US and Colombia recall envoys as diplomatic rift deepens
Washington, DC went first, recalling its charge d'affaires John McNamara on Thursday, 'following baseless and reprehensible statements from the highest levels of the government of Colombia,' State Department spokesperson Tammy Bruce said, without giving specifics.
In addition to McNamara's recall, Bruce said the United States 'is pursuing other measures to make clear our deep concern over the current state of our bilateral relationship', without further details.
Within hours, Colombia's President Gustavo Petro announced he was calling home his top diplomat in Washington, DC, in response.
Ambassador Daniel Garcia-Pena 'must come to inform us of the development of the bilateral agenda,' Petro wrote on X, such as tapping South America's 'great potential for clean energy' and the fight against 'drug lords and their international finances'.
The diplomatic row came on the heels of the resignation of Colombia's foreign minister earlier on Thursday – the latest top-ranking official to exit Petro's government.
'In recent days, decisions have been made that I do not agree with and that, out of personal integrity and institutional respect, I cannot support,' Laura Sarabia, who was also Petro's former chief of staff, wrote on X.
Deterioration of ties
Colombia was until recently one of the US's closest partners in Latin America, with decades of right-wing rule, before bilateral relations sharply deteriorated.
Prosecutors in the South American nation opened an investigation this week into an alleged plot to overthrow Petro with the help of Colombian and American politicians, following the publication by the Spanish daily El Pais of recordings implicating former Foreign Minister Alvaro Leyva.
'This is nothing more than a conspiracy with drug traffickers and apparently, the Colombian and American extreme right,' Petro said on Monday.
During a speech in Bogota on Thursday, Petro said he did not think US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, whom he had previously linked to the alleged overthrow attempt, was 'in the midst of a coup d'etat' against his government.
'I don't believe that a government that has Iran as its enemy and nuclear weapons pointed at it … is going to start fooling around with a coup d'etat' in Colombia, he said.
In late January, the US briefly suspended consular services to retaliate for Petro's refusal to allow US military planes to return Colombian refugees and migrants to their homeland.
Petro accused the US of treating them like criminals, placing them in shackles and handcuffs.
The two countries issued threats and counter-threats of crippling trade tariffs of up to 50 percent.
A backroom diplomatic deal involving the deployment of Colombian air force planes to collect the refugees and migrants averted a looming trade war at the eleventh hour.
Al Jazeera's Alessandro Rampietti, reporting from Bogota, said the first crisis between the two countries over the deportation of migrants was resolved quickly in January.
'The current situation is obviously very worrisome as it is unclear what will happen in this case,' he said.
'But it shows that ties that were taken for granted might now be unravelling,' Rampietti added.
Colombia's left-wing government also recently refused a US request to extradite two prominent rebel leaders wanted by Washington, DC, for alleged drug trafficking.
Last month, Colombia was rattled by bombing attacks in Cali in the southwest of the country that killed seven people, and the attempted assassination of a conservative opposition senator and presidential hopeful, Miguel Uribe Turbay, at a campaign rally in Bogota. The eruption of violence raised fears of a return to the darker days of previous decades, of assassinations and bombings.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Jazeera
12 minutes ago
- Al Jazeera
Venezuela's Fight for Justice
A lawyer fights to free Venezuelans imprisoned after a crackdown on political dissent. The number of political prisoners in Venezuela reached its highest point following protests against Nicolas Maduro's controversial re-election in July 2024. Alfredo Romero, a lawyer and the executive director of Foro Penal, brings hope to detainees and their families by providing pro bono legal and humanitarian assistance. Prisoners face charges such as incitement to hatred, terrorism, and conspiracy. They're often denied communication and access to legal defence. With a rebellious spirit rooted in his youth as a punk rocker and driven by a desire for social change, Alfredo must reinvent the ways in which Foro Penal works to free those unjustly imprisoned. Venezuela's Fight for Justice is a documentary film by Luis Del Valle.
Al Jazeera
4 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
UK agrees to drop mandate for Apple ‘back door', US spy chief says
Apple will no longer be forced to provide the United Kingdom's government with access to American citizens' encrypted data, Washington's spy chief has said, signalling the end of a months-long transatlantic privacy row. Tulsi Gabbard, the United States' director of national intelligence, said on Monday that London agreed to drop its requirement for Apple to provide a 'back door' that would have allowed access to the protected data of US users and 'encroached on our civil liberties'. Gabbard said the reversal was the result of months of engagement with the UK to 'ensure Americans' private data remains private and our constitutional rights and civil liberties are protected'. The UK government said it would not comment on operational matters, but that London and Washington have longstanding joint security and intelligence arrangements that include safeguards to protect privacy. 'We will continue to build on those arrangements, and we will also continue to maintain a strong security framework to ensure that we can continue to pursue terrorists and serious criminals operating in the UK,' a government spokesperson said. 'We will always take all actions necessary at the domestic level to keep UK citizens safe.' Apple did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The UK's climbdown on encryption comes after Apple in February announced it could no longer offer advanced data protection, its highest-level security feature, in the country. While Apple did not provide a reason for the change at the time, the announcement came after The Washington Post reported that UK security officials had secretly ordered the California-based tech giant to provide blanket access to cloud data belonging to users around the world. Under the UK's Investigatory Powers Act, authorities may compel companies to remove encryption under what is known as a 'technical capability notice'. Firms that receive a notice are legally bound to secrecy about the order unless otherwise granted permission by the government. It was not immediately clear if Apple would start offering advanced data protection again in the UK. Like other tech giants, Apple has marketed its use of end-to-end encryption as proof of its steadfast commitment to the privacy of its users. End-to-end encryption scrambles data so it cannot be read by third parties, including law enforcement and tech companies themselves. Governments around the world have made numerous attempts to undermine or bypass encryption, saying that it shields serious criminals from scrutiny. Privacy experts and civil liberties advocates have condemned efforts to weaken the technology, arguing that they treat innocent people as potential criminals and put the privacy and security of all users at risk. John Pane, chair of the advocacy group Electronic Frontiers Australia, welcomed the UK's reported reversal as a win for digital rights and safety. 'Were Apple to create a backdoor to its encrypted user data it would create a significant risk which could be exploited by cybercriminals and authoritarian governments,' Pane told Al Jazeera. 'EFA believes access to encryption technologies is vital for individuals and groups to be able to safeguard the security and privacy of their information and it is also fundamental to the existence of the digital economy. The right to use encrypted communications must be enshrined in law.'
Al Jazeera
6 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
UK drops mandate for Apple ‘back door', US spy chief says
Apple will no longer be forced to provide the United Kingdom's government with access to American citizens' encrypted data, Washington's spy chief has said, signalling the end of a months-long transatlantic privacy row. Tulsi Gabbard, the United States' director of national intelligence, said on Monday that London agreed to drop its requirement for Apple to provide a 'back door' that would have allowed access to the protected data of US users and 'encroached on our civil liberties'. Gabbard said the reversal was the result of months of engagement with the UK to 'ensure Americans' private data remains private and our constitutional rights and civil liberties are protected'. The UK government said it does not comment on operational matters, but that London and Washington have longstanding joint security and intelligence arrangements that include safeguards to protect privacy. 'We will continue to build on those arrangements, and we will also continue to maintain a strong security framework to ensure that we can continue to pursue terrorists and serious criminals operating in the UK,' a government spokesperson said. 'We will always take all actions necessary at the domestic level to keep UK citizens safe.' Apple did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The UK's climbdown on encryption comes after Apple in February announced it could no longer offer advanced data protection, its highest-level security feature, in the country. While Apple did not provide a reason for the change at the time, the announcement came after The Washington Post reported that UK security officials had secretly ordered the California-based tech giant to provide blanket access to cloud data belonging to users around the world. Under the UK's Investigatory Powers Act, authorities may compel companies to remove encryption under what is known as a 'technical capability notice'. Firms that receive a notice are legally bound to secrecy about the order unless otherwise granted permission by the government. Like other tech giants, Apple has marketed its use of end-to-end encryption as proof of its steadfast commitment to the privacy of its users. End-to-end encryption scrambles data so it cannot be read by third parties, including law enforcement and tech companies themselves. Governments around the world have made numerous attempts to undermine or bypass encryption, arguing that it shields serious criminals from scrutiny. Privacy experts and civil liberties advocates have condemned efforts to weaken the technology, arguing that they treat innocent people as potential criminals and put the privacy and security of all users at risk.
