logo
Rideshare drivers use apps to help them judge whether a ride is worth it. Uber and Lyft are trying to kill some of them.

Rideshare drivers use apps to help them judge whether a ride is worth it. Uber and Lyft are trying to kill some of them.

As gig workers' incomes have dropped, some Uber and Lyft drivers are turning to apps like GigU, Maxymo, and Mystro to help them work smarter — and dodge the lowest-paying rides.
"They weed out the garbage offers that they're sending you," said Sergio Avedian, a driver and senior contributor to the Rideshare Guy, a gig driver advocacy blog and YouTube channel. "The cherry-pickers always make more money."
Some of the apps have recently encountered roadblocks in the form of rideshare giants Uber and Lyft, which argue that using the third-party apps runs afoul of their terms of service.
Doug Feigelson, the CEO of Mystro, told Business Insider that Uber has sent letters accusing his company of violating its terms of service and interfering with its relationships with drivers.
"We think we're aligned with at least their publicly stated values," Feigelson said, adding that he believes his app promotes driver safety by keeping drivers' eyes on the road. He said he hopes the companies can reach a deal. "But we certainly are worried, especially with Uber's cease-and-desist letters, that they might sue us."
An Uber representative said they wouldn't talk about any specific app, but said "using third-party tools to bypass the system breaks our Community Guidelines and Terms of Service. It hurts riders, other drivers, and the trust that keeps Uber running."
The apps often use an Android phone's accessibility features to read the screen and overlay a widget to guide the driver. Feigelson said Mystro uses ride and delivery apps' application programming interfaces, or APIs, so that drivers can automatically accept and reject offers based on criteria they select, such as the ride's per-mile revenue.
They aren't free, but they say drivers can increase their earnings by more than what the tools cost, which ranges from $5 to $19 a month. Some drivers have previously told BI that they can make more money if they're pickier about the rides they accept, though for Uber drivers, declining rides based on destinations can put their accounts at risk.
Once upon a time, Uber was seen as a technological disruptor, upsetting incumbent taxi companies and bucking outdated local rules on ride services. The company even had a project called Greyball that it used for years to serve up a fake version of the app to regulators.
Now, it's the one cracking down. GigU, which launched in the United States in May, was sued by Uber in Brazil, where it says its app has been downloaded a half-million times. GigU says it has come out ahead, although Uber has said the legal process is ongoinGigUigU also said it has filed an antitrust complaint against Uber with CADE, a Brazilian regulator.
Uber said its driver app is transparent about where demand is high and where a particular ride would go and how much a driver would make from it. Transferring credentials violates its terms of service, the representative said.
"Using automation tools, apps, or bots to manipulate the Uber app or access Uber data in any way isn't allowed."
Luiz Gustavo Neves, GigU's CEO and cofounder, also told BI that some of its US users recently got an email from Lyft. The message told gig workers that Lyft had "identified unusual behavior associated with your driver account" and that third-party apps, of which GigU is one, "are not secure and not allowed."
While the message didn't specifically name GigU or any other apps, Lyft's message made the risks to drivers clear: "Your account may be at risk of deactivation."
Since Lyft sent out the message, GigU and Mystro have both sought to argue that using the apps doesn't put drivers' access to Lyft at risk. GigU has published a blog post on its website and answered users' questions on Reddit, Neves said. GigU isn't violating Lyft's terms of service, Neves believes.
A Lyft spokesperson said the group isn't against all third-party apps and says it hasn't disabled any driver accounts for using them. It said that some of the apps cross lines, though it didn't name any.
"Unauthorized apps can harm the user experience and create an unfair marketplace for our drivers, for example by enabling automatic ride cancellations, delaying response times, and disadvantaging those who follow the rules," the spokesperson wrote in an email.
Most ride-hailing and delivery drivers still don't use third-party apps to screen their ride and delivery offers. The UberEatsDrivers forum on Reddit, which is run by drivers and has 76,000 members, says it will ban users who discuss what it calls "cheating apps." The rule singles out Para, which shut down last year, according to Reddit posts by its users.
Minsu Longiaru, an attorney with the worker advocacy group PowerSwitch Action, said it's unsurprising that ride-hailing drivers would turn to third-party apps in hopes of getting an edge. She said her group's recent survey of Uber drivers showed that most of them felt "squeezed and manipulated" by the app and said they often earned less than they expected because offers seemed to get worse as they approached their goals.
"We think that it's fair that drivers should be able to use tools that they have at their disposal to try and make a fair and decent wage," she said. "At the same time, these third-party tools are not a substitute for real protection."
This past fall, Lyft executive Jeremy Byrd said it has made its app more transparent for drivers.
Some drivers and the teams behind the apps are skeptical of the gig apps' claims to be acting in drivers' interests.
"They probably would love it if drivers only worked for their app and if they offered lowball fares and drivers would accept them," Feigelson said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Uber Freight still a negative EBITDA but it's improving
Uber Freight still a negative EBITDA but it's improving

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Uber Freight still a negative EBITDA but it's improving

Uber Freight moved closer toward a positive EBITDA in the second quarter, but it isn't there yet. EBITDA at Uber Freight was negative $6 million, according to the company's second quarter earnings released Wednesday. That was an improvement from the negative $7 million in the first quarter. The results continue the streak where after posting positive EBITDA in the third and fourth quarters of 2022, Uber Freight has failed to bust through that breakeven point again. However, the last two quarters have shown significant improvement in its negative EBITDA numbers. Uber Freight's EBITDA in the fourth quarter of 2024 was negative $22 million. A year ago, it was negative $12 million before sliding to negative $19 million in the third quarter before the big decline at the end of the year. The small shifts led to a slight improvement in the EBITDA margin as a percent of revenue, rising to negative 0.5% from negative 0.6%. In the fourth quarter, that number was negative 1.7%. 'Uber Freight is seeing strong momentum across our business, driven by continued growth in Transportation Management and brokerage, as well as improved margins,' a company spokeswoman said. 'Our recent advancements in AI — including the launch of the industry's first scaled AI logistics network powered by a proprietary large language model — are helping shippers automate execution, gain proactive intelligence, and unlock new efficiencies. We're also seeing sustained strength in Intermodal, where volumes have grown significantly year-over-year as customers diversify their mode mix and benefit from our deep railroad partnerships.' More than in the past, the company's earnings report and conference call with analysts had nothing to say about its Freight division. There was no commentary in the earnings about the group's performance, just a report on its financial numbers. There usually are a few sentences of comments on the company's activities in the quarter; there were none this quarter. References to Uber Freight on the parent company's (NYSE: UBER) conference call with analysts are infrequent. There were none this quarter. More articles by John Kingston Each driver's payout in Lytx Illinois biometrics case will be between about $650 and $850 Uber Freight's best EBITDA in years gets little attention Uber Freight CEO vows focus on growing opportunities for carriers The post Uber Freight still a negative EBITDA but it's improving appeared first on FreightWaves. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Uber in talks with banks, private equity firms to fund robotaxi expansion
Uber in talks with banks, private equity firms to fund robotaxi expansion

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Uber in talks with banks, private equity firms to fund robotaxi expansion

By Akash Sriram (Reuters) -Uber is in talks with private equity firms and banks to secure funds to build its robotaxi business, CEO Dara Khosrowshahi said, as the ride-hailing giant bets on a mass roll-out of the nascent and much-scrutinized technology. The company has been offering robotaxis from Alphabet-owned Waymo on its ride-hailing app in Austin and Atlanta. It also struck a $300 million partnership in July that will allow it to deploy more than 20,000 vehicles, made by electric-vehicle firm Lucid and powered by self-driving tech from Nuro, over six years. Khosrowshahi on Wednesday pitched the tie-ups as part of a larger plan that involves three robotaxi business models: paying partners that own such vehicles a fixed rate, sharing revenue with fleet operators and owning vehicles while licensing software for self-driving technology. "We are talking to private equity players, we have talked to banks," the CEO said. "Once we prove the revenue model, how much these cars can generate on a per day basis, there will be plenty of financing to go around." For now, Uber said it was planning on using a "modest" portion of its around $7 billion in annual cash flows to fund deployments. It might also sell minority stakes in companies to aid the expansion, it said. Analysts have said that mass robotaxi deployment could lower driver-reliant Uber's operating costs and boost profitability. Despite strong regulatory scrutiny and doubts about wider adoption, several companies including Tesla and U.S. market leader Waymo have been rushing to roll out robotaxis, a business Elon Musk has said could be worth trillions of dollars. Waymo is present in five U.S. cities including San Francisco, while Tesla launched a robotaxi service in Austin in June and started ride-hailing operations in the Bay Area last month. Uber said it has not yet seen any changes in demand trends in Austin or San Francisco since Tesla's robotaxi service was launched in the cities. "To a lot of these companies, it does seem this will be a worthwhile endeavor ... as there are lofty predictions about the robotaxi industry's total addressable market," said Ken Mahoney, CEO of Mahoney Asset Management.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store