logo
Telangana High Court orders compensation to temple for land acquired five decades ago

Telangana High Court orders compensation to temple for land acquired five decades ago

Time of India13 hours ago
1
2
Hyderabad: Justice NV Shravan Kumar of the Telangana high court has directed the state govt to complete land acquisition proceedings within four months and pay compensation to Sri Balaji Venkateswara Swamy Vari Devasthanam for 60 acres of temple land taken nearly 50 years ago for a road project.
The order came while disposing of a writ petition filed by the temple. The judge said that despite earlier directions issued by the court in 2007 and upheld by a division bench in 2022, compensation had not been paid for the land at Annadaivam village in Khammam district, which was used in 1975 for the road between Annapureddipalli and Chaparalapalli.
Observing that 'persistent disobedience' of court orders amounts to contempt, the judge referred to the Supreme Court's view that govt authorities are constitutionally bound to comply with judicial directions.
You Can Also Check:
Hyderabad AQI
|
Weather in Hyderabad
|
Bank Holidays in Hyderabad
|
Public Holidays in Hyderabad
|
Gold Rates Today in Hyderabad
|
Silver Rates Today in Hyderabad
Taking note of the govt pleader's submission that acquisition proceedings under the 2013 Land Acquisition Act were under process, the court fixed a four-month deadline for completion and directed the authorities to release compensation to the temple without further delay.
Stay updated with the latest local news from your
city
on
Times of India
(TOI). Check upcoming
bank holidays
,
public holidays
, and current
gold rates
and
silver prices
in your area.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

SC asks if harmony between governor, state govt meets Constitution's vision
SC asks if harmony between governor, state govt meets Constitution's vision

Business Standard

time2 minutes ago

  • Business Standard

SC asks if harmony between governor, state govt meets Constitution's vision

The Supreme Court on Wednesday asked whether the country has lived up to the expectations of the Constitution framers that there will be harmony between the governor and the state government, besides the consultation on various issues between the two power centres. The observation of a five-judge Constitution bench headed by Chief Justice BR Gavai came when Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing for the Centre, referring to the Constituent Assembly debates on appointment and powers of the governor. The bench, also comprising Justices Surya Kant, Vikram Nath, PS Narasimha and AS Chandurkar, was told by Mehta that unlike criticism made in different quarters, the post of governor is not for political asylum seekers but has certain powers and responsibility under the Constitution. The solicitor general, who continued his submissions on the Presidential Reference which raised constitutional questions on whether the court can impose timelines for governors and the president to deal with Bills passed by state assemblies, said that elaborate debates on the role and appointment of governors has taken place in the Constituent Assembly keeping in view the federal scheme of the Constitution. On Tuesday, the top court questioned the Centre and the attorney general over the long pendency of Bills passed by assemblies with governors, underscoring the limitations of Constitutional courts in situations where legislation has been pending since 2020. The top court has said it would be expressing its views only on the law and not on the April 8 decision in the Tamil Nadu case, fixing a timeline for governors and the president for acting on Bills passed by state legislatures. The top court, while responding to the preliminary objections raised by Tamil Nadu and Kerala governments on maintainability of the Presidential Reference, said it would exercise its advisory jurisdiction as it was not sitting in the appellate jurisdiction. In May, President Droupadi Murmu exercised powers under Article 143(1) to know from the top court whether judicial orders could impose timelines for the exercise of discretion by the president while dealing with Bills passed by state assemblies. The Centre said in its written submission that imposing fixed timelines on governors and the president to act on Bills passed by a state assembly would amount to one organ of the government assuming powers not vested in it by the Constitution, and lead to "constitutional disorder". On April 8, the apex court while dealing with the powers of the governor with respect to Bills passed by the Tamil Nadu Assembly, for the first time, prescribed that the president should decide on the Bills reserved for her consideration by the governor within three months from the date on which such a reference is received. In a five-page reference, President Murmu posed 14 questions to the Supreme Court and sought to know its opinion on the powers of the governor and president under Articles 200 and 201 in dealing with Bills passed by the state legislature.

Rekha Gupta's attacker Rajesh Sakaria's mother reveals why 'animal lover' son attacked Delhi CM
Rekha Gupta's attacker Rajesh Sakaria's mother reveals why 'animal lover' son attacked Delhi CM

Time of India

time2 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Rekha Gupta's attacker Rajesh Sakaria's mother reveals why 'animal lover' son attacked Delhi CM

Delhi Chief Minister Rekha Gupta was attacked during a public hearing at her camp office by Rajesh Sakaria, an auto-rickshaw driver from Gujarat. Sakaria's mother stated that he was upset about the Supreme Court's order to relocate stray dogs in Delhi. Police are investigating whether Sakaria acted alone or was part of a larger protest group. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Delhi Chief Minister Rekha Gupta was attacked on Wednesday during a 'Jan Sunwai' programme at her Civil Lines camp office. The accused, identified as Rajesh Sakaria (41) from Rajkot, Gujarat, was detained by police soon after the the political motive behind the attack was widely speculated, his mother, Bhanuben Sakaria , told reporters that her son was upset with the Supreme Court's recent order to relocate stray dogs in Delhi to shelters.'He loves dogs, cows and birds. That is why he was upset after the SC said all the stray dogs in Delhi should be captured. He went to Haridwar a few days back and then told us over phone that he will go to Delhi to participate in protests in support of dogs,' Bhanuben sources told PTI that Sakaria, an auto-rickshaw driver, first handed some papers to the chief minister before allegedly attacking her. He was overpowered and taken into custody for Minister Parvesh Sahib Singh said the attacker had conducted a 24-hour recce before the assault. 'Now, it has been found out that that person was doing a recce for 24 hours to find out how to meet the Chief Minister. He even did recce till CM Rekha Gupta house in Shalimar Bagh. Yesterday, he spent the night in the nearby Civil Lines area and when he came today morning, he did not have any papers in his hand. There was no such issue and he attacked as soon as he met her,' Singh told minister, Manjinder Singh Sirsa, added that the accused had filmed videos of Gupta's residence. 'The attacker was doing a recce for the last 24 hours. He had been to Rekha Gupta's Shalimar Bagh residence too. He had shot videos there as well... It is very clear that he had come with the intent to attack; he had no Jan Sunvai papers in his hand. Videos from yesterday were found on his phone. His intent to attack is clear... Jan Sunvai will continue... Works for Delhi will go on,' Sirsa maintained her son had no links with any political party. 'That's all he told us over the phone when we asked when he would return,' she are now probing whether Sakaria acted alone or was part of a larger group protesting against the Supreme Court's directions on stray dogs.

MPs elect Veep, not parties: Justice Reddy appeals to NDA to back him in polls
MPs elect Veep, not parties: Justice Reddy appeals to NDA to back him in polls

India Today

time22 minutes ago

  • India Today

MPs elect Veep, not parties: Justice Reddy appeals to NDA to back him in polls

Justice Sudershan Reddy, the opposition's vice-presidential candidate, appealed to MPs across party lines to rise above partisan politics and vote for him in the September 9 polls while emphasising that his sole agenda would be to promote constitutional an exclusive interview with India Today, the former Supreme Court judge said he was oblivious to the bind his candidature would put the parties in the two Telugu-speaking states of Andhra Pradesh and TELUGU CONUNDRUM "MPs elect the vice president, not the parties. There is no whip in the polls. I trust the wisdom of MPs. They will weigh the relative merits of all candidates," Justice Reddy said. He has been pitted against Maharashtra Governor and Tamil Nadu BJP leader CP Radhakrishnan, the NDA candidate, setting up a mouthwatering South vs South opposition's selection of Justice Reddy, who was born into a Telugu family, has come as a googly for NDA parties and fence sitters in Andhra Pradesh and Telangana - the TDP, the YSRCP, and the Telangana and Andhra have 42 Lok Sabha and 18 Rajya Sabha that the elections would be the most "decent and dignified" contest for the post, Justice Reddy urged the NDA to support him."I will follow PM Modi's footsteps and appeal to the NDA members to support me. If an opportunity is given, I will meet the NDA MPs. Will urge them to support me," he further REDDY ON HIS AGENDAThe 79-year-old, who retired from the Supreme Court in 2011, asserted that his agenda would be to protect and uphold the Constitution."As a lawyer and judge, I upheld the Constitution. If opportunity comes, I will protect the constitution... I can defend the Constitution," Justice Reddy underlined in a seeming jibe at the BJP, which has often been accused by the opposition of subverting constitutional his contest with CP Radhakrishnan, a seasoned BJP leader from Tamil Nadu with an RSS background, Justice Reddy said they both belong to different ideologies."CP Radhakrishnan is a respectable person. He belongs to RSS. We belong to different ideologies. He is entitled to his ideology. I am a liberal, socialist, and a democrat. I am a follower of Ram Manohar Lohia," he further said.- EndsMust Watch

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store