries of major league players. In 2021, Major League Baseball eliminated 43 minor league teams affiliated with MLB organizations. Why, owners wondered, should we continue to pay two dozen entry-level players to fill out a roster when only two of them might be legitimate prospects? And what could be more efficient than turning over player development to colleges? The NFL has no minor league. The NBA has one. Even after those 2021 cuts, MLB teams remain affiliated with 14 minor leagues. Read more: Reds pitcher Wade Miley accused of being drug supplier for Tyler Skaggs That brings us to the Angels. In football and basketball, a first-round draft pick almost always goes from college one year to the NFL and the NBA the next. In baseball, even a first-round draft pick can spend several years in the minor leagues. Advertisement The Angels just called up second baseman Christian Moore, who could make his major league debut Friday in Baltimore, and pitcher Sam Bachman. That means the Angels' roster now includes eight of their first-round picks — including each of their past five, all 25 or younger. None of them spent even 100 games in the minor leagues, and almost all of that limited time was spent at the highest levels of the minors. This time last year, Moore was preparing for the College World Series with eventual national champion Tennessee. The Angels gave him 20 games at triple-A Salt Lake, in which he hit .350 with a .999 OPS, and summoned him to the majors. Of the nine players likely to take the field for the Angels on Friday, the team drafted six in the first round: Moore (2024), first baseman Nolan Schanuel (2023), shortstop Zach Neto (2022), and outfielders Jo Adell (2017), Taylor Ward (2015) and Mike Trout (2009). The bullpen would include Bachman (2021) and Reid Detmers (2020). Angels shortstop Zach Neto walks through the dugout during a game against the Miami Marlins on May 24. (Gina Ferazzi / Los Angeles Times) This is not the only way to win. None of the Dodgers' past five top draft picks are even in the major leagues, and the team's current roster includes only two Dodgers' first-round draft picks: catcher Will Smith (2016) and pitcher Clayton Kershaw (2006). Advertisement No matter, of course, because the team's current roster also includes Shohei Ohtani, Mookie Betts, Freddie Freeman and Yoshinobu Yamamoto. Total cost for that quartet: $1.6 billion. Total signing bonuses for the eight Angels first-round picks: $30 million. And there is no evidence to show what we might call the Angels Way — drafting polished college stars capable of getting to the majors in a hurry — is a way to win. The Angels are trying to rebuild without investing heavily in scouting and player development. They have not posted a winning season in 10 years. As the Angels open play Friday, they are one game under .500. They played .360 ball in April and .500 ball in May, and they have played .700 ball so far in June. They are 4 ½ games out of first place in what appears to be baseball's weakest division, the American League West. What the Angels are trying means you absolutely cannot miss on your top draft picks. Although each of their first-rounders this decade now has made the majors, to this point only Neto has displayed star potential. It's still early, of course, and a team that learned that Ohtani and Trout alone cannot deliver October is hoping to develop a broader base of talent. Advertisement Read more: Can the Angels' offense be saved? It probably (mostly) depends on Mike Trout The Angels will try again in a few weeks. They have the second overall pick in the July draft. They could aim to fill their Anthony Rendon-sized third-base hole with Oregon State's Aiva Arquette. On Thursday, prospect analyst Keith Law of The Athletic projected the Angels would take Tennessee left-hander Liam Doyle. "Everyone expects the Angels to take Doyle or (LSU left-hander) Kade Anderson,' Law wrote, 'and then put whoever they select in the majors before the ink is dry on the contract." That would make nine first-rounders on the major league roster. That, certainly, would be efficient. Negotiations for a new collective bargaining agreement start next year, and the Angels Way could embolden owners to eliminate even more minor league teams. Advertisement The fans might be rooting for the star-studded Dodgers. The cost-conscious owners are rooting for the Angels. Get the best, most interesting and strangest stories of the day from the L.A. sports scene and beyond from our newsletter The Sports Report. This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.


Los Angeles Times
2 hours ago
- Los Angeles Times
Why many cost-conscious MLB owners are rooting for Angels' success
The winter wails of 'Are the Dodgers ruining baseball?' pretty much established the Dodgers as the team other major league owners love to hate. If there is one thing most owners love more than winning, it is cost control. That is why they covet a salary cap. The team other owners love? It might just be the Angels. For owners, costs go beyond the salaries of major league players. In 2021, Major League Baseball eliminated 43 minor league teams affiliated with MLB organizations. Why, owners wondered, should we continue to pay two dozen entry-level players to fill out a roster when only two of them might be legitimate prospects? And what could be more efficient than turning over player development to colleges? The NFL has no minor league. The NBA has one. Even after those 2021 cuts, MLB teams remain affiliated with 14 minor leagues. That brings us to the Angels. In football and basketball, a first-round draft pick almost always goes from college one year to the NFL and the NBA the next. In baseball, even a first-round draft pick can spend several years in the minor leagues. The Angels just called up second baseman Christian Moore, who could make his major league debut Friday in Baltimore, and pitcher Sam Bachman. That means the Angels' roster now includes eight of their first-round picks — including each of their past five, all 25 or younger. None of them spent even 100 games in the minor leagues, and almost all of that limited time was spent at the highest levels of the minors. This time last year, Moore was preparing for the College World Series with eventual national champion Tennessee. The Angels gave him 20 games at triple-A Salt Lake, in which he hit .350 with a .999 OPS, and summoned him to the majors. Of the nine players likely to take the field for the Angels on Friday, the team drafted six in the first round: Moore (2024), first baseman Nolan Schanuel (2023), shortstop Zach Neto (2022), and outfielders Jo Adell (2017), Taylor Ward (2015) and Mike Trout (2009). The bullpen would include Bachman (2021) and Reid Detmers (2020). This is not the only way to win. None of the Dodgers' past five top draft picks are even in the major leagues, and the team's current roster includes only two Dodgers' first-round draft picks: catcher Will Smith (2016) and pitcher Clayton Kershaw (2006). No matter, of course, because the team's current roster also includes Shohei Ohtani, Mookie Betts, Freddie Freeman and Yoshinobu Yamamoto. Total cost for that quartet: $1.6 billion. Total signing bonuses for the eight Angels first-round picks: $30 million. And there is no evidence to show what we might call the Angels Way — drafting polished college stars capable of getting to the majors in a hurry — is a way to win. The Angels are trying to rebuild without investing heavily in scouting and player development. They have not posted a winning season in 10 years. As the Angels open play Friday, they are one game under .500. They played .360 ball in April and .500 ball in May, and they have played .700 ball so far in June. They are 4 ½ games out of first place in what appears to be baseball's weakest division, the American League West. What the Angels are trying means you absolutely cannot miss on your top draft picks. Although each of their first-rounders this decade now has made the majors, to this point only Neto has displayed star potential. It's still early, of course, and a team that learned that Ohtani and Trout alone cannot deliver October is hoping to develop a broader base of talent. The Angels will try again in a few weeks. They have the second overall pick in the July draft. They could aim to fill their Anthony Rendon-sized third-base hole with Oregon State's Aiva Arquette. On Thursday, prospect analyst Keith Law of The Athletic projected the Angels would take Tennessee left-hander Liam Doyle. 'Everyone expects the Angels to take Doyle or (LSU left-hander) Kade Anderson,' Law wrote, 'and then put whoever they select in the majors before the ink is dry on the contract.' That would make nine first-rounders on the major league roster. That, certainly, would be efficient. Negotiations for a new collective bargaining agreement start next year, and the Angels Way could embolden owners to eliminate even more minor league teams. The fans might be rooting for the star-studded Dodgers. The cost-conscious owners are rooting for the Angels.