logo
Why neurodivergent workers pay the price for poor communication

Why neurodivergent workers pay the price for poor communication

Yahoo17-06-2025
In many workplaces, communication is built for the neurotypical. Instructions are often vague, feedback is wrapped in subtle social cues and important guidance gets buried in casual Slack messages. It's a system that expects everyone to just 'read between the lines' – which can leave many excluded.
For some neurodivergent people, who use language literally, this can mean a constant struggle to understand the intended meaning of a communication. Not only does this create confusion and stress, it can lead many neurodivergent workers to be sidelined when it comes to career opportunities and promotions.
Read more: How the maternity system is failing self-employed women
According to a survey of 1,000 young people by the charity Young Minds, 74% of neurodiverse young people have felt out of place in the workplace. A further 40% said being neurodiverse could be a barrier to employment or promotion.
Of course, there is no one-size-fits-all approach. However, using inclusive language can be a helpful step to make sure that neurodivergent people are supported and included.
Most of us struggle with unclear communication. It makes misunderstandings and misinterpretation inevitable, which can make it much harder for us to do our jobs. But it can be even more complex for someone who processes information differently, such as autistic people and those with ADHD, dyslexia, dyspraxia and other neurodivergent conditions.
'For an autistic team member, unclear expectations might lead to anxiety, frustration, or unintentional mistakes. Not because of ability, but because what was being asked was never clearly explained,' says Hester Grainger, who has ADHD and is the co-founder of the neurodiversity consultancy Perfectly Autistic. She runs the business with her autistic and ADHD husband Kelly.
'For someone with ADHD, a vague instruction can feel like being handed a jigsaw puzzle without the picture,' she adds. 'We often need to be shown what is required of us. Otherwise we will spend ages wondering if we understood what was asked of us.'
Also, adds Helen Davies, founder of the Neuroinclusion Quality Marker, it's not always easy to ask for clarification. 'Many neurodivergent folk have problems self-advocating and in extreme cases this can lead to anxiety, withdrawal and impact performance,' she says.
'Don't just ask for a 'quick favour' – actually explain what you are wanting,' says Grainger. 'Direct feedback is also really important. Avoid vague 'let's catch up soon' comments. Our brains then think – when is soon, do you mean now, in an hour, tomorrow or in a week?
'It's important to avoid reliance on indirect language or social cues that may be challenging for some neurodivergent individuals. Don't assume that someone understands what you are implying.'
Davies adds that it's helpful to be clear about what is needed, by whom, and when. 'The 'when' needs to be specific, for example, outline a time and date and avoid 'ASAP'. It's really great to use clear language that is jargon free, so no idioms or abstract instructions.'
If you rely on phrases like 'circle back' and 'low-hanging fruit' – don't. Few people enjoy hearing meaningless business language, but it can be particularly disconcerting for some neurodivergent workers.
Read more: Why the pressure to be liked at work is holding women back
'Corporate speak and acronyms are a big no, no. Most of the time, people don't know what the acronyms stand for anyway, but it can be especially confusing for dyslexic people,' says Grainger.
'Vague or unclear communication can be a huge barrier for neurodivergent people at work. Many of us thrive on clarity and structure. When things are left open-ended or full of corporate jargon like 'touch base', it can create overthinking, second-guessing or even shutdowns if it feels too much.'
Everyone has different needs and preferences. While some people may prefer lots of detail and context, others may just want the key issues or points. 'Just check their preference,' says Davies.
'Having a bit of warning and knowing when instructions are likely to be given is helpful. Some folk may need a bit more extra processing time or opportunity to ask questions without judgement.'
If you have a verbal chat, it can help to make sure that the key points are written down. 'Some people prefer verbal communication but may need it followed up on an email. Others will want written instructions that they can follow and refer back to,' says Grainger.
Davies also suggests using visual aids, which can help with complex tasks with lots of steps.
'These help visual thinkers and are great for a point of reference too,' she says. 'Don't be afraid to use flowcharts and task lists that break things down into chunks, steps, agendas and diagrams.
Culturally, you can celebrate different processing styles as part of team diversity, build in neuro-inclusion training for managers and comms leads.'
Read more:
Could child-friendly co-working spaces fix the childcare crisis?
How inadequate maternity leave harms mothers' wellbeing
Five questions you shouldn't be asked in a job interview
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

What Is Code-Switching And Why Does It Matter In Communication?
What Is Code-Switching And Why Does It Matter In Communication?

Forbes

timean hour ago

  • Forbes

What Is Code-Switching And Why Does It Matter In Communication?

Have you ever noticed how your voice, word choice, or even body language changes depending on who you're talking to? Maybe you adjust your vocabulary when speaking to a senior executive compared to a friend. Or perhaps you change your tone and style in meetings versus casual conversations in the break room. That shift, whether subtle or dramatic, is called code-switching and while it can be a useful skill, it also carries a hidden cost in the workplace. The key question to consider is when code-switching helps people connect and when it has a negative impact eroding authenticity and trust. What Is Code-Switching? Code-switching is a linguistics term that refers to when people alternate between two or more languages or dialects depending on the audience or setting. Over time, the meaning has expanded beyond language to include changes in tone, behavior, clothing, or demeanor to meet perceived expectations. Research has shown that this is especially common among people from underrepresented backgrounds who feel pressure to adapt in order to be accepted, taken seriously, or promoted. But it is not limited to those groups. In politics, for example, public figures like Congresswoman Jasmine Crockett have faced scrutiny for changing vocal tone depending on the audience, raising the question of whether they were doing it intentionally to connect or whether it was simply an unconscious adjustment. It is also worth asking whether this is the same as intentionally learning to shift your voice for better impact. In my interview with renowned voice coach Roger Love, he explained how training your voice can make you sound more confident, approachable, or persuasive. That is about consciously using vocal tools to connect with others. Code-switching, on the other hand, can be either conscious or unconscious. It might be done to relate to others, but it can also stem from a fear of not fitting in. The difference lies in whether the change feels like a choice or a survival mechanism. Where Does Code-Switching Show Up In The Workplace? Code-switching can be intentional or unconscious. An employee might alter their speaking style in a board meeting to sound more formal, shift into industry jargon when talking with clients, or downplay parts of their personal identity to avoid standing out. It can also extend to nonverbal things such as posture, facial expressions, or clothing choices, especially in environments with strong cultural or unspoken norms. In some cases, it is simply about effective communication. Adapting your message to match your audience is part of emotional intelligence and can make conversations more productive. For example, a sales executive presenting to a technical team might use more precise data and fewer marketing slogans. This type of audience awareness can help bridge gaps in understanding. But when the adaptation is driven by fear, such as fear of bias, being misunderstood, or being excluded, it can create a constant sense of performance. Over time, this mental and emotional strain can take a toll. A Harvard Business Review article on code-switching noted that many professionals of color feel they must suppress parts of their identity to avoid negative stereotypes, which can impact both well-being and job satisfaction. What Is The Emotional And Cognitive Cost Of Code-Switching? Code-switching can be exhausting because it demands continuous self-monitoring. It involves trying to focus on your work, but also running an internal script: 'How do I sound? Did I say that the right way? Am I blending in enough?' You have just so much mental bandwidth, and that could be used for problem-solving, creative thinking, and relationship-building. The Cleveland Clinic has pointed out that code-switching can create a sense of disconnection from your authentic self. This is particularly true in workplaces where there is little diversity or psychological safety. When employees feel they must always edit themselves, it can lead to stress, burnout, and a diminished sense of belonging. Over time, some may disengage completely, which is costly for both the individual and the organization. As I have seen in my own research on curiosity, the constant need to self-censor can stifle a person's willingness to speak up, ask questions, or share new ideas. Curiosity thrives in environments where people feel safe to show up as themselves. When people are in constant code-switching mode, their focus shifts from learning and contributing to managing perceptions. When Can Code-Switching Be An Advantage Or Disadvantage? It is important to recognize that code-switching is not always negative. In multicultural or multi-generational teams, the ability to shift your style to meet others where they are can be an asset. It shows empathy, cultural awareness, and adaptability, qualities that leaders value. For instance, a bilingual customer service agent may switch between languages to better serve clients, or a manager might adopt a more informal style when collaborating with creative teams and a more structured tone when meeting with legal or compliance teams. In these situations, the intent is positive. When people feel they can adjust their style to connect with others rather than must in order to be accepted, the experience is more empowering than draining. At the same time, there is a fine line between relating across generations and trying so hard that it backfires. Characters like Phil Dunphy in Modern Family and Michael Scott in The Office became running jokes for attempting to look hip with younger people but just ending up looking ridiculous. In real workplaces, overcompensating in that way can erode credibility instead of building rapport. How Can Businesses Reduce The Burden Of Code-Switching? Why Does Code-Switching Matter For Business Success? Code-switching is part of the reality of human interaction. It can be a tool for connection and influence, but it can also be a silent drain on morale, creativity, and retention. For organizations, the cost is often hidden in missed ideas, disengaged talent, and turnover. When employees feel free to contribute without filtering themselves through constant adjustments, they perform better, innovate more, and are more likely to stay.

East Lothian residents fear glamping pods could put local water supply at risk
East Lothian residents fear glamping pods could put local water supply at risk

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

East Lothian residents fear glamping pods could put local water supply at risk

Plans to convert a horse field into a new site for glamping will go before councillors next week after nearly 100 objections were lodged. Concerns over the impact of the new venture on p ublic health as well as the countryside itself, were raised by local residents, who said the pods could contaminate the local water supply. Despite this, East Lothian planning officers are recommending the plans are approved. READ MORE: Edinburgh braced for thunderstorms as Met Office issues warning amid heatwave READ MORE: Edinburgh tanning salon given final warning over noise complaints The application by Ltd, has now been called in to be decided at a meeting of Ethe council's planning committee next week by Councillor George McGuire. A report to members says Councillor McGuire Said: "Given the large number of objections and concerns raised against these proposals, I feel it is worthy of further consideration by the full planning committee." The application is for a change of use of the horse field, which is next to Boggs Holding, near Pencaitland, to allow six glamping pods to be placed on the site. The applicants says the timber clad pods will be used for short term holiday lets. Officers said they received 35 individual objections as well as an objection from Boggs Community Association which is signed by 62 people. The objectors raised concerns about a lack of public transport to the site, its impact on the landscape and wildlife and on local residents with claims a lack of drainage plans on the site could lead to the local water supply being affected. Planning officers recommended the application for approval saying it was 'compatible' with the surrounding area. They said: "The principle of the proposed land use is considered to be acceptable in this location, and the design of the proposal has no unacceptable impact on the landscape character and natural environment. "The proposed use and scale of development is compatible with the adjoining land uses." The committee will meet to discuss the application at a meeting next Tuesday. Join Edinburgh Live's Whatsapp Community her e and get the latest news sent straight to your messages.

France restarts nuclear plant after jellyfish invasion
France restarts nuclear plant after jellyfish invasion

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

France restarts nuclear plant after jellyfish invasion

A nuclear power plant in northern France hit by a jellyfish invasion was getting back online on Wednesday, operator EDF said, with service restored at the first of four closed reactors. The Gravelines facility near Dunkirk on the French coast is the largest nuclear power plant in western Europe, with six 900 megawatt reactors. Four of its reactors were shut down on Sunday and Monday after a swarm of jellyfish clogged cooling pumps. "Reactor No. 6 restarted at 7:30 am this morning," an EDF spokeswoman told AFP, adding that work was still going on to bring three other reactors back online "in the coming days". The plant's two other units are offline for maintenance. The incident had not affected the safety of the facilities, personnel or the environment, the operator said. The Gravelines plant was also disrupted by jellyfish in the 1990s, and the creatures have caused plants to close in the past in the United States, Sweden and Japan. Experts say overfishing, plastic pollution and climate change have created conditions allowing jellyfish to thrive and reproduce. Nuclear power accounts for around three-fifths of French electricity output and the country boasts one of the globe's largest nuclear power programmes. France has 18 nuclear power plants with a total of 57 reactors. etb-as/jh/jxb

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store