logo
Kate Middleton Makes Unexpected Nod to Prince Harry and Meghan Markle at Garden Party Appearance

Kate Middleton Makes Unexpected Nod to Prince Harry and Meghan Markle at Garden Party Appearance

Yahoo21-05-2025

Kate Middleton hosted a Buckingham Palace garden party on May 20—her first appearance at such an event in two years.
The Princess of Wales's ensemble was loaded with symbolism and meaning, from tributes to the late Queen Elizabeth to her husband Prince William to—Prince Harry and Meghan Markle?
Only Kate knows if it was a coincidence or not, but the future queen wore the same hat on Tuesday that she wore to Harry and Meghan's royal wedding in 2018, just one day after the Duke and Duchess of Sussex celebrated their seventh wedding anniversary on May 19.In an unexpected sartorial decision, Kate Middleton not only paid tribute to Queen Elizabeth through her butter yellow Emilia Wickstead dress worn to yesterday's Buckingham Palace garden party and to Prince William through the earrings she chose—but the future queen also nodded to Prince Harry and Meghan Markle in her ensemble.
Let's break down the entire look: the Princess of Wales's dress on May 20 was not only an homage to the late Queen's affinity for wearing bright colors (it made her easier to spot in a crowd, she explained), but Kate had also previously worn it to the Queen's Platinum Jubilee in June 2022, specifically to a Service of Thanksgiving celebrating her historic 70 years on the throne. Kate accessorized Tuesday with the same pair of Robinson Pelham earrings worn to her wedding to William on April 29, 2011. But that wasn't the only wedding callback Kate wore yesterday—her Philip Treacy hat was also worn to a well-known and widely covered royal wedding in recent memory: that of the Duke and Duchess of Susssex, who coincidentally had just celebrated their seventh wedding anniversary the day prior, on May 19.
Whether this was an intentional fashion nod—saying something without saying a word—or a true coincidence, there's no way that someone on Kate's team (or even Kate herself) wasn't aware of the decision. Kate has only worn the hat a couple of times—to Harry and Meghan's wedding, then to Trooping the Colour in 2019, and now to the garden party. The saucer-style headpiece is pale yellow and features a collection of round flowers complemented by a rosette, according to The Daily Express, which called it 'distinctive and eye-catching and a timeless, sophisticated choice for special occasions.'
While once fiercely close with brother-in-law Harry—Harry even said in the past that he considered Kate the sister he never had—thanks to Harry's strained relationship with William, Kate's relationship with Harry has cooled, as well. Kate appeared on the surface to have a friendly relationship with Meghan in the early years of Harry and Meghan's courtship, but in his 2023 book Endgame, royal biographer Omid Scobie wrote that when she became a member of the royal family, Meghan hoped Kate 'would be someone she could at least turn to for an encouraging word during her lowest points. They were once both outsiders, middle-class women brought into the House of Windsor for unimaginably different lives. Kate, however, was uninterested in forming this kind of bond with Meghan.'
Yet, as a source previously told Us Weekly, Kate and Meghan 'are two women under serious amounts of pressure, stress, and under a huge spotlight that no one can relate to—they will always have a bond that no one can break.' In her 2021 interview alongside Harry with Oprah Winfrey, Meghan called Kate 'a good person,' adding, 'I think so much of what I have seen play out is this idea of polarity, where if you love me, you don't have to hate her. And if you love her, you don't need to hate me.'
Of Kate's relationship with Harry today, Scobie wrote that Kate 'was closest to Harry, and she will always look back fondly on those moments…and the relationship he had with their children…but to her, there is no way she could ever trust them after all their interviews.' In addition to that, Harry and Meghan's decision to step back as working royals in 2020 and relocate to the U.S. also put more strain on William and Kate to 'fill the working void left behind,' Scobie added. Harry himself said that his family 'won't speak to me' in an emotional BBC interview earlier this month, one where he also sought reconciliation.
Yesterday's garden party saw the Prince and Princess of Wales mingle with 7,500 guests from a number of their patronages, military affiliations, and projects close to their hearts, including Homewards, Action for Children, and Ty Hafan, according to The Mirror. The couple also chatted with the family of Liz Hatton, a 17-year-old photographer who photographed William at an investiture and met with Kate at Windsor Castle last October before her far-too-soon death in December. Other attendees at the garden party included Holocaust survivor Steven Frank and 10-year-old Tony Hudgell, who missed a garden party last year because he got stuck in traffic, prompting another invitation this year. All's well that ends well, as yesterday was Kate's first garden party since 2023, so Hudgell might have missed 2024's party, but he got the chance to meet the Princess of Wales in exchange.
Read the original article on InStyle

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

A New Role & a Rare 2-Word Comment: Prince William's Subtle References to Prince Harry This Week
A New Role & a Rare 2-Word Comment: Prince William's Subtle References to Prince Harry This Week

Yahoo

time9 hours ago

  • Yahoo

A New Role & a Rare 2-Word Comment: Prince William's Subtle References to Prince Harry This Week

Another week, another set of appearances from the royals—and this one was a big one: Prince William made his first appearance in Wattisham, Suffolk as Colonel-in-Chief of the Army Air Corps, a position bestowed on him by King Charles in 2024, but more notably, one that likely would have gone to Prince Harry had he not exited the royal family in 2020. (The Army Air Corps is Harry's former regiment with the Duke of Sussex serving as a pilot with the Corps during his second tour of Afghanistan up through 2014, something he opens up about quite a bit in Spare.) When Charles made the announcement of William's appointment back in 2023 around the time of his coronation, it was a bit controversial, but also speaks to a larger issue that looms over his reign: Harry. (More on that in a minute.)As part of William's appearance this week, he also had the chance to chat with soldiers who were on a water break from combat training. It was there that the Prince of Wales brought up the topic of family, according to the Daily Mail. 'Is the pace of life good at the moment?' he asked. One of the soldiers replied that it was a 'mixed bag,' which is when William took that two-word phrase and ran with it: 'Families OK? See you enough? Some of them might not want to see you that much. It's a mixed bag sometimes.' Oof. Whether or not William was directly referencing the situation with his brother is up for interpretation, but it resurfaces the mounting pressure for the Prince of Wales and the king to extend an olive branch and make a public move toward reconciliation with the Sussexes—or put themselves at risk of this being the line that is forever drawn when it comes to their royal reputations. (My guess is that this is the opposite of what they want.)That's not to say that William and Charles aren't justified in their actions—two things can be true. As many reputable publications have reported, trust issues are certainly at play. Harry's perspective is the public perspective, for better or worse, but in the case of the monarchy, the family is intertwined so deeply with the business, it feels logical for an effort to be made to smooth things over if only to achieve some sort of closure that removes this asterisk on their legacy. Based on Harry's recent chat with the BBC, he's ready and willing, not to mention openly asking for it. The ball is in their court. The problem is that until they make a move, no matter how good Charles's (and William's) public performance is, the private family drama will overshadow and minimize those efforts. Like I said, there are bigger issues at play: A lack of trust, battles over security, so much. This royal rift runs deep. But the 'never complain, never explain' motto beloved by the late Queen Elizabeth II doesn't seem to be working here and the noise around this issue is getting louder. The choice is theirs. Kensington Palace Just Posted a Striking Photo of Kate Middleton with George (Plus a Surprising Prince William Vid)

'Excited' Meghan Markle Sizzles In A White Slip Dress In New Pic Of Her Running On The Beach
'Excited' Meghan Markle Sizzles In A White Slip Dress In New Pic Of Her Running On The Beach

Yahoo

time10 hours ago

  • Yahoo

'Excited' Meghan Markle Sizzles In A White Slip Dress In New Pic Of Her Running On The Beach

Meghan Markle seems to be in a great place in her life if the new blissful photo of her running on the beach is anything to go by. The duchess has been in a generous mood lately as she has given royal fans a peek into her life by sharing rare family moments from a Disneyland trip with Prince Harry and their children. Meghan Markle also recently went viral online and sparked an intense debate after posting a video of herself dancing while pregnant to induce labor. On Saturday, June 7, Meghan looked breathtaking as she was captured in a serene moment by the beach, as seen in a photo posted on the Instagram page of her lifestyle brand, As Ever. Dressed in a flowing white gown, the Duchess of Sussex ran barefoot along the shoreline, casually brushing her hair back with one hand. The caption read: "So excited for all the good to come! Running into the weekend like." The image certainly wowed royal fans as several took to social media to praise the former actress. One person wrote, "Good for her. Enjoying every minute of her fabulous life despite all those deranged haters," while another noted that "she looks happy and fab." The beach photo comes just hours after Meghan shared a heartfelt montage of a recent family trip to Disneyland, featuring herself, Prince Harry, and their children: Prince Archie, six, and Princess Lillibet, four. Describing their two-day Disneyland vacation as "pure joy," the mother of two expressed gratitude to the company that made the getaway possible. The photos captured the family enjoying numerous rides and indulging in delicious treats. Among the highlights was the adorable moment Lillibet and Archie met Elsa from "Frozen" for the first time. Another photo captured the duke and his daughter enjoying a theme park ride together, and a different one with his son. Prior to Meghan's Disneyland video montage, she shared a video of herself and Harry dancing in what appeared to be a hospital room, a lighthearted moment meant to induce labor before Lilibet's birth. The clip showed a visibly pregnant Meghan twerking playfully in a black gown, while Harry danced alongside her in a grey hoodie and jeans. Posting the video on Instagram to celebrate Lilibet's fourth birthday, Meghan wrote: "Four years ago today, this also happened." She continued, "Both of our children were a week past their due dates… so when spicy food, all that walking, and acupuncture didn't work - there was only one thing left to do!" Earlier this week, Meghan gave fans a fresh update on her lifestyle brand, As Ever, by sharing a vibrant photo on the brand's Instagram page, hinting that new products may be on the way. The image showcased a table filled with colorful bowls of berries, lemons, and measuring cups. In the caption, she wrote: "To all who've been wondering and waiting, thank you! Your favorites are returning, plus a few NEW things we can't wait to show you." She added, "Coming this month... get excited!" This update follows the brand's successful launch on April 2, when Meghan introduced the first collection, featuring items such as Raspberry Spread and Flower Sprinkles, all of which sold out within an hour. "Our shelves may be empty, but my heart is full! We sold out in less than one hour, and I can't thank you enough … for celebrating, purchasing, sharing, and believing," she wrote on Instagram that day. "It's just the start @aseverofficial. Here we go!" Meghan's As Ever update follows the release of a bonus episode of her podcast, Confessions of a Female Founder. In the episode, she opened up to Beyoncé's mother, Tina Knowles, about the behind-the-scenes challenges of building As Ever. Reflecting on the brand's April launch, Meghan acknowledged the intentional scarcity of products such as jam, likening the strategy to a "sneaker drop." She admitted that while the limited release may have generated excitement, it wasn't without concern. "A scarcity mentality at the beginning might be a hook for people," she said. "But I don't want you to eat that jam once every six months. I want that to be on your shelf all the time." Discussing the overwhelming demand, she shared the internal debate that followed: "Yes, amazing, great news. Then what do you do? And then you say, 'Ok, we planned as best as we could. Are we going to replenish and sell out again in an hour? Or is that annoying as a customer?" Ultimately, the duchess decided to slow things down: "I'm looking at it, saying 'Just pause. That happened. Let's wait until we are completely stable and we have everything we need.'"

‘Good Night, and Good Luck' CNN live broadcast brings George Clooney's play to the masses
‘Good Night, and Good Luck' CNN live broadcast brings George Clooney's play to the masses

Los Angeles Times

time21 hours ago

  • Los Angeles Times

‘Good Night, and Good Luck' CNN live broadcast brings George Clooney's play to the masses

Saturday afternoon out west and evening back east, as citizens faced off against ICE agents in the streets of Los Angeles, 'Good Night, and Good Luck,' George Clooney's 2005 dramatic film tribute to CBS newsman Edward R. Murrow, became a Major Television Event, broadcast live from Manhattan's Winter Garden Theater, by CNN and Max. That it was made available free to anyone with an internet connection, via the CNN website, was a nice gesture to theater fans, Clooney stans and anyone interested to see how a movie about television translates into a play about television. The broadcast is being ballyhooed as historic, the first time a play has been aired live from Broadway. And while there is no arguing with that fact, performances of plays have been recorded onstage before, and are being so now. It's a great practice; I wish it were done more often. At the moment, is streaming recent productions of Cole Porter's 'Kiss Me, Kate!,' the Bob Dylan-scored 'Girl From the North Country,' David Henry Hwang's 'Yellow Face' and the Pulitzer Prize-winning mental health rock musical 'Next to Normal.' Britain's National Theater at Home subscription service offers a wealth of classical and modern plays, including Andrew Scott's one-man 'Vanya,' as hot a ticket in New York this spring as Clooney's play. And the archives run deep; that a trip to YouTube can deliver you Richard Burton's 'Hamlet' or 'Sunday in the Park With George' with Mandy Patinkin and Bernadette Peters is a gift not to be overlooked. Clooney, with co-star Anthony Edwards, had earlier been behind a live broadcast of 'Ambush,' the fourth season opener of 'ER' as a throwback to the particular seat-of-your-pants, walking-on-a-wire energy of 1950s television. (It was performed twice, once for the east and once for the west coast.) That it earned an audience of 42.71 million, breaking a couple of records in the bargain, suggests that, from a commercial perspective, it was not at all a bad idea. (Reviews were mixed, but critics don't know everything.) Like that episode, the 'live' element of Saturday's broadcast, was essentially a stunt, though one that ensured, at least, that no post-production editing has been applied, and that if anyone blew a line, or the house was invaded by heckling MAGA hats, or simply disrupted by audience members who regarded the enormous price they paid for a ticket as a license to chatter through the show, it would presumably have been part of the broadcast. None of that happened — but, it could have! (Clooney did stumble over 'simple,' but that's all I caught.) And, it offered the groundlings at home the chance to see a much-discussed, well-reviewed production only a relatively few were able to see in person — which I applaud on principal and enjoyed in practice — and which will very probably not come again, not counting the next day's final performance. The film, directed by Clooney and co-written with Grant Heslov (who co-wrote the stage version as well), featured the actor as producer and ally Fred W. Friendly to David Strathairn's memorable Murrow. Here, a more aggressive Clooney takes the Murrow role, while Glenn Fleshler plays Friendly. Released during the second term of the Bush administration, the movie was a meditation on the state of things through the prism of 1954 (and a famous framing speech from 1958 about the possibilities and potential failures of television), the fear-fueled demagoguery of Wisconsin Sen. Joseph McCarthy, and Murrow's determination to take him on. (The 1954 'See It Now' episode, 'A Report on Sen. Joseph McCarthy,' helped bring about his end.) As in the film, McCarthy is represented entirely through projected film clips, echoing the way that Murrow impeached the senator with his own words. It's a combination of political and backstage drama — with a soupcon of office romance, represented by the secretly married Wershbas (Ilana Glazer and Carter Hudson) — even more hermetically set within the confines of CBS News than was the film. It felt relevant in 2005, before the influence of network news was dissolved in the acid of the internet and an administration began assaulting the legitimate press with threats and lawsuits; but the play's discussions of habeas corpus, due process, self-censoring media and the both-sides-ism that seems increasingly to afflict modern media feel queasily contemporary. 'I simply cannot accept that there are, on every story two equal and logical sides to an argument,' says Clooney's Murrow to his boss, William F. Paley (an excellent Paul Gross, from the great 'Slings & Arrows'). As was shown here, Murrow offered McCarthy equal time on 'See It Now' — which he hosted alongside the celebrity-focused 'Person to Person,' represented by an interview with Liberace — but it proved largely a rope for the senator to hang himself. Though modern stage productions, with their computer-controlled modular parts, can replicate the rhythms and scene changes of a film, there are obvious differences between a movie, where camera angles and editing drive the story. It's an illusion of life, stitched together from bits and pieces. A stage play proceeds in real time and offers a single view (differing, of course, depending on where one sits), within which you direct your attention as you will. What illusions it offers are, as it were, stage magic. It's choreographed, like a dance, which actors must repeat night after night, putting feeling into lines they may speak to one another, but send out to the farthest corners of the theater. Clooney, whose furrowed brow is a good match for Murrow's, did not attempt to imitate him, or perhaps did within the limits of theatrical delivery; he was serious and effective in the role if not achieving the quiet perfection of Strathairn's performance. Scott Pask's set was an ingenious moving modular arrangement of office spaces, backed by a control room, highlighted or darkened as needs be; a raised platform stage left supported the jazz group and vocalist, which, as in the movie, performed songs whose lyrics at times commented slyly on the action. Though television squashed the production into two dimensions, the broadcast nevertheless felt real and exciting; director David Comer let the camera play on the players, rather than trying for a cinematic effect through an excess of close-ups and cutaways. While the play generally followed the lines of the film, there was some rearrangement of scenes, reassignment of dialogue — it was a streamlined cast — and interpolations to make a point, or more directly pitch to 2025. New York news anchor Don Hollenbeck (Clark Gregg, very moving in the only role with an emotional arc) described feeling 'hijacked … as if all the reasonable people went to Europe and left us behind,' getting a big reaction. One character wondered about opening 'the door to news with a dash of commentary — what happens when it isn't Edward R. Murrow minding the store?' A rapid montage of clips tracking the decay of TV news and politics — including Obama's tan suit kerfuffle and the barring of AP for not bowing to Trump's Gulf of America edit and ending with Elon Musk's notorious straight-arm gesture, looking like nothing so much as a Nazi salute — was flown into Clooney's final speech. Last but not least, there is the audience, your stand-ins at the Winter Garden Theatre, which laughed at the jokes and applauded the big speeches, transcribed from Murrow's own. And then, the curtain call, to remind you that whatever came before, the actors are fine, drinking in your appreciation and sending you out happy and exhilarated and perhaps full of hope. A CNN roundtable followed to bring you back to Earth.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store