iPhone owners warned as two popular models added to doomed ‘vintage' list & there's a costly consequence for Apple fans
Tech companies routinely discontinue products after so many years to make way for shiny new gadgets.
3
3
3
Apple downgrades its older devices into a vintage category before becoming totally obsolete.
When a device falls into the vintage category it means repairs can become quite difficult.
The definition is important for Apple fans, as once your iPhone enters the vintage stage getting it repaired can become tricky.
While these devices are still eligible for repair, it is based on the availability of parts which will soon run out.
Apple defines iPhones and other products as vintage when sales were stopped more than five years ago but less than seven years ago.
After seven years, they become obsolete resulting in no hardware service at all.
The latest additions to the vintage list are the iPhone 7 Plus and the iPhone 8.
These were announced way back in September 2016 and September 2017 respectively.
The iPhone 8 was notable for being the last flagship iPhone to feature the home button and Touch ID, before it was axed entirely for Face ID on the iPhone X.
Apple's list currently only lists the 64GB and 256GB versions of the iPhone 8 as vintage, but the 128GB version isn't.
Apple reveals 'Safety Check' trick to instantly stop exposing your pics and location
The (PRODUCT)RED versions of the iPhone 8 were already on the vintage list.
Elsewhere, Apple bumped the iPad Air 2 and iPad Mini 2 from vintage to obsolete in its latest update.
Here is the full list of "vintage" iPhones as it now stands:
iPhone 4 (8GB)
iPhone 5
iPhone 6
iPhone 7 Plus
iPhone SE
iPhone 8 (64GB, 256GB)
iPhone 8 Red
iPhone 8 Plus Red
iPhone X
And these are the iPhones that are obsolete:
iPhone
iPhone 3G (China mainland) 8GB
iPhone 3G 8GB, 16GB
iPhone 3GS (China mainland) 16GB, 32GB
iPhone 3GS (8GB)
iPhone 3GS 16GB, 32GB
iPhone 4 CDMA
iPhone 4 CDMA (8GB)
iPhone 4 16GB, 32GB
iPhone 4 GSM (8GB), Black
iPhone 4S
iPhone 4S (8GB)
iPhone 5C
iPhone 5S
iPhone 6 Plus
iPhone 6s (32GB)
iPhone 6s Plus (32GB)
Time to upgrade?
Analysis by Jamie Harris, Assistant Technology and Science Editor at The Sun
If you own an affected device you only really have two choices.
Fix any issues you're aware of now while parts are still available - but bear in mind that the cost to get this repair may not be worth it compared to the value of your smartphone today.
Or, upgrade.
Of course, upgrading to a brand new phone is expensive but it may cost you less in the long run compared to repairs, especially as your current phone will be more prone to further breakages and is likely to go completely kaput soon.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Despite their public fallout, Musk continued donating millions of dollars to Trump
Elon Musk funnelled $15 million to Republican-affiliated political action committees (PACs), despite an ongoing bitter feud with Donald Trump. The contributions, made on 27 June 2025, included $5 million each to MAGA Inc., the Senate Leadership Fund, and the Congressional Leadership Fund. Musk's donations followed a period of public animosity with Donald Trump, during which he criticised a bill and made a controversial comment about the Epstein files, later apologising. Despite making these significant donations, Musk continued to threaten Republicans who voted for the bill, stating they would lose their primary elections. Musk has also proposed establishing a new 'America Party' and previously intervened in the Wisconsin supreme court race by donating to voters.
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Jury orders Tesla to pay $329m to plaintiffs in deadly 2019 Autopilot crash
A Miami jury ordered Elon Musk's car company on Friday to pay $329m to victims of a deadly crash involving its Autopilot driver assist technology, opening the door to other costly lawsuits and potentially striking a blow to Tesla's reputation for safety at a critical time for the company. The federal jury held that Tesla bore significant responsibility because its technology failed and that not all the blame can be put on a reckless driver, even one who admitted he was distracted by his cell phone before hitting a young couple out gazing at the stars. The decision comes as Musk seeks to convince Americans his cars are safe enough to drive on their own as he plans to roll out a driverless taxi service in several cities in the coming months. The decision ends a four-year long case remarkable not just in its outcome but that it even made it to trial. Many similar cases against Tesla have been dismissed and, when that didn't happen, settled by the company to avoid the spotlight of a trial. 'This will open the floodgates,' said Miguel Custodio, a car crash lawyer not involved in the Tesla case. 'It will embolden a lot of people to come to court.' The case also included startling charges by lawyers for the family of the deceased, 22-year-old, Naibel Benavides Leon, and for her injured boyfriend, Dillon Angulo. They claimed Tesla either hid or lost key evidence, including data and video recorded seconds before the accident. Tesla has previously faced criticism that it is slow to cough up crucial data by relatives of other victims in Tesla crashes, accusations that the car company has denied. In this case, the plaintiffs showed Tesla had the evidence all along, despite its repeated denials, by hiring a forensic data expert who dug it up. Tesla said it made a mistake after being shown the evidence and honestly hadn't thought it was there. It's not clear how much of a hit to Tesla's reputation for safety the verdict in the Miami case will make. Tesla has vastly improved its technology since the crash on a dark, rural road in Key Largo, Florida, in 2019.
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Jury says Tesla must pay $329 million for a deadly crash involving Autopilot
A Miami jury ordered Elon Musk 's car company on Friday to pay $329 million to victims of a deadly crash involving its Autopilot driver assist technology, opening the door to other costly lawsuits and striking a blow to Tesla 's reputation for safety. The federal jury held that Tesla bore significant responsibility because its technology failed and that not all the blame can be put on a reckless driver, even one who admitted he was distracted by his cell phone before hitting a young couple out gazing at the stars. The decision comes as Musk seeks to convince Americans his cars are safe enough to drive on their own as he plans to roll out a driverless taxi service in several cities in the coming months. The decision ends a four-year long case remarkable not just in its outcome but that it even made it to trial. Many similar cases against Tesla have been dismissed and, when that didn't happen, settled by the company to avoid the spotlight of a trial.
