Rideshare drivers use apps to help them judge whether a ride is worth it. Uber and Lyft are trying to kill some of them.
"They weed out the garbage offers that they're sending you," said Sergio Avedian, a driver and senior contributor to the Rideshare Guy, a gig driver advocacy blog and YouTube channel. "The cherry-pickers always make more money."
Some of the apps have recently encountered roadblocks in the form of rideshare giants Uber and Lyft, which argue that using the third-party apps runs afoul of their terms of service.
Doug Feigelson, the CEO of Mystro, told Business Insider that Uber has sent letters accusing his company of violating its terms of service and interfering with its relationships with drivers.
"We think we're aligned with at least their publicly stated values," Feigelson said, adding that he believes his app promotes driver safety by keeping drivers' eyes on the road. He said he hopes the companies can reach a deal. "But we certainly are worried, especially with Uber's cease-and-desist letters, that they might sue us."
An Uber representative said they wouldn't talk about any specific app, but said "using third-party tools to bypass the system breaks our Community Guidelines and Terms of Service. It hurts riders, other drivers, and the trust that keeps Uber running."
The apps often use an Android phone's accessibility features to read the screen and overlay a widget to guide the driver. Feigelson said Mystro uses ride and delivery apps' application programming interfaces, or APIs, so that drivers can automatically accept and reject offers based on criteria they select, such as the ride's per-mile revenue.
They aren't free, but they say drivers can increase their earnings by more than what the tools cost, which ranges from $5 to $19 a month. Some drivers have previously told BI that they can make more money if they're pickier about the rides they accept, though for Uber drivers, declining rides based on destinations can put their accounts at risk.
Once upon a time, Uber was seen as a technological disruptor, upsetting incumbent taxi companies and bucking outdated local rules on ride services. The company even had a project called Greyball that it used for years to serve up a fake version of the app to regulators.
Now, it's the one cracking down. GigU, which launched in the United States in May, was sued by Uber in Brazil, where it says its app has been downloaded a half-million times. GigU says it has come out ahead, although Uber has said the legal process is ongoinGigUigU also said it has filed an antitrust complaint against Uber with CADE, a Brazilian regulator.
Uber said its driver app is transparent about where demand is high and where a particular ride would go and how much a driver would make from it. Transferring credentials violates its terms of service, the representative said.
"Using automation tools, apps, or bots to manipulate the Uber app or access Uber data in any way isn't allowed."
Luiz Gustavo Neves, GigU's CEO and cofounder, also told BI that some of its US users recently got an email from Lyft. The message told gig workers that Lyft had "identified unusual behavior associated with your driver account" and that third-party apps, of which GigU is one, "are not secure and not allowed."
While the message didn't specifically name GigU or any other apps, Lyft's message made the risks to drivers clear: "Your account may be at risk of deactivation."
Since Lyft sent out the message, GigU and Mystro have both sought to argue that using the apps doesn't put drivers' access to Lyft at risk. GigU has published a blog post on its website and answered users' questions on Reddit, Neves said. GigU isn't violating Lyft's terms of service, Neves believes.
A Lyft spokesperson said the group isn't against all third-party apps and says it hasn't disabled any driver accounts for using them. It said that some of the apps cross lines, though it didn't name any.
"Unauthorized apps can harm the user experience and create an unfair marketplace for our drivers, for example by enabling automatic ride cancellations, delaying response times, and disadvantaging those who follow the rules," the spokesperson wrote in an email.
Most ride-hailing and delivery drivers still don't use third-party apps to screen their ride and delivery offers. The UberEatsDrivers forum on Reddit, which is run by drivers and has 76,000 members, says it will ban users who discuss what it calls "cheating apps." The rule singles out Para, which shut down last year, according to Reddit posts by its users.
Minsu Longiaru, an attorney with the worker advocacy group PowerSwitch Action, said it's unsurprising that ride-hailing drivers would turn to third-party apps in hopes of getting an edge. She said her group's recent survey of Uber drivers showed that most of them felt "squeezed and manipulated" by the app and said they often earned less than they expected because offers seemed to get worse as they approached their goals.
"We think that it's fair that drivers should be able to use tools that they have at their disposal to try and make a fair and decent wage," she said. "At the same time, these third-party tools are not a substitute for real protection."
This past fall, Lyft executive Jeremy Byrd said it has made its app more transparent for drivers.
Some drivers and the teams behind the apps are skeptical of the gig apps' claims to be acting in drivers' interests.
"They probably would love it if drivers only worked for their app and if they offered lowball fares and drivers would accept them," Feigelson said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Los Angeles Times
an hour ago
- Los Angeles Times
Tesla will start testing its robotaxis in the Bay Area, report says
Elon Musk may be bringing his robotaxis to the Bay Area soon to compete head to head with the other leaders in the driverless vehicle market. Tesla plans to launch an invite-only service in the Bay Area as soon as this weekend, according to a Business Insider report citing an internal company memo. The move comes about a month after Tesla robotaxis hit the roads in Austin, Texas. The vehicles, which are still being tested using human co-pilots to monitor their movements and help them get out of tough traffic situations, have drawn scrutiny for behaving oddly. Musk has touted the abilities and potential of his company's self-driving technology for years. The pressure to deliver on his promises has risen as Tesla's electric vehicle sales decline. The chief executive has increasingly banked the future of the company on a successful robotaxi service and developing other robotics, including the humanoid robot Optimus. On Thursday, Musk shared a post on his social media platform X, discussing how Tesla's latest self-driving software is able to take into account 10 times more parameters as it guides cars. In theory this should give vehicles more awareness of their surroundings to drive better. On Wednesday, the company reported a 16% year over year decline in automotive sales for the second quarter. Total revenue fell 12% to $22.5 billion. Musk faces a crowded field of competitors in the robotaxi space, including Waymo, which has operated in San Francisco since 2022 and began service in Los Angeles late last year. Waymo is owned by Google's parent company Alphabet. Amazon is testing its own robotaxi effort, Zoox, in several cities. In the U.S., Waymo is well ahead of the competition, having already completed millions of driverless rides. Its vehicles are operating without backup human co-pilots. As Tesla scrambles to catch up, the company also faces a lawsuit from the Department of Motor Vehicles accusing Tesla of leading buyers to believe that its vehicles can operate autonomously. A semi-autonomous feature known as Full Self-Drive mode is widely available in Tesla vehicles, but it cannot be used without a human in the driver's seat. Several incidents have been reported by Tesla drivers using FSD, leading to a National Highway Traffic Safety Administration investigation that begun last year. Musk has lofty ambitions for the feature, claiming that one day customers will be able to sleep in the back of their Tesla as it drives across the country. Musk has also advertised an Uber-like service in which Tesla owners can earn money by deploying their autonomous vehicle as a taxi. Last October, Musk unveiled a prototype for the Cybercab, a self-driving vehicle that lacks a steering wheel and pedals. Although he made promises that a fleet of Cybercabs would soon transport customers in several cities, the robotaxis currently operating in Austin are Model Y Teslas. Musk has not updated his timeline for launching the Cybercab. Tesla shares have fallen more than 16% this year following a series of setbacks for the company, including brand damage and plateauing interest in electric vehicles. Tesla fell out of favor with many potential buyers while Musk served a prominent role in the Trump administration earlier this year. His subsequent feuds with the president have further alienated customers, especially those who are liberal-leaning. On an earnings call this week, Musk warned that the company could have 'a few rough quarters,' partially in response to an expiring electric vehicle tax credit that makes it more affordable to purchase a new or used EV. The $7,500 credit will be eliminated at the end of September as dictated in President Trump's recent megabill. Tesla bull Dan Ives predicted that autonomous technology could be a $1 trillion venture for Tesla. Musk aims to have robotaxi services available to half the U.S. population by the end of 2025, Ives said in a note.
Indianapolis Star
an hour ago
- Indianapolis Star
Uber rolling out feature to pair female riders with female drivers
Uber is launching a new feature aimed at making women feel safer while using the ride-sharing service, the company shared this week. The initiative called the Women's Preferences program, which pairs female riders with female drivers, is set to pilot over the next few weeks in Detroit, Los Angeles and San Francisco, Uber announced in a release Wednesday, July 23. 'Women riders and drivers have told us they want the option to be matched with other women on trips," VP of Operations for US and Canada Camiel Irving said in the news release. "We've heard them − and now we're introducing new ways to give them even more control over how they ride and drive.' Here's what to know about the new feature − and how customers can use it. Once the new preferences roll out, riders will see an option for female drivers. However, the company notes that if the wait time for a the preferred driver is longer than expected, riders will still be able to change their selection for a different ride. Female riders will be able to reserve a female driver in advance by pre-booking a trip, Uber says. They can also adjust their settings to default to "women drivers" for future rides. The company warns it's not guaranteed women will be paired with each other, but making the change in settings increases the odds of a match. For female Uber drivers, the change presents an opportunity to solely work with female riders, specifically during peak evening hours, Uber says. Drivers will be able to toggle on the 'Women Rider Preference' in their Uber app settings. To receive requests from all riders, drivers can turn the preference off at any time. According to Uber, the feature is launching in the next few weeks, first in Detroit, Los Angeles and San Francisco. Uber doesn't have specific plans to expand just yet, the company told USA TODAY, but noted possible plans to bring the feature to new cities following the pilot programs. The company has already implemented similar features in other parts of the world. In 2019, Uber launched Women Rider Preference in Saudi Arabia, a year after the country granted women the right to drive following an approximate 60-year ban. Riders in the country had a positive response, the company said. That same feature is now in use in 40 countries and has led to over 100 million Uber rides. 'Making this work reliably − not just symbolically − required thoughtful design. Most drivers are men, so we've worked to ensure this feature was truly usable in different places around the world,' said Irving, noting Uber has tested and refined the product in markets including Germany and France. 'As a result, in a first for the industry, we're able to launch more reliable features that offer women riders multiple ways to be matched with a woman driver." On Thursday, July 24, Uber's competitor Lyft, announced a different, but similar concept that will allow riders to "favorite" a driver so they can match with them in the future. That feature will begin rolling out in select cities in the coming weeks and will launch in the U.S. and Canada by the end of August, the company said in a release.
E&E News
2 hours ago
- E&E News
Interior increases targets for layoffs
The Interior Department is expanding its targets for layoffs to include more than 1,400 'competitive areas' — an increase of hundreds of categories since its first notice this spring — including new units within the Bureau of Reclamation, Fish and Wildlife Service, Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement, and Office of the Secretary, according to an internal document. The newly released list of offices or units that could face layoffs was obtained by the National Parks Conservation Association and shared with POLITICO's E&E News. The Interior Department declined to comment Friday afternoon. Advertisement 'We do not have additional updates to provide at this time,' said Interior Department spokesperson Aubrie Spady, in response to questions. The agency notified employees of the updates in an internal newsletter, the 'OneInterior All Employee Digest,' on Tuesday. 'The Department continues to follow guidance from the Office of Personnel Management on workforce efficiency requirements. Please reach out to your Servicing Human Resources Office with any questions,' the notice states, sandwiched between notifications about a new email signature available for the nation's sesquicentennial and the 'Plain Language Tip of the Week.' The notification marks the second time in recent months that Interior has issued a list of competitive areas to its employees as it prepares to pursue staff reductions, continuing efforts initiated by the so-called Department of Government Efficiency to hollow out executive branch agencies. The notifications identify units where federal employees could face dismissals — called 'reductions in force' or RIFs — classifying those in similar job duties and locations into competitive groups, and basing cuts on details like performance evaluations and tenure. New additions to Interior's list include Bureau of Reclamation offices — where the number of targeted units has doubled since the first notice, to more than 180 — for the Upper and Lower Colorado River Basin, Great Plains, Mid-Pacific and Pacific Northwest regions. The Fish and Wildlife Service faces potential cuts to jobs in national wildlife refuges across the nation and to posts focused on ecological services and fish and aquatic conservation. There are also dozens of categories across the Office of the Secretary not included in a previous list. According to the Office of Personnel Management, the 'competitive area' notifications also start a 90-day countdown before a RIF can take effect, although agencies can seek a waiver for a shorter notice period. In addition, federal employees must receive at least a 60-day notice before a RIF action can be executed, although that period can also be reduced to 30 days with OPM's approval. It was not immediately clear whether Interior intends to restart the notification period for the jobs listed in its most recent target list. Interior notified employees in April that their jobs would be considered competitive areas — including various Bureau of Ocean Energy Management and Bureau of Land Management offices — with a RIF expected to be announced in mid-May. But that effort hit a wall when a federal judge in California issued a sweeping injunction on the federal reorganization. The Supreme Court lifted that injunction earlier this month, freeing agencies to restart the process. Michael Fallings, managing partner at the law firm Tully Rinckey, said Interior would have to restart the notification clock based on its most recent announcement to employees, even those whose jobs were included in a previous competitive areas list. 'It does start a new clock, but for some agencies, they haven't viewed it that way,' Fallings said, pointing to disputes at the Department of Health and Human Services. Employees who believe they are being classified in the wrong way can challenge their inclusion in a group via the Merit System Protection Board, an independent, quasi-judicial executive branch agency. There is no standard for how employees receive a notice of 'competitive areas' — although 'a newsletter does seem odd,' Fallings noted — but employees targeted for RIFs must receive a physical letter in addition to any other communication, such as an email. 'The key notice that needs to go out is that they're being subject to a RIF,' Fallings said. Interior has already shed at least 11 percent of its workforce during the Trump administration, as nearly 7,500 employees took buyout or early retirement offers between January and June. That includes 1,180 of the 5,700 employees Reclamation had previously reported to OPM in September 2024. Reclamation spokesperson Peter Soeth declined to comment on the newest competitive areas list. 'The Bureau of Reclamation remains focused on providing essential water and hydropower to the American public across the 17 Western states,' Soeth said. 'While we do not comment on personnel matters, we are committed to enhancing workforce management and are collaborating closely with the Office of Personnel Management to embrace new opportunities for optimization and innovation.' Reporter Robin Bravender contributed.
