logo
‘Back our £25bn green energy project or we'll take it overseas'

‘Back our £25bn green energy project or we'll take it overseas'

Telegraph30-03-2025

Britain risks missing out on a pioneering £25bn green energy project because of ministerial dithering, one of the country's most prominent business figures has warned.
Sir Dave Lewis, the former Tesco boss spearheading an audacious plan to power millions of UK homes with cheap solar and wind power from Morocco, has warned that prolonged bureaucracy could derail a scheme that promises to lower household bills, slash emissions and create thousands of jobs.
As chairman of X-Links, the company behind the project, he warned that 'international investors won't wait forever'.
Sir Dave said 'there are people lining up and down the street' to provide the £8bn of funding needed, and when the company recently tested the debt markets for the remaining £17bn of financing, it was 'significantly oversubscribed', he added.
However, X-Links could decide to take the project to another country amid growing frustration over the time it is taking to get the green light from the Government, he claimed.
Under the company's plans, solar and wind power generated in Morocco's Saharan Tan-Tan region will be transported at hyper speed through 4,000km of hi-tech underwater cables to the Devon coast in less than a second.
'This is sub-second power. Literally, you switch a light on and it's there,' Sir Dave said.
The scheme is expected to provide electricity for 9m homes and cut carbon emissions from the UK power sector by around 10pc, while also bringing down energy bills through a reduction in wholesale costs.
A new factory employing over 1,200 people has been commissioned in Scotland to provide the thousands of miles of cable needed to connect Morocco with the UK, with the plant eventually expected to supply other clean energy initiatives like it.
However, X-Links is working on parallel plans to reproduce the exact same set-up in Germany and another unnamed country, which will be fast-tracked if the UK version cannot overcome political red tape in the coming months.
Instead of exporting power to Britain, X-Links could choose to partner with another state, which would likely then be where the giant cable factory would be built instead of Scotland.
'The people who have invested in this project want it to go ahead in the UK,' he said. 'We think that's by far and away the best use of this energy, but there comes a point where you go, 'OK, we're four years in. We've done everything that you asked us to do, but this process is taking an enormous amount of time.''
Despite being designated a project of national significance nearly 18 months ago, X-Links is now waiting for Ed Miliband, the Energy Secretary, to give it his blessing in the form of a long-term inflation-linked contract that will guarantee the company can sell its electricity at a fixed price.
The so-called strike price X-Links is seeking is somewhere in the region of £70 megawatt hours (MWh), making it cheaper than nuclear, biomass, and tidal power, according to Sir Dave.
The cost of offshore wind farms is similar but 'not directly comparable', because the weather means they are not always reliable. That is unlike weather patterns in Morocco, which he claims can enable electricity generation for 19 hours a day.
Sir Dave said X-Links chose Morocco because 'the sun shines every day and the wind blows every evening ... It's geographically perfect'.
Meanwhile, the decision to build a completely new factory in south-west Scotland was prompted by a global supply squeeze that is causing a long wait for the copper and aluminium cables, which are roughly the diameter of a saucer.
The current wait is around eight years, and the delays are 'getting worse' because demand is rising and there are only three suppliers across Europe. By building its own factory, X-Links will be able to bypass such obstacles.
The site in Hunterson on the Ayrshire coast was chosen because it is located next to water deep enough to receive ships that lay the cable.
It also comes with enough land to accommodate thousands of kilometres of power lines, as well as a 180-metre tower that will be the tallest man-made structure north of the Scottish border.
This will be used to stretch out the cables vertically, which will ensure they remain 'perfectly cylindrical', Sir Dave said.
What X-Links needed was essentially 'planning permission for a very large town', he said.
Sir Dave, who dragged Tesco back from the brink of financial disaster, said Whitehall inertia can be traced back to the chaotic final throes of Tory rule.
'The issue with the Conservative government was we had five energy ministers in less than three years ... Given the numerous stops and starts, and then a general election ... I think they [X-Links investors] are genuinely getting a little bit frustrated,' he said.
Perceptions of administrative apathy risk inflicting further damage on Britain's waning image abroad, Sir Dave warned.
'I think they [investors] genuinely say: 'Of all the places you can invest, we like the UK, the rule of law, the quality of people – all of those things,'' he said. 'But they're frustrated with our lack of policy, lack of engagement, lack of real partnerships.'
Sir Dave questioned whether the UK's standing would be boosted by the Chancellor's backing for several large infrastructure projects, such as the Lower Thames crossing between Kent and Essex – 16 years after work on the road tunnel began.
'I think they'd look at the crossing and say: 'That was 16 years ago. Are you telling me that X-Links is a 16-year wait before they decide?''
As for Morocco, he said it is fast becoming a renewable energy superpower.
The country's abundant sunshine and vast desert make it a prime location for solar power, and its long Atlantic coastline means it gets strong trade winds at night, making it ideal for wind power generation too.
X-Links believes this combination will increase the reliability of Britain's energy at the same time as improving the diversity of supply.
'It's counter-cyclical to anything that happens in the North Sea. The problem for us as a country is, when the wind doesn't blow, because we're so small, it basically takes out all of the generating assets,' he added.
X-Links was one of the first big renewable energy projects to envisage using high-voltage direct current (HVDC) underwater cables, but the plans have spawned a series of copycat proposals.
With nearly 30 other clean energy projects around the world looking to use the same technology, Sir Dave fears that these too could lure X-Links investors away if government approval remains elusive.
'The worry is that some of your investors and sources of financing have their heads turned and go off and do other stuff, and at some point you're struggling to sort of keep them on board,' he said.
He is concerned that Labour's race to hit net zero by the end of the decade will result in a raft of perfectly viable green projects, including the X-Links scheme, being overlooked because they won't be ready until after the deadline.
Yet Sir Dave points out that energy demand is expected to accelerate after 2030 because of electrification: 'You need to be building against that demand – now. You don't want to be waiting.'
He also fears that X-Links' chances of getting government sign-off could suffer because of Westminster's focus on improving Britain's home-grown energy sources.
'It's a reaction to what's happened with Russia and Ukraine,' he said. 'It plays on this fear that we are dependent on somebody else [but] all the material required for a nuclear power plant comes from abroad.'
The potential for damage to the cables from ship anchors and the risk of sabotage is also minimal, he said. Firstly, they will be laid too deep to come into contact with most ships, while the cables will be in territorial waters.
'If somebody were to come after these cables, it would effectively be an act of war,' he said.
Sir Dave also rejects the suggestion that there is something morally questionable about exploiting the natural resources of a developing country to decarbonise Western industrialised nations.
'This is Morocco driving this,' he said, highlighting how X-Links will create 10,000 jobs in the country.
'The Moroccan king and the Moroccan parliament are saying, 'for the good of Morocco'. It's strategic for them and the amount of investment that comes to Morocco as a result of this is enormous.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Ken Ofori-Atta: Interpol issues red notice for Ghana's fugitive ex-minister
Ken Ofori-Atta: Interpol issues red notice for Ghana's fugitive ex-minister

BBC News

time36 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Ken Ofori-Atta: Interpol issues red notice for Ghana's fugitive ex-minister

Ghana's former finance minister Ken Ofori-Atta has been placed on Interpol's Red Notice list for allegedly using public office for personal comes after Ghanaian prosecutors declared him a wanted person as well as a fugitive from justice, as he was outside the country, over his alleged involvement in several corruption cases when he was in government.A Red Notice is not an arrest warrant but a request to police worldwide to detain someone pending who is said to be out of the country for medical reasons, has not commented on the allegations, but he has said he has been unlawfully treated. The 65-year-old has been accused of causing financial losses to the state. The allegations include questions over procurement procedures in the building of a controversial national cathedral, which remains a hole in the ground despite the alleged spending of $58m (£46.6m) of government lawyers had offered to represent him but the state prosecutor said they could not respond to criminal charges on behalf of their who sued MP and won $18m hopeful he will pocket the moneyIn February, Ofori-Atta appealed to the Office of the Special Prosecutor (OSP) to remove his name from the wanted list and provided a definite return date in prosecutor Kissi Agyabeng accepted Ofori-Atta's assurance and subsequently took his name off the wanted list. But in March Ofori-Atta filed a lawsuit, claiming unlawful treatment and requesting removal of related content from the OSP's social media this month, Ofori-Atta was re-declared a wanted person and a fugitive from justice after failing to appear before an investigative panel. Agyebeng subsequently formally initiated the Red Notice request, seeking international help in tracking down the former official, local media reported. "We want him here physically, and we insist on it. A suspect in a criminal investigation does not pick and choose how the investigative body conducts its investigations," Agyebeng the Red Notice released on late Thursday, Interpol said Ofori-Atta is wanted on charges of "using public office for profit".He was finance minister from January 2017 to February 2024, when the New Patriotic Party (NPP) was in NPP lost last December's elections to the National Democratic John Mahama, who was inaugurated in January, went on to establish an investigative committee known as Operation Recover All committee has received over 200 complaints of corruption, amounting to more than $20bn in recoverable has directed the attorney general and minister of justice to launch investigations into these allegations, stating that Ghana will no longer be a safe haven for some Ghanaians have criticised him for discontinuing cases against his former allies on trial. More Ghana stories from the BBC: Can Ghana's new president meet the voters' high expectations?The Maths Queen with a quantum mission to mentor girlsWhy some Ghanaians are fighting in insurgency-hit Burkina FasoGhana wants more for its cashews, but it's a tough nut to crack Go to for more news from the African us on Twitter @BBCAfrica, on Facebook at BBC Africa or on Instagram at bbcafrica

Rachel Reeves's spending review will reveal what this government's priorities really are
Rachel Reeves's spending review will reveal what this government's priorities really are

The Guardian

time44 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Rachel Reeves's spending review will reveal what this government's priorities really are

On 11 June, the government will unveil its long-awaited spending review, laying out how it wants to spend more than £600bn annually on public services over the next few years. That's about a fifth of the entire British economy. The choices made over funding for the NHS, schools, courts, prisons and much more besides will shape life in the UK in the coming years. It's no exaggeration to say this could be the defining domestic policy moment of this parliament. Rachel Reeves's first budget included a big tax rise and a two-year increase in borrowing to boost spending on public services. For future years, the chancellor has repeatedly reaffirmed her 'ironclad' commitment to borrow only to invest. Such is the dismal state of the public finances that even with tax revenues that are high by historical standards, spending growth in the coming years will be relatively modest. Overall day-to-day departmental spending is set to rise by an average of just 1.2% above inflation over the next three years. This will make the spending review tough. Allocating spending across departments will inevitably mean picking winners and losers. The single most consequential decision will be how much funding to allocate to the NHS. The NHS budget is big – it accounts for 40% of day-to-day spending on public services. That's comfortably more than is spent on schools, universities, the police, prisons and defence combined. For decades, the savings from declining defence spending were effectively ploughed into the health service. Those 'peace dividend' days are gone. The government has already committed to increase defence spending to 2.5% of national income. It's unusual for health and defence spending to grow at once – and unheard of for it to happen in a period of low growth and high interest rates. If the government also chooses to prioritise the NHS budget alongside defence, other departments' budgets will see cuts. Consider this scenario: if the government increases defence spending as promised, and opts for a 3.4% annual increase in NHS funding – below the long-term average and far short of the 6% growth seen under Labour in the 2000s – it would probably be enough to hire the staff the government's workforce plan says the NHS needs and deliver improvements to NHS performance before the next election. But the wider implications would be stark: it would require cuts of 1% a year to the budget for all other departments. The government could, of course, allocate less to the NHS. That could jeopardise the promise to substantially reduce hospital waiting times by the next election and to build an 'NHS fit for the future'. But it would free up resources for its other missions to 'break down the barriers to opportunity', 'make Britain a clean energy superpower', deliver 'safer streets' and 'kickstart economic growth'. When funding is tight, more money for a shiny new initiative inevitably means less money for something else. The prime minister noted that achieving the five missions of his government will demand 'relentless focus and prioritisation'. We'll soon find out, when push comes to shove, what this government's priorities are. Some departments, and some ministers, are likely to be disappointed. Once the spending review settlements are revealed, the deputy prime minister, Angela Rayner, may not be the only Labour MP calling for higher taxes to reduce pressure on spending. By autumn, however, disgruntled colleagues could be the least of Reeves's concerns. At the spring statement in March, the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) was significantly more optimistic about growth prospects than most other forecasters. Since then, global developments have been bad news for the UK's economic outlook. If the OBR downgrades its growth forecast, that could easily wipe out the chancellor's limited wiggle room against her fiscal rules – perhaps several times over. Last November, Reeves was adamant that she would not be 'coming back with more borrowing or more taxes'. But unless she gets lucky, she will have to come back with something to avoid a breach of her rules for borrowing. Assuming her fiscal rules remain 'ironclad', Reeves will have three options. She could cut departmental spending, just a few months after settling multiyear spending plans with her cabinet colleagues. She could make further cuts to the social security budget, when there is pressure – not least from some MPs – to do the exact opposite. Or she could raise taxes again to pay for the spending that has already been pledged. It's clear why speculation about potential tax rises will continue. But we should not let speculation about the budget distract us from scrutinising the spending review itself. The government's decisions on how to allocate more than £600bn of spending a year for several years will be of great consequence, whatever happens in the autumn. And, since speculation about the budget will inevitably continue, the discussion should shift from simply how taxes could be tweaked to raise more revenue to how they could be reformed to be less damaging to growth. Delivering higher growth deserves its place as the government's number one mission and should be a central focus across all areas of policy. Reeves is yet to show any interest in tax reform. She is missing an opportunity. With challenging years ahead, we need a government that seizes every opportunity to drive up economic growth. Achieving that mission would make everything else easier. Helen Miller is the incoming director of the Institute for Fiscal Studies

How much money Elon Musk lost because of feud with Donald Trump
How much money Elon Musk lost because of feud with Donald Trump

Daily Mail​

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mail​

How much money Elon Musk lost because of feud with Donald Trump

The controversial former-head of DOGE Elon Musk has reportedly lost more than $34billion from his personal net worth after his fall from grace at the White House and very online break up with the US President. Shares in Musk's Tesla also dropped more than 14 per cent at the end of yesterday, losing about $150billion in market value - the largest single-day decline in the company's history. It is the second largest loss of personal net worth, beaten only by Musk's own wipe out again in November 2021, according to the Bloomberg Billionaires Index of the 500 wealthiest people on the planet. He remains the richest man in the world, with a huge $334.5 billion fortune. Musk, who officially left the White House last week, reached a peak of nearly $500 billion in the months after Trump's election success. The valuation of his companies had surged thanks to the belief they would profit from his close relationship with Trump and his role as head of the Department of Government Efficiency, it was reported. But his government contracts with the US were on the line last night as he continued to take part in a savage war with words against Donald Trump, with their partnership breaking down over a tax-cut and spending bill. 'The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts," Trump posted on Truth Social. The withdrawal would have potentially huge consequences for his Tesla and SpaceX revenue. SpaceX has been awarded over $17 billion in government contracts since 2015, according to ABC news. Much of that money comes from NASA and the Department of Defence. One of Trump's oldest advisors, Steve Bannon, went further and suggested the government seize SpaceX under the Defense Production Act - a move that would undoubtedly trigger challenges. Musk, who had threatened to decommission the SpaceX Dragon capsule - a critical lifeline for transporting American astronauts and supplies to the International Space Station - ultimately retreated. After a user on X suggested he 'cool off and take a step back for a couple of days', Musk abruptly posted: 'Good advice. Ok, we won't decommission Dragon.' It was not before he claimed that Trump is 'in the Epstein files', suggested that he should be impeached and replaced with 40-year-old Vice President J.D. Vance. Moments before the Epstein charge, Trump had taken to Truth Social and said he had asked Musk to leave his administration and said the billionaire went 'CRAZY!' With that, Musk announced that it was 'time to drop a really big bomb.' This 2014 image shows Elon Musk (right) alongside Ghislaine Maxwell (left) who facilitated Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking ring. She's currently serving time in federal prison '@RealDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public,' Musk wrote. 'Have a nice day, DJT!' Jeffrey Epstein is a serial child sex offender who died in prison in 2019. Trump pledged to release the files related to Epstein, with Attorney General Pam Bondi releasing some pages in February, but most of that information was already in the public domain. 'Mark this post for the future. The truth will come out,' Musk added. Asked for comment, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told the Daily Mail in a statement: 'This is an unfortunate episode from Elon, who is unhappy with the One Big Beautiful Bill because it does not include the policies he wanted.' The brawl started when the X-owner had originally campaigned to stop the 'disgusting abomination' of the x bill which he believed would contribute too much to the country's $36.2 trillion debt. Trump's big, beautiful bill' called for getting rid off electric vehicle tax credits - the cause of Musk's frustration, according to Trump. Analysts at JPMorgan Chase & Co. estimated that the bill would cut about $1.2 billion from Tesla's full-year profit. Despite staying quiet at first, Trump then told reporters he was 'very disappointed' in Musk and they 'had a great relationship. I don't know if we will anymore'. Musk immediately responded via tweet, saying: 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election'. He had spent nearly $300 million backing Trump's campaign among other other Republicans in last year's election. However, the drastic drop in net worth might not reveal the true impact on Musk who increasingly relies on his private enterprises as a source, it was reported in Bloomberg.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store